Kulalani Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kulalani Village
Building Overview
Kulalani Village in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale, built 1994; no pets and no short-term rentals allowed per MLS data.
About Kulalani Village
Kulalani Village is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood and was built in 1994. Specific information on unit count, building size, and construction type is not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, the property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list additional on-site amenities or common area features.
Parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and the managing company are not specified in the MLS information (management company listed as unknown). Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages (e.g., '80% owner occupied') and found none. A single listing does note 'Owner occupied but easy to show,' which confirms some owner-occupancy but gives no numeric percentage; therefore I cannot supply a percentage and return null with low-to-moderate confidence.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator information (e.g., '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found no references. Because there is no explicit numeric elevator count in the remarks, I cannot infer or change a numeric value and return null with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. No public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' (likely agent checkbox usage), but the majority of MLS entries indicate it is included across multiple listings. Evidence is implied from MLS checkbox consistency rather than explicit remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No MLS listings (0/20) indicate HOTWAT included, while 16 of 20 list WTRHTR (water heater) in the unit inclusions — a strong indicator hot water is provided by unit heaters and not covered by association fees. Public remarks do not mention hot water being included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 current MLS listings list SEWER as included in association fees. Public remarks do not mention sewer explicitly, so the conclusion is primarily driven by consistent MLS checkbox data across multiple listings rather than agent remarks.
18 of 20 current MLS listings indicate WATER is included in association fees. No public remarks explicitly state 'water included' or 'water in HOA', so the determination is based on consistent MLS checkbox data rather than explicit agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly mention a clubhouse/community center—phrases include 'Villages of Kapolei community center and pool', 'community recreation centers', and 'association’s recreation center'. While CLUHOU is checked in 6 of 20 MLS listings, the repeated explicit mentions across different agent remarks support including clubhouse/community center as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 20 current listings have the PATDEC/COVPAT amenity checked, and public remarks across the 20 listings do not describe patios or decks. Remarks repeatedly mention sliding/slider doors to expansive grassy common areas or community lawn (e.g., "sliding door access to an expansive grassy area", "opens directly to a large community lawn", "kitchen slider door opens to a large, grassy common area") but contain no language like "patio", "deck", "lanai", or "covered patio"; evidence points to copy-paste checkbox entries rather than an actual building-level patio/deck amenity.
There are no remarks that reference a jogging or walking path; listings mention parks, greenbelts, community lawns, and recreation centers but never 'jogging path' or 'walking path'. With only 4 of 20 MLS listings checking the WAJOPA box and no corroborating remarks, evidence for a formal jogging/walking path is weak and likely an inconsistent MLS checkbox rather than a verifiable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building provides recreation areas/common amenity spaces: although only 6/20 listings have RECARE checked in MLS, many remarks across listings reference the association recreation center, community pool, and common grassy areas (e.g., "Villages of Kapolei recreation & aquatic center," "association pool and recreation center"), showing consistent building-level recreation area amenities.
Strong evidence across many listings that the building offers recreation rooms: multiple remarks state '3 recreation rooms available to rent' and 'association’s recreation center' and several units note direct access to the Villages of Kapolei Recreation & Aquatic Center. 12 of 20 current MLS listings have the RECROO amenity checked and remarks consistently reference rentable/event recreation rooms and the association recreation center, indicating a building-level recreation room amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings: numerous public remarks reference the community/association pool or Villages of Kapolei Recreation & Aquatic Center, with phrases like "lap pool, kiddie pool, baby pool with shaded seating" and "one of the most well kept pools on the island." This confirms the building/community offers a swimming pool and aligns with MLS checkbox data (18/20 listings).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence: MLS inclusions previously showed 19 of 20 listings include washer/dryer and the current public remarks repeatedly confirm in-unit laundry across multiple listings. Representative quotes include "full-size washer and dryer", "in-unit washer and dryer", and "washer and dryer included", indicating many units have in-unit laundry rather than isolated or erroneous checkbox use.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings include parking features (e.g., OPEN/COVERED/GARAGE/ASSIGN) and numerous public remarks state 'two parking stalls', '2 parking', or 'includes two parking stalls', indicating building-level parking is broadly offered across units. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings.
