King Manor
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
King Manor
Building Overview
King Manor in Downtown-Chinatown (1969) — concrete construction with a pool and on-site resident manager.
About King Manor
Based on MLS data, King Manor is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1969 and is of concrete construction. Size details (number of units or floors) are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key on-site features include a pool and a resident manager. No other common-area amenities are listed in the provided data.
Additional details from the MLS indicate covered, assigned parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. According to available records, buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, fees, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for direct occupancy indicators such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or other explicit owner-occupancy language, but none appeared. The remarks only suggest the building is suitable for owner-occupants or investors, which does not quantify occupancy.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a count like "4 elevators," but found none. Because this is rarely included in MLS remarks, there is no basis to assign a number from the provided text.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: All 4/4 current MLS listings show CABTV in association_fee_includes, and there is no contrary remark suggesting cable is excluded from maintenance fees.
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (other common expenses) in association_fee_includes, which is standard for condos and is consistently applied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: All 4/4 current MLS listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and none list a separate hot water heater inclusion that would suggest individual responsibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 current MLS listings show SEWER in association_fee_includes with no conflicting information in remarks.
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 current MLS listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, with no mention of separate water billing in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: The 2nd listing mentions 'building amenities including a ... sauna' and the 4th states 'Building features pool, sauna', and 3/4 MLS entries include SAUNA in amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 84%: All 4/4 MLS listings include TRACHU in amenities; although not mentioned in remarks, trash chutes are standard in Honolulu high-rises of this type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: The 2nd listing explicitly notes 'building amenities including a pool' and the 4th states 'Building features pool', and 4/4 MLS entries include POOL-related codes in amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: Three separate remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry: 'including washer/dryer', 'rare convenience of a new in-unit washer and dryer', and 'in-unit washer/dryer', and 4/4 MLS inclusions list WASHER/DRYER.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 MLS listings have ASSIGN in parking_features, and remarks repeatedly reference 'one parking' or 'one ... parking comes with unit', consistent with assigned stall(s) in a condo garage.
Confidence 96%: All 4/4 MLS listings show covered/garage-related parking codes, and remarks explicitly state 'covered parking' and 'One covered secured parking comes with unit'.
The remarks clearly indicate that parking is deeded/owned with the unit. I also saw other parking references, but the explicit deeded-stalls language is the key evidence.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee disclosures, monthly parking charges, and parking rental language, but none were provided. The listings mention assigned, covered, and secured stalls, but not any separate parking cost.
No analysis available
Confidence 96%: All 4/4 MLS listings have SECENT in parking_features, and remarks mention 'One covered secured parking' and 'gated parking', indicating controlled access to the parking area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking and found nothing. The listings describe assigned and deeded stalls instead, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 80%: Remarks mention "24/7 security" for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: All 4/4 MLS listings specify CONCRE in construction_materials, consistent with typical Honolulu mid/high-rise condo construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 78%: 2/4 MLS listings include SLAB in construction_materials, suggesting a slab foundation, and this is common for concrete Honolulu condo buildings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 80%: 2/4 MLS listings explicitly code ABOGRO in construction_materials, and the building is a multi-story Honolulu condo (units like #704, #707), which by nature is above-ground construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR approval language such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or legal STR references and found none. The remarks also do not suggest any rental-program language that would indicate building-level STR permission.
I looked for Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style pool references, hotel rental programs, or managed rental-pool language and found nothing. Because there is no evidence that STRs are allowed, a hotel pool is not supported.
I searched for mandatory hotel-pool language such as required participation, must rent, or cannot opt out and found none. There is also no evidence that the building even permits STRs, so mandatory pooling is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold wording such as lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold, renewed through, or expiry dates, but found nothing. Since no specific year is stated, this remains unknown.
The public remarks strongly support VA financing approval. I found direct references to VA assumable loans and an explicit statement that the building is VA approved.
I searched for insurance-related language such as "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," and similar phrases, but found nothing. The remarks do mention monthly payment including taxes and insurance for a loan, which is unrelated to HOA building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
The remarks include direct fire-safety compliance language, specifically that the "Fire Safety/Alarm project [was] approved in 2022." While not phrased exactly as FLSE, this is strong evidence of fire/life safety approval or pass-related compliance. I looked for FLSE, passed fire inspection, fire safety certified, and similar terms; this was the clearest relevant mention.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: The 2nd listing states 'private lanai overlooking the city', showing that at least some units have a city view, even though MLS view_descriptions omit CITY on current entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.