Lehua Nani
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lehua Nani
Building Overview
Lehua Nani in Pearl City — concrete building (1975); pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Lehua Nani
Lehua Nani is a condominium building located in Pearl City, built in 1975 and constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes and number of units are not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. No additional amenity details (such as pool, laundry, or fitness facilities) are listed in the MLS data provided.
Parking arrangements, association fees, and the managing company are not specified in the MLS data. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fee information with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for occupancy clues such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found no percentage. One remark says the owner lived here for 22 years, which is a unit-level history and not a building-wide occupancy figure.
I looked for explicit count language such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but found none. The remarks confirm there is at least one elevator, yet they do not provide a number, so the count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for common-area electricity is moderate. MLS data has OTCOEX checked in 6 of 8 listings, and one remark says the maintenance fee covers 'other common area expenses' alongside other included utilities. This appears consistent across listings, though the public remarks are more indirect than the explicit utility mentions.
No analysis available
This is very strongly supported. All 8/8 MLS records include ELECTR, and multiple public remarks explicitly say 'maintenance fee covers ELECTRICITY' or 'HOA fees include electricity.' The evidence is consistent across several listings and agents, with no meaningful contradiction.
No analysis available
Hot water appears likely but is not explicitly described in the public remarks. The MLS data shows HOTWAT in 6 of 8 listings and no WTRHTR flag, which supports inclusion, but there is no direct phrase like 'hot water included' from agents. Confidence is therefore moderate-high rather than definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed. All 8/8 MLS records include SEWER, and several remarks explicitly state 'maintenance fee covers ... sewer' or 'HOA fees include ... sewer.' The consistency across listings makes this a high-confidence feature.
Water inclusion is well supported. Seven of 8 MLS listings show WATER, and multiple remarks explicitly state that maintenance fees include water. The remarks align with the MLS data and do not suggest a recent change or correction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention a car wash facility in any of the listings reviewed. The only signal is a single MLS amenity checkbox (1/8 listings), which is weak and looks more like copy/paste MLS data than a confirmed building feature. Based on the current evidence, the building should not be marked as having a car wash.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current listings reference a lanai, which matches the patio/deck feature definition. Phrases like 'spacious lanai,' 'covered 144 sq. ft. lanai,' and 'large lanai is a nice extension to the living space' appear repeatedly, so this does not look like a one-off copy/paste error. Confidence is very high that buyers will find patio/deck-style outdoor space here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a building amenity in most current listings: 7 of 8 MLS listings show TRACHU checked. The public remarks do not explicitly say “trash chute,” “garbage chute,” or “refuse chute,” but the repeated MLS amenity across multiple listings is consistent enough to support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported: 8/8 current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked, and at least 3 separate public remarks explicitly reference it. The remarks describe a "common swimming pool" and say "Enjoy amenities including a pool," which aligns with the MLS checkbox data and suggests this is a shared building amenity rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported by the remarks: at least 6 listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, using phrases like "in unit washer and dryer," "stackable washer/dryer," and "STACKED WASHER / DRYER LAUNDRY UNIT." The current MLS data also aligns, with 7/8 listings showing washer/dryer in inclusions, suggesting this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly a building-level feature. Across the remarks, 6+ listings explicitly mention parking stalls or parking spaces, and several describe covered/gated garage parking. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and reads like normal MLS copy, but the feature itself is strongly confirmed.
Assigned parking is supported by a minority of MLS records, but the remarks imply specific stall allocation rather than generic open parking. Because the public remarks do not explicitly say "assigned" or "reserved," this is only moderate-confidence evidence. It appears to be a building feature present in some listings rather than a universally described amenity.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed by both MLS data and the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention covered stalls, a gated garage, and covered parking, making this a high-confidence building feature. The consistent wording across several listings suggests this is not a one-off agent error.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The remarks only describe the number and type of parking spaces, so deeded parking is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a parking fee, rental, or separate monthly parking cost. The listings describe parking availability, but do not mention any additional parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or "join the list for parking." Nothing in the public remarks suggests a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window/wall AC appears to be available in some units, based on 5 of 8 current listings showing ACWIUN in inclusions. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'window AC' or 'wall AC'; the closest mention is a generic 'AC.' in one listing, so this looks like moderate MLS evidence rather than strong remark-based confirmation.
All 8 current MLS listings indicate concrete construction, making this the strongest construction signal for the building. The public remarks across the listings do not mention the material, which suggests the MLS checkbox is being used as the authoritative source here rather than copied from remarks.
Just 1 of 8 listings has the double wall checkbox, and no remarks explicitly describe double-wall construction. With no corroborating public text, this appears to be a weak MLS-only signal.
Only 2 of 8 current MLS listings carry the hollow tile checkbox, and there are no matching phrases in the remarks. This looks like a limited or possibly inconsistent MLS entry rather than a clearly described building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental," NUC/TVU references, or similar permission language. None were found, so there is no evidence that STRs are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or branded pool programs. None were mentioned, and because STR is not supported by the remarks, this must be false.
I searched for wording like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out." The remarks contain no such language, and there is no evidence of a hotel rental pool program at all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for specific lease-expiry language such as "lease expires 20XX," "ground lease ends," or "renewed through" and found no year. The remarks confirm leasehold status, but not the expiration date.
The listing directly confirms VA financing is accepted. I did not need to infer this from context; it is stated plainly in the remarks.
I looked for insurance language such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, but none appeared. The remarks discuss maintenance fees and amenities, yet they do not say the HOA provides full building insurance.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like fire life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection, but found nothing. Since there is no current verified value and no supporting remark evidence, this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear to be offered in some units, with 4 of 8 current MLS listings showing MOUNTA in the view descriptions. The public remarks do not directly mention mountain views, so this is supported mainly by the MLS data rather than agent narratives.
No analysis available
City views are well supported by the MLS data: 6 of 8 current listings include CITY in the view descriptions. The remarks do not specifically describe cityscape or downtown views, so the evidence is primarily from repeated MLS entries rather than descriptive copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are moderately supported. Three of eight current MLS listings show SUNRIS, and several remarks mention the unit being on the 'cooler east side' with 'unobstructed views to the east,' which is consistent with eastern exposure/sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly confirmed. Four of eight current MLS listings include SUNSET, and multiple remarks explicitly say 'Experience sunset views' and 'watch the sunset from your expansive 144 sq ft. lanai.' This looks like consistent building-level marketing rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is clearly supported. The remarks explicitly say "an on-site resident manager" and "On-site manager" in multiple listings, and the current MLS data shows RESMAN in 8/8 listings. The evidence is consistent across listings and appears to be a stable building feature, not copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.