Luna-Liho Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Luna-Liho Towers
Building Overview
Luna-Liho Towers in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1979) with ocean views and a resident manager.
About Luna-Liho Towers
Luna-Liho Towers is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1979. The building is concrete construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the available data.
Key features include ocean views, a resident manager on site, and window air conditioning for units. The listed management company is unknown in the MLS records provided.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to the MLS data. Specific association fees, rules, and other operational details are not included in the provided records; buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or association. Based on MLS data—buyers and agents should confirm details independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for numeric owner-occupancy percentages or qualitative hints such as 'mostly owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but none were present. The remarks mention first-time buyers and investors, which does not quantify the owner-occupied share.
I searched the public remarks for an explicit elevator count or descriptions indicating multiple elevators, but none were mentioned. The listings repeatedly describe the property as a secure high-rise/secured building, yet that does not confirm the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of nine recent MLS listings indicate association fees include common/other electricity (OTCOEX). While the public remarks do not explicitly mention utilities, the majority, multi-agent checkbox pattern strongly suggests common area electricity is covered by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 9 listings, agents never check HOTWAT for association fees, while most specify individual water heaters (WTRHTR) in the units. This consistent pattern indicates hot water is not a building-provided, HOA-included utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings for Luna-Liho Towers show sewer included in the association fee (11/11). The public remarks do not explicitly mention sewer, but the MLS checkbox is fully consistent across listings, which is strong building-level evidence.
All current MLS listings for Luna-Liho Towers show water included in the association fee (11/11). Public remarks do not call it out directly, but the consistent MLS data across multiple agents strongly supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence across the public remarks strongly supports patio/deck amenities: at least 7–8 listings explicitly mention 'lanai' (phrases include 'Large lanai', 'rarely available enclosed lanai', and 'spacious lanai'). MLS checkbox data also shows PATDEC/COVPAT on 4/10 listings; multiple agents independently reference lanais rather than a single copy/paste, so the building should be listed as offering patio/deck space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by the current MLS amenity data in 6 of 11 listings, which suggests the building likely has a shared chute system. None of the public remarks mention trash chute specifically, but there is also no conflicting evidence. This looks like a moderate-confidence building amenity rather than a copied remark claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported across the listing set: multiple remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including 'washer and dryer in the unit,' 'in unit washer/dryer,' and 'full-sized washer and dryer in the unit.' The evidence appears consistent across many listings and agents, reinforcing the existing high-confidence MLS data rather than suggesting a copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported. Multiple listings mention 'one reserved parking stall,' 'one secured parking stall,' '1 secure standard parking stall,' and 'covered, assigned parking,' which aligns with the high-confidence MLS history showing ASSIGN in most records. The repeated wording across many remarks suggests this is a consistent building feature, not a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is very well supported. Several remarks explicitly state 'one covered parking stall' and 'secure garage parking,' while others reference 'secured parking stall' in a secure building, matching the high-confidence MLS checkbox data showing covered/garage parking in nearly all records. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents.
I looked for explicit wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The remarks only confirm a reserved/secured/assigned stall, so deeded parking is not established.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a separate parking fee or rental amount and found nothing. The remarks only indicate that parking is included as a stall, not whether it carries an extra monthly cost.
No analysis available
At least 5 of 9 listings reference security for parking, with phrases like 'one secured parking stall', '1 secure parking', 'secure garage parking', and 'one covered parking stall with a secured entry'. This consistent language across several agents, plus MLS SECENT flags, supports that the building’s parking has a secured or gated entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as "waiting list" or "join waitlist for parking" and found none. The remarks instead suggest assigned/reserved parking is available with the unit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported across the listings: multiple remarks explicitly say "A/C window units," "living room AC," and "A brand new A/C in the unit." Historical MLS data also shows ACWIUN in 11/11 current listings, which makes this a high-confidence building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern: 9 of 11 current listings mark CONCRE. Across the remarks, the building is repeatedly described as a "secured high-rise" and "secure high-rise in Makiki," which is consistent with concrete construction. There is no contrary remark evidence, so this feature should be retained with very high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is not supported by the public remarks, and the MLS signal is very weak at just 1 of 11 listings. Because the remarks consistently frame Luna-Liho Towers as a secured high-rise rather than a low-rise masonry/stucco building, this appears to be a likely copy-paste or checkbox error. Confidence is moderate-high that this feature should not be carried forward.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Single wall construction is not supported by the remarks and is inconsistent with the building being described as a secured high-rise. The MLS evidence is minimal at 1 of 11 listings, suggesting checkbox noise rather than a real building characteristic. Confidence is high that Luna-Liho Towers is not single wall construction.
I searched for any indication that short-term rentals are allowed, including NUC/TVU or hotel-style rental language, and found none. There is also no language suggesting the building supports STR use.
I looked for references to a hotel pool or managed rental program and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel pool participation is also not supported.
I searched for mandatory participation wording such as must-rent, required rental pool, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. The remarks do not indicate any rental pool program for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly describe the building/unit as fee simple, which indicates there is no ground lease or lease expiration year to extract. I did not find any leasehold or renewal language in the remarks.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit VA financing language and found none. Since VA approval must be stated publicly to count, there is no evidence here that the building is VA approved.
I searched for statements that the HOA provides full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, but the remarks do not mention any of those terms. Without an explicit statement, there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a fire/life safety evaluation passing, fire safety compliance, or a similar certification, but found none in the remarks. The comments mention recent building work like plumbing/master piping projects, but nothing about fire/life safety approval.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that the building offers mountain views appears in multiple listings: MLS data shows 2 of 10 listings with MOUNTA, and remarks state the building has a 'corner end unit on the mountain side' and a lanai that 'overlooks the mountains.' These explicit, unit-level remarks across different listings indicate some units have mountain views.
No analysis available
The building offers city views in some units: MLS data records CITY in 3 of 10 listings, and remarks explicitly note a lanai that 'overlooks...the city' (and other listings reference proximity to Downtown). These explicit mentions across listings support inclusion of city view as an available building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings in the current set explicitly describe sunset views, evening sun, or western exposure. The remarks are consistent across multiple agents and focus on location, renovations, and general city/mountain outlooks rather than sunset exposure. This supports correcting the feature to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager. Although 6/11 current MLS records have RESMAN checked, the lack of any supporting remark language across multiple agents suggests this amenity is probably not actually verified for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.