Keolu at Koa Ridge Phase I
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Keolu at Koa Ridge Phase I
Building Overview
Keolu at Koa Ridge Phase I in Mililani-Waipio, built 2025; window A/C, assigned and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Keolu at Koa Ridge Phase I
Keolu at Koa Ridge Phase I is a residential building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood, completed in 2025. Based on MLS data, specific information about unit sizes and construction type is not provided in the available records.
According to available records, the building uses window air conditioning and the management company is listed as unknown. The MLS data indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are prohibited.
Parking provisions noted in the MLS include assigned parking and guest parking. Information about maintenance fees, special assessments, or other HOA details was not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I checked the remarks for any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative description, but there was no mention. Since this is a numeric field and there is no explicit evidence to use, the value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator reference, including numeric counts and generic wording, but found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no current value to preserve, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS association_fee_includes currently lists INTSER on 4/4 listings, but public remarks across all four listings contain no mention of internet, WiFi, or 'internet included'. Because there is no prior/historical confirmation and no remarks describing the service, this appears to be an unchecked claim by agents (likely copy/paste), so we exclude internet as included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
MLS association_fee_includes currently lists SEWER on 4/4 listings, yet none of the public remarks reference 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA fees'. With no prior verification and no remarks corroborating this, the evidence for sewer being included in maintenance is weak and likely a checkbox error, so we exclude it.
MLS association_fee_includes currently lists WATER on 4/4 listings, but none of the public remarks mention 'water included' or similar language. Because historical data is absent and public remarks provide no confirmation, the inclusion of water in maintenance fees is not supported by remarks and is therefore excluded.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across all four listings that the building provides parking. MLS parking_features are set on all listings and each public remark repeats "2 dedicated parking spaces," indicating assigned stalls for units rather than an agent checkbox error.
Assigned parking is well supported: every MLS listing includes ASSIGN and the public remarks repeatedly state "2 dedicated parking spaces," which strongly indicates reserved/assigned stalls for the units.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as deeded, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only mention dedicated or assigned stalls, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for any monthly parking cost, parking rental fee, or additional parking charge. The remarks only describe assigned/dedicated parking and do not state any fee.
MLS checkboxes indicate guest parking on all four listings (GUEST present), but public remarks do not mention guest/visitor parking. The presence in MLS across listings suggests guest parking may exist, but lack of remarks means the evidence is moderate and could reflect checklist copy/paste by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or join-waitlist language, but found none. The remarks instead indicate parking is included with the units, with no evidence of a waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 listings for the building mention 'wall A/C units in living room and bedrooms', and the MLS inclusions field ACWIUN is checked on all 4 listings. This consistent, repeated language across every listing indicates the units are provided with wall/window-style air conditioning units and provides high confidence that the building offers window/wall AC.
Only 1 of 4 MLS listings shows 'CONCRE' in construction materials and the historical confidence was Low. None of the four public remarks mention concrete construction (no phrases like 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or 'concrete building'), and the remarks are highly similar across listings, indicating probable copy/paste checkbox error. Given lack of corroborating remarks and low historical confidence, the building is treated as not confirmed concrete construction.
While the MLS checkboxes list double-wall construction on all four entries, none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' With no remark-level confirmation and no prior history, evidence is insufficient to include this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four listings have the STEFRA checkbox, however none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar language. Given the lack of corroborating remarks and no prior historical confidence, the steel-frame claim appears to be unchecked by supporting agent text and is omitted until corroborated.
All four MLS entries include the SLAB checkbox, yet none of the public remarks reference 'concrete slab' or similar foundation descriptions. Because there is no corroborating language in agent remarks and no historical data, slab foundation is omitted until further confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental permission indicators such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, or legal vacation rental language. The remarks do not mention any STR allowance, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted.
I looked for hotel pool references like hotel rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel language. Nothing in the remarks suggests a hotel rental pool exists for this building.
I searched for mandatory participation language such as required rental pool, must be in program, or cannot opt out. The remarks contain no such statements, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease, leasehold, lease expires, and similar land-tenure language, but the remarks do not mention any lease expiry date. Without a specific year, this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like VA approved, VA financing accepted, and VA loans, but found nothing. There is no evidence here to support VA loan approval for this building.
I searched the remarks for full HOA insurance or walls-in coverage language and found nothing. With no explicit insurance statement in the remarks, this feature is treated as not confirmed and set to false.
All 4 listings for this building mention an 'interior sprinkler system' (public remarks repeat the phrase across listings) and the MLS FIRSPR amenity is checked on all 4 entries. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings (likely copy/pasted agent remarks) and aligns with the MLS amenity flags, supporting a high-confidence determination that the building has fire sprinklers.
I looked for language such as FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, and none was present. Sprinklers are a positive safety feature, but they do not confirm the building passed the required evaluation, so this remains false.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current listings list 'MOUNTA' in the MLS view_descriptions (4/4). Public remarks for the units do not mention views, but the consistent, repeated MLS view entry across multiple listings/agents suggests the building offers mountain (mauka/Koolau) views; copy-paste is possible but the uniformity across all listings provides reasonably strong evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.