Ke Kilohana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ke Kilohana
Building Overview
Ke Kilohana in Ala Moana-Kakaako (built 2017) with concrete/steel construction and ocean views; amenities include fitness center and BBQ area.
About Ke Kilohana
Ke Kilohana is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 2017. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and steel frame. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The property offers ocean views. Short-term rentals are not allowed and pets are not allowed, per the MLS information.
Parking provided is covered parking with guest parking available. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the seller or managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion appears in 1 of 4 current listings via CABTV in association_fee_includes. The remarks are silent, so this may reflect inconsistent MLS entry rather than strong confirmation, but it is enough to suggest the building may offer cable as an included fee item in at least some listings.
Two of three current listings check OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, while the remarks are silent on utility coverage. This looks like a likely building-level inclusion, but the evidence is moderate and appears mostly MLS-driven rather than explicitly confirmed by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing checks HOTWAT, and two of three include WTRHTR instead, which is a strong signal that hot water is not a common-area fee inclusion here. The public remarks do not contradict this, so the best reading is that hot water is not included.
Internet inclusion appears in 1 of 4 current listings via INTSER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not discuss internet service, so the evidence is thin and could be copy-paste MLS noise, but it still points to possible internet inclusion at the building level.
No analysis available
Sewer is shown in association_fee_includes on 3 of 4 current listings, supporting inclusion at the building level. The remarks do not mention sewer charges, but the strong MLS pattern across multiple listings is consistent with sewer being part of the association fees.
Water is included in association_fee_includes on 3 of 4 current listings. Although the remarks are silent, the repeated MLS checkmarks across multiple listings make water inclusion highly likely at the building level.
BBQ is clearly supported. Two remarks directly cite "BBQ areas," matching the MLS data that flags BBQ in all 3/3 listings. This is strong, consistent building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports an exercise room/fitness center. The public remarks explicitly mention a 'fitness center' in multiple listings, with one also describing a 'yoga studio' and another a 'yoga room,' which aligns with the MLS amenity data. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
Meeting-room functionality is strongly supported. The remarks repeatedly reference 'co-working spaces' alongside other shared amenities, which is consistent with a building-level meeting or conference room amenity. This aligns with the high-confidence MLS history and appears to be a stable building feature.
Patio/deck amenities are strongly supported. 3 listings mention the building’s 'signature Sky Lanais' or 'sky lanai lounges,' including wording that they are 'on the same level and directly across from the unit,' indicating a shared amenity rather than a private unit-only space. This aligns with the historical MLS checkbox pattern (2 of 3 listings).
No public remarks mention a jogging or walking path, but the MLS data shows the amenity in 2/3 listings. That suggests possible building-level support, though this remains less certain and may reflect inconsistent agent input.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some MLS support for a putting green, but no public remark confirmation. Since 2/3 listings carry the amenity flag, it may exist, but the evidence is weaker than for the other shared amenities and could reflect MLS inconsistency.
Evidence for a recreation area is moderate and mostly implied rather than stated with the exact phrase. Multiple listings mention 'Sky Lanais,' 'resident gathering space,' and 'perfect for relaxing, entertaining,' supporting a shared recreational amenity in the building. The wording is consistent across listings, but still indirect.
The building’s recreation-room-type amenities are well supported by the remarks. Multiple listings mention a "movie theater" and "karaoke room," and the MLS amenity flag is present in 3/3 listings. This appears to be a genuine shared amenity space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is directly confirmed in the public remarks. The listing clearly states that residents have access to "bike and surfboard storage."
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a real building amenity based on the MLS history, which is fully consistent across all prior listings. The public remarks do not mention it, but there is no contradictory evidence suggesting removal or correction. Confidence remains high because the MLS data has been consistently affirmative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Because the current building context indicates there is no pool, the salt-water pool feature is not present. I also found no public remarks suggesting a saltwater or saline pool.
In-unit laundry is supported by current MLS data: 4 of 4 listings include WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions. The public remarks for the sampled listings do not mention laundry directly, but the consistent MLS inclusions across multiple listings are strong evidence that units in this building have in-unit washer/dryer.
No analysis available
I searched for coin-operated, card-operated, quarter, or fee-based laundry language and found nothing. The public remarks do not indicate whether any community laundry exists or whether it requires payment.
I looked for references to laundry on every floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or shared laundry facilities, but found none. The remarks focus on unit features and amenities like sky lanais, fitness spaces, and storage, without mentioning community laundry.
