Kunia Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kunia Gardens
Building Overview
Kunia Gardens in Waipahu, concrete construction from 1968; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kunia Gardens
Kunia Gardens is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1968 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count information are not provided in the available MLS-derived data.
Key policies noted in the MLS-derived data include a no-pets rule and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity details are provided in the MLS data.
Additional specifics such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, homeowner association details, and other building amenities are not included in the provided MLS information. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with listing agents or property management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements (e.g., 'owner occupied', '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found none. There is no prior numeric value to preserve and no explicit evidence to set a percentage, so the owner_occupancy is left unknown (null) with low confidence.
The public remarks repeatedly describe the property as a 'three-story walk-up community', which typically denotes stairs-only access and implies no elevators. I searched the remarks for explicit phrases like 'elevator', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found none; the 'walk-up' phrasing is direct evidence that elevators are not present.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 5 current MLS listings check OTCOEX (common area electricity included). None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'common area electricity' or 'building power included', suggesting the checkbox may be agent-entered rather than described by multiple agents. Because a majority of listings mark OTCOEX but remarks are silent, the inclusion is plausible but only moderately supported across sources.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 5) check HOTWAT, and 3 of 5 listings explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, which strongly indicates hot water is provided by individual unit heaters rather than included in HOA fees. Public remarks do not claim 'hot water included', so evidence strongly supports hot water not being included in maintenance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current MLS listings mark SEWER as included in association fees. The public remarks are silent on sewer being included, so while MLS checkbox data consistently indicates sewer is included, the lack of agent remarks reduces overall certainty to a moderate level.
4 of 5 current MLS listings check WATER as included in the association fees. Public remarks do not state 'water included' or similar, so while MLS data consistently marks water as included, the absence of explicit remarks or owner/manager confirmations means the conclusion is moderately supported rather than definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All five current listings include the pool amenity and multiple public remarks explicitly reference a pool (quotes: 'community swimming pool', 'common amenities of swimming pool', 'pool on property', 'condo association pool'). The evidence is consistent across several agent listings, providing strong support that the building offers a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current listings have the COMLAU amenity checked and several agent remarks explicitly reference shared facilities—phrases include 'community laundry' and 'laundromat' (e.g., 'Enjoy the common amenities... laundromat' and 'Community laundry'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, supporting a high confidence that the building offers shared/community laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All five listings for the building reference parking, each noting one assigned or designated parking stall (e.g., "one assigned parking stall", "1 designated parking stall"). Current MLS checkbox data also indicates parking features for all five listings, so evidence is consistent and strong across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings mention an assigned/designated parking stall for the unit, but they do not state that the parking is deeded or included in the deed. Because 'deeded' is not explicitly used, deeded parking is not indicated in the public remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks mention an assigned parking stall but do not state any monthly fee or rental cost for parking. Without explicit wording about a parking fee, the monthly parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no reference to a parking waitlist system in any of the listings. The remarks consistently describe assigned stalls but do not mention a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current MLS listings list ABOGRO in construction materials. Public remarks repeatedly call the property a 'three-story walk-up' and reference a 'ground floor' unit, which implies above-ground construction even though remarks do not use the exact term 'above ground materials.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting the feature is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks do not reference permissibility of short-term rentals or a hotel/rental program. In absence of explicit allowance language, STR allowed is assumed not indicated in these listings.
Listings do not mention participation in any hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program. Because there is no indication STRs are allowed, hotel pool participation is not indicated.
There is no language suggesting mandatory participation in a hotel/rental pool; no listing states units must be enrolled or cannot opt out. Therefore mandatory pool participation is not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no reference to leasehold/ground lease or any expiration year in the remarks. I looked for phrasing like 'lease expires 20XX', 'land lease to...', or renewal language but found nothing, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
Public remarks do not reference VA loan approval or acceptance. I searched the remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans' but found no matches, so VA financing is assumed not indicated in these listings.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related terms like 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. With no explicit mention and no prior data, the field is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. Because there is no mention and no prior data, the feature is set to false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests it was not stated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset or western exposure (0 of 5 public remarks). Current MLS view_descriptions contain 0/5 SUNSET and one instance of NONE; public remarks contain no phrases like 'sunset view', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun'. Given lack of any corroborating agent remarks across multiple listings and the MLS checkbox not set, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS listings (4 of 5) have the RESMAN amenity checked and two separate public remarks explicitly state 'Resident manager is on site' or 'Resident manager'. While several listings do not mention it in remarks—suggesting possible copy/paste—the combination of a majority of MLS checkboxes plus explicit agent remarks provides moderate support that the building has an on-site resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.