Kuahine
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kuahine
Building Overview
Kuahine in Manoa — concrete building from 1963 with covered parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Kuahine
Kuahine is a concrete residential building located in the Manoa neighborhood, built in 1963. According to available records, the building dates to the early 1960s and is constructed of concrete.
Key features include covered parking for residents. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS-derived data. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided records.
Based on MLS data, covered parking, pet restrictions, and prohibition on short-term rentals are noted; buyers should verify building management, fees, maintenance details, and any other conditions with official sources or the listing agent before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention homeowners, investors, and tenant occupancy of the listed unit, but these statements do not establish the building-wide owner-occupancy rate. No explicit percentage or qualitative owner-occupancy description was found.
The remarks describe the unit as a walk-up and reference stairs, but this does not establish the building's elevator count. No phrases such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators' were found.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included at the building level based on 6 of 8 MLS listings showing OTCOEX. The public remarks are silent on utilities, and nothing suggests a recent change, so this looks like a consistent MLS feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is strongly supported by the MLS data: 7 of 8 listings check HOTWAT, while only one listing shows WTRHTR. The remarks do not discuss utilities, and there is no indication of a building change, so the historical evidence remains highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported across 7 of 8 MLS listings. Because the remarks do not mention utilities or any service changes, the evidence looks consistent and building-level rather than copy-paste noise.
Water is included according to 7 of 8 MLS listings, which is strong building-level evidence. The public remarks are silent on water service, so there is no basis to treat this as a change or correction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported by the listings: multiple remarks explicitly mention "community laundry," "on-site community laundry," and being located next to the community laundry. This aligns with the prior MLS pattern showing COMLAU across all listings, indicating a consistent shared laundry facility for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building: at least five listings mention an assigned or included parking stall or parking garage. Key phrases include "one assigned parking stall," "1 parking stall," and "one floor above the parking garage," consistent with the 8/8 MLS parking-feature records.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly say "one assigned covered parking stall" or "one covered, assigned parking stall," confirming reserved parking for the unit. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern and appears consistent across several listings rather than a one-off checkbox error.
Covered parking is clearly supported by several independent listing remarks, including "covered, assigned parking stall," "covered parking stall," and a unit located above the "parking garage." This aligns with 5 of 8 current MLS records identifying covered or garage parking and confirms the prior high-confidence feature.
Multiple listings describe one assigned, covered, or included parking stall. None say the stall is deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed, so deeded parking is not established.
No analysis available
The remarks reference assigned and covered parking but provide no monthly parking fee, rental charge, or additional cost. The parking fee is therefore unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting-list, and join-the-waitlist language. The listings describe assigned parking but do not indicate that a waitlist exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported across the building: 8 of 8 current listings include CONCRE in construction_materials. The public remarks do not discuss construction type, but the MLS consistency is very strong and does not look like a one-off copy/paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in 4 of 8 current MLS records, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention construction type. This is moderate evidence from the MLS checkbox data only, so it is plausible but not as strongly supported as concrete construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention homeowners, investors, rental income, and a month-to-month tenant, but do not state that short-term rentals, vacation rentals, NUCs, or TVUs are allowed. Short-term-rental permission is therefore not established.
The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, branded hotel operation, or managed rental program. Because STR permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is also false.
I found no statement that owners must participate in a hotel pool, must use a rental program, or cannot opt out. Since STR permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, land lease, ground lease, lease expiration, and renewal language. None of the remarks identify a lease expiry year, so the expiry date is unknown.
The remarks do not mention VA approval, VA financing, or acceptance of VA loans. Therefore, there is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA approved.
The remarks do not describe the HOA's insurance coverage or confirm walls-in insurance. With no current verified value and no relevant language, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks contain no explicit statement that the building passed a fire or life safety evaluation. Because there is no current verified value and no supporting mention, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence that some units may offer city views: 1 of 8 current MLS entries lists CITY in the view description. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention city, downtown, or urban views, so this looks like a possible but unconfirmed building feature rather than a consistently advertised one.
No analysis available
Across the listing set, there is no remark-based evidence of garden views, and 6 of 7 MLS records explicitly show NONE for view descriptions. One listing shows GARDEN in MLS data, but it is not reinforced by any of the public remarks, so the balance of evidence indicates this building does not offer garden-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.