Kumelewai Gardens 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kumelewai Gardens 1
Building Overview
Kumelewai Gardens 1 in Mililani Mauka‑Launani Valley, built 1992; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company unknown.
About Kumelewai Gardens 1
Kumelewai Gardens 1 is a residential building located in the Mililani Mauka–Launani Valley neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1992. Size, unit count, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key property policies include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The available MLS information does not list specific building amenities, common-area features, or on-site services.
Additional details such as assigned parking, maintenance fees, homeowner association contacts, and the managing company are not provided (management company listed as unknown). Buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, fees, and available amenities with the listing agent or HOA prior to making decisions; this summary is based solely on the MLS data provided.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The highest MLS floor field is 2, matching the county parcel max_floors and the state registration floors value. No penthouse or unit-number evidence contradicts this.
The county reports 84 reconciled residential units, and the state registration independently reports 84 total and residential units. The registration covers one building, so its figure applies to this record.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 2690. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
I searched for explicit elevator counts and generic references such as multiple elevators, but none of the public remarks mention elevators. No current elevator value was provided, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee based on current MLS inclusions, with 6 of 9 listings showing OTCOEX. The public remarks do not explicitly mention common electric, but there is also no contradictory language suggesting it was removed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. No current MLS listings show HOTWAT, while many list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is unit-supplied rather than part of the HOA fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the association fee. All current MLS listings show SEWER, and the remarks do not contain any contrary language, making this one highly consistent across listings.
Water is included in the association fee. All current MLS listings list WATER, with no conflicting remarks, so this appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 7 current MLS listings list RECARE in amenities and agent remarks explicitly mention '7 recreation centers', 'resort-style amenities like a sparkling pool, BBQ areas', and community pools. Multiple listings reference shared recreation amenities, indicating a building/community-level recreation area rather than isolated unit features.
Multiple listings mention the community offers "7 recreation centers for entertaining," which is direct evidence of a recreation room / recreation-center amenity. The MLS checkbox appears inconsistently used (only 1 of 9 listings has RECROO), but the repeated wording across several agent remarks makes the feature highly credible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported by both historical MLS data and current listing remarks. At least 2 current remarks explicitly mention storage access, including "large external lockable storage" and "comes with a storage locker!" This does not look like a one-off copy-paste error because the feature appears in both amenities and unit-level descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool amenity is strongly supported. Several remarks explicitly mention it, including "6 swimming pools to cool off," "resort-style amenities like a sparkling pool," and references to "pools" in the community. This looks consistent across multiple listings and agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is strongly supported by both the historical MLS inclusions and current listing remarks. At least 3 separate remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'stacked washer/dryer,' 'in-unit washer and dryer,' and 'full size LG washer and dryer.' This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention parking stalls and garage-style parking features, with phrases like '1 assigned parking stall,' '2 assigned parking stalls,' and 'two parking ground-floor unit.' The evidence is strong and consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent note.
Assigned parking is confirmed by multiple remarks and supported by the MLS checkboxes. Listings specifically say '1 assigned parking stall close to the unit's entrance' and '2 assigned parking stalls,' which is strong building-level evidence. This appears consistent across agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention one or two assigned parking stalls, including stall 132. Assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly charge, rental, and additional-cost language. Nothing in the public remarks indicates a parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be available in the building. At least one remark says 'lots of guest parking,' and the MLS data shows guest parking checked in a substantial share of listings. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and consistent with a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to joining or being placed on a parking waitlist. No such system is described.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 7 current MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions. Public remarks lack explicit phrases like 'window AC' or 'window unit' (one remark only notes 'AC in both bedrooms and the living room'), so the evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes across multiple listings rather than corroborating agent remarks.
Concrete construction is supported by the MLS checkbox data in 5 of 9 current listings, but there are no explicit remarks such as "concrete construction" or "reinforced concrete." Because the public remarks are silent, confidence is only moderate and this should be treated as MLS-based rather than remark-confirmed evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in only 3 of 9 current listings and is not mentioned in any of the merged remarks. The lack of corroboration makes this a low-confidence MLS signal, with no strong basis to treat it as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss residential use, amenities, and community locations but do not mention short-term rental permissions. With no public evidence that STR is allowed, this is set to false at medium confidence.
No hotel pool or hotel rental program language was found. Because STR is not established as allowed, this feature must also be false.
I searched for mandatory rental-pool and required-participation language and found none. Since STR is not established as allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold terminology and specific expiration or renewal years. No applicable lease information was found, so the expiry year remains unknown.
The remarks directly mention a VA assumable loan option, which is strong public evidence that VA financing is available. This supports retaining a high-confidence true value.
I searched for references to full insurance, fully insured coverage, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. No such language appeared in the public remarks, so full HOA insurance coverage is not evidenced.
No analysis available
I searched for statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. None appeared in the remarks, so this feature is not evidenced.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/7) mention mountain views and 3/7 explicitly list NONE. Public remarks do not describe mountain or 'mauka view'—the occurrences of 'Mililani Mauka' refer to the neighborhood, not a view. Evidence is strong across MLS data and remarks that the building does not offer documented mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows garden views on 2 of 8 listings, but most listings show no view. Public remarks are mostly indirect, referring to 'lush tropical landscaping' and nearby parks rather than explicitly stating a garden or courtyard view, so this is moderate but not strong evidence. The pattern looks more like occasional listing-level exposure than a consistently advertised building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/7) mention sunrise views and multiple listings list NONE. Public remarks contain no phrases like 'sunrise view', 'morning sun', or 'eastern exposure.' MLS data and remarks consistently lack evidence for sunrise views.
There is some evidence that the building has sunset-view units, but it is weak: only 1 of 9 current listings explicitly says SUNSET while most list NONE. Public remarks across the listings do not reinforce this with phrases like "sunset view" or "western exposure," suggesting this may be a unit-specific MLS entry rather than a building-wide pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager. While 3/9 listings currently show RESMAN in MLS amenities, the feature is not corroborated in the text remarks, so this appears more likely to be an MLS checkbox artifact than a confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.