Kealakai at Kapolei V
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kealakai at Kapolei V
Building Overview
Kealakai at Kapolei V in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale (built 2011); no pets and no short-term rentals per MLS.
About Kealakai at Kapolei V
Kealakai at Kapolei V is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood and was built in 2011. According to available MLS records, specific details on building size and construction type are not provided in the listing data.
Based on MLS data, key policies for Kealakai at Kapolei V include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS information available does not list building amenities, common facilities, or unit-level features.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, management company contact, and other association rules are listed as unknown or not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building facts, policies, fees, and amenities with the listing agent or association prior to making purchasing decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but there were no references. Without a current value or explicit remark-based evidence, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for elevator references such as "elevators," "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording and found none. Since no current value was provided and there is no explicit evidence in the listings, the number of elevators cannot be determined from these remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for common-area electricity is moderate: 2 of 4 listings have OTCOEX checked in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention common electric or building power. This looks like possible MLS checkbox data rather than agent-described amenity, so confidence is below the water/sewer features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current data: no listing has HOTWAT checked, while 3 of 4 list WTRHTR, a strong indicator that the unit has a water heater instead of HOA-provided hot water. No public remarks mention hot water being included, so this is best corrected to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported. Three of four MLS records include SEWER, and one remark directly states the maintenance charge includes 'water and sewer,' confirming the feature in plain language. This appears consistent across the building rather than a one-off agent error.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. Three of four listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, and one listing explicitly says the maintenance charge includes 'water and sewer.' The evidence is consistent and high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is moderate: 3 of 4 listings include PATDEC/COVPAT in the MLS amenities. None of the remarks explicitly say 'patio' or 'deck' for the building, so this may be partly driven by agent checkbox data rather than repeated descriptive confirmation. Still, the MLS pattern suggests some units or the building may offer outdoor patio/deck-type space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool appears in the current MLS amenity data for 3 out of 4 listings, which suggests the building likely offers a pool or shared water amenity. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention a pool, so this could still reflect copy/paste MLS data rather than verified building amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is confirmed by the current remarks: one listing explicitly says "washer/dryer in the unit." That is a direct mention from a listing description, so this feature should be included for the building. The evidence is explicit but comes from a single listing remark rather than multiple independent mentions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at this building. All 4 current listings indicate parking features, and the remarks explicitly describe "two assigned parking stalls" and "2 parking," which strongly confirms the amenity rather than a copied checkbox only.
Assigned parking is supported by both MLS data and the public remarks. At least 2 of 4 listings show ASSIGN, and the clearest remark says "two assigned parking stalls," making this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
I looked for deeded, owned parking, included parking stall, and similar wording. The listings only mention assigned parking stalls, so there is no explicit evidence that the stalls are deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or any added cost for parking. The remarks mention parking stalls but do not state any separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting list language and found none. The remarks discuss assigned stalls but do not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings include ACWIUN in MLS inclusions, while none of the public remarks mention air conditioning explicitly. The consistency across listings supports window AC being available in the building, though the lack of descriptive confirmation keeps confidence below very high.
No public remarks describe the building as concrete, and only 1 of 4 listings currently checks CONCRE. The evidence is weak and appears more like a stray MLS checkbox than a verified building-wide construction type.
Double wall construction is checked in all 4 of 4 listings, making it the most consistent construction attribute in the dataset. There are no conflicting remarks, and the all-listing agreement suggests this is a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 2 of 4 listings. No remarks explicitly confirm it, so confidence is moderate rather than high, but the feature shows up more than once and may reflect the building’s construction type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC/TVU, and related rental-rule phrases. Nothing in the remarks confirms STR eligibility, so I cannot mark it allowed from the provided text.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or other hospitality rental language. No such references were found in the remarks, and there is no evidence that STR is allowed.
I searched for mandatory participation wording such as required rental program, cannot opt out, or must be in the pool. The remarks contain none of that language, so there is no evidence of a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expires, lease ends, and renewal/extension language, but found no specific year. The remarks do not indicate whether this is leasehold or provide any lease expiry date.
The remarks explicitly mention VA financing and an assumable VA loan, which is strong public evidence that VA financing is available for this building/listing. I did not find any contradictory language in the remarks.
I searched the remarks for phrases like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance and found nothing. Because the listings do not mention HOA insurance coverage, there is no support for marking the building as fully insured from these remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection, and there were no such references. With no explicit mention in the remarks and no current positive value, this is treated as not evidenced in the listing set.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear to be available in at least some units: 1 of 4 current listings shows "SUNSET" in the view description, while 2 of 4 show NONE. None of the public remarks explicitly mention sunset or western exposure, so the evidence is MLS-based and not reinforced by agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.