Kulana Knolls 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kulana Knolls 1
Building Overview
Kulana Knolls 1 in Waipahu — built 1994; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted (based on MLS data).
About Kulana Knolls 1
According to available records, Kulana Knolls 1 is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood, originally built in 1994. Specific details on building size, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Based on MLS data, the building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company for Kulana Knolls 1 is listed as unknown in the records provided. No additional amenity details (such as common facilities or on-site services) are specified in the MLS information.
Parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and any other building policies are not detailed in the available MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or association prior to making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or other percentage-based or qualitative references, but none were present. Because there is no current occupancy percentage provided and no remark evidence, the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I searched the listings for explicit elevator references such as a numbered count ('4 elevators'), 'multiple elevators,' or similar wording, but found none. Because there is no current elevator value provided and no supporting remark evidence, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity is not clearly supported in the public remarks. While the current MLS shows OTCOEX on 10/18 listings, the remarks are silent on hall/elevator/amenity power, which suggests the checkbox may be copied inconsistently rather than confirmed building policy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is consistently unsupported: 0/18 current MLS listings check HOTWAT, and most instead show WTRHTR. Public remarks reinforce this with phrases like “water heater located in closet” and “water heater closet,” which points to unit-supplied water heaters rather than HOA-provided hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed. The current MLS shows SEWER on all 18/18 listings, and the remarks include direct confirmation that HOA fees cover “water and sewer,” making this one of the most reliable features.
Water inclusion is consistently supported across the building. All 18/18 current listings check WATER, and remarks directly confirm HOA fees cover “water and sewer,” so this appears to be a stable building-level amenity rather than agent copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no explicit references to a clubhouse or community center for the building. A single remark mentions the RKCA Recreation Center & Park, but it is framed as a nearby destination rather than a community amenity of the property. Overall evidence is weak and looks like potentially copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to offer patio/deck-style outdoor space, with many listings mentioning a "private lanai," "covered lanai," "courtyard," "private yard," or "outdoor space." Roughly 10+ listings reference this feature in some form, including several with very specific phrases like "floor to ceiling sliding door leading to your private, fully fenced in Lanai" and "private lanai while taking in beautiful Diamond Head views." The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks, suggesting this is a real building-level amenity rather than an MLS copy-paste error.
At least 2 listings reference path-type amenities or close-by trails, including the explicit phrase 'walking paths.' While some wording is about nearby parks/trails rather than an on-site path, the evidence is consistent enough to treat this as available for buyers searching for jogging or walking paths. The MLS checkbox is modestly supported rather than purely copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by the MLS in a meaningful share of current listings, with 3 listings checking building-level storage/additional storage and 6 listing it in unit features. Remarks reinforce this in at least a few places, including an exterior water-heater closet that "can also be used as additional storage" and references to "ample storage space." The evidence suggests storage is available in some units or as a condo feature, but it does not read like a consistently advertised building-wide locker amenity.
I looked for dedicated surfboard storage or shared board storage amenities, including phrases like 'surfboard storage' or 'bike and surfboard storage.' The remarks mention general exterior storage closets and assigned parking, but nothing that indicates surfboard storage.
No listing clearly describes tennis courts as part of the building or immediate shared amenities. One remark references tennis courts at a nearby community park, which does not confirm the building offers them. The current MLS checkbox appears more likely to be a mistaken copy/paste than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a saltwater pool or any pool at all. The provided building context indicates there is no pool, and the remarks do not contradict that, so a saltwater pool is not supported.
