Kemoo By Lake
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kemoo By Lake
Building Overview
Kemoo By Lake in Wahiawa-Whitmore Village, concrete building (1972) with mountain views, BBQ area and assigned parking.
About Kemoo By Lake
Kemoo By Lake is a residential building located in the Wahiawa-Whitmore Village neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1972 and is of concrete construction. It is noted for mountain views.
Key on-site features include a BBQ area and a resident manager. Units use window air conditioning. Based on MLS data the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is available and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; prospective buyers should verify all details, rules and fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy information such as a percentage or wording like "highly owner occupied," but the remarks do not provide it. Without a stated percentage or clear ownership concentration, the value is unknown.
I found multiple references confirming the building has elevators, but none of the public remarks provide a specific count such as "2 elevators" or "4 elevators." Because this is a numeric field and no exact number is given, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in association fees for this building, with 15 of 20 current listings marked OTCOEX. No public remarks explicitly call this out, so this is supported mainly by consistent MLS data rather than agent commentary.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water should not be treated as included here. None of the 20 current listings include HOTWAT, and many explicitly mention WTRHTR (water heater) in the unit, which is a strong indicator against building-supplied hot water being part of the fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is strongly supported as a fee inclusion, with 17 of 20 current listings showing SEWER. There are no remark-level contradictions, and the MLS pattern is consistent enough to treat this as a building-level inclusion.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee for this building, based on 17 of 20 current listings. The remarks are silent on this point, so the evidence is primarily the consistent MLS inclusion data.
Strong evidence the building offers BBQ facilities. Multiple listings mention a shared "BBQ area," "BBQ areas," or "lounge/bbq area," which suggests this is a real common amenity rather than a copy-paste artifact. The current MLS data also shows 18/20 listings checked for BBQ, reinforcing the feature across many agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck is strongly supported by the remarks: well over 10 listings mention a lanai, balcony, or outdoor space, including phrases like "spacious 375 sq. ft. lanai," "extra-large lanai," "large lanai with extra storage," "huge lanai," and "private balcony." The pattern is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS indicates recreation area in 9 of 20 listings. In these remarks at least two listings reference a shared recreation center or lounge (phrases include “recreation center” and “lounge/bbq area”), giving moderate evidence that the building offers a common recreation area, though some agent copy/paste is possible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently mentioned across multiple current listings, not just a single agent remark. Several listings explicitly describe storage associated with the lanai or unit, indicating the building offers storage/locker space that buyers can expect. The evidence aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data and appears to be broadly repeated rather than a one-off copy-paste artifact.
I searched for explicit surfboard storage references, including surf storage, board storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage. The remarks mention generic storage cabinets or extra storage, but nothing that specifically indicates surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Moderate MLS-driven evidence supports a trash chute system: 12 of 20 current listings have the TRACHU checkbox checked. However, none of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a trash/garbage chute, so this appears to come from checkbox data rather than descriptive confirmation. Given the current listing volume, it is more likely present than absent, but confidence remains moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found no references to any pool, much less a saltwater or saline pool. Given the current building context says there is no pool, this is very likely false.
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings confirms this feature. Multiple remarks explicitly say "full-size washer and dryer in the unit," "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer dryer in unit," and similar phrasing across numerous agents, so this does not look like a copy-paste error. The current remarks align with the historical MLS data showing 20/20 inclusions with washer/dryer.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating coin laundry, coin-op, card use, quarters, or laundry fees. There were no such references, and the listings instead emphasize in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for explicit floor-by-floor community laundry language such as laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry. Nothing like that appears; instead, the listings consistently advertise in-unit washer/dryer, which points away from shared laundry facilities.
Parking is clearly a building-level feature. Across the remarks, many listings mention "assigned parking," "1 parking space included," "parking included," "one covered assigned parking," and "lots of parking," which is consistent with the MLS showing parking features on all 20 listings. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. At least a dozen remarks explicitly reference assigned or reserved stalls, including phrases like "two assigned parking stalls," "assigned parking," and "1 assigned parking stall." The MLS pattern also supports this, with 18 of 20 listings flagged as assigned, indicating this is a real building feature rather than an agent error.
