Ke Kilohana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ke Kilohana
Building Overview
Ke Kilohana in Ala Moana-Kakaako (built 2017) with concrete/steel construction and ocean views; amenities include fitness center and BBQ area.
About Ke Kilohana
Ke Kilohana is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 2017. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and steel frame. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The property offers ocean views. Short-term rentals are not allowed and pets are not allowed, per the MLS information.
Parking provided is covered parking with guest parking available. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the seller or managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The 17 listings reach floor 41 but are sparse and include no penthouse listings, so they do not establish the top floor; the stored 43-floor count is retained under the rule for incomplete listing coverage.
The stored 424-unit count is below the county's 425-unit reconciled total, but the county parcel is shared by two buildings, so that figure is only an upper bound and does not independently establish this building's exact count.
The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and descriptions such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but none were found. The owner-occupancy rate is therefore unknown.
The remarks were searched for explicit elevator counts such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but none were found. The number of elevators is therefore unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion appears in 1 of 4 current listings via CABTV in association_fee_includes. The remarks are silent, so this may reflect inconsistent MLS entry rather than strong confirmation, but it is enough to suggest the building may offer cable as an included fee item in at least some listings.
Four of six current listings identify OTCOEX, supporting inclusion of common-area electricity in the maintenance fee. No public remark explicitly mentions common electric or building power, so the evidence is consistent but may partly reflect copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero of six current listings check HOTWAT, while four identify WTRHTR. One public remark specifically states the unit has a water heater, and no listing mentions hot water being included, providing strong evidence that this feature should be false.
Internet inclusion appears in 1 of 4 current listings via INTSER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not discuss internet service, so the evidence is thin and could be copy-paste MLS noise, but it still points to possible internet inclusion at the building level.
No analysis available
Five of six current listings identify SEWER as included in the association fee. No public remark explicitly discusses sewer fees, but the high proportion of consistent MLS entries supports this feature with high confidence.
Five of six current listings identify WATER as included in the association fee. Although no public remark explicitly says water is included, the consistent entries across multiple listings provide strong building-level evidence.
Three listings directly mention shared BBQ facilities, including a "BBQ Sky Deck," "Sky Deck with BBQ grills," and "BBQ areas." This aligns with the strong historical confidence and current 5/6 MLS representation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three listings mention the amenity directly, using "dog park" twice and "dog run" once. The consistency across multiple remarks indicates a real shared pet amenity and suggests the current MLS checkbox is underreported rather than an isolated agent error.
No analysis available
At least 5 of the provided remarks explicitly mention a fitness center, fitness room, or yoga studio paired with a fitness center. The repeated language across multiple listings and the 6/6 MLS amenity presence strongly confirms this shared building feature.
No analysis available
One listing explicitly identifies a "meeting room," while several others describe co-working, business/work, or flex-work spaces. Combined with the 6/6 MLS amenity presence and prior high confidence, the building clearly offers shared meeting/workspace facilities.
At least 4 of 4 provided listing remarks mention building-level outdoor amenities, using phrases such as 'signature Sky Lanais,' 'sky lanai lounges,' 'BBQ Sky Deck,' and 'multiple indoor and outdoor lounges.' This strongly confirms that the building offers shared patio/deck-style spaces across multiple listings, rather than an isolated unit-specific feature.
No public remarks mention a jogging or walking path, but the MLS data shows the amenity in 2/3 listings. That suggests possible building-level support, though this remains less certain and may reflect inconsistent agent input.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some MLS support for a putting green, but no public remark confirmation. Since 2/3 listings carry the amenity flag, it may exist, but the evidence is weaker than for the other shared amenities and could reflect MLS inconsistency.
At least 4 listings describe shared recreation-oriented spaces, including "Sky Lanais," "sky lanai lounges," "multiple indoor and outdoor lounges," and an explicit recreation area. The consistency across listings and 5/6 MLS presence strongly confirms this feature.
At least 4 listings mention shared entertainment spaces such as a movie theater and karaoke room. These repeated building-level amenities support the recreation room designation, consistent with the historical high confidence and 5/6 current MLS records.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 listings explicitly mention storage: one describes a "dedicated storage room" on the unit’s floor, and another lists "storage lockers" among the building amenities. These are specific references from multiple listings, supporting that the building offers storage rather than this being only a copied MLS checkbox.
The remarks directly identify bike and surfboard storage as a resident amenity in multiple listings. This repeated explicit evidence strongly confirms the feature.
