Leolua Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Leolua Gardens
Building Overview
Leolua Gardens in Waipahu — concrete construction, built 1968; pets and short-term rentals are not permitted.
About Leolua Gardens
Leolua Gardens is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood, constructed in 1968 with concrete construction. According to available records, the building's basic construction type and year are documented in MLS-derived data.
Key documented items for Leolua Gardens include its concrete construction and the building policies recorded in MLS data. No additional amenity, unit size, or building amenity details are available in the provided MLS information.
Based on MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at Leolua Gardens. The listing records do not identify a management company. Buyers should verify parking, fees, amenities, and any other property details with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on the available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptors in the public remarks but found none. With no prior/current numeric value and no explicit statement in the remarks, owner-occupancy is unknown.
I reviewed the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or mentions (e.g., '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'elevator'). There are no references to elevators in the remarks, and no prior/current numeric value exists, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of five current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity checkbox indicating shared/community laundry. None of the public remarks in the provided listings mention a laundry room, coin laundry, or shared facilities (no phrases like "community laundry" or "laundry room"), so evidence is primarily from agent-checked MLS amenities rather than explicit remarks. Given the majority of listings list COMLAU but no explicit confirmations in remarks, include the feature with moderate confidence (0.75) rather than high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks mention covered parking; 0/5 listings describe garage/carport or 'covered' stalls. Multiple listings explicitly state 'assigned uncovered parking stall' or 'one assigned uncovered parking stall,' while only 1/5 MLS entries has a covered-parking checkbox, suggesting agents mis-checked a box rather than the building actually offering covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' as the construction material, but 0 of 5 public remarks explicitly mention concrete or reinforced concrete. Evidence is therefore implied (likely from agent checkbox entries) rather than directly confirmed in remarks; confidence is moderate (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating the HOA or building provides full/walls-in insurance coverage. The remarks contain no such statements, so I report false with medium confidence (absence of evidence in remarks).
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or related certifications. There are no mentions, so per rules absence = likely doesn't exist; returning false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the building's current listings, 0 of 5 mention SUNSET in view_descriptions and 2 of 5 explicitly list NONE. None of the supplied public remarks contain phrases like 'sunset view', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun' (e.g., remarks focus on location, updates, and parking). Given the lack of any agent remarks and the MLS checkbox absence, evidence is strong that the building does not offer a sunset view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.