Ke Kilohana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ke Kilohana
Building Overview
Ke Kilohana in Ala Moana-Kakaako (built 2017) with concrete/steel construction and ocean views; amenities include fitness center and BBQ area.
About Ke Kilohana
Ke Kilohana is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 2017. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and steel frame. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The property offers ocean views. Short-term rentals are not allowed and pets are not allowed, per the MLS information.
Parking provided is covered parking with guest parking available. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the seller or managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 2 current listings checks OTCOEX, but neither remark set explicitly says the maintenance fee includes common electricity. Evidence is moderate and appears to come from MLS checkbox data rather than agent description, so this is likely but not strongly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing checks HOTWAT, and one listing instead includes WTRHTR, which points away from building-provided hot water. Public remarks also do not describe hot water service as an included building amenity, so the evidence strongly supports exclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 2 listings includes SEWER in the association fee data, while the remarks are silent on sewer charges. This looks like a moderate-confidence MLS-based inclusion and may reflect agent-entered building data.
1 of 2 listings checks WATER, but the remarks do not explicitly confirm water is included in maintenance fees. The evidence is moderate and consistent with building-level MLS data rather than detailed agent verification.
BBQ is supported by both the public remarks and the current MLS flags. One listing specifically says residents enjoy "BBQ areas," so this appears to be a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is clearly supported. Two listings describe on-site fitness amenities, including a "fitness center" and "yoga room/yoga studio," which is strong building-level evidence rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
This is supported indirectly through shared work amenities. Both remarks reference "co-working spaces," which strongly suggests a building-level meeting/community room function even though the exact phrase "meeting room" is not used.
2 listings mention the feature, both describing shared 'sky lanai' spaces. The remarks say the sky lanai is 'located on the same level and directly across from the unit' and also reference 'sky lanai lounges,' indicating a common building amenity rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No evidence in the remarks supports a jogging or walking path. The feature appears unconfirmed and likely reflects an unverified MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-level support for a putting green. With only a single MLS checkbox and no descriptive confirmation, this feature is not validated for the building.
Evidence for a recreation area is moderate. The remarks don’t use the exact phrase, but "sky lanai lounges" and similar shared amenity spaces suggest a common recreation area/amenity deck type feature.
The building’s recreation offerings are well supported. Two listings reference shared entertainment spaces such as a "movie theater" and "karaoke room," indicating a genuine recreation room/rec space amenity set.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly state that residents enjoy "bike and surfboard storage," which clearly confirms this feature. This is strong public-remarks evidence and does not require inference.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a real building amenity based on current MLS consistency. Even though the public remarks don’t mention it, the 2/2 MLS amenity checks support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for any mention of a saltwater, saline, or salt pool. The current building context indicates there is no pool, and the remarks contain no pool references, so this is best marked false.
Both current listings show WASHER/DRYER in the MLS inclusions (2 of 2), but neither public remark explicitly calls out in-unit laundry. This looks more like consistent MLS inclusion data than copy-paste remark evidence, so the feature should be treated as available in the building with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for signs that the building has paid community laundry, such as coin-op, card-operated, or coin laundry language. The remarks do not mention laundry facilities or any payment requirement, so this feature is not evidenced.
I searched the public remarks for any indication of shared laundry facilities on each floor, including terms like laundry on every floor or floor-by-floor laundry. Nothing in the remarks mentions community laundry at all, so there is no evidence to support this feature.
Parking is clearly available in this building. One current remark explicitly says '1 covered parking stall,' and the MLS data shows parking features in both current listings. This is strong evidence that buyers can expect parking here.
Assigned parking is not clearly supported by the remarks. Although one MLS listing has the ASSIGN checkbox, none of the public descriptions mention assigned or reserved parking. This looks more like inconsistent MLS input than a confirmed building-wide feature.
Covered parking is strongly supported. Both current listings show covered parking in MLS, and one remark directly confirms it with '1 covered parking stall.' This is consistent across the available data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking is not confirmed by the remarks. Only one MLS listing checks the guest parking box, and there are no public references to visitor parking. This suggests the feature may be inconsistently entered.
Secured-entry parking is not supported by the public remarks. One MLS listing indicates it, but none of the remarks describe gated, secured, or card-access parking. The evidence is too thin to confirm.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for access-control language such as keycard entry, fob access, or card reader security. There is no such mention, so the presence of card-based security is not supported by the text.
Security guard service appears in the current MLS data for 2 out of 2 listings via the SECGUA amenity checkbox. None of the public remarks explicitly say "security guard" or "24-hour security," so this is supported mainly by the MLS amenity data rather than listing text. Because the checkbox is consistent across both listings, it looks more like a building amenity than a one-off copy-paste error.
I looked for any indication of a patrol-based security service in the remarks. None is mentioned, so there is no public-remarks evidence for security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC appears in 1 out of 2 current listings via the ACSPL inclusion checkbox. Neither set of public remarks mentions split, ductless, or mini-split AC, so the evidence is limited and could reflect copy/paste MLS input. Still, because some units appear to offer it, it is relevant for buyers searching for split AC units in the building.
The only evidence is the MLS inclusions (1/1 listings show ACWIUN). The public remarks do not mention 'window AC' or similar language, so this is a weak/implied indication (possible agent copy/paste). Buyers should be aware the MLS indicates units have window AC, but confirm with listing agent or site visit.
Concrete construction is indicated in the current MLS data for 1 of 2 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete.' This looks like a likely building-level attribute rather than a repeated remark-driven detail, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The feature appears in 1 of 2 current MLS listings via the FIRSPR amenity flag, but neither public remark mentions a fire sprinkler system or related fire suppression details. This looks like weak, listing-data-only evidence rather than something confirmed by agent remarks.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
There is direct evidence of ocean views in the remarks, and the current MLS data also supports it with 1 of 2 listings showing OCEAN. The phrasing appears consistent with building-level view availability rather than a one-off claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are explicitly confirmed in the remarks and reinforced by the current MLS data. This looks like a legitimate building feature available to some units, not just copy-paste noise.
Coastline views are supported by the current MLS data, which shows COASTL in both listings. The remarks mention ocean and harbor views rather than coastline specifically, so the evidence is MLS-driven but still fairly strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are strongly supported by both current MLS data and the public remarks. With 2 of 2 listings showing SUNSET, this appears to be a consistent building-level view offering.
No analysis available
I searched for references to fireworks views from the building or units, including lanai-based viewing. The remarks mention ocean, sunset, and harbor views, but nothing about fireworks, so this cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
Resident manager is flagged in both current MLS listings (2/2), even though neither public remark explicitly says “resident manager,” “on-site manager,” or similar. Because the checkbox is consistent across both listings, this is stronger evidence than the earlier low-confidence record, though it still appears to be MLS-data driven rather than remark-confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.