Kulalani Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kulalani Village
Building Overview
Kulalani Village in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale, built 1994; no pets and no short-term rentals allowed per MLS data.
About Kulalani Village
Kulalani Village is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood and was built in 1994. Specific information on unit count, building size, and construction type is not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, the property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list additional on-site amenities or common area features.
Parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and the managing company are not specified in the MLS information (management company listed as unknown). Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages such as '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' and found none. One listing notes 'Owner occupied but easy to show,' which suggests at least some owner occupancy, but it does not provide a reliable percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or any spelled-out count and found none. The listings describe ground-floor and split-level townhomes, which do not suggest a building elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 current MLS listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, which strongly suggests common area electricity is included. The public remarks across many listings discuss parking, pools, and recreation access but do not explicitly state the fee covers common electric, so this appears to be MLS-driven rather than remark-confirmed evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings indicates HOTWAT, while 17 of 20 list WTRHTR in inclusions. Across the public remarks, there is no explicit claim that hot water is included in maintenance fees, and the prevalence of WTRHTR supports the interpretation that hot water is not a shared building expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 current MLS listings indicate sewer is included in association fees. The remarks do not directly call this out, but there is no contradictory evidence, and the listing pattern is consistent across many units.
18 of 20 current MLS listings list WATER as included in association fees. Public remarks across the building do not explicitly confirm this, but the repeated MLS inclusion across most listings makes it likely to be correct.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The clubhouse/community center feature is strongly supported across many listings, with well over 10 remarks explicitly referencing the recreation or community center. Multiple agents use similar language such as "recreation center," "community center and pool," and "recreation rooms," which suggests this is a real shared amenity rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence that meeting/conference room facilities are available: the remarks mention '2 event spaces' and '3 recreation rooms available to rent out for parties, conferences, etc.' across the listing text, indicating meeting-room style spaces exist even though this feature lacked prior historical data.
Only a small share of listings (4/20) include the patio/deck-related MLS amenity, and the remarks generally imply outdoor access instead of directly naming a patio or deck. Phrases like "sliding door opens directly to an expansive grassy area" and "opens to a large, grassy common area" are supportive but indirect, so confidence is moderate-low rather than strong.
No current public remarks reference a jogging or walking path. Listings describe greenbelts, expansive grassy common areas, parks, and recreation centers but never 'jogging path'/'walking path' or similar; given prior low confidence (5/20 MLS checks) agents likely mis-checked the box, so the building does not appear to offer a dedicated jogging/walking path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building provides recreation areas/common amenity spaces: although only 6/20 listings have RECARE checked in MLS, many remarks across listings reference the association recreation center, community pool, and common grassy areas (e.g., "Villages of Kapolei recreation & aquatic center," "association pool and recreation center"), showing consistent building-level recreation area amenities.
Strong evidence the building/community offers recreation rooms: the remarks repeatedly reference the Villages of Kapolei Recreation & Aquatic Center and state 'recreation rooms for rent' and '3 recreation rooms available to rent out for parties, conferences, etc.' Combined with historical high-confidence MLS data (many prior listings), this is well supported across agents rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms the building/community has pool access. At least 10+ remarks explicitly mention a pool or aquatic center, and the wording is consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. The MLS history is also highly consistent, with 18 of 20 listings showing pool-related amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the listing set that this building offers in-unit laundry. Roughly 10+ current remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including multiple agents saying "in-unit washer & dryer," "full-size washer/dryer," and "washer and dryer included in unit," which confirms the high-confidence MLS data rather than looking like a mistaken checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. All 20 current MLS listings include parking features, and numerous remarks explicitly reference "two assigned parking stalls," "2 parking stalls," or parking located right in front of the home. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be repeated by multiple agents, not a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is well supported for this building. Sixteen of 20 current MLS listings include ASSIGN, and the remarks repeatedly say things like "two assigned parking stalls," "2 ASSIGNED PARKING," and "one right in front of the unit." The recurring language across many listings strongly suggests assigned/reserved parking is a common building feature.
