Lakeshore Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lakeshore Tower
Building Overview
Lakeshore Tower in Aliamanu-Salt Lake (built 1971) with concrete construction, ocean and mountain views, pool and resident manager.
About Lakeshore Tower
Based on MLS data, Lakeshore Tower is located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood and was built in 1971. The building is of concrete construction. Unit count, floor count and other size details were not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, Lakeshore Tower offers ocean and mountain views and on-site amenities that include a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. The building has two elevators and is constructed of concrete.
MLS data indicates covered, assigned parking is available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company and any association fees were not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and unit-specific information, with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative phrases like majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. The remarks provide no indication of owner-occupancy levels.
Public remarks directly confirm the building has two elevators, matching the current value exactly. This is high-confidence evidence from multiple listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 8 listings have OTCOEX in association_fee_includes indicating common area electricity. Remarks note 'solar panels installed to reduce the common area expenses,' which supports that building-level/common electricity is managed—evidence is implied across multiple listings but not explicitly 'fees include common electric' in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 9 listings explicitly shows HOTWAT in association fee includes, while 6 of 9 list WTRHTR in inclusions, which usually suggests a unit water heater rather than hot water provided by the building. The remarks across the listings do not mention hot water being included, so the evidence looks more like copy/paste MLS inconsistency than a clear building-wide amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 of 9 listings include SEWER in association fee includes, providing very strong building-level evidence that sewer is covered by the maintenance/HOA fee. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the consistency suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly.
All 9 of 9 listings show WATER included in association fee includes, so water appears to be a standard building-wide HOA expense. The public remarks do not conflict with the MLS data, and the pattern is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
BBQ is strongly supported: 6+ current remarks mention it directly as a "BBQ area," "Pool & BBQ area," "on-site barbecue area," or "BBQ area and cabana." This appears consistently across multiple listings/agents, so it is not just a one-off MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard-specific storage facilities or combined bike/surfboard storage references. The remarks mention general storage lockers and a storage shed, but nothing about surfboard storage.
No analysis available
There is some MLS checkbox evidence for a trash chute system, but no current remarks in the provided listings confirm it. Because agent-entered amenities can be copied incorrectly, this is only moderate-confidence evidence rather than a strong confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly supported. At least 7 of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a pool, with phrasing such as 'nice size pool,' 'sparkling pool,' 'community pool,' and 'pool & BBQ area.' Combined with current MLS data showing the pool amenity checked in all listings, this appears to be a consistent building-level amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit salt-water pool language such as salt pool or saline pool. The remarks confirm a pool exists, but none describe it as salt water.
Strong, consistent evidence across the building supports in-unit laundry. Public remarks explicitly mention it in at least 4 listings, while MLS inclusions show washer/dryer for all 9 listings, suggesting this is not a copy-paste anomaly. This feature should be considered reliably available in the building.
No analysis available
I searched for language suggesting paid common laundry, including coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. Nothing in the remarks supports a paid community laundry setup; the only laundry mention is washer/dryer in the unit.
I looked for public remarks indicating community laundry on each floor, such as laundry rooms on every floor or floor-by-floor laundry access. The listings instead mention in-unit laundry, and there is no evidence of shared laundry facilities being available on every floor.
Parking is clearly available at the building. Multiple listings mention it in different forms—assigned, covered, side-by-side, and tandem—showing this is not a copy-paste anomaly but a consistent building feature across remarks.
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks reference covered parking: 3 listings explicitly state "covered" (e.g., "2 covered parking stalls 18 & 19," "Covered Tandem Parking"). CURRENT MLS checkbox data also shows 6 of 8 listings flagged as covered/garage. Evidence is consistent across several listings, though a few ads omit parking details (possible copy/paste).
I looked for deeded, owned stall, or parking included in deed language and found none. The listings describe assigned and tandem parking, but that is not enough to conclude the stalls are deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking rent, monthly parking fee, additional parking cost, or similar language and found nothing. The remarks talk about stall count and parking location, but not any charge.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Tandem parking is strongly supported by both remarks and MLS data. At least three separate listings explicitly describe tandem parking, and several others list tandem in the parking features, indicating this is a real building-level offering rather than an isolated unit quirk.
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or join-waitlist language and found none. The remarks only discuss assigned, tandem, covered, and nearby street parking.
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly point to secured entry with fob access. That is strong public-remarks evidence for a card/fob security system.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-service wording such as security patrol or roving security. The remarks only mention secured entry, surveillance cameras, and an on-site manager, but no patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 9 of 9 current listings include CONCRE in construction materials. None of the public remarks explicitly describe the structure, but the MLS consensus is unanimous, so this appears to be a stable building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Double wall construction is not supported by the public remarks: across the provided listings there are no mentions of "double wall," "double-wall," or two-wall construction. With only 2 of 9 current MLS listings checked and no corroboration in remarks, this is likely an erroneous or copy-pasted MLS entry, so the feature should be treated as absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for indications that short-term rentals are allowed, including NUC/TVU references or hotel-style rental wording, and found no evidence. With no public remark support, the feature is treated as not indicated.
I looked for hotel pool or rental program references such as Hilton pool, Trump pool, or managed-by-hotel language and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false as well.
I searched for wording that owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no evidence of an STR/hotel rental program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold wording such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewed through, or lease end dates and found nothing. There is no specific 4-digit expiry year to extract from the public remarks.
The listings explicitly reference a VA assumable loan, which strongly indicates VA-related financing. I did not find an exact phrase like "VA approved," but the VA loan language is clear enough to support a true value.
I looked for wording like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. The remarks do not mention HOA insurance status, so this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, or passed fire inspection. Nothing in the provided remarks indicates the building has passed such an evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are explicitly mentioned in multiple public remarks across different listings, with at least 5 listings referencing them directly. Phrases include "views of the mountains from the spacious lanai," "breathtaking view of the mountains," and "sweeping golf course and mountain views," which is strong, consistent evidence rather than a one-off agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to viewing Friday night fireworks from a lanai, unit, or building vantage point. The remarks mention mountain, golf course, ocean, and city views, but nothing about fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.