Kuahine
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kuahine
Building Overview
Kuahine in Manoa — concrete building from 1963 with covered parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Kuahine
Kuahine is a concrete residential building located in the Manoa neighborhood, built in 1963. According to available records, the building dates to the early 1960s and is constructed of concrete.
Key features include covered parking for residents. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS-derived data. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided records.
Based on MLS data, covered parking, pet restrictions, and prohibition on short-term rentals are noted; buyers should verify building management, fees, maintenance details, and any other conditions with official sources or the listing agent before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy information, including percentages like '80% owner occupied' or qualitative descriptions such as 'mostly owner occupied,' but found none. The remarks do mention both homeowners and investors as potential buyers, but that does not indicate the actual owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as a count ('4 elevators'), 'multiple elevators,' or similar building-wide elevator language, but found none. The only access clue is that the unit is described as a 'walk-up' on the third floor, which suggests stairs are used, but it does not confirm the building's elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included at the building level based on 6 of 8 MLS listings showing OTCOEX. The public remarks are silent on utilities, and nothing suggests a recent change, so this looks like a consistent MLS feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is strongly supported by the MLS data: 7 of 8 listings check HOTWAT, while only one listing shows WTRHTR. The remarks do not discuss utilities, and there is no indication of a building change, so the historical evidence remains highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported across 7 of 8 MLS listings. Because the remarks do not mention utilities or any service changes, the evidence looks consistent and building-level rather than copy-paste noise.
Water is included according to 7 of 8 MLS listings, which is strong building-level evidence. The public remarks are silent on water service, so there is no basis to treat this as a change or correction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported by the listings: multiple remarks explicitly mention "community laundry," "on-site community laundry," and being located next to the community laundry. This aligns with the prior MLS pattern showing COMLAU across all listings, indicating a consistent shared laundry facility for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly say "one assigned covered parking stall" or "one covered, assigned parking stall," confirming reserved parking for the unit. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern and appears consistent across several listings rather than a one-off checkbox error.
Covered parking is clearly supported. Several listings mention "covered parking stall" and even reference the parking garage, showing this is a building feature rather than a mistaken checkbox. The evidence is repeated across multiple remarks and matches the prior high-confidence MLS data.
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings only describe assigned covered parking, which is not enough to conclude the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any separate parking cost, rental fee, or monthly parking charge. The remarks mention parking stalls and a parking garage, but no explicit fee is stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "join the waitlist," or similar wording. Nothing in the remarks indicates that parking is waitlisted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported across the building: 8 of 8 current listings include CONCRE in construction_materials. The public remarks do not discuss construction type, but the MLS consistency is very strong and does not look like a one-off copy/paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in 4 of 8 current MLS records, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention construction type. This is moderate evidence from the MLS checkbox data only, so it is plausible but not as strongly supported as concrete construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "legal vacation rental," "NUC," or "TVU." The remarks only say the unit may be good for investors, which does not establish that short-term rentals are permitted.
I searched for hotel-pool language like "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or branded pool programs. No such references appear in the remarks, so there is no evidence this building participates in one.
I looked for wording indicating required participation in a rental program, such as "mandatory pool," "must rent through hotel," or "cannot opt out." The remarks contain none of that language, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold terminology tied to the building or ground lease, such as "lease expires [year]," "ground lease ends," or "renewed through [year]." The remarks only mention a unit lease ending on 7/31, which does not establish the building's land tenure expiration year.
I searched for explicit language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no public remark indicating VA eligibility, there is no evidence to support this feature.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related language indicating full HOA coverage or walls-in insurance, such as 'fully insured' or 'full insurance,' but found no such wording. Since the remarks do not address insurance coverage, this cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for any statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection, or similar certification, and found nothing in the remarks. There is no explicit mention of FLSE, fire safety compliance, or a passed inspection.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence that some units may offer city views: 1 of 8 current MLS entries lists CITY in the view description. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention city, downtown, or urban views, so this looks like a possible but unconfirmed building feature rather than a consistently advertised one.
No analysis available
Across the listing set, there is no remark-based evidence of garden views, and 6 of 7 MLS records explicitly show NONE for view descriptions. One listing shows GARDEN in MLS data, but it is not reinforced by any of the public remarks, so the balance of evidence indicates this building does not offer garden-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.