Kemoo By Lake
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kemoo By Lake
Building Overview
Kemoo By Lake in Wahiawa-Whitmore Village, concrete building (1972) with mountain views, BBQ area and assigned parking.
About Kemoo By Lake
Kemoo By Lake is a residential building located in the Wahiawa-Whitmore Village neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1972 and is of concrete construction. It is noted for mountain views.
Key on-site features include a BBQ area and a resident manager. Units use window air conditioning. Based on MLS data the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is available and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; prospective buyers should verify all details, rules and fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Listings reach floor 10, including penthouse unit 1006, with strong floor-field and unit-number agreement. County records and the state registration also report 10 floors.
County assessor records report 88 residential units, and the state registration independently reports 88 units for this single-building registration. These agree with the currently stored value.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 428. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks confirm that the building has elevators, but none state a number such as 2 or 4. Because the elevator count cannot be determined from the remarks, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in association fees for this building, with 15 of 20 current listings marked OTCOEX. No public remarks explicitly call this out, so this is supported mainly by consistent MLS data rather than agent commentary.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water should not be treated as included here. None of the 20 current listings include HOTWAT, and many explicitly mention WTRHTR (water heater) in the unit, which is a strong indicator against building-supplied hot water being part of the fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is strongly supported as a fee inclusion, with 17 of 20 current listings showing SEWER. There are no remark-level contradictions, and the MLS pattern is consistent enough to treat this as a building-level inclusion.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee for this building, based on 17 of 20 current listings. The remarks are silent on this point, so the evidence is primarily the consistent MLS inclusion data.
Strong evidence the building offers BBQ facilities. Multiple listings mention a shared "BBQ area," "BBQ areas," or "lounge/bbq area," which suggests this is a real common amenity rather than a copy-paste artifact. The current MLS data also shows 18/20 listings checked for BBQ, reinforcing the feature across many agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck is strongly supported by the remarks: well over 10 listings mention a lanai, balcony, or outdoor space, including phrases like "spacious 375 sq. ft. lanai," "extra-large lanai," "large lanai with extra storage," "huge lanai," and "private balcony." The pattern is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS indicates recreation area in 9 of 20 listings. In these remarks at least two listings reference a shared recreation center or lounge (phrases include “recreation center” and “lounge/bbq area”), giving moderate evidence that the building offers a common recreation area, though some agent copy/paste is possible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently mentioned across multiple current listings, not just a single agent remark. Several listings explicitly describe storage associated with the lanai or unit, indicating the building offers storage/locker space that buyers can expect. The evidence aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data and appears to be broadly repeated rather than a one-off copy-paste artifact.
Some remarks mention extra storage cabinets, lanai storage, and nearby beaches or surfing spots. None specifically identify a building facility for storing surfboards.
No analysis available
Moderate MLS-driven evidence supports a trash chute system: 12 of 20 current listings have the TRACHU checkbox checked. However, none of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a trash/garbage chute, so this appears to come from checkbox data rather than descriptive confirmation. Given the current listing volume, it is more likely present than absent, but confidence remains moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings do not describe a swimming pool, saltwater pool, saline pool, or salt pool. The current building context also indicates that the building has no pool.
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings confirms this feature. Multiple remarks explicitly say "full-size washer and dryer in the unit," "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer dryer in unit," and similar phrasing across numerous agents, so this does not look like a copy-paste error. The current remarks align with the historical MLS data showing 20/20 inclusions with washer/dryer.
No analysis available
The listings primarily mention in-unit washers and dryers. No remarks indicate that community laundry exists or requires payment.
The remarks repeatedly describe full-size washers and dryers located inside individual units. No public remark identifies community laundry facilities available on every floor.