No analysis available
I looked for deeded/owned parking language, including phrases like deeded stall, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only mention assigned stalls and visitor parking, so deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I searched for any separate parking charge, rental, or monthly fee and found no mention of one. The listings only refer to assigned and guest parking, so no parking fee can be confirmed.
Twelve of 20 MLS listings include guest parking and several remarks explicitly reference 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking also available' (examples: 'many guest parking stalls', 'visitor parking also available', 'ample guest parking throughout the community'). Evidence is consistent across numerous listings, indicating on-site guest/visitor parking is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to parking waitlists, waiting lists, or joining a list for parking. The remarks discuss assigned stalls and guest parking only, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence that this building has window air conditioning units. Multiple recent listings explicitly mention window AC, window AC’s, or new window AC units in the living room and bedrooms, across different agents and unit types. This aligns with the prior MLS pattern showing ACWIUN in 18/20 listings, so the feature should remain included.
Moderate evidence that part of the building is concrete: 9 of 20 current MLS listings include CONCRE in construction_materials. Public remarks across the provided listings do not mention concrete or structural materials, suggesting the CONCRE entries may reflect mixed-material construction or inconsistent agent entry rather than uniformly concrete construction.
There is moderate MLS checkbox support for double-wall construction: 13 of 20 current listings have DOUWAL checked. However, the public remarks are silent on double-wall construction, so this appears to rely mainly on MLS data and may reflect copy-paste usage rather than explicit confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The slab foundation indicator is not supported by the public remarks and appears only in 3 of 20 current MLS listings. That is far too limited to treat as a reliable building-level feature, so it should not be considered established from the available evidence.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building is wood-frame construction. 18 of 20 current listings are marked WOOFRA, and none of the public remarks contradict that. The consistency across listings suggests this is building-level data rather than a one-off agent error.
Limited evidence for 'above ground' construction: 6 of 20 current MLS listings include ABOGRO, but the public remarks across listings do not mention above-ground materials or recent structural changes. This suggests some listings mark the feature but it is not widely documented in remarks and should be treated as possible but unconfirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental language such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental permissions. Nothing in the public remarks indicates STR is allowed, so this is treated as false based on absence of evidence.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton pool, or similar programs and found none. Since STR is not evidenced here, hotel pool participation must also be false.
I searched for mandatory participation language like must rent, required to participate, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. With no evidence of STR or a rental program, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expiry years, ground lease end dates, renewal dates, or phrases like "lease expires" and found nothing. Since no specific year is provided, this remains unknown.
Multiple listings directly mention VA financing, which is strong evidence the building is VA-approved or otherwise accepts VA loans. The references are explicit and repeated, so this is a high-confidence true.
I searched the remarks for explicit walls-in coverage, fully insured HOA, full insurance, or similar language and found no evidence. The listings do not discuss HOA insurance coverage at all, so there is no public-remarks basis to mark this true.
No analysis available
I looked for any statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, or passed fire inspection language and found nothing. The remarks focus on unit features and community amenities, not building safety certification.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 20 current MLS listings list GARDEN in view_descriptions. Multiple public remarks across different listings state unit access or outlooks to "large community lawn," "manicured greenbelt," and "grassy common area," indicating some units do offer garden/courtyard views. Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks (likely genuine unit-level features rather than a single copy/paste), so the building should be listed as offering garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention sunset views, evening sun, western exposure, or fireworks, and the current MLS view data explicitly trends to NONE for many listings. Across the remarks, the building is described with greenbelt, grassy common-area, and breeze-oriented settings rather than sunset-facing views, so there is no evidence supporting this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes show RESMAN on 15 of 20 listings, but 0 of the public remarks mention a resident or on-site manager (no phrases such as 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'). Given the medium historical confidence and complete absence in remarks across many agents, there is weak evidence the building actually lists a resident manager; the checkbox entries appear to be copy/paste rather than confirmed amenity statements.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.