Covered parking is supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings mention "covered parking," "one covered assigned parking," or similar wording, while the current MLS data flags 8 of 20 listings as covered/garage. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and appears repeatedly across listings.
I looked for explicit language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and did not find it. The remarks only support assigned/included parking, so deeded parking is not established.
No analysis available
The public remarks clearly identify a monthly parking cost for an extra stall. The fee appears repeatedly as $75 per month, so that is the value recorded.
Guest parking is well supported. Remarks repeatedly say "guest parking," "plenty of guest parking," and "plenty of visitor parking," matching the MLS pattern where 12 of 20 listings include guest parking. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for terms like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," and "join waitlist for parking" and found none. The listings instead mention assigned stalls, guest parking, and in some cases renting an additional stall through the association, which suggests parking allocation is handled differently than a waitlist system.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe secured entry and fob/keycard-style access, including 'secured with fob access' and 'security door.' That is strong evidence the building has card/fob access security.
Across 20 listings, the evidence supports a secure building, but not actual security guard service. Multiple agents mention terms like "secured building," "secured entry," "fob access," and "security door," yet none describe a guard, 24/7 security, or on-site security personnel. Given the sparse checkbox usage (4/20) and the absence of explicit guard language, this feature does not appear verified.
I looked for public remarks describing a security patrol service or roving patrol. The listings only mention secured entry, fob access, or a secure building, which is not the same as a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Historical data shows ACWIUN on 14 of 20 listings, and one remark explicitly says "window A/C units"; several other listings mention air conditioning generally. The evidence is consistent enough across listings to treat this as a true feature of the building for buyers searching for window AC.
Construction is very likely concrete-based at the building level. The MLS data is highly consistent, with 19 of 20 current listings marked as CONCRE, and none of the public remarks suggest a different construction type. This appears to be stable building-level information rather than agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the listings for STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "STR permitted," "NUC," "TVU," and vacation-rental wording, but found nothing. Some remarks mention investment potential or separate entrances, but those are not evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so the feature remains unsupported and is treated as false.
I looked for references to hotel rental pools or hotel-managed rental programs and found none. Since STR allowance is not evidenced either, there is no basis to mark hotel-pool participation true.
I searched for wording like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. There is also no evidence of any hotel pool program at all, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or a renewal year and found none. The only relevant tenure language indicates fee simple ownership, so there is no lease-expiry year to extract.
Public remarks clearly support VA financing approval for the building. I found several separate listings referencing VA-approved status and assumable VA financing, which is strong direct evidence.
I looked for any indication that the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage, but the listings do not discuss insurance terms. Since this is only determined from public remarks and none mention it, it remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE pass status and fire inspection references, and found nothing. With no public-remarks evidence, I cannot confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well supported across the current remarks: roughly a dozen listings explicitly say "mountain view," "mountain views," or "mountain panorama." This aligns with the prior high-confidence assessment and looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some building-level evidence for marina-type views from the MLS view data (6 of 20 listings marked MARCAN), but the public remarks themselves are silent on marina/harbor/canal views. Confidence is moderate because this may reflect selective or inconsistent agent entry rather than a universally advertised feature.
I found no current public remarks explicitly mentioning sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure; several instead mention sunsets or mountain/lake views. Combined with the prior high-confidence assessment, this strongly suggests the building should not be marketed for sunrise views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to viewing Friday night fireworks from the building or unit, such as 'watch fireworks from the lanai' or 'fireworks view.' The remarks mention lake, mountain, and sunset views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings include RESMAN in amenities, but zero public remarks mention 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or similar phrases. The evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings (possible agent copy/paste), so include the feature with moderate confidence pending direct owner/manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.