Parking is clearly a building-level feature. Across the remarks, many listings mention "assigned parking," "1 parking space included," "parking included," "one covered assigned parking," and "lots of parking," which is consistent with the MLS showing parking features on all 20 listings. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. At least a dozen remarks explicitly reference assigned or reserved stalls, including phrases like "two assigned parking stalls," "assigned parking," and "1 assigned parking stall." The MLS pattern also supports this, with 18 of 20 listings flagged as assigned, indicating this is a real building feature rather than an agent error.
Covered parking is supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings mention "covered parking," "one covered assigned parking," or similar wording, while the current MLS data flags 8 of 20 listings as covered/garage. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and appears repeatedly across listings.
The listings mention covered, assigned, included, and additional rented parking stalls, including statements such as "one assigned parking stall" and "parking included." Assigned or included parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly identify a $75 monthly charge for an additional or second reserved parking stall. This supports a parking fee value of 75 per month.
Guest parking is well supported. Remarks repeatedly say "guest parking," "plenty of guest parking," and "plenty of visitor parking," matching the MLS pattern where 12 of 20 listings include guest parking. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, and instructions to join a parking list. None were found. They instead mention assigned stalls, guest parking, and the ability to rent additional parking through the association.
No analysis available
Multiple listings provide direct evidence of controlled building access, including fob-secured entry and secured elevators. This supports a card/fob access security system.
Across 20 listings, the evidence supports a secure building, but not actual security guard service. Multiple agents mention terms like "secured building," "secured entry," "fob access," and "security door," yet none describe a guard, 24/7 security, or on-site security personnel. Given the sparse checkbox usage (4/20) and the absence of explicit guard language, this feature does not appear verified.
Several listings mention a secured building, security doors, fob access, and secured elevators. These access-control features do not establish that the property has a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Historical data shows ACWIUN on 14 of 20 listings, and one remark explicitly says "window A/C units"; several other listings mention air conditioning generally. The evidence is consistent enough across listings to treat this as a true feature of the building for buyers searching for window AC.
Construction is very likely concrete-based at the building level. The MLS data is highly consistent, with 19 of 20 current listings marked as CONCRE, and none of the public remarks suggest a different construction type. This appears to be stable building-level information rather than agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term rental, vacation rental, STR, NUC, TVU, and minimum-stay language. None appeared; references to investors or rental potential do not establish short-term-rental permission. Accordingly, STR allowance is not supported by the public remarks.
I found no references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because STR participation is not supported and hotel-pool participation requires STR allowance, this is false.
I searched for mandatory-pool and required-rental language and found none. Since no hotel rental pool or allowed STR program is identified, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold, land lease, lease expiry, ground lease, renewal, and four-digit expiration years. None were found. One listing describes the property as fee simple, but no lease-expiry year is provided.
Several separate listings explicitly identify the building as VA approved and reference assumable VA loans. This is strong, repeated public-remarks evidence that VA financing is available.
The available remarks do not discuss the HOA's insurance coverage or whether the building is fully insured. Therefore, there is no public-remark evidence confirming full insurance.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation and fire inspection language, but no relevant statements were found. This does not establish that the building failed an evaluation; it only indicates there is no public-remark evidence confirming passage.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well supported across the current remarks: roughly a dozen listings explicitly say "mountain view," "mountain views," or "mountain panorama." This aligns with the prior high-confidence assessment and looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some building-level evidence for marina-type views from the MLS view data (6 of 20 listings marked MARCAN), but the public remarks themselves are silent on marina/harbor/canal views. Confidence is moderate because this may reflect selective or inconsistent agent entry rather than a universally advertised feature.
I found no current public remarks explicitly mentioning sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure; several instead mention sunsets or mountain/lake views. Combined with the prior high-confidence assessment, this strongly suggests the building should not be marketed for sunrise views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks describe mountain, lake, sunset, and other scenic views, as well as proximity to beaches and North Shore areas. They do not state that fireworks are visible from the units or building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings include RESMAN in amenities, but zero public remarks mention 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or similar phrases. The evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings (possible agent copy/paste), so include the feature with moderate confidence pending direct owner/manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.