Lehua Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lehua Hale
Building Overview
Lehua Hale in Pearl City (built 1975) is a concrete building with covered, assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Lehua Hale
Based on MLS data, Lehua Hale is a residential building located in the Pearl City neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1975 and is of concrete construction.
According to available records, key features include covered, assigned parking. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted, per MLS information. The management company is listed as Unknown in the available data.
Buyers should note that this summary is based on MLS data; interested parties should verify current details, policies, fees, and management information with the listing agent or association prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any owner-occupancy indicator such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks mention the property as suitable for primary living or rental use, but they do not quantify owner occupancy. Without an explicit percentage or descriptive occupancy statement, this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to elevators, including explicit counts and generic mentions of multiple elevators. None of the listings mention elevator access, so there is no basis to confirm the building has any. Because this is a numeric building attribute and no value is stated, it remains unknown from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable appears to be included in at least some units' maintenance fees. Evidence comes from one listing that explicitly states "water, sewer, gas & cable," plus current MLS checkbox data showing 2 of 7 listings marked CABTV. The pattern looks mixed but not isolated to a single typo, so include it with moderate confidence.
Common-area electricity is present in a minority of current listings (3 of 7), but the public remarks do not mention hall/elevator/amenity power or similar wording. This looks like partial MLS support without remark confirmation, so confidence is lower than for sewer/water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported across the building. Current MLS data shows 7 of 7 listings marked SEWER, and one remark explicitly says the fee covers "water, sewer, gas & cable," which reinforces that this is not just copy-paste noise.
Water inclusion is very well supported. All 7 current listings show WATER in the fee-includes field, and one public remark directly confirms the fee covers "water, sewer, gas & cable." This is strong building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Shared/community laundry appears to be a building feature at Lehua Hale. The current MLS data shows 5 of 7 listings with COMLAU, and one listing directly mentions "on-site secured laundry," which supports the checkbox data rather than a copy-paste error. Overall evidence is strong enough to include community laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is well supported across the listings. At least 2 remarks explicitly say 'dedicated parking stall/space,' and the MLS data shows 6/7 listings with ASSIGN checked, suggesting this is consistent building-level information rather than copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is confirmed in every current MLS record (7/7) and is directly described in the remarks several times. Listings mention 'covered parking' and 'under the covered garage,' making this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is modest but supportive: 1 listing explicitly mentions a 'window A/C unit,' and current MLS data has 2 of 7 listings checked for ACWIUN. The pattern suggests this is a real building feature available in some units, though the remarks are limited and could reflect unit-level differences rather than universal inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance coverage language, especially terms indicating full or walls-in insurance. The listings only discuss maintenance fees, utilities, parking, and location, not the building's insurance scope. Since there is no explicit coverage statement, it is not confirmed from the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks do not include any of these phrases, and there is no explicit evidence that the building has passed a fire/life safety review. In the absence of a mention, this is treated as not documented in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that this building offers sunset views. Across the supplied remarks from multiple listings, 0 listings explicitly mention sunset-related views, and the MLS view data is mostly NONE. This looks like a copy-paste-heavy set of remarks focused on location and renovations rather than views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the reviewed listings describe a resident manager or on-site management; there are no phrases like "resident manager," "on-site manager," or "live-in manager" in the public remarks. Because the feature only appears in 3 of 7 MLS amenity sets and is not corroborated by any listing comments, the evidence is weak and likely reflects inconsistent agent data rather than a confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.