Lakeview Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lakeview Gardens
Building Overview
Lakeview Gardens in Aliamanu-Salt Lake, built 1972; no pets and no short-term rentals per available MLS data.
About Lakeview Gardens
Lakeview Gardens is located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood and was built in 1972. According to available MLS records, specific details about building size (units/square footage) and construction type are not provided in the data set.
Based on MLS data, key property policies include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity or maintenance information is provided in the MLS extract.
Buyers and agents should verify building size, construction details, management, parking arrangements, fees, and any other material facts with the listing agent or property management, as this narrative is based solely on the MLS data available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." None of the remarks provide an owner-occupancy percentage or even a qualitative hint, so this cannot be determined from the listings.
I searched for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or a similar numeric description. The remarks only indicate that the building has updated elevators, so the actual number cannot be verified from these listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no supporting remark evidence for internet being included in maintenance fees. With only 1 of 9 current MLS listings showing INTSER, the feature appears unconfirmed and likely incorrect for the building as a whole.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported by the MLS across 8 of 9 listings. No remarks dispute it, and the pattern is consistent enough to treat sewer as included in the association fee for this building.
Water inclusion is shown in all 9 current MLS listings. The evidence is very strong and consistent, with no remarks suggesting otherwise, so water should be treated as included in the maintenance fee.
BBQ is clearly a shared building amenity. It is mentioned in several listings, including phrases like "BBQ at the grill" and "BBQ area," and the MLS checkbox is checked across all 9/9 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and looks reliable rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no public remarks referencing a car wash facility in any of the provided listings. Although 6/9 MLS records currently check CRWSH, the lack of any descriptive confirmation suggests this may be copied MLS data rather than a verified shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage amenities using terms like surf storage, board storage, or bike and surfboard storage. Nothing in the remarks indicates this amenity exists.
No analysis available
None of the provided listings describe a trash chute system. The MLS data currently shows TRACHU in 7/9 listings, but the absence of any matching remarks makes this look unverified and potentially copied rather than confirmed by agents or site visits.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly supported by the current remarks and MLS amenities. At least 6 listings explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, often alongside other shared amenities like BBQ and recreation room, which indicates this is a real building feature. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is not just agent copy/paste but a genuine common amenity at Lakeview Gardens.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit saltwater pool wording such as saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The building has a pool, but the remarks do not identify it as salt water, so this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has shared laundry facilities. Current MLS data shows 8 of 9 listings marked COMLAU, and one remark specifically mentions 'community laundry on the ground floor,' which aligns with the checkbox data. This appears to be consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy/paste error.
I searched for signs that the community laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, paid laundry, or card-operated machines. The remarks mention community laundry but do not say it is paid, so there is no evidence to confirm this feature.
I looked for language indicating laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or laundry rooms on every floor. The only explicit mention is community laundry on the ground floor, so this feature is not supported.
Parking is clearly a building feature. Across the remarks, listings mention "one assigned parking stall," "2 parking stalls—one open and one partially covered," "One parking stall," and "Partially covered parking." The MLS data also shows parking features in all current listings, so confidence is very high.
Assigned parking is supported by both the MLS checkboxes and the remarks. At least two listings explicitly say "one assigned parking stall" or "1-assigned parking stall," and the current MLS data shows assignment in most listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The remarks only describe assigned or open/covered stalls, which is not enough to conclude the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, parking rental, or any additional fee language. Nothing in the listings mentions a parking cost, so the fee cannot be determined from the remarks.
Guest parking appears to be a real building amenity. Remarks mention "Ample guest parkings," "6-guest parking stalls," and "plenty of guest and street parking," which aligns with the current MLS data showing guest parking in a majority of listings. The evidence is repeated across several listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for wording such as parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a queue for parking. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system, so there is no evidence that one exists.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access terms like keycard entry, fob access, or card readers. The remarks only say the building is secured, which is not enough to confirm card-based security access.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to patrol service or roving security. The remarks describe a secured building, but there is no evidence of a security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to be concrete construction based on current MLS data: 9 of 9 listings show CONCRE in construction_materials. None of the public remarks explicitly contradict this, and the consistency across listings suggests this is a reliable building-level attribute rather than a one-off entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as legal short-term rental, NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or minimum-stay rules. None were mentioned in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program, including brand-specific pools. No such language appears in the listings, and there is no evidence supporting hotel-pool participation.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, no opt-out, or required rental-program enrollment. The remarks contain no such evidence, so a mandatory pool is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, or expiry-year language such as "lease expires" or "renewed through" and found none. The listings instead say "Fee Simple," so there is no public evidence of a lease expiry date.
The remarks directly indicate VA eligibility, which supports VA financing approval. I found no contradictory language in any of the listings.
I searched for wording such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensively insured. The listings only describe the insurance as acceptable/loan friendly, which does not confirm full HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks reference a fire/life safety alarm upgrade, but that is not the same as a confirmed pass, so there is no evidence to mark this true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are supported by both MLS data and remarks. 6 of 9 listings include CITY in the view descriptions, and multiple agents explicitly describe "city views" alongside mountain/ocean views, which suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error. No listing indicates NONE, so the evidence strongly supports view_city = true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for direct evidence that units can view fireworks from the building, not just that fireworks are nearby. The remark explicitly states fireworks can be enjoyed from the property, supporting a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.