Kealakai at Kapolei II
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kealakai at Kapolei II
Building Overview
Kealakai at Kapolei II in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale (built 2010); pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kealakai at Kapolei II
Kealakai at Kapolei II is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood and was built in 2010. According to available records, specific details on unit sizes, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the MLS data supplied.
Based on MLS data, the building has explicit policies: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided MLS extract. No additional amenity information is included in the available records.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, condo association contact, and other building amenities are not specified in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions, as this summary is based solely on the available MLS information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy data such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found nothing. Because the remarks do not provide a percentage or a reliable descriptive indicator, this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or any mention of elevator service/access, and found none. Since this is a numeric field and the remarks do not provide evidence, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 recent listings check OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. Remarks do not explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar, so the evidence is primarily from multiple agents' MLS checkbox entries and appears implied rather than described in copy. Confidence moderate because remarks don't confirm the feature directly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 5 listings checks HOTWAT, while all 5 listings list WTRHTR (water heater) as an inclusion and one remark explicitly notes a 'solar water heater.' This strongly indicates hot water is provided by unit-level heaters—not included in HOA fees—so hot-water-included is set to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 recent listings check SEWER as included in association fees. Although public remarks do not explicitly say 'sewer included,' the unanimous MLS entries across multiple agents strongly indicate sewer is included in the HOA/maintenance fee.
All 5 listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. While one remark mentions a 'solar water heater' (unit-level hot water source), agents consistently checked 'water included' on MLS; the unanimous checkbox presence across listings is strong evidence that water is included in the association/maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks reference outdoor living spaces: 3 of the provided listings explicitly mention a lanai ('private lanai', 'open lanai', 'views from your lanai'), and MLS amenities indicate 4/5 listings checked PATDEC/COVPAT. The evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, supporting that the building offers patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked and multiple listing remarks explicitly mention a community pool — phrases include "community pool," "take a dip in the community pool," and "w/community pool and rec center." Evidence comes from several different listing remark sections rather than a single isolated line, so the building-level pool amenity is strongly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings include WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions and at least four of the public remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry with phrases like 'in unit washer and dryer', 'full-size washer/dryer', and 'in-unit washer & dryer'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and the MLS checkboxes, indicating the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 MLS listings show parking features (none show 'NONE'), and public remarks repeatedly reference parking stalls/spaces (e.g., "Unit comes with 2 assigned parking stalls", "two-designated parking spaces", "2bed, 2prkg"). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating the building does provide parking.
Four of five MLS records indicate assigned parking and four separate public-remarks entries explicitly state assigned or designated parking stalls (quotes include "2 assigned parking stalls" and "two-designated parking spaces"). The agent remarks consistently support the MLS checkboxes, so assigned parking is highly likely.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "parking included in deed," or "owned stall," and found none. The remarks mention assigned stalls, but that is not the same as deeded parking.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state a monthly parking charge of $75 for additional stalls. This is direct evidence for the parking fee.
MLS data shows guest parking on 2 of 5 listings and at least one remark explicitly mentions "lots of guest parking" (another mentions "lots of visitors parking"/additional stalls available for $75/month). The evidence is present but less uniformly mentioned across listings, so guest parking is likely but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," and similar language, but found none. The remarks only mention assigned stalls and additional stalls available for a fee, not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions, and 3 of the 5 public remarks explicitly reference AC units—quotes include 'window A/C units to keep you cool year round', 'Window ACs', and 'new air conditioning units...in both the living room and bedroom'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and the MLS inclusion, supporting that some units in the building have window AC units.
Only 1 of 5 current MLS listings indicates concrete construction ('CONCRE'), but none of the five public remarks reference concrete, reinforced concrete, or related terms. Evidence for concrete construction is weak and appears to be an isolated MLS checkbox rather than corroborated by agent remarks across listings.
Four of five MLS listings indicate double-wall construction ('DOUWAL'), but none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' The repeated MLS entries provide moderate evidence for double-wall construction, but lack of corroborating remarks suggests caution.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings list wood frame construction ('WOOFRA'), but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'wood frame.' The unanimous MLS checkbox across listings provides moderate evidence for wood-frame construction, though the lack of explicit mention in agent remarks leaves some uncertainty.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental terms such as "STR allowed," "NUC," "TVU," "vacation rental allowed," or similar language, and found nothing. There is no public remark evidence that short-term rentals are allowed here.
I searched for hotel pool references such as "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or named hotel program participation, and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I looked for language suggesting mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as "required to rent," "must be in the rental program," or "cannot opt out," but found none. With no evidence of an STR or hotel pool program, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording like "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or any renewal/expiry year, but nothing appeared in the remarks. There is no public remark evidence to identify a lease expiry year.
I searched the remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted," but found none. Based on the public remarks alone, there is no evidence that this building is VA-approved.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related wording such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance.' None appeared, so there is no support for marking the building as fully insured from these listings.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'FLSE passed,' 'fire/life safety compliant,' 'passed fire inspection,' or similar certification language. The remarks only mention ceiling fire sprinklers, which is not the same as a stated passed evaluation, so there is no evidence to mark this as true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 5 listing remarks mention sunset views—one unit advertises 'mountain & sunset views from your lanai.' However, 4 of 5 MLS view_descriptions show NONE, suggesting inconsistent reporting or possible agent copy/paste. Because at least one unit claims sunset views, the building is listed as offering sunset views, but the evidence is moderate rather than strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.