Lehua Nani
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lehua Nani
Building Overview
Lehua Nani in Pearl City — concrete building (1975); pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Lehua Nani
Lehua Nani is a condominium building located in Pearl City, built in 1975 and constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes and number of units are not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. No additional amenity details (such as pool, laundry, or fitness facilities) are listed in the MLS data provided.
Parking arrangements, association fees, and the managing company are not specified in the MLS data. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fee information with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for statements such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The single reference to a long-term owner resident does not provide a building-wide percentage, so owner occupancy is unknown.
I searched for explicit count language such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." The remarks only mention a secured elevator in one listing, so the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for common-area electricity is moderate. MLS data shows OTCOEX in 7 of 9 listings, and one remark mentions the fee covers electricity, water, sewer, the pool, and "other common area expenses." The wording is less explicit than a direct "common electric" statement, so confidence is below the stronger utility inclusions.
No analysis available
Electricity inclusion is very strongly supported. All 9 of 9 MLS records include ELECTR, and multiple remarks explicitly say "maintenance fee covers ELECTRICITY" or "electric included." The repeated phrasing across listings suggests this is not a copy-paste error but a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Hot water appears likely based on MLS data rather than the public remarks. Seven of 9 listings include HOTWAT and none show WTRHTR, which supports that building-supplied hot water is included. Because the remarks are silent on hot water specifically, confidence is solid but not as strong as the utility inclusions explicitly named in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed. All 9 of 9 MLS records include SEWER, and several remarks explicitly state that the maintenance fee covers "sewer" or "electricity, water, and sewer." The evidence is consistent across listings and does not appear to be a one-off agent error.
Water inclusion is well supported. Eight of 9 MLS listings show WATER, and multiple remarks directly say "water included" or that fees cover "electricity, water, and sewer." The consistency across agents and listings makes this a highly reliable feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention a car wash facility in any of the listings reviewed. The only signal is a single MLS amenity checkbox (1/8 listings), which is weak and looks more like copy/paste MLS data than a confirmed building feature. Based on the current evidence, the building should not be marked as having a car wash.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current listings reference a lanai, which matches the patio/deck feature definition. Phrases like 'spacious lanai,' 'covered 144 sq. ft. lanai,' and 'large lanai is a nice extension to the living space' appear repeatedly, so this does not look like a one-off copy/paste error. Confidence is very high that buyers will find patio/deck-style outdoor space here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a real building amenity based on MLS history, with 8 of 9 listings showing TRACHU checked. The public remarks across the provided listings do not explicitly mention it, which suggests the MLS checkbox may be carrying the information rather than the agent remarks. Given the strong historical consistency, this should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the building. Public remarks explicitly mention it in several listings, including phrases like "use of the common swimming pool," "amenities including a pool," and "POOL." This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings: multiple remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including "in unit washer and dryer," "stackable washer/dryer," and "STACKED WASHER / DRYER LAUNDRY UNIT." This appears consistently across several listings and different agents, reinforcing that the building offers in-unit laundry rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly a building-level feature. Across the remarks, 6+ listings explicitly mention parking stalls or parking spaces, and several describe covered/gated garage parking. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and reads like normal MLS copy, but the feature itself is strongly confirmed.
Assigned/reserved parking appears to be available in at least some building listings. 4/9 MLS records currently tag ASSIGN, and remarks mention “covered and secured adjacent parking stalls” and a “dedicated EV charging outlet,” suggesting specific stall allocation rather than purely open parking. The evidence is moderate and somewhat mixed, but it is more than a copy-paste checkbox with no support.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed for this building. 8/9 MLS records include covered/garage-type parking, and multiple remarks explicitly say “covered and secured adjacent parking stalls,” “one covered space in a gated garage,” and “covered parking in a gated garage.” The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so confidence is very high.
Parking is repeatedly mentioned, including covered, secured, adjacent, and gated spaces. However, no listing explicitly states that the stalls are deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking fees, monthly parking charges, additional parking costs, and parking rental language. None was found, so there is no public-remarks evidence of a parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe available parking stalls and spaces but do not mention a waitlist system. Therefore, parking_waitlist is false based on the absence of public-remarks evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window/wall AC appears to be available in some units in this building. The strongest evidence is the current MLS data, where 6 of 9 listings include ACWIUN; the public remarks are mostly silent, with only one listing explicitly noting "AC." This looks like a building-level feature offered in some units, though the remarks do not strongly confirm it across multiple agents.
Concrete construction appears to be a strong building-level feature: 9/9 current MLS listings indicate CONCRE in construction materials. The public remarks across the listings do not mention any alternative construction type or suggest a change, so this remains a high-confidence building characteristic.
Just 1 of 8 listings has the double wall checkbox, and no remarks explicitly describe double-wall construction. With no corroborating public text, this appears to be a weak MLS-only signal.
Only 2 of 8 current MLS listings carry the hollow tile checkbox, and there are no matching phrases in the remarks. This looks like a limited or possibly inconsistent MLS entry rather than a clearly described building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental permission, vacation-rental language, NUC, TVU, and related STR terms. The remarks only refer generally to an investment property and do not establish that short-term rentals are allowed.
The remarks contain no reference to a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Because short-term-rental permission is not established, this feature must also be false.
I searched for mandatory rental-pool, required participation, and cannot-opt-out language, but found none. Since short-term-rental permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Leasehold status is mentioned, so an expiry may apply. I searched for an explicit four-digit year, lease-expiry date, ground-lease end date, or renewal date, but none was found; therefore the expiry year is unknown.
The remarks directly confirm that VA financing is welcome. This is explicit public evidence, so financing_va is true with very high confidence.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related language such as fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. None of these terms or equivalent statements were found.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, passed fire inspection, and life safety compliant. References to replaced smoke detectors and GFCI outlets do not establish that the building passed an official fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear to be offered in some units, with 4 of 8 current MLS listings showing MOUNTA in the view descriptions. The public remarks do not directly mention mountain views, so this is supported mainly by the MLS data rather than agent narratives.
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported by the MLS data: 7 of 9 current listings include CITY in the view descriptions, and only one listing shows NONE. The remarks repeatedly reference view-oriented units with phrases like "unobstructed views," "excellent view," and "sunset views," suggesting the building offers view units, with the MLS data providing the clearest evidence for city views specifically.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are moderately supported. Three of eight current MLS listings show SUNRIS, and several remarks mention the unit being on the 'cooler east side' with 'unobstructed views to the east,' which is consistent with eastern exposure/sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly confirmed. Four of eight current MLS listings include SUNSET, and multiple remarks explicitly say 'Experience sunset views' and 'watch the sunset from your expansive 144 sq ft. lanai.' This looks like consistent building-level marketing rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported across multiple listings. Several remarks explicitly mention "on-site resident manager" or "on-site manager," and the wording is consistent across agents rather than a single isolated mention. This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data and shows the feature is part of the building's standard offerings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.