Lunalilo Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lunalilo Tower
Building Overview
Lunalilo Tower in Downtown‑Chinatown (built 1974) — concrete construction; pets and short‑term rentals not allowed.
About Lunalilo Tower
Based on MLS data, Lunalilo Tower is located in the Downtown‑Chinatown neighborhood. The building was built in 1974 and is of concrete construction.
According to available records, Lunalilo Tower does not allow pets and short‑term rentals are not permitted. No specific amenity list or unit size information is provided in the available MLS data.
Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify parking, fees, amenities, management, and other material details with the listing agent or property management, as this summary is based solely on the MLS-derived information provided.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or any numeric owner-occupancy rate, but none were provided. The references to owner-occupants and investors are marketing language and do not establish the actual occupancy percentage.
The remarks directly state the building has two elevators, which matches the current value. This is a clear, explicit mention, so confidence is high.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central AC is very strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "CENTRAL A/C" and list it among HOA-covered items, while the MLS includes ACCEN in every listing. The evidence is consistent across agents and listings.
Cable TV is strongly supported across the listings. Remarks repeatedly state that the HOA covers "cable TV" and "basic cable," matching the MLS inclusions in most listings. This looks consistent and not like a one-off agent mistake.
Common expenses are supported indirectly by the MLS and by remarks describing the HOA as "all-inclusive" and covering "other common expenses." The wording is less specific than for water or electricity, but the inclusion is consistent across the listing set. Confidence is moderate rather than extreme because remarks rarely spell out common-area electricity directly.
No analysis available
Electricity is clearly included. Remarks repeatedly say the HOA covers "electricity" and "all utilities," and the MLS checkbox is present on every listing. This is strong, repeated evidence from multiple sources.
No analysis available
Hot water is strongly supported by both MLS and remarks. Several listings explicitly list "hot water" as HOA-covered, and there is no conflicting WTRHTR signal. This is consistent across the building's public remarks.
Internet service is included according to both MLS and remarks. Listings repeatedly mention "internet" or "internet included" among the HOA-covered items, showing consistent building-level support. This appears to be a stable amenity, not an isolated claim.
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included. Multiple remarks explicitly say the HOA covers "sewer," and the MLS shows it on every listing. The evidence is uniform and high confidence.
Water is strongly and consistently included. Several listings explicitly mention "water" in the maintenance fee, and the MLS includes it across the board. This is one of the clearest supported features for the building.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported. At least several listings mention "barbeque" or "BBQ" in the amenities, and the current remarks include it directly alongside other shared building features. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a standard building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are supported by explicit remarks calling out a "car wash lane." Historical MLS data also shows the amenity in multiple listings, though less consistently than BBQ. This looks like a genuine shared building feature that some agents mention and others omit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many public remarks confirms the building offers storage units/lockers. At least 7+ listings explicitly mention storage, including detailed references such as "private basement storage," "storage locker in garage," and "dedicated basement storage cabinet," which suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste MLS error. Current remarks also align with the prior high-confidence MLS data showing storage in both amenities and unit features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly include "trash chute" (one listing remark in the text). MLS checkbox data shows 3 of 8 listings flag trash chute, so there is modest corroboration; evidence is moderate but not ubiquitous across all agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed across the remarks and MLS amenities. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "pool access all covered," "pool," "swimming pool," and "refreshing dark blue-tiled pool." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current listings/remarks support in-unit laundry, with explicit mentions in every example provided. Key phrases include "in-unit washer/dryer," "FULL-SIZE WASHER AND DRYER," and "side by side washer and dryer," which are consistent across multiple listings and appear to be genuine rather than copy-paste error. This feature remains very strong and should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that parking is assigned. Across the provided remarks, 7 listings explicitly mention a stall that is 'secured,' 'covered,' or otherwise designated, including phrases like 'secured covered parking stall' and 'gated covered parking.' This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Very strong evidence that the building offers covered parking. The remarks repeatedly mention 'secured covered parking stall,' 'gated covered parking,' and 'covered parking in a secured building,' matching the high-confidence historical MLS pattern. This is consistent across many listings and agents.
The listings consistently mention a covered parking stall, but not deeded/owned parking. Because the remarks never describe the stall as deeded or included in title, I cannot mark it as deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any separate parking cost, rental fee, or monthly charge. The remarks only say the unit has a secured covered parking stall, so no fee can be confirmed from the text.
No analysis available
There is strong evidence the parking area has secured entry. Multiple listings describe parking as 'secured,' 'gated,' or in a 'secured building,' indicating controlled access rather than open parking. The evidence is repeated across several remarks, not just a single MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," and similar wording, but found none. The listings suggest parking is available with the unit, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for central AC. At least 6 of the current public-remarks variants explicitly mention 'central AC,' 'CENTRAL A/C,' or 'central air conditioning,' and the descriptions read like repeated agent copy rather than isolated one-off notes. This matches the prior high-confidence MLS signal, so the feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence strongly supports concrete construction: 9 of 9 current MLS listings mark CONCRE. Multiple remarks describe the same building consistently and there is no contrary language suggesting a different construction type, so this looks like a reliable building-level attribute rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is not supported by the public remarks and appears only in a minority of current MLS records (4 of 9). In contrast, every current listing marks concrete construction, so the masonry/stucco checkbox looks more like inconsistent agent data than a confirmed feature of the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and 30-day minimum language. There is no explicit permission in the remarks, so STR allowance is not supported.
I looked for hotel pool language like Hilton pool, hotel rental program, or managed-by-hotel wording and found none. Since short-term rentals are not shown as allowed, this must be false.
I searched for mandatory pool terms such as required participation, must rent, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. The remarks do not describe any hotel pool arrangement, so mandatory participation is unsupported and treated as false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like lease expires, land lease, leasehold, ground lease ends, and renewal dates, but found nothing. Since no specific lease year is stated, this remains unknown.
The remarks directly say the building is VA approved, which indicates VA financing is accepted. This is repeated across listings, making it very strong evidence.
The listing remarks directly say the building is 100% insured, which indicates full HOA/walls-in insurance coverage. This is strong explicit evidence, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life-safety approval language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection, but found nothing. With no evidence in the public remarks, this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly mention city views — phrases include 'private lanai with city views', 'twinkly Honolulu City lights', and 'pleasant treetop view of the City.' At least 3–4 separate public remarks from different listings/agents reference city views, indicating the building offers units with city views; evidence is strong across multiple listings rather than a single copy-paste instance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention 'sunrise', 'morning sun', or 'eastern exposure' and current MLS data shows 0/8 listings with SUNRIS in view_descriptions. With no corroborating agent remarks or user verification, there is high confidence the building does not advertise sunrise views.
Sunset views are supported by current MLS data (3/9 listings marked SUNSET) and at least one remark explicitly advertising 'ocean, sunset, and city views.' Other remarks mention city views and evening lights, which is directionally consistent, but the clearest evidence is the explicit sunset wording. This looks like a building-level feature available in some units rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for a resident/on-site manager. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "resident manager," "on-site Resident Manager," and similar wording across several listings, which aligns with the MLS RESMAN amenity and does not look like a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.