16 of 20 MLS listings list ASSIGN and multiple public remarks explicitly mention '2 assigned parking stalls' or 'two assigned parking', showing that assigned/reserved parking is a common, building-level feature for many units. The evidence is strong and repeated across numerous listings.
No analysis available
Listings describe assigned/assigned parking stalls (e.g., "two assigned parking stalls") but never call them deeded or included in the deed. Without explicit language, cannot mark as deeded.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' or monetary amounts related to parking; none were found, so monthly parking fee is unknown.
12 of 20 MLS listings include guest parking in parking_features and several public remarks say 'guest parking', 'visitor parking also available', or 'ample guest parking', indicating guest/visitor parking is available in the community. Multiple agents reference visitor parking, providing consistent supporting evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist' language; listings only mention assigned stalls and guest parking, so there is no evidence of a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that units have window air conditioning: MLS checkbox ACWIUN was set in 16 of 20 listings and numerous public remarks (at least 14+ listings) explicitly state "window AC units" or variations like "Window ac in living room and bedrooms" and "new window AC units were installed." Mentions appear across multiple agents and listings rather than being a single mistaken copy/paste, so include window_ac = true with high confidence.
CURRENT MLS: 8/20 listings show CONCRE in construction_materials, but there is no prior confidence history. None of the public remarks mention 'concrete', 'concrete building', or similar. Given the absence of any explicit mentions across multiple agent remarks and the relatively small number of MLS checkboxes, evidence indicates concrete construction is unlikely and the CONCRE flags are probably agent data-entry/copy-paste errors.
14 of 20 current MLS listings have the DOUWAL (double-wall) checkbox checked, but none of the public remarks mention double-wall construction. Evidence is moderate (MLS checkbox majority) but not explicitly confirmed in remarks; consider verifying with owner/agent or site visit for higher confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical: Medium confidence (previous summary ~16/20). CURRENT MLS: 17/20 listings show WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction_materials. No public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or describe framing, so evidence is implied (many MLS checkboxes) rather than explicit; appears consistent across many listings but could be agent bulk entry, hence medium-high implied confidence.
CURRENT MLS: 5/20 listings show ABOGRO in construction_materials, with no prior history. None of the provided public remarks mention 'above ground' construction or similar. Given the lack of any corroborating language across listings and the small number of MLS flags, the ABOGRO entries appear to be erroneous or copy-paste, so the building is treated as not 'above ground' per the feature definition.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Reviewed remarks for explicit STR-permission language and found none. Absence of STR language suggests short-term rentals are not indicated in public remarks.
No evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool; because STRs are not indicated in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
No language indicating mandatory participation in any rental pool. With no evidence of STR or hotel pool, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No evidence in the remarks about ground/land lease or lease expiry year. Unable to determine lease expiry from available public remarks.
Listings explicitly mention VA financing and a VA assumption, indicating the building accepts VA financing. High confidence due to direct mentions in multiple listings.
I searched the public remarks for explicit language indicating the HOA provides full/walls-in building insurance and found no such statements. Because there is no mention and no user verification, I mark fully insured as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed all public remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification and found none. In the absence of any mention and with no current verified value provided, the conservative default is false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 20 current MLS listings list GARDEN in view_descriptions. Multiple public remarks across different listings state unit access or outlooks to "large community lawn," "manicured greenbelt," and "grassy common area," indicating some units do offer garden/courtyard views. Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks (likely genuine unit-level features rather than a single copy/paste), so the building should be listed as offering garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) mention SUNSET or phrases like 'western exposure' or 'evening sun' in remarks; five listings explicitly list View as NONE. With current MLS checkboxes showing no sunset views and no agent remarks describing sunset/west-facing views, there is strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings that the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 current listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox, but public remarks across all listings contain no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. The evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data (multiple agents) with no descriptive confirmation in remarks, so inclusion is plausible but not confirmed — recommend direct verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.