Kuilima Ests West
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kuilima Ests West
Building Overview
Kuilima Ests West in Koolauloa — built 1973; pets and short-term rentals not allowed, management company unknown.
About Kuilima Ests West
Kuilima Ests West is located in the Koolauloa neighborhood and was built in 1973. Based on available MLS data, specific details such as unit count, building size, and construction type are not provided in the records supplied.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data lists the management company as unknown. No additional amenity or common-area information is included in the provided MLS summary.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers — including parking provisions, maintenance fees, special assessments, and on-site amenities — are not available in the supplied MLS data. Prospective buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or managing entity and confirm any information obtained from MLS sources.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy percentages or qualitative phrases such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied' and found none. One listing mentions a specific unit being 'owner-occupied in the main area,' but that is unit-level occupancy, not a building-wide owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevator,' 'multiple elevators,' or a count like '4 elevators' and found none. Because there is no building-wide elevator language in the remarks, I cannot confirm the number of elevators from this data.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
11 of 20 current MLS listings have CABTV checked; 0 public remarks mention 'cable included' or similar. Evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears to be agent-entered (no corroborating remarks), so inclusion is plausible but not explicitly confirmed in the remarks.
15 of 20 MLS records have common-area electricity checked; 0 agent remarks reference 'common area electricity' or 'building power included.' The checkbox prevalence across listings supports inclusion but the lack of explicit remarks suggests agent copy/paste may be a factor.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
HOTWAT is checked in 4/20 MLS listings and WTRHTR appears in 10/20 unit inclusions; 0 public remarks mention 'hot water included.' The balance of evidence (many units showing individual water heaters and no remarks confirming building-supplied hot water) suggests hot water is likely not included in the maintenance fee, but confirmation is modest.
6 of 20 MLS records check 'internet service included' and 0 public remarks mention internet/wifi being included in HOA fees. The low checkbox rate across listings and absence of remark confirmation indicate internet is probably not included in the maintenance fee for this building.
No analysis available
17 of 20 MLS listings have 'sewer included' checked; 0 public remarks explicitly reference sewer being included. The consistent MLS checkbox across many listings supports that sewer is included in association fees, but agent remarks do not provide direct confirmation.
16 of 20 MLS records have 'water included' checked; 0 public remarks explicitly mention water being included in HOA fees. The MLS checkbox consistency across listings suggests water is included in the maintenance fee, though agent remarks do not explicitly confirm it.
Strong evidence across listings that the community offers BBQ facilities: 17 of 20 current MLS listings have the BBQ amenity checked and numerous remarks state 'BBQ areas', 'BBQ pavilions', or 'BBQ'. Mentions appear across many agent remarks (not isolated), supporting inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence for a clubhouse/community center: 7 of 20 listings have the CLUHOU amenity checked and multiple remarks mention 'clubhouse', 'club house', or a 'community recreation area'. Mentions are explicit but less frequent across listings than tennis or BBQ.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building has patios/decks: 19 of 20 current MLS entries list PATDEC/COVPAT and numerous public remarks explicitly reference outdoor spaces—examples include 'screened lanai', 'private lanai', 'covered lanai with serene golf course views', and 'private patio area featuring a spa, BBQ'. Mentions appear across many listings/agents (not limited to a single ad), indicating a building-level amenity rather than an isolated unit feature.
Strong evidence the property offers jogging/walking paths: 13 of 20 current MLS listings have the WAJOPA amenity checked and numerous remarks explicitly state 'walking paths', 'jogging and biking paths', or 'walking trails', appearing consistently across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence that a shared recreation area exists: 8 of 20 MLS listings list RECARE, and the remarks include phrases like 'community recreation area' and 'recreation area' in several listings. While supported by both MLS and remarks, the signal is weaker than for tennis courts and may reflect selective or varying agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and similar amenity descriptions. The remarks mention surfing and beach access, but nothing about dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
Very strong evidence the property offers tennis courts: 19 of 20 current MLS listings have the TENCOU amenity checked and almost every public remark references 'tennis courts' (frequently with 'pickleball'), showing consistent confirmation across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that Kuilima Estates West has multiple swimming pools. Remarks repeatedly state "multiple pools," "two swimming pools," and "three pools" in numerous agent write-ups, and CURRENT MLS data shows 19/20 listings with the pool amenity checked—consistent across multiple agents rather than a single outlier.
There is no substantive evidence that the building's pools are heated: agent remarks never say "heated pool" or "heated swimming pool," pool_features show 0/20 with HEATED, and only 1/20 listings include a HEAPOO amenity flag. This is inconclusive but leans toward no heated pools.
I searched for "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," and similar wording. The listings mention multiple swimming pools, but none specify that they are saltwater.
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: MLS inclusions list washer/dryer on 18 of 20 current listings and numerous public remarks across different agents explicitly say 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'full-size washer and dryer', or 'just installed brand new washer/dryer'. These confirmations appear in many distinct listings rather than a single copy/paste, supporting high confidence that the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I looked for indicators of paid community laundry such as coin-op, card-operated, quarters, or laundry fees. The public remarks do not mention any shared laundry system at all, only in-unit laundry.
I searched for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar floor-by-floor community laundry references. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer or full-size washer and dryer, not shared laundry facilities on every floor.
All 20 MLS records indicate parking (OPEN/CO/GARAGE/ASSIGN/UNASSI) and none show 'NONE'. Remarks repeatedly mention parking and guest parking (e.g., 'ample guest parking', 'parking'), so building-level parking availability is strongly supported across listings and agents.