Strong evidence supports in-unit laundry at Kulana Knolls. At least 4 current remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like "washer, and dryer," "full size washer and dryer," and "W/D Hookups in Unit." This aligns with the MLS inclusions data (16/18 listings with washer/dryer), so the feature appears to be a real building-level offering in many units.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating paid community laundry, including coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks reference in-unit laundry and washer/dryer hookups instead, so there is no evidence that shared laundry requires payment.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to shared laundry being available on each floor, such as 'laundry room on every floor' or 'floor-by-floor laundry.' The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer or W/D hookups, so there is no evidence supporting community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly present throughout the building. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings reference parking directly, including phrases like 'two assigned parking stalls,' 'two reserved parking stalls,' '2 parking,' and 'two dedicated parking stalls.' The evidence is strong and consistent across many agents, not just copy-paste.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported. Numerous listings explicitly mention 'assigned parking,' 'reserved parking,' or 'dedicated parking stalls,' including multiple references to two stalls. The pattern is consistent across the building and reinforced by the MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The remarks only say "assigned parking stalls," "reserved parking stalls," and "parking spaces," which indicates use rights but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking fee, monthly parking cost, or parking rental charge. The listings discuss parking availability and assignment, but none specify a parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be available in the building. Several remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking,' 'Guest pkg located half way down,' and 'ample guest parking,' matching the MLS data flag on many listings. The evidence is solid, though slightly less universal than assigned parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list for parking," or similar wording. The remarks mention assigned, reserved, and guest parking, but nothing about a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked specifically for card/fob-based access language such as key card access, fob access, or electronic card readers. The remarks describe gated access with owner-specific codes and monitored surveillance, which supports secure entry but not a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a security patrol or roving patrol service. The remarks only discuss gated access, monitored video surveillance, and secure entry, so there is no evidence of an actual patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is supported by both the MLS history and the remarks. Historical MLS inclusions show ACWIUN in 13 of 17 listings, and one current remark explicitly says a bedroom has a "window A/C unit." The repeated MLS pattern suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Double wall construction appears to be a genuine building feature for Kulana Knolls, supported by 12 of 18 recent listings checking DOUWAL. Public remarks do not explicitly mention it, but the MLS pattern is consistent across multiple listings and agents, making this a strong building-level indicator.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough evidence to support above-ground construction as a building feature. Only 4 of 18 recent listings have the ABOGRO checkbox, and public remarks across the listings do not mention 'above ground' construction or materials, so this appears unverified and likely unreliable in MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators such as vacation rental allowed, NUC/TVU, legal STR, or 30-day minimum rules. The remarks only describe a regular residential gated community and do not indicate short-term rentals are allowed.
I searched for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel-managed language, or rental program mentions. None appear in the remarks, and because STR is not evidenced here, this must be false.
I looked for wording like mandatory participation, required rental program, or cannot opt out. The remarks contain no such language, and there is no evidence of STR or hotel-pool operations in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease, leasehold, and explicit expiration-year wording such as "lease expires 2050" or "ground lease ends." The remarks do not mention leasehold tenure or any lease expiry year, so this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." None of the listings mention VA eligibility or financing terms, so there is no evidence to mark the building as VA-approved.
I searched for HOA insurance or walls-in coverage language, including 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' and 'comprehensive building insurance,' but found no references. Since the remarks do not address insurance coverage and no current value was supplied, this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety evaluation language, inspection pass statements, and compliance wording such as FLSE passed or fire safety certified, but nothing in the remarks indicates that status. With no explicit mention and no current value provided, this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3–4 current listing remarks explicitly cite Diamond Head (quotes include "beautiful Diamond Head views" and "panoramic views—Diamond Head"). Although only 1/16 MLS view_descriptions currently lists DIAHEA, multiple listings from different agents describe Diamond Head vistas, indicating the building does offer Diamond Head views for some units. Evidence appears across several listings rather than a single copy/paste, so inclusion is warranted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is mixed but present: 3 of 18 current listings explicitly show GARDEN in the MLS view field, while 7 show NONE. Multiple remarks reference courtyard, yard, or landscaped-style outdoor areas, though many listings instead advertise ocean, city, or Diamond Head views, suggesting the garden-view signal may apply only to some units and may partly reflect agent copy/paste rather than consistent building-wide marketing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention 'sunrise', 'morning sun', or eastern exposure, and CURRENT MLS data lists 0/16 with SUNRIS (3/16 marked NONE). Given the absence of any supporting remarks and the MLS checkbox being unchecked, confidence is high that the building does not offer advertised sunrise views.
There is limited but real evidence for sunset-related views: 1 of 17 current listings shows SUNSET in the MLS view field, and one remark specifically mentions watching 'the Friday night fireworks from the comfort of home.' Most other listings do not mention sunset, so this looks like a feature present in only some units rather than a building-wide guarantee.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks explicitly say residents can watch Friday night fireworks from home, which directly satisfies the view requirement. This is strong evidence that units in the building have fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is moderate but indirect. Roughly 10 of 18 current listings show RESMAN in the MLS amenities, while the public remarks themselves do not directly mention a resident manager. A few remarks reference an 'on-site office,' but the language looks more like generic community management copy than an explicit resident-manager confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.