Kealoha Arms
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kealoha Arms
Building Overview
Kealoha Arms in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1970 with concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kealoha Arms
Kealoha Arms is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1970 and is constructed of concrete. Size details such as number of units or floors are not provided in the MLS data.
Key property policies noted in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS listing does not provide information about on-site amenities, common area features, or specific services offered to residents. The management company for the building is listed as unknown in the available records.
Parking, maintenance fees, and other operational details are not specified in the MLS-derived data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify policy, amenity, parking and fee information with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for an owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative statements such as "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so the value remains unknown.
I looked for a stated number of elevators such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators," but the remarks only reference a singular elevator in passing. Because no explicit count is provided, the elevator quantity remains unknown from these listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports cable being included in the maintenance fee. The public remarks explicitly state "including cable and internet," which confirms the MLS checkbox data rather than appearing to be a copy-paste artifact.
There is no public-remarks evidence that common area electricity is included. Since this is a newer MLS-only checkbox signal without remark support, it looks more like a possibly inconsistent data entry than a verified building benefit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence points away from hot water being included in the HOA fee. Multiple current listings include WTRHTR, and none of the public remarks describe hot water service as part of the maintenance fee.
Internet inclusion is directly confirmed in the remarks. The phrase "including cable and internet" is strong firsthand-style evidence and matches the MLS data trend.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears very stable across the building. All current MLS listings show SEWER, and there is no public-remarks evidence suggesting otherwise.
Water inclusion is consistently reported across every current MLS listing. The public remarks do not dispute it, so this appears to be a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 4 current MLS listings indicate TRACHU (trash chute) in amenities. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash, garbage, or refuse chute, so the evidence appears to come from MLS checkbox data rather than agent descriptions. Given the repeated current MLS signals, the building likely has a trash chute system, but confidence is moderate without remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current listings have the pool amenity flagged in MLS, but the public remarks across the sample never mention a pool, swimming pool, or related amenities. Because the remarks are silent and appear to be generic listing copy, this looks like checkbox data rather than verified descriptive evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of the provided remarks explicitly mentions in-unit laundry: 'The washer and dryer are in the unit.' The current MLS data also shows washer/dryer inclusions on 3/4 listings, which reinforces that this is a real building feature and not just agent copy. Confidence is very high because the public remark is direct and matches the MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported. Two public remarks explicitly mention 'one assigned parking stall' / '1 assigned parking unit,' and the current MLS data shows assigned parking in all 4/4 listings. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent note.
Covered parking appears to be present based on the current MLS checkbox data, which is consistent across 4/4 listings. However, none of the public remarks explicitly reference covered stalls, a garage, or a carport, so the evidence from remarks is indirect and likely reflects standard MLS checkbox selection rather than descriptive confirmation.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The remarks only confirm assigned parking, which is not enough to conclude the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking rental, parking charge, or additional monthly parking cost. The remarks only say there is one assigned stall and do not state any separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or similar wording and found nothing. The remarks describe assigned parking but do not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of three current MLS listings includes ACWIUN in inclusions, but none of the three public remarks mention 'window AC', 'window unit' or similar (remarks focus on lanai, breeze, hurricane shutters, in-unit washer/dryer). Evidence is weak and may be due to agent copy/paste, so the building may offer window units but this is uncertain.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 4 of 4 current listings list CONCRE as the construction material. None of the public remarks explicitly discuss the building material, so this appears to be a stable MLS building attribute rather than a copy-paste remark issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for indicators like 'short-term rental allowed,' 'vacation rental,' 'NUC,' or 'TVU,' and found none. Based on the public remarks alone, there is no evidence that STRs are allowed.
I searched for hotel rental pool language such as 'hotel pool,' 'managed by hotel,' or named resort programs and found nothing. Since there is no evidence STR is allowed, this must be false.
I looked for wording like 'mandatory pool,' 'required to participate,' or 'cannot opt out,' and found none. There is also no evidence from the remarks that a short-term rental program exists at all, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'leasehold,' or any 4-digit expiry year, but nothing was stated in the remarks. Without a specific lease year, this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing,' or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Based on the remarks alone, there is no evidence the building is VA loan approved.
I searched for HOA insurance language such as fully insured, fully covered, or walls-in coverage, but the remarks do not mention it. There is no public-remarks evidence to confirm the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing. With no evidence in the public remarks, this cannot be confirmed and is treated as not stated.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 1 listing explicitly mentions mountain-type views via "Punchbowl views." The other remarks focus on location and unit features rather than contradicting the view, so the evidence supports that some units in this building offer mountain views. The MLS data is mixed, but the remark is a clear direct mention rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe a city view, only the building's convenient location near Ala Moana, Kakaako, and Downtown Honolulu. Because the MLS view data is inconsistent and multiple listings show NONE, this appears to be an agent/data-entry issue rather than a confirmed building view feature. Based on the available evidence, city views are not supported with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.