Kulalani Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kulalani Village
Building Overview
Kulalani Village in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale, built 1994; no pets and no short-term rentals allowed per MLS data.
About Kulalani Village
Kulalani Village is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood and was built in 1994. Specific information on unit count, building size, and construction type is not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, the property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list additional on-site amenities or common area features.
Parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and the managing company are not specified in the MLS information (management company listed as unknown). Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or phrases (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found none. One listing notes a single unit is 'Owner occupied', but there is no building-level percentage, so the owner_occupancy is unknown and left null (no guessing).
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator counts or references (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators' or simply 'elevator') and found none. No current numeric value was provided to retain. Per rules, I will not guess a number without explicit evidence in the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings describe assigned/allocated parking stalls but do not state that parking is deeded or owned with the unit. Absence of the word 'deeded' means we cannot mark parking as deeded based on public remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', or dollar amounts for parking; none were present in the public remarks, so monthly parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings discuss assigned stalls and ample guest parking but do not indicate a waitlist system. Absence of mention suggests there is no parking waitlist, but this is not definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the public remarks that short-term rentals are permitted. Given the absence of STR language and no contrary statements, STR allowed is marked false with medium-low confidence.
No public-remarks evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool. As STRs are not indicated, hotel-pool participation is marked false.
No evidence that units are required to participate in a rental/hotel pool; listings describe owner use and community amenities but not mandatory rental programs, so mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public-remarks evidence of a leasehold or any lease expiry year. Searched for explicit four-digit expiry years and lease-renewal language but found none, so the expiry year is unknown.
Public remarks explicitly mention VA financing and a VA assumption in more than one listing. This provides high confidence that VA loans are accepted for units in this building.
I searched the remarks for any indication that the HOA provides full/walls-in building insurance and found no such language. With no explicit mention and no current value to preserve, I report false with medium confidence (absence in remarks implies not stated).
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for any statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar certifications and found none. Because there is no explicit mention and no current value to retain, the absence suggests it is not stated; therefore set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.