Kunia Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kunia Gardens
Building Overview
Kunia Gardens in Waipahu, concrete construction from 1968; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kunia Gardens
Kunia Gardens is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1968 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count information are not provided in the available MLS-derived data.
Key policies noted in the MLS-derived data include a no-pets rule and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity details are provided in the MLS data.
Additional specifics such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, homeowner association details, and other building amenities are not included in the provided MLS information. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with listing agents or property management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy language (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'owner occupied') and found none. Because no numeric owner-occupancy value exists in the current data and remarks provide no evidence, the percentage is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Public remarks explicitly describe the property as a three-story walkup, which implies no elevators. This supports keeping the current value of 0 elevators with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 5 current MLS listings check OTCOEX (common area electricity included). None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'common area electricity' or 'building power included', suggesting the checkbox may be agent-entered rather than described by multiple agents. Because a majority of listings mark OTCOEX but remarks are silent, the inclusion is plausible but only moderately supported across sources.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 5) check HOTWAT, and 3 of 5 listings explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, which strongly indicates hot water is provided by individual unit heaters rather than included in HOA fees. Public remarks do not claim 'hot water included', so evidence strongly supports hot water not being included in maintenance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current MLS listings mark SEWER as included in association fees. The public remarks are silent on sewer being included, so while MLS checkbox data consistently indicates sewer is included, the lack of agent remarks reduces overall certainty to a moderate level.
4 of 5 current MLS listings check WATER as included in the association fees. Public remarks do not state 'water included' or similar, so while MLS data consistently marks water as included, the absence of explicit remarks or owner/manager confirmations means the conclusion is moderately supported rather than definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All five current listings include the pool amenity and multiple public remarks explicitly reference a pool (quotes: 'community swimming pool', 'common amenities of swimming pool', 'pool on property', 'condo association pool'). The evidence is consistent across several agent listings, providing strong support that the building offers a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current listings have the COMLAU amenity checked and several agent remarks explicitly reference shared facilities—phrases include 'community laundry' and 'laundromat' (e.g., 'Enjoy the common amenities... laundromat' and 'Community laundry'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, supporting a high confidence that the building offers shared/community laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All five listings for the building reference parking, each noting one assigned or designated parking stall (e.g., "one assigned parking stall", "1 designated parking stall"). Current MLS checkbox data also indicates parking features for all five listings, so evidence is consistent and strong across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly mention an assigned/designated parking stall. There is no language indicating the stall is deeded or included in the deed, so deeded parking is not indicated in the remarks.
No analysis available
Remarks describe an assigned parking stall but provide no information about monthly parking fees or rental costs. Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' with no results.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no reference to a parking waitlist or waiting list process in any listing. The remarks focus on assigned stalls without mentioning any queue or waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current MLS listings list ABOGRO in construction materials. Public remarks repeatedly call the property a 'three-story walk-up' and reference a 'ground floor' unit, which implies above-ground construction even though remarks do not use the exact term 'above ground materials.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting the feature is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not state whether short-term rentals are permitted. In absence of explicit allowance language, STR permissibility is not indicated in the remarks.
Listings do not reference any hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program. Because STRs are not indicated as allowed, hotel pool participation is not supported by the remarks.
There is no language suggesting mandatory enrollment in a hotel or rental pool. Multiple listings simply describe the unit and amenities with no mention of required rental program participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no mention of land tenure being leasehold or any lease expiration year. Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold', and specific years but found nothing.
Public remarks do not reference VA loan approval or acceptance. I searched the remarks for terms such as 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans' and found none, so VA financing is not indicated.
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating HOA walls-in or full building insurance (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage') and found no evidence. With no mention and no prior confirmed value, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found nothing. In absence of any mention and no existing confirmed value, set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset or western exposure (0 of 5 public remarks). Current MLS view_descriptions contain 0/5 SUNSET and one instance of NONE; public remarks contain no phrases like 'sunset view', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun'. Given lack of any corroborating agent remarks across multiple listings and the MLS checkbox not set, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS listings (4 of 5) have the RESMAN amenity checked and two separate public remarks explicitly state 'Resident manager is on site' or 'Resident manager'. While several listings do not mention it in remarks—suggesting possible copy/paste—the combination of a majority of MLS checkboxes plus explicit agent remarks provides moderate support that the building has an on-site resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.