King Manor
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
King Manor
Building Overview
King Manor in Downtown-Chinatown (1969) — concrete construction with a pool and on-site resident manager.
About King Manor
Based on MLS data, King Manor is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1969 and is of concrete construction. Size details (number of units or floors) are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key on-site features include a pool and a resident manager. No other common-area amenities are listed in the provided data.
Additional details from the MLS indicate covered, assigned parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. According to available records, buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, fees, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks include phrases like 'ideal for owner-occupants' and 'perfect for Owner Occupants,' but no explicit owner-occupancy percentage is provided. Because owner_occupancy is numeric and there is no explicit number, the percentage is unknown.
No explicit elevator count appears in any of the listing remarks. Because elevators is a numeric field and there is no explicit number, we cannot infer a value and therefore leave it as unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: All 4/4 current MLS listings show CABTV in association_fee_includes, and there is no contrary remark suggesting cable is excluded from maintenance fees.
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (other common expenses) in association_fee_includes, which is standard for condos and is consistently applied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: All 4/4 current MLS listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and none list a separate hot water heater inclusion that would suggest individual responsibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 current MLS listings show SEWER in association_fee_includes with no conflicting information in remarks.
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 current MLS listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, with no mention of separate water billing in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: The 2nd listing mentions 'building amenities including a ... sauna' and the 4th states 'Building features pool, sauna', and 3/4 MLS entries include SAUNA in amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 84%: All 4/4 MLS listings include TRACHU in amenities; although not mentioned in remarks, trash chutes are standard in Honolulu high-rises of this type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: The 2nd listing explicitly notes 'building amenities including a pool' and the 4th states 'Building features pool', and 4/4 MLS entries include POOL-related codes in amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: Three separate remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry: 'including washer/dryer', 'rare convenience of a new in-unit washer and dryer', and 'in-unit washer/dryer', and 4/4 MLS inclusions list WASHER/DRYER.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 MLS listings have ASSIGN in parking_features, and remarks repeatedly reference 'one parking' or 'one ... parking comes with unit', consistent with assigned stall(s) in a condo garage.
Confidence 96%: All 4/4 MLS listings show covered/garage-related parking codes, and remarks explicitly state 'covered parking' and 'One covered secured parking comes with unit'.
Several remarks explicitly state '4 deeded parking stalls' (penthouse) and others consistently mention an assigned/covered/secured parking stall that 'comes with unit.' This indicates at least some parking stalls in the building are deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking charge', or dollar amounts for parking but found no references. Parking fees (if any) are not specified in these public remarks.
No analysis available
Confidence 96%: All 4/4 MLS listings have SECENT in parking_features, and remarks mention 'One covered secured parking' and 'gated parking', indicating controlled access to the parking area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or joining a waitlist and found none. Absence of mention suggests no advertised waitlist in these listings, but this is not definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 80%: Remarks mention "24/7 security" for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 MLS listings specify CONCRE in construction_materials, consistent with typical Honolulu mid/high-rise condo construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 78%: 2/4 MLS listings include SLAB in construction_materials, suggesting a slab foundation, and this is common for concrete Honolulu condo buildings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 80%: 2/4 MLS listings explicitly code ABOGRO in construction_materials, and the building is a multi-story Honolulu condo (units like #704, #707), which by nature is above-ground construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for explicit language permitting STRs (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'TVU', 'vacation rental allowed') and found none. Listings mention leasing/rental applications for longer-term rentals, so STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is assumed not stated.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or hotel-managed rentals; none were found. Since STR allowance isn't mentioned, there is no evidence of hotel rental pool participation.
I looked for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or conversely 'optional'—no such statements were found. With no evidence of STR or hotel pool, mandatory participation is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'ground lease', and specific years; none were found. Therefore the lease expiry year is unknown from these remarks.
Multiple listings explicitly reference VA approval and an assumable VA loan with specific balances/rates. This is clear, direct evidence that the building is VA loan approved/assumable.
I searched the remarks for terms indicating HOA provides full building/walls-in insurance (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance'). There were no such statements, so there is no evidence the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
There is a reference to a 'Fire Safety/Alarm project approved in 2022,' which indicates work or approvals related to fire systems, but no explicit phrase such as 'FLSE passed' or 'fire life safety evaluation passed' was found. Absent an explicit statement, we cannot mark the FLSE as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: The 2nd listing states 'private lanai overlooking the city', showing that at least some units have a city view, even though MLS view_descriptions omit CITY on current entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.