Kealoha Arms
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kealoha Arms
Building Overview
Kealoha Arms in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1970 with concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kealoha Arms
Kealoha Arms is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1970 and is constructed of concrete. Size details such as number of units or floors are not provided in the MLS data.
Key property policies noted in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS listing does not provide information about on-site amenities, common area features, or specific services offered to residents. The management company for the building is listed as unknown in the available records.
Parking, maintenance fees, and other operational details are not specified in the MLS-derived data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify policy, amenity, parking and fee information with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
2 of 3 current MLS listings list CABTV in association_fee_includes. Remarks for the available listings do not mention cable; evidence comes from multiple MLS entries (likely some agents checked the box for the building). Because some units/listings include cable, the building should be listed as offering cable in fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 3 MLS entries lists HOTWAT, whereas 2 of 3 explicitly include WTRHTR (in-unit water heater) in inclusions—a strong sign hot water is not supplied by the association. No remarks claim hot water is covered, so the feature is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes. The public remarks for the units do not dispute this, and the consistent checkbox across listings provides strong evidence that sewer is included in the maintenance fees.
All three MLS listings show WATER in association_fee_includes. With no contradictory remarks and consistent MLS reporting across listings, there is strong evidence that water is included in the association fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 3 current MLS listings check 'TRACHU' (trash chute) in amenities, but none of the public remarks mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute and there is no owner or site verification. Evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings (possible agent copy/paste), so the building likely offers a trash chute but this is only moderately confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked (POOl/HEAPOO flags), but none of the public remarks mention a pool or describe it. There is no prior verification or historical data, so inclusion is based on consistent MLS checkbox data across multiple listings (possible agent copy/paste); confidence is moderate (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
One public remark explicitly says 'The washer and dryer are in the unit,' and the current MLS checkbox is set on 2 of 3 listings. This combination of an explicit agent remark plus majority-checked MLS inclusions provides strong evidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry, so the feature is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current MLS records list assigned parking and one listing remark explicitly states '1 assigned parking unit.' While only one remark mentions it, the MLS checkbox is consistent across listings, so evidence is strong that the building offers assigned parking (recommend on-site verification if needed).
All three MLS records indicate covered/garage parking, but no public remarks reference covered stalls, garage, or carport. This is likely an MLS checkbox entry (possible agent copy/paste); included here with moderate confidence (0.75) pending direct verification or clearer remark support.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The only parking reference is an assigned parking unit, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking fee, parking rental, or additional monthly parking cost. The remarks do not provide a parking charge, so this remains unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a parking list. There is no evidence in the remarks that this building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of three current MLS listings includes ACWIUN in inclusions, but none of the three public remarks mention 'window AC', 'window unit' or similar (remarks focus on lanai, breeze, hurricane shutters, in-unit washer/dryer). Evidence is weak and may be due to agent copy/paste, so the building may offer window units but this is uncertain.
All three current MLS entries for the building list 'CONCRE' as the construction material (3/3 listings). None of the provided public remarks explicitly states 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or similar; therefore the evidence is primarily from the MLS construction_materials checkbox across multiple listings and may reflect agent copy/paste rather than explicit confirmation in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators like "STR allowed," "vacation rental," "NUC," or "TVU," and found none. Based on the remarks alone, there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or named resort pool programs. None was found, and without evidence of STR allowance, this must remain false.
I searched for mandatory pool wording like "required to participate," "must be in rental program," or "cannot opt out." The remarks contain no such language, so there is no evidence of a mandatory rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold terms such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," or a specific expiry year, but found nothing. The remarks do not provide enough information to determine a lease expiration date.
I searched the public remarks for VA-loan language and found none. There is no evidence in the listing remarks that the building is VA approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.