Kealakai at Kapolei V
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kealakai at Kapolei V
Building Overview
Kealakai at Kapolei V in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale (built 2011); no pets and no short-term rentals per MLS.
About Kealakai at Kapolei V
Kealakai at Kapolei V is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood and was built in 2011. According to available MLS records, specific details on building size and construction type are not provided in the listing data.
Based on MLS data, key policies for Kealakai at Kapolei V include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS information available does not list building amenities, common facilities, or unit-level features.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, management company contact, and other association rules are listed as unknown or not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building facts, policies, fees, and amenities with the listing agent or association prior to making purchasing decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but the remarks contain no such information. Because no current percentage or other occupancy indicator is provided, the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for elevator references, including "elevators," specific counts such as "4 elevators," and wording like "multiple elevators," but found none. Because no current elevator count is provided and the remarks do not establish one, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current MLS listings indicate OTCOEX, suggesting maintenance fees include common-area electricity. None of the five public remarks explicitly mention common electric or building power, so the evidence is MLS-based rather than confirmed by multiple agent narratives.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current data: no listing has HOTWAT checked, while 3 of 4 list WTRHTR, a strong indicator that the unit has a water heater instead of HOA-provided hot water. No public remarks mention hot water being included, so this is best corrected to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current listings have SEWER checked in association_fee_includes, consistent with the previously high-confidence determination. Although the supplied current remarks do not repeat the fee details, the historical evidence and current MLS majority support sewer inclusion.
Three of five current listings identify WATER as included in association fees, matching the prior high-confidence conclusion. The current remarks do not explicitly mention water fees, but the MLS majority and historical remark evidence strongly support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of five current listings include PATDEC/COVPAT in the MLS amenities. Remarks explicitly reference a lanai and a private backyard suitable for coffee, BBQs, and outdoor enjoyment; the combination of repeated MLS data and multiple outdoor-space descriptions supports including the feature, although some checkbox evidence may be copied across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool appears in the current MLS amenity data for 3 out of 4 listings, which suggests the building likely offers a pool or shared water amenity. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention a pool, so this could still reflect copy/paste MLS data rather than verified building amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported: 5 of 5 current listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions, and one remark explicitly says, "Includes a large stackable washer/dryer." The consistent MLS data and direct remark confirmation indicate this is a legitimate building feature rather than an isolated copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building: 2 of 5 listings explicitly mention parking, including '2 parking stalls' and 'two assigned parking stalls.' This confirms the historical high-confidence conclusion and is consistent with the MLS parking features reported for all 5 listings.
Assigned parking is supported by both MLS data and the public remarks. At least 2 of 4 listings show ASSIGN, and the clearest remark says "two assigned parking stalls," making this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is mentioned in multiple remarks, but assignment does not establish deeded ownership. No explicit deeded, owned, or included-in-deed parking language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks describe two parking stalls but provide no information about a recurring or additional parking fee. No explicit parking-cost language was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings refer to assigned parking stalls and guest parking, but do not describe a parking waitlist system. No waitlist language was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Air conditioning is supported across the building: 5 of 5 current listings include ACWIUN in the MLS data. Two public remarks mention AC, with one specifically confirming "split AC units in both bedroom and living room," providing strong multi-listing evidence that units offer air conditioning.
No public remarks describe the building as concrete, and only 1 of 4 listings currently checks CONCRE. The evidence is weak and appears more like a stray MLS checkbox than a verified building-wide construction type.
Double-wall construction is supported by 4 of 5 current listings and was previously assessed with high confidence. No public remarks explicitly mention “double wall” or “two walls,” but the feature appears consistently across multiple MLS records rather than in a single isolated listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 2 of 4 listings. No remarks explicitly confirm it, so confidence is moderate rather than high, but the feature shows up more than once and may reflect the building’s construction type.
Three of five current listings indicate above-ground construction in MLS, but none of the five public remarks mention “above ground construction,” an “above ground building,” or above-ground materials. Because this is a new, uncorroborated checkbox attribute, it is treated as likely agent-entered data rather than validated building evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention investors and a previous tenant, but do not establish that short-term rentals are permitted. No explicit STR authorization or prohibition was found, so this is treated as false under the no-evidence rule.
There is no reference to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because STR permission is not established, this feature must also be false.
The remarks contain no mandatory rental-pool language or hotel program details. Since STR is not established as permitted, mandatory hotel-pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold and lease-expiry language, including specific years and extension terms. No applicable lease-expiration year was found, so the value remains unknown.
The listing directly references a VA loan and its assumability, providing strong public evidence that VA financing is available. This supports a high-confidence true value.
I searched for statements such as "fully insured," "full insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage," but found none. There is no current positive verification of full HOA insurance coverage, so this is marked false with low-to-medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for indications that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, including "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," and "passed fire inspection," but found no such statements. With no current positive verification or explicit certification in the remarks, this is marked false with low-to-medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are indicated in 1 of 5 listings through the MLS view description value “MOUNTA,” while 3 of 5 listings report “NONE.” No public remarks quote or describe a mountain view, so the feature is included because at least one unit appears to offer it, but the evidence is not strong across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear to be available in at least some units: 1 of 4 current listings shows "SUNSET" in the view description, while 2 of 4 show NONE. None of the public remarks explicitly mention sunset or western exposure, so the evidence is MLS-based and not reinforced by agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.