Lakewood
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lakewood
Building Overview
Lakewood in Aliamanu-Salt Lake (built 1973) is a concrete-built condominium; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per MLS data.
About Lakewood
Based on MLS data, Lakewood is a condominium building located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1973 and is of concrete construction. Specifics on unit count and building size are not provided in the available records.
Key features derived from the MLS information include the construction type (concrete) and the building's age (1973). No management company is listed in the MLS data provided, and there are no additional amenity details included in the available records.
According to available records, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed for this property. Parking, maintenance fees, and other operational details were not provided in the MLS excerpt. Prospective buyers should verify all information, including management, parking, fees, and any building rules, with listing agents or official documents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings reach floor 3, and both county records and the state registration report 3 floors.
County records report 60 residential units, matching the state registration's 60 units; the single-building parcel scope supports applying that total here.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 545. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks describe the property as a three-story, low-rise walk-up community but do not state the number of elevators. Searches for elevator-related terms, including specific counts and 'multiple elevators,' found no evidence, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of seven listings include OTCOEX in the association-fee inclusions. No remarks explicitly quote common-area electricity, so this appears to rely primarily on consistent MLS data rather than independently verified agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Gas is listed as included in only two of seven listings, and several remarks instead mention a gas range or gas stove inside the unit. The remarks do not support building-provided gas, so the limited MLS checkbox evidence is likely inconsistent or copied incorrectly.
Hot water is marked included in only one of seven listings, and another listing identifies WTRHTR, which weighs against a building-wide included-hot-water feature. No agent remarks confirm hot water in the maintenance fee, so HOTWAT appears unreliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of seven listings include SEWER in the association-fee inclusions. Although the public remarks do not independently mention sewer, the agreement across nearly all listings is strong evidence of a building-level inclusion.
Water is checked in only two of seven listings, with no public-remark confirmation such as 'water included' or 'water fees included.' This appears weaker than the common-area and sewer evidence and is likely inconsistent MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported across the building: 4 of 7 current listings explicitly mention shared laundry facilities, with multiple remarks specifying that it is located on the ground floor. The feature is also consistently marked in MLS amenities on all 7 listings, indicating a genuine building-wide amenity rather than an isolated or copied claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is consistently documented across all 7 listings, with phrases including "two assigned parking spaces," "1 parking unit," "assigned parking stall," "two parking spaces," and "1 covered parking." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and confirms the building offers parking.
At least 5 listings explicitly mention assigned parking, including "two assigned parking spaces," "TWO assigned parking stalls," and "the assigned parking stall is directly outside the unit." This is supported by ASSIGN appearing in 6 of 7 MLS records, indicating assigned parking is a genuine building feature rather than isolated copy-paste.
Three listings explicitly describe covered parking: "one covered, and one open," "TWO assigned parking stalls (1 covered, 1 open)," and "1 covered parking." This matches the 3/7 MLS records containing covered or garage parking features and confirms the building offers covered parking to some units.
Multiple listings confirm assigned parking, including covered and open stalls. Assigned parking is not sufficient evidence that the stalls are deeded, so deeded parking was not established.
No analysis available
The listings mention maintenance fees and assigned parking but do not identify a separate parking charge. No monthly parking fee was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned parking and available street parking, but provide no evidence of a parking waitlist system. No waitlist language was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of seven listings include the MLS ACWIUN designation, suggesting that some units may have window or wall AC. Public remarks do not quote “window AC” or “window unit”; the only explicit air-conditioning references are to “2 split AC units” and “a split AC unit,” so the checkbox evidence may be inconsistent or reflect different AC types.
Concrete construction is recorded in all 7 listings, making this a strong building-level MLS consensus. The remarks do not independently quote 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete,' so the evidence is based primarily on consistent checkbox data rather than explicit agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in 3 of 7 listings, while none of the seven remarks mention above-ground construction or materials. This limited, checkbox-only evidence is weaker and may reflect inconsistent MLS entry, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss owner occupants and investors but do not state that short-term rentals are permitted. No explicit STR allowance or legal vacation-rental designation was found.
There are no remarks describing participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Because short-term rental permission was not established, hotel pool participation is false.
No remarks indicate that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or rental program. Since STR is not established, mandatory hotel pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks include "Fee Simple," which does not provide a leasehold expiration year. No specific 4-digit lease expiry or extension year was found.
The remarks explicitly mention VA financing through an assumable VA loan. Although the remark does not separately state that the building is VA-approved, this is direct evidence of VA financing associated with a unit in the building.
The remarks contain no statement about full HOA insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, or the building being fully insured. Under the no-mention rule for boolean fields, this is recorded as false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. Under the no-mention rule for boolean fields, this is recorded as false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views or related western/evening exposure; 0/7 MLS records contain SUNSET and 6/7 contain NONE. The consistent absence across multiple listings and explicit NONE designations strongly indicate the building should not be marked as offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.