
Kokea Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kokea Gardens
Building Overview
Kokea Gardens in Kalihi-Palama — concrete construction, window air conditioning. Assigned parking; no pets or short-term rentals allowed.

About Kokea Gardens
Kokea Gardens is located in the Kalihi-Palama neighborhood and was built in 1959. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and units are served by window air conditioning.
Based on MLS data, key features include assigned parking availability. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. Management company details are listed as unknown in the available records.
Buyers should verify all information with their broker or the managing entity, as this summary is based on MLS data only and may not reflect recent changes to policies, management, or building systems.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit owner-occupancy percentage, such as "80% owner occupied," or qualitative statements like "majority owner occupied," but found none. The remarks do not provide a unit mix or occupancy profile, so the percentage cannot be determined from these listings.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "elevator," "elevators," "four elevators," and other access-related descriptions, but found none. The listings repeatedly describe the units as corner, top-floor, or ground-floor walk-up style units and mention stairway proximity, which does not confirm any elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to include common-area electricity in maintenance fees based on 13 of 18 MLS listings showing OTCOEX. Public remarks do not explicitly mention it, so the evidence is primarily the repeated MLS association-fee data. This looks like a building-level checkbox pattern rather than copy-paste noise because it appears in the majority of listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported as an included maintenance-fee item: 0 of 18 current MLS listings mark HOTWAT, and many instead note WTRHTR. Several remarks mention a water heater or in-unit washer/sink setup, which is consistent with individual water heating rather than included building hot water. This is strong negative evidence across the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fees, with 15 of 18 current listings checking SEWER. The remarks do not suggest any separate sewer billing or exception. This is a strong, consistent MLS pattern across multiple listings.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fees, with 15 of 18 current listings marking WATER as included. None of the remarks indicate separate water billing, and the pattern is consistent across multiple listings. This is strong building-level evidence rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck access is strongly supported by the remarks: many listings mention a “spacious lanai,” “open lanai,” “open back lanai,” or a “nice patio area.” At least 10+ listings reference some form of outdoor lanai/patio space, making this a consistent building feature rather than an isolated unit detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports in-unit laundry at Kokea Gardens. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings mention washer/dryer or laundry space in the unit/lanai, and the current MLS data shows 15 of 18 listings include WASHER/DRYER. This appears consistent across several agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at Kokea Gardens. Across the remarks, many listings mention "1 assigned parking," "assigned uncovered parking stall," or similar phrasing, and the MLS data shows parking features present in all current listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents, not just copy-paste noise.
Assigned parking is strongly supported at Kokea Gardens. Multiple remarks explicitly use phrases like "assigned parking" and "assigned uncovered parking stall," matching the MLS ASSIGN flag in a majority of listings. The evidence is consistent across several listings and agents.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded, owned parking, parking included in deed, or owned stall wording. The listings consistently describe assigned stalls only, which is not the same as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any separate parking charge, parking rental, or monthly fee language. The remarks mention assigned parking but do not state any cost, so no fee can be extracted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or instructions to join a waitlist. Nothing suggests a waitlist system for parking in these listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is mentioned in multiple listings, including phrasing like "the largest bedroom features a window AC unit" and "the largest bedroom boasts a window AC unit." That said, other remarks describe the unit as breezy enough to not need AC, so this appears to be a feature of some units rather than the entire building. The MLS checkbox data (6/18 listings) and the repeated remarks are consistent enough to include it.
Concrete construction appears to be the building’s primary material. MLS data shows 15 of 18 listings with CONCRE, and none of the remarks suggest a different primary construction type, so this is high-confidence and likely consistent across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not substantiated by the remarks. Only 6 of 18 MLS records check ABOGRO, and no listings explicitly describe the building as above-ground, so this appears to be low-confidence MLS checkbox data.
Brick is not supported by the public remarks. With only 5 of 18 listings checking BRICK and no listing text describing brick exterior or brick-and-mortar construction, the evidence is weak and may reflect inconsistent agent entry.
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental language, and found none. There is also no wording suggesting a 30-day minimum exception or similar STR permission.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, Hilton pool, or similar branding. No such remarks were present, and there is no evidence that this building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I searched for mandatory participation language like required to participate, cannot opt out, or must be in rental program. Because no hotel pool program appears in the remarks, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like lease expires, ground lease ends, land lease to, or a 4-digit expiry year tied to the property. Nothing in the remarks indicates leasehold status or a lease expiration date, so the expiry year is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any VA-related language such as VA approved or VA financing and found none. With no explicit evidence, VA loan approval cannot be confirmed from the listings.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related language such as "fully insured," "walls-in coverage," or similar HOA insurance statements, and found nothing. The listings focus on unit condition and location, so there is no evidence to confirm the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit reference to a fire/life safety evaluation passing status, certification, or recent fire inspection results, but none appeared in the remarks. Because this status is only confirmed by explicit public remarks and there is no such wording here, it remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the current listings, there are no explicit sunset-view mentions and most view fields are marked NONE. Remarks repeatedly mention "bright and breezy," "cool breeze," and "natural light," but not sunset, western exposure, or evening sun. This suggests the building does not offer sunset views, and the MLS data appears consistent rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, none of the public remarks mention a resident manager on-site or any equivalent phrase. The only supporting signal is the MLS amenity checkbox appearing in 2/18 listings, which is too sparse to overcome the absence of corroborating remarks and is consistent with agent copy/paste errors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.