Parking is clearly available in this building. One current remark explicitly says '1 covered parking stall,' and the MLS data shows parking features in both current listings. This is strong evidence that buyers can expect parking here.
2 of 3 current listings indicate assigned parking in MLS, but none of the public remarks explicitly use assigned/reserved language. The evidence looks more like MLS checkbox data than copy-pasted remark confirmation, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
Covered parking is strongly supported. One current remark explicitly says "1 covered parking stall," and the historical MLS pattern also shows covered/garage-type parking in multiple listings. This appears consistent across listings and is not just a copy-paste checkbox with no remark support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking is not confirmed by the remarks. Only one MLS listing checks the guest parking box, and there are no public references to visitor parking. This suggests the feature may be inconsistently entered.
Secured-entry parking is not supported by the public remarks. One MLS listing indicates it, but none of the remarks describe gated, secured, or card-access parking. The evidence is too thin to confirm.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for key card access, fob entry, card readers, or other electronic access-control language. The remarks do not mention any card-based security system.
Security guard service appears supported by the current MLS data for 3 out of 3 listings via the SECGUA amenity checkbox. The public remarks do not explicitly spell out 'security guard,' but there is no conflicting evidence and the feature is consistently present in the current MLS amenities, suggesting this is not a copy-paste error. Confidence is very high given the uniform MLS signals across multiple listings.
I searched for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled-building language. Nothing in the remarks indicates a patrol-based security service.
No analysis available
Across the 3 provided listings, none of the public remarks explicitly describe central AC or building-wide HVAC. With 0/3 unit features checked for ACCEN/CENAC and only 1/3 showing ACCEN in inclusions, the evidence points away from the building offering central air conditioning as a shared feature.
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention split AC or any equivalent wording such as ductless or mini-split. The only evidence is the current MLS ACSPL inclusion checkbox in 2 of 4 listings, which is not reinforced by agent remarks and is consistent with copy-paste MLS data errors.
The only evidence is the MLS inclusions (1/1 listings show ACWIUN). The public remarks do not mention 'window AC' or similar language, so this is a weak/implied indication (possible agent copy/paste). Buyers should be aware the MLS indicates units have window AC, but confirm with listing agent or site visit.
Concrete construction appears supported by the current MLS record across 3 of 4 listings. No remarks explicitly say "concrete" or "reinforced concrete," but the repeated MLS checkbox data makes this a credible building-level feature.
Double wall construction is not corroborated by the public remarks and appears only in a single MLS entry. That pattern suggests it is likely not a reliable building-wide feature.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is mentioned in just 1 of 4 listings and is absent from the remarks. The evidence is too weak to support this as a building-level feature.
Steel frame construction is not supported by the remarks, and the MLS evidence is limited to a single listing. This looks more like isolated checkbox noise than a building-wide characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Fire sprinklers appear in the current MLS data for 3 of 4 listings via the FIRSPR amenity flag. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a fire sprinkler system, so this looks like MLS checkbox evidence rather than copy-supported text, but it is still enough to include with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the building’s listings. Current remarks say “captivating ocean views from every room” and also mention “breathtaking ocean, sunset, and harbor views” from the sky lanai, confirming the feature across multiple units and amenity spaces. This does not look like a one-off or copy-paste error; it appears to be a real building-level selling point.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are consistently supported by both historical MLS data and current public remarks. The listings describe “city and mountain views,” “stunning mountain and city views,” and even reference “skyline views,” which aligns with a genuine building feature. Evidence is repeated across multiple remarks, not just a single agent’s wording.
Coastline views are supported by the current MLS data, which shows COASTL in all 3 listings. The remarks do not explicitly say 'coastline,' but they do describe ocean, harbor, and skyline views, which is consistent with a coastal outlook. Confidence is high based on MLS consistency, though the wording in remarks is indirect.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are very strongly confirmed. All 3 current MLS listings show SUNSET, and the remarks explicitly repeat 'sunset views' in multiple units. This is high-confidence, building-level evidence.
No analysis available
I looked for statements that units can view Friday night fireworks, such as from the lanai or living area. The remarks mention ocean, sunset, harbor, skyline, city, and mountain views, but nothing about fireworks viewing.
No analysis available
Resident manager is flagged in all 4 of 4 current MLS listings through the RESMAN amenity field. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'resident manager' or similar, but the complete consistency across listings makes this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.