Lakeshore Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lakeshore Tower
Building Overview
Lakeshore Tower in Aliamanu-Salt Lake (built 1971) with concrete construction, ocean and mountain views, pool and resident manager.
About Lakeshore Tower
Based on MLS data, Lakeshore Tower is located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood and was built in 1971. The building is of concrete construction. Unit count, floor count and other size details were not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, Lakeshore Tower offers ocean and mountain views and on-site amenities that include a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. The building has two elevators and is constructed of concrete.
MLS data indicates covered, assigned parking is available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company and any association fees were not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and unit-specific information, with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages like '80% owner occupied' as well as phrases such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' No such evidence appears in the remarks, so the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
The public remarks directly confirm that the building has two elevators, matching the current value exactly. This is strong, repeated evidence from the listings, so confidence is very high.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 8 listings have OTCOEX in association_fee_includes indicating common area electricity. Remarks note 'solar panels installed to reduce the common area expenses,' which supports that building-level/common electricity is managed—evidence is implied across multiple listings but not explicitly 'fees include common electric' in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence does not support hot water being included in the maintenance fee. Across the available listings, only 1 of 10 shows HOTWAT while 7 of 10 list WTRHTR in inclusions, and none of the remarks describe hot water as an HOA-covered utility. This looks more like copy-paste MLS inconsistency than a shared building expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be a standard HOA-covered expense for this building. The MLS data shows SEWER included in 10 of 10 listings, which is very strong consensus across listings and agents. No remarks suggest any change or exception.
Water appears to be included in the association fee for this building. All 10 of 10 listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, which is strong and consistent across multiple listings. No remarks indicate any change or exclusion.
BBQ is well supported across many listings and appears to be a shared building amenity, not a one-off unit feature. At least 6 listings in the provided remarks mention it directly, often alongside the pool, suggesting consistent agent remarks rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of the 9 remarks mention outdoor deck-style space, most often a "lanai" or "covered lanai," and one listing describes a "rec deck" with BBQ/pavilion area. This aligns with the MLS amenity tags appearing in 3/10 listings, suggesting the feature is real but may be inconsistently entered by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is supported by multiple current remarks, especially the listing that says "nice size pool, rec deck and BBQ area." Another listing mentions a "covered pavilion" with the pool, reinforcing that this is a common amenity deck/recreation space available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across multiple listings, not just copy-paste checkbox data. At least 3 remarks explicitly describe storage availability, including "storage lockers ... on each floor" and an "individual storage ... shed," which indicates the building offers storage units/lockers for residents.
I looked for surfboard-specific storage references, including surf storage or bike-and-surfboard storage. The remarks mention general storage lockers and a storage shed, but nothing surfboard-specific.
No analysis available
Trash chute is not confirmed by any of the provided public remarks. The only support is the MLS amenity checkbox data, which shows moderate historical evidence, but there are no agent descriptions like "trash chute" or "garbage chute" to corroborate it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported. At least 7 of the provided public remarks explicitly mention it, using phrases like "large community pool," "sparkling pool," "Pool & BBQ area," and "refresh in the condo pool." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with the current MLS amenity data, so this feature should be retained.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit salt-water pool language such as salt pool, saltwater pool, or saline pool. The remarks confirm a pool exists, but none describe it as salt water.
Strong, consistent evidence supports in-unit laundry for this building. At least 4 listings explicitly mention it in the remarks, and the MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in all 10/10 listings, which looks like confirmed building-wide data rather than agent copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating paid common laundry, such as coin laundry, coin-op machines, card-operated laundry, or laundry fees. Nothing in the remarks indicates a paid community laundry setup.
I searched for remarks like laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry access, or community laundry rooms on every level. The remarks do not mention that arrangement, and the only laundry reference is to in-unit laundry, so there is no support for community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly available at the building. Multiple listings mention it in different forms—assigned, covered, side-by-side, and tandem—showing this is not a copy-paste anomaly but a consistent building feature across remarks.
Evidence points to assigned parking being available in the building. One listing explicitly mentions "1 assigned parking stall," while multiple others reference specific stalls such as "two tandem parking stalls" and "side-by-side parking," and the current MLS data has ASSIGN checked in 6/10 listings. This is moderate-strength evidence, with some copy-paste variation across remarks.
Covered parking is strongly supported by the remarks and MLS data. At least 2 listings explicitly say "covered," including "2 covered parking stalls 18 & 19" and "covered tandem parking stall," while the current MLS parking_features show covered-related codes in 7/10 listings. The repeated mentions across multiple remarks make this feature highly credible.
I looked for deeded, owned stall, parking included in deed, or similar ownership language and found none. The listings only describe assigned/tandem/covered parking, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking fee, parking rent, additional parking cost, or similar language and found nothing. The remarks discuss the number and type of stalls, but not any separate parking charge.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Tandem parking is strongly supported by both remarks and MLS data. At least three separate listings explicitly describe tandem parking, and several others list tandem in the parking features, indicating this is a real building-level offering rather than an isolated unit quirk.
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or join-waitlist language and found none. The public remarks only describe available parking types and nearby street/metered parking.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly indicate card/fob-controlled access. Phrases like "fob required entry" strongly support a card/fob security system for the building.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-service wording such as security patrol, roving security, patrolled building, or similar language. The remarks only mention secured entry, cameras, and an on-site manager, not an actual patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 10 of 10 current listings include CONCRE in construction materials. The public remarks do not explicitly mention construction type, but there is no conflicting evidence, and the consistency across all listings suggests this is not a copy-paste error.
Double wall construction is not supported by the public remarks: across the provided listings there are no mentions of "double wall," "double-wall," or two-wall construction. With only 2 of 9 current MLS listings checked and no corroboration in remarks, this is likely an erroneous or copy-pasted MLS entry, so the feature should be treated as absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, NUC, TVU, vacation rental allowed, or hotel-style rental wording and found nothing. Based on the remarks alone, there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool or hotel-operated program references and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this is also not supported.
I searched for wording that owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out and found nothing. There is no public remark suggesting a mandatory hotel or rental pool program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold wording such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewed through, or lease end dates and found nothing. There is no public remark giving a lease expiry year.
The remarks explicitly mention a VA assumable loan, which is strong public evidence of VA-related financing. I did not need to infer anything beyond the direct loan language.
I looked for wording such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. The remarks do not show that the HOA provides full insurance, and the fire insurance assessment reference is insufficient to conclude fully insured status.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for FLSE, fire life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, life-safety compliant, and passed fire inspection language. Nothing indicates a passed fire/life safety evaluation, and the fire insurance assessment wording is not the same thing, so this is best treated as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are explicitly mentioned in multiple listings across the building, with about 6+ remarks referencing them directly. The evidence appears consistent across different agents and timeframes, so this is a strong building-level feature rather than a one-off unit description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to viewing Friday night fireworks from a lanai, unit, or building vantage point. The remarks mention ocean, mountain, and golf course views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.