Lakeview Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lakeview Plaza
Building Overview
Lakeview Plaza in Aliamanu-Salt Lake (built 1974) features concrete construction and on-site pool with resident manager.
About Lakeview Plaza
Lakeview Plaza is a residential building located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1974 and constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes and total number of units are not provided in the MLS-derived data.
Key features include an on-site pool and a resident manager. Units rely on window air conditioning. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided information.
Parking is available with assigned stalls. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all details, including fees, specific unit information, and rules, with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner occupancy language such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar phrasing. Nothing in the remarks provides an ownership-percentage indicator, so this cannot be determined from the listing text.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator count language such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but none was provided. The only reference was a unit being located "near the elevator," which confirms an elevator exists but not how many.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current listings include OTCOEX, suggesting the building fees cover common area electricity. No public remarks explicitly mention it, so this is based on consistent MLS checkbox data rather than agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings mark HOTWAT, and multiple listings instead show WTRHTR, which usually points away from maintenance-fee hot water coverage. There are no public remarks supporting hot water inclusion, so this is a strong correction to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current listings include SEWER in association fees, making this a very strong and consistent building feature. The public remarks do not discuss it, but the MLS data is unanimous.
All 5 current listings include WATER in association fees, so this appears to be a standard building expense. No remarks mention otherwise, and the MLS data is fully consistent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is clearly supported across multiple listings, with 4 separate mentions of a "storage locker" or "assigned storage space." The language is consistent and appears in multiple agent remarks, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is indicated in the current MLS amenities for all 5 listings, but the public remarks do not mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. Because this appears only in the checkbox data and not in agent descriptions, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed across multiple recent listings. At least 3 listings explicitly mention the pool in the remarks, with details like 'lounge chairs and picnic tables' and 'lanai overlooks the pool,' which reads like genuine agent/local knowledge rather than a checkbox-only entry. The MLS amenities also consistently include pool-related codes in all 5/5 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Shared laundry is directly confirmed in multiple listings, with remarks saying "community laundry on the first floor" and "community laundry located on the ground level." The MLS data matches this across 5/5 listings, so this is a strong building-level amenity and not just a single-unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the listings: multiple remarks explicitly say "1 parking space" and "assigned parking conveniently located near the elevator." This is consistent with the MLS parking_features field being populated in all 5/5 listings, with no conflicting remark evidence.
Assigned/reserved parking is clearly confirmed by both MLS data and public remarks. At least two listings explicitly mention "assigned parking" or "assigned parking stall," and the feature appears to be consistent rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
The parking is clearly assigned, but I found no wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. Based on the remarks, deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, including monthly parking cost or parking rental terms, but there were no mentions. The remarks only reference an assigned stall/space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking and found nothing. With no evidence of a waitlist system, this is marked false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is supported by the current MLS data across all 5 recent listings, making this a strong building-level feature. None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction type, but there is no conflicting evidence, and the repeated MLS material entry suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental permission, legal STR, TVU/NUC language, and also for clues like 30-day minimum or owner-occupant-only restrictions. Nothing in the public remarks indicates STR is allowed, so this is marked false by absence of evidence.
I looked for hotel pool terms such as hotel rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or managed by hotel, but found none. Since there is no evidence STR is allowed, this feature is also false.
I searched for wording that owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, and found nothing. With no STR allowance evidence and no mandatory-pool language, this is marked false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, or renewal dates, but found none. No expiration year can be extracted from the public remarks.
The listing repeatedly confirms VA financing eligibility, including an assumable VA loan. This is direct public-remarks evidence, so the building should be marked VA approved.
The remarks explicitly state the building has "Full hurricane insurance" and "100% HURRICANE COVERAGE," which is strong evidence of full insurance coverage. While this does not spell out every policy detail, it is clear support for fully insured status.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, and life safety compliant. The remarks do not mention any fire/life safety inspection status, so there is no evidence to mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 1 listing explicitly says the lanai "offers... city views," and the MLS data shows CITY in 2 of 5 listings. The repeated view language across remarks suggests this is a genuine building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Several listings reference greenery and open views, including phrases like "scenic greenery" and "views of the greenery," which aligns with the garden/landscaped view definition. The MLS data shows GARDEN in 3 of 5 listings, suggesting this is a real view type available in the building, though the wording is more implied than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is indicated in the MLS amenities for 5 out of 5 listings, suggesting a consistent building-level feature rather than a one-off agent entry. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, so the evidence comes from the repeated MLS checkbox rather than narrative descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.