Lalea at Hawaii Kai 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lalea at Hawaii Kai 2
Building Overview
Lalea at Hawaii Kai 2 in Hawaii Kai — concrete building built 1997; pets allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
About Lalea at Hawaii Kai 2
Lalea at Hawaii Kai 2 is a residential building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1997 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features and policies reported in MLS records include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available data. No specific amenities (pool, gym, etc.) are identified in the MLS information provided.
Other details commonly of interest—such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and homeowner association specifics—are not included in the MLS extract available here. Based on MLS data; buyers and agents should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or condominium management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 6 current listings list OTCOEX (common area electric) in association_fee_includes. Remarks do not mention common-area electric explicitly, so evidence is partial and may reflect inconsistent agent checkboxing; included because some units/listings indicate it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most listings point away from hot water being included: 6 of 7 show WTRHTR, while only 1 of 7 shows HOTWAT. The public remarks across the provided listings repeatedly discuss A/C, laundry, and amenities but never say hot water is covered, so the building-level pattern is more consistent with unit water heaters than included hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 listings show SEWER included in the association fees, which is consistent across agents and listings. The public remarks do not dispute this, so this feature should be retained with very high confidence.
All 7 listings indicate WATER is included in HOA/association fees. There are no remark-based contradictions across the provided listings, so this appears to be a stable building-level feature with very high confidence.
BBQ facilities are strongly supported for this building. Multiple current remarks mention the amenity directly, including 'recreation and BBQ area' and 'Gazebo Garden space and BBQ Area,' matching the historical MLS pattern where 7/7 listings included BBQ. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference a meeting/community room (quotes: 'Crow's Nest meeting room' and 'Party Room'), found in at least 2 listing remarks. This matches the MLS checkbox counts (2/6) and indicates the building offers shared meeting/party room space available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly supported by both historical MLS amenities and current listing remarks. Multiple listings explicitly reference a "swimming pool," "pool," and nearby access to the pool/recreation area, which is consistent across several agent remarks rather than a one-off copy-paste error. This appears to be a confirmed building/community amenity for Lalea.
No public remarks mention a heated pool; only 2 of 6 MLS amenity checkboxes indicate HEAPOO. Because remarks do not describe a 'heated pool' and pool_features does not list HEATED, there is insufficient corroboration to affirm a heated pool despite two checkbox entries, so heated status is currently unconfirmed.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers in-unit laundry: all current MLS listings list washer/dryer as included, and 5+ public remarks explicitly mention it. The language is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at this building. Across the remarks, multiple listings mention garages, open stalls, and driveway parking, which matches the MLS data showing parking features in every listing.
Assigned parking appears to be available for some units. One listing explicitly mentions an 'assigned parking stall nearby,' and the MLS checkbox data supports that this is not just a one-off copy-paste issue.
Covered parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings describe garages as enclosed or attached, indicating covered parking is a building feature available to buyers.
I searched for deeded parking language such as owned stall, parking included in deed, or deeded parking and found none. The listings describe open/assigned parking and guest parking, which does not indicate deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for references to parking rental fees, monthly parking costs, or separate parking charges. The public remarks do not mention any fee, so there is no evidence to extract a value.
Guest parking is clearly available in the community. Several listings specifically mention 'guest parking' or 'lots of Guest Parking throughout,' aligning with the strong MLS checkbox pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or instructions to join a waitlist for parking. Nothing in the remarks suggests a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the listings supports window AC availability in the building. At least 2 remarks explicitly describe A/C in the living room and primary bedroom, including one noting 'Newly installed A/C units,' and all 7/7 MLS records include ACWIUN. This appears to be a consistent building/unit feature rather than a one-off agent error.
CURRENT MLS metadata shows 3/6 listings with CONCRE checked, but none of the public remarks reference concrete, reinforced concrete, or similar phrasing. Because there is no prior/high-confidence historical data or owner/site verification and no remarks describe concrete construction, the MLS checks appear likely to be copy/paste; evidence is insufficient to include this feature.
Current MLS data is fairly consistent: 6 of 7 listings show DOUWAL for construction materials. None of the public remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction or a recent change, so this is based on MLS consistency rather than remark confirmation. Because the feature appears in most current listings, it is reasonable to include, though the evidence is not independently verified by agent remarks.
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS metadata shows 3/6 listings with MASSTU checked, but none of the public remarks reference masonry, stucco, or 'masonry and stucco' construction. In the absence of prior high-confidence data or explicit agent/owner/site verification, the checkbox entries likely reflect copy/paste and do not provide sufficient evidence to include this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental approval language, including STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU references. The remarks contain no such language, so short-term rental allowance is not indicated.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar branding. The remarks do not mention any hotel pool participation, and there is no evidence that STR is allowed.
I looked for wording such as mandatory hotel pool, must participate, cannot opt out, or required rental program. The remarks provide no evidence of any rental-pool requirement, so this is not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold terms such as lease expiry years, ground lease end dates, renewals, or extension language. The remarks do not mention land tenure or any lease expiration year, so the value cannot be determined from the public text.
I searched the remarks for explicit references to VA approval, VA loans accepted, or VA financing language and found none. With no public remark evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across multiple listings and agents. At least 3 remarks explicitly reference mountain-related views, including "clear view of Koko Head crater" and "easterly views of Koko Crater," which aligns with the existing MLS view data showing MOUNTA in most listings. This appears to be consistent listing information rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The feature appears in 5 of 7 current MLS listings, which suggests the building likely has a resident/on-site manager. However, the public remarks across the sampled listings do not explicitly mention a resident manager, so this is moderate-confidence evidence and could reflect checkbox carryover rather than direct agent verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.