Ke Nani Kai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ke Nani Kai
Building Overview
Ke Nani Kai, neighborhood not specified — built 1983; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Ke Nani Kai
Ke Nani Kai is a condominium building recorded as built in 1983. Location details such as neighborhood, unit sizes, number of units and construction type are not specified in the provided MLS-derived data.
Key recorded policies for the building include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No specific amenities, common area features, or onsite services are provided in the supplied data.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers — including parking provisions, maintenance fees, lease restrictions beyond short-term rental and pet policies, and any recent assessments — are not included in the MLS information provided here. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, fees, and availability of amenities with a listing agent or the managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
6/7 current MLS listings include CABTV in association_fee_includes and the public remarks explicitly say "monthly maintenance fee covers water, cable/internet, trash removal, and outdoor upkeep." Evidence is consistent across MLS data and at least one agent remark, indicating cable is included in the maintenance fee.
4/7 current MLS listings have OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention "common area electricity" or "building power included." This is therefore an MLS-implied feature (moderate confidence) and may reflect copy/paste checkbox usage by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current MLS listings list HOTWAT (0/7) and 5/7 show WTRHTR in inclusions (units supply hot water via water heaters). Public remarks contain no mention of hot water being included in fees. Strong evidence supports that hot water is not covered by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
6/7 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, but none of the provided public remarks explicitly state "sewer included." The evidence is primarily checkbox-driven (moderate confidence) and could be due to agent copy/paste.
6/7 MLS listings have WATER in association_fee_includes and the public remarks explicitly say "monthly maintenance fee covers water...", giving strong, corroborating evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
At least 5 of the 7 listing remarks mention BBQ or "BBQ's/BBQ areas" (examples: "BBQ facilities", "BBQ's, Club House, Tennis Court/Pickleball, Hot Tub & Pool"). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and align with MLS amenity checkboxes, supporting inclusion as a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 of the 7 remarks mention a clubhouse or community room (quotes include "community room", "expansive clubhouse with BBQ facilities", "clubhouse"). These repeated agent remarks plus MLS checkbox data support inclusion of a shared clubhouse/community room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks (7 separate remark blocks) explicitly mention outdoor space: 'outside, 219sf patio', 'large private lanai', '242 square foot, open lanai', 'large, comfortable lanai', 'large lanai and grass area', 'wrap lanai and loft', and 'wrap around deck'. The MLS checkbox is also set on 5 of 7 current listings, so evidence is strong across multiple agents and listings that the building offers patios/decks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention storage: at least 3–4 of the 7 public remarks note storage/closets (quotes include 'lots of storage and closet space', 'plenty of storage', and '2 separate exterior walk in storage closets'). MLS checkbox data also shows storage listed in some amenities/unit_features (2/7 amenities, 3/7 unit_features). Evidence is consistent across several agents and unit remarks, so the building is reported to offer storage/lockers.
I looked for specific references to surfboard or board storage and found none. Although the listing notes exterior walk-in storage closets, there is no explicit surfboard storage, so I report false with medium confidence.
Six of the 7 listing remarks explicitly reference "tennis court" or "tennis/pickleball courts" (e.g., "tennis/pickleball courts", "well-maintained tennis and pickleball courts"). Repeated, consistent mentions across listings and MLS checkbox data indicate a building-level tennis facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 of the 7 listing remarks specifically mention a "hot tub" or "jacuzzi" (examples: "hot tub", "jacuzzi", "Hot Tub & Pool"). The consistency across multiple agent remarks together with MLS amenity checks supports listing the building as offering a whirlpool/hot tub.
All seven listings indicate a pool in MLS amenities and multiple remarks reference the pool (e.g., 'community swimming pool', 'large gated pool', 'pool', 'hot tub/jacuzzi'). Mentions appear across different agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste, providing high confidence that the building has a pool.
Only one of seven listings has a heated-pool amenity checked and no remarks explicitly say 'heated pool' (remarks reference 'hot tub/jacuzzi' but not a heated pool). The lack of corroborating language across listings suggests the heated-pool flag is likely erroneous, so the building is reported as not having a heated pool.
The listing repeatedly references a community pool and hot tub but does not indicate the pool is salt water. With no evidence of a salt pool, I report false with medium confidence.
All 7 current MLS listings list 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions, but none of the public remarks mention 'washer', 'dryer' or 'in-unit laundry'. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings (likely a checkbox used by all listing agents) but lacks explicit textual confirmation in property remarks, so inclusion is probable but not fully corroborated by agent descriptions.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit mentions of paid laundry (coin-op, card, quarters, fees) and found none in the remarks. With no evidence, I mark paid community laundry as false with medium confidence.
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating laundry on every floor (e.g., 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor'). There are no references to community laundry at all, so I report false with medium confidence due to lack of any mention.
All 7 current listings have parking indicated in MLS checkboxes and several agent remarks explicitly reference a parking lot in front of units (quotes: "sits just across the parking lot (which is in front of the unit)", "concrete ramp from parking lot to home"). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so building-level parking is very likely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating parking is deeded (e.g., 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', 'parking included in deed') and found none. The remarks describe a parking lot location but do not indicate ownership of stalls, so deeded parking is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rental' and found no information. Without any mention, the presence or amount of a parking fee cannot be determined from these listings.
Only 1 of 7 MLS records lists GUEST parking and none of the public remarks mention "guest" or "visitor" parking. This sparse, isolated checkbox entry (likely agent-level or copy/paste) lacks corroboration across multiple listings, so guest parking is omitted for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for indications of a parking waitlist system and found none in the remarks. Absence of mention suggests no waitlist is indicated in these listings, but this is based solely on the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for language describing electronic card or fob access and found no references. Therefore security card access is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
There are no statements about security patrols or patrolled services in the remarks. I mark security patrol as false with medium confidence due to absence of evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings for this building list construction_materials=WOOFRA (wood frame). None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction type, so the evidence is driven entirely by the unanimous MLS checkbox across multiple listings. This is strong MLS-level consistency (7/7), though remarks do not confirm and agent copy/paste is possible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly declare the development is a legal short-term rental area, and multiple listings reference vacation rental usage and resort amenities. That directly supports that short-term rentals are allowed.
I searched for terms like 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or 'managed by hotel' and found none. Although STRs are allowed, there is no evidence the building participates in a hotel-style rental pool program.
I looked for explicit language that rental pool participation is required (e.g., 'must participate', 'mandatory hotel pool') and found none. Listings describe STR use and vacation rental potential but do not state any mandatory pool participation, so mandatory pool is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in' and did not find any year or lease-expiry information. Because there is no reference to leasehold terms in the remarks, the lease expiry year is unknown from these listings.
I searched the remarks for explicit language indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. Therefore I determine VA financing is not indicated in the public remarks. If you have owner/manager verification that contradicts this, please provide it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 7 current MLS listings list GARDEN in view_descriptions. Public remarks mention being "surrounded by lush vegetation" and "luscious landscaping that surrounds the deck," and reference a grass area and privacy from landscaping. These are implied garden/courtyard views across multiple listings (moderate evidence rather than explicit repeated 'garden view' phrasing).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any statements about viewing fireworks from the building or units. Nothing was found, so fireworks view is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.