Kuliouou Kai Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kuliouou Kai Villa
Building Overview
Kuliouou Kai Villa in Kuliouou-Kalani Iki, built 1974; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kuliouou Kai Villa
According to available records, Kuliouou Kai Villa is located in the Kuliouou‑Kalani Iki neighborhood and was built in 1974. MLS data provided does not specify unit sizes, number of units, or construction type, so those details should be verified with the listing agent or management.
Key policy details recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS listing shows the management company as unknown; no amenity list is provided in the available data.
Based on MLS data, other specifics such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, special assessments, or homeowner association rules are not included in the records provided. Buyers should verify all details, including unit size, construction type, parking, fees, and management, with official association documents or the listing agent before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most current listings (6/8) include OTCOEX, pointing to common area electricity being part of the maintenance fee. The public remarks do not explicitly discuss utilities, so this is driven primarily by consistent MLS checkbox data and appears likely to reflect a building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing includes HOTWAT, and most mention WTRHTR instead, which is a strong signal that building-supplied hot water is not included. The remarks also do not mention hot water service, so the MLS pattern strongly supports false for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included on 8/8 current listings, making this a very high-confidence building feature. The public remarks do not contradict it, and the consistency across all listings suggests this is a stable building-level inclusion.
Water is included on all 8 current listings, so this is a highly reliable building-level feature. The remarks do not mention utilities directly, but the MLS data is uniform across agents and strongly supports inclusion.
No public remarks mention BBQ, grills, barbecue areas, or outdoor grilling facilities. The only evidence is the MLS checkbox data (3/8), which looks like likely copy-paste or unverified amenity data rather than a real shared feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks reference any car wash facility or vehicle wash station. With only 1/8 MLS records showing CRWSH and no supporting text, this looks like an unsupported amenity entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck amenities are clearly confirmed. Across the listings, multiple remarks mention "private patios" and a "large 750 sq. ft. partially covered lanai," which is consistent with the MLS data showing PATDEC/COVPAT in all 8/8 listings. The evidence is strong and repeated, not just a one-off agent remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Private yard is not supported by the current remarks. Across the provided listings, there are no explicit mentions of a private yard, fenced yard, or yard access; the outdoor spaces described are patios and a covered lanai. With only partial MLS checkbox support and no corroborating narrative evidence, this feature appears unreliable.
No analysis available
The remarks consistently describe pool, lush gardens, beach access, and lanai space, but never a recreation area or recreation deck. Since the current MLS amenity data is present in 6/8 listings without textual support, it appears to be unverified checkbox inflation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by several listings, not just MLS checkboxes: 2 listings explicitly mention an 'extra storage cabinet in covered carport,' and other remarks describe a bonus room useful for 'more storage.' Because the mentions appear across multiple listings and align with current MLS storage indicators, this looks like a real feature rather than copy-paste noise.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, or surf-related storage amenities. The remarks only mention an extra storage cabinet and general storage, not surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly has a shared swimming pool. Multiple current listings mention it explicitly, including phrases like "amenities with swimming pool" and "access to a community association pool." This matches the historical MLS pattern and appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as salt water pool, saltwater pool, or saline pool. A pool is mentioned, but there is no indication that it is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported by the MLS history: 8/8 current listings include washer/dryer in the inclusions. None of the public remarks explicitly mention laundry, which suggests the feature is being carried in MLS data rather than repeated in marketing copy, but there is no evidence against it.
No analysis available
I looked for coin-op, card-operated, quarters, or other paid laundry references. The remarks do not mention laundry at all, so there is no basis to confirm paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to laundry on every floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or shared laundry facilities. Nothing in the listings mentions community laundry access, so there is no evidence this feature exists.
Parking is clearly present across the listings. Multiple remarks repeatedly mention "two parking stalls" and "two parking townhouse," which strongly confirms that the building offers parking.
Assigned parking appears likely, though the remarks do not always say "assigned" outright. The repeated MLS pattern (6/8) plus phrases like stalls "located close to the unit" and the consistent two-stall setup support this feature, but the evidence is less explicit than for parking itself.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed. Multiple listings repeat the same wording—"one covered, one uncovered"—and several also reference a "covered carport," indicating this building offers covered stalls.
I searched for wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks only confirm that two stalls are included, not that the parking is deeded to the unit.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of monthly parking charges, parking rental fees, or added parking costs and found nothing. The remarks state that two parking stalls are included, but they do not indicate any separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or needing to join a list for parking and found none. The listings describe included stalls, but nothing suggests parking is assigned through a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob access, card reader, or electronic entry language. The remarks do not mention any card-based security system.
No analysis available
I looked for references to security patrol, roving security, or a patrolled building. The public remarks contain no such security language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split A/C is confirmed by multiple current remarks, which repeatedly say the unit(s) feature "split A/C units." The evidence appears in more than one listing and is not just a checkbox artifact, so buyers searching for ductless or mini-split cooling should consider this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears in 4 of 8 current MLS listings via the DOUWAL construction_materials code. None of the public remarks explicitly describe "double wall" or "two walls," so this is supported mainly by MLS data rather than narrative confirmation. The repeated MLS coding across multiple listings suggests the feature is likely real, but the confidence is only moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 5 of 7 current listings via MLS material codes (WOOFRA). None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, so the evidence is based on repeated MLS data rather than narrative descriptions. Because the checkbox appears in a majority of listings, it is likely a building-level construction feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental language, including "STR permitted," "NUC," "TVU," and similar terms, but found no evidence. Because there is no explicit allowance stated, the building is treated as not confirmed for STR in these remarks.
I looked for hotel pool language such as "hotel rental program," branded pool participation, or hotel-managed units and found none. Since the remarks do not establish that STR is allowed, hotel-pool participation is not supported here.
I searched for wording like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. The listings provide no evidence that any rental pool exists, much less that participation is mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or any 4-digit renewal/expiry year, but nothing was stated. Since no specific year appears in the remarks, the lease expiry remains unknown from the provided text.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. There is no explicit evidence in the listings to confirm VA loan eligibility for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are well supported across the listings. At least 4 of 7 current MLS entries show OCEAN, and several remarks explicitly mention "ocean views" or a "direct ocean view." This looks like a real building-level feature rather than a copy/paste anomaly.
Mountain views appear to be available in this building based on MLS data: 5 of 8 listings include mountain-related view descriptions. The current remarks do not explicitly call out mountain views, so this looks like a building-level feature present in some units rather than a repeated marketing claim across all agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views appear in some current MLS view descriptions, with 3 of 7 listings showing COASTL. However, the public remarks only reference coastal living and proximity to the beach, which is not the same as an actual coastline view, so confidence stays moderate.
Garden views are strongly supported: 6 of 8 listings have GARDEN in the MLS view descriptions, and multiple remarks mention "lush gardens". This is consistent across several listings and appears to reflect a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate MLS support for sunset views, but no supporting language appears in the public remarks. Because only 2 of 7 listings show SUNSET and the remarks focus on ocean/beach proximity instead, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements that units or lanais have a view of Friday night fireworks. The remarks discuss ocean views and beach proximity, but do not mention fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there are 0 explicit mentions of a resident manager or any equivalent on-site management language. The current MLS data is sparse (2/8 listings tagged RESMAN), which is not strong enough to validate the feature without supporting remarks. Based on the remarks alone, this appears unconfirmed and potentially copy-paste MLS noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.