Majority of MLS checkbox data (16 of 20) list ASSIGN and remarks explicitly reference 'Assigned Parking Stall' and 'Assigned Parking Stall + Extra Guest Parking'. Evidence is consistent across many listings and agent remarks, supporting assigned/reserved parking at the building.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit terms like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The only parking language is about assigned stalls and guest parking, which does not indicate deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking fee, rental cost, or monthly parking charge and found nothing. The remarks describe assigned parking and guest parking, but do not mention any separate parking cost.
15/20 MLS listings flag guest parking and numerous remarks say 'guest parking', 'ample guest parking' or 'extra guest parking'. The combination of MLS prevalence and repeated agent remarks provides strong support that guest parking is available.
MLS shows SECENT in a minority of records (4/20), but many remarks describe the property as a 'gated community' with '24-hour security' or 'gated, secure complex'. While agents often copy/paste, the repeated references to gated/secure access across multiple listings provide moderate (implied) evidence that parking has a secured entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found none. The public remarks do not indicate that parking is controlled by a waitlist.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob, card reader, electronic access, or keycard entry language. The remarks say the community is gated and has 24-hour security, but they do not describe a card/fob access system.
MLS checkbox was checked on 16/20 listings and many agent remarks in the current dataset explicitly state "24-hour security" or "24 hour security" (appearing repeatedly across listings such as "24 hour security", "24-hour security and more", and "gated community with 24-hour security"). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents/listings, so the building-level security guard/24‑hour security feature is included.
I searched for explicit patrol-related wording such as security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building. The listings repeatedly mention 24-hour security and a gated community, but they never specifically say there is patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that units have window air conditioning: MLS checkbox ACWIUN was checked in 15 of 20 listings and at least six separate public remarks explicitly state '2 AC window units' or similar phrases (also several mentions of 'window A/C units in both bedrooms' and 'just installed 2 new AC units'). This appears across multiple listings/agents and aligns with historical MLS data, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
18 of 20 MLS records list DOUWAL (double wall) while none of the listing remarks explicitly reference double-wall construction. The feature is strongly present in MLS checkbox data across agents, but the absence of descriptive confirmation in remarks suggests the evidence is checkbox-driven (possible copy/paste) rather than descriptive confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 4 of 20 MLS records include SLAB and none of the public remarks mention a concrete slab foundation. This yields weak evidence that any units use a slab foundation—MLS checkboxes indicate it may apply to a minority of listings, but the public remarks do not corroborate, so confidence is low.
No analysis available
14 of 20 current MLS records include WOOFRA (wood frame) but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' Evidence comes mainly from MLS checkbox prevalence across multiple listings rather than descriptive agent remarks, so inclusion is likely but not strongly corroborated by the public remarks.
Although ABOGRO appears on 10 of 20 MLS records, public remarks do not mention 'above ground construction' or similar phrasing. Remarks refer to some units being ground-floor, 'perched above the landscape,' and reroofing, but none explicitly confirm above-ground building materials or construction method.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly and explicitly confirm that short-term rentals are allowed in Kuilima Estates West. Listings use phrases such as "legal short-term rental," "legal nightly rental," and "approved for short term rentals with proper registration."
I searched for references to a hotel pool, hotel rental program, or hotel-managed operations and found none. Since the remarks only describe legal STR usage and do not mention a hotel rental pool, this feature is not supported.
I looked for language requiring mandatory participation in any rental pool, such as "must participate" or "cannot opt out," and found none. The remarks instead emphasize owner flexibility and personal use, which is inconsistent with a mandatory hotel pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for a 4-digit lease expiry year or language like "lease expires 20XX," "ground lease ends," or "renewed through" and did not find one. The listings do mention that this is a leasehold sale and that the fee can be purchased, but no specific expiration year is provided.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related wording such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no explicit evidence in the remarks, I cannot confirm VA loan approval for this building.
I searched the remarks for terms like fully insured, walls-in coverage, full insurance, or comprehensive building insurance and found no such language. Nothing in the public remarks confirms that the HOA or building is fully insured.
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings shows the FIRSPR checkbox; none of the public remarks mention 'fire sprinkler', 'sprinkler system', or 'fire suppression'. Given the lack of any remark evidence and the MLS checkbox being unchecked in the vast majority of listings, there is strong evidence the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.
I looked for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, passed fire inspection, or was fire/life safety compliant, but found none. The only related mention was a 2025 reroof using a fire-resistant shingle, which is not evidence of FLSE passage.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks explicitly mention mountain/Koolau views (e.g., 'stunning Koolau Mountain views', 'majestic mountains beyond'). At least four separate listings reference mountain views, and the language is direct rather than implied, indicating building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe lush, well-manicured landscaping and a 'private backyard oasis' and note views of grassy areas and landscaping adjacent to the lanai. While explicit 'garden view' wording is limited, the repeated landscaping/grounds language implies garden/courtyard-type views for some units.
Strong evidence the building offers golf course views: the MLS historically flagged GOLCOU in 14/20 listings and the public remarks repeatedly state location on/adjacent to the Fazio/Arnold Palmer courses and 'golf course' or 'fairway' views (examples: 'positioned on the 1st tee of the Fazio Course', 'lanai with golf course and pool views', 'overlooking the golf course'). Mentions appear across multiple agents and listings, indicating this is a genuine building-level feature rather than isolated copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Many listings explicitly reference sunsets (phrases include 'watch breathtaking sunsets', 'beautiful sunsets', 'nightly sunsets'), and several mention coastline orientation and proximity to sunset viewpoints. This consistent language across listings indicates units in the building offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements that units can watch fireworks from the building or lanai. The remarks discuss sunsets, ocean views, golf course views, and beach access, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The RESMAN checkbox is present on 17 of 20 current MLS listings, indicating multiple agents have marked a resident manager. However, none of the public remarks explicitly state 'resident manager' or similar phrases, so the evidence is predominantly checkbox-based across many listings and appears implied rather than explicitly described in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.