No analysis available
One listing directly mentions "trash chutes," while the feature is present in all 6 current MLS records. Although not repeated in every public remark, the explicit confirmation plus consistent building-wide MLS data strongly supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building context indicates that the building has no pool, so a saltwater pool is not present. The public remarks list extensive amenities but do not contradict this.
All 6 current listings identify WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions, continuing the previously high-confidence evidence. One of the 5 provided public remarks explicitly states the unit has a "heavy duty stacked washer/dryer"; the remaining remarks do not discuss laundry, but the consistent MLS data strongly supports in-unit laundry availability.
No analysis available
The remarks identify an in-unit washer/dryer but do not mention shared laundry or any payment requirement. No evidence was found for coin-op, card-operated, or fee-based community laundry.
The remarks mention an in-unit stacked washer/dryer and various community amenities, but do not describe community laundry facilities on every floor. There is no public-remarks evidence confirming this feature.
Parking is clearly available in this building. One current remark explicitly says '1 covered parking stall,' and the MLS data shows parking features in both current listings. This is strong evidence that buyers can expect parking here.
Assigned parking is supported by 4 of 6 current MLS records and is explicitly described in one remark as 'one assigned covered parking stall.' Although most remarks do not specify assignment, the direct wording plus majority MLS support confirms the feature.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed across all 6 current MLS records. At least three public remarks explicitly mention a 'covered parking stall,' providing consistent support from multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remark mentions guest or visitor parking across the available listings. Although 3 of 6 current MLS records contain a guest-parking code, the low historical confidence and absence of supporting descriptions make this feature unconfirmed and likely erroneous.
No public remark describes secured parking, gated access, card access, or a secure entry system. Despite SECENT appearing in 3 of 6 current MLS records, the low historical confidence and lack of corroboration indicate that secured parking should not be treated as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe building amenities and conveniences but provide no evidence of a card- or fob-based security access system. The absence of this terminology prevents confirmation.
Security guard service is supported by the current MLS amenity checkbox in 5 of 6 listings and by prior high-confidence evidence. None of the five supplied public remarks explicitly mention a security guard or 24-hour security, so the evidence comes primarily from consistent MLS amenity data rather than independent agent descriptions.
Although the building context indicates a security guard, that does not specifically establish patrol service. The public remarks contain no explicit reference to security patrols or roving patrol personnel.
No analysis available
Across the 3 provided listings, none of the public remarks explicitly describe central AC or building-wide HVAC. With 0/3 unit features checked for ACCEN/CENAC and only 1/3 showing ACCEN in inclusions, the evidence points away from the building offering central air conditioning as a shared feature.
One of the five provided listings explicitly mentions “two split system a/c units,” while current MLS data marks ACSPL in 3 of 6 listings. Although the feature was not explicitly mentioned in historical remarks, the direct current-unit description and multiple MLS inclusions provide strong evidence that split A/C is offered in the building.
Two of five current listings identify ACWIUN, while none of the four provided public-remark sections mention window air conditioning or similar wording. The repeated MLS checkbox evidence suggests the building may offer or permit window AC, but confidence is moderate because there is no explicit remark confirmation and the data may be copied across listings.
Concrete construction is supported by current MLS construction-materials data in 5 of 6 listings. None of the five public remarks mention concrete construction, a concrete building, or reinforced concrete, so the evidence appears primarily MLS-based rather than independently confirmed in agent remarks.
Double wall construction is not corroborated by the public remarks and appears only in a single MLS entry. That pattern suggests it is likely not a reliable building-wide feature.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is mentioned in just 1 of 4 listings and is absent from the remarks. The evidence is too weak to support this as a building-level feature.
Steel frame construction is not supported by the remarks, and the MLS evidence is limited to a single listing. This looks more like isolated checkbox noise than a building-wide characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for full insurance, fully insured, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage, but no such statements were found. Full HOA insurance coverage is not confirmed.
One of the five provided remarks explicitly mentions that the building "features fire sprinklers." In addition, 5 of 6 current listings carry the FIRSPR flag, so the feature is supported by both direct remark evidence and consistent MLS data across multiple listings.
The remarks mention that the building has fire sprinklers, but they do not state that a fire/life safety evaluation was passed, that FLSE was passed, or that the building is life-safety certified. Under the available evidence, this feature is not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the building: 5 of 6 current MLS listings mention OCEAN, and multiple remarks explicitly describe ocean views from residences or the shared Sky Lanais. The evidence comes from several listings and aligns with the previously high historical confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are consistently supported: 5 of 6 current MLS listings include CITY, with remarks explicitly citing 'ocean and city views' and 'mountain and city views.' This reinforces the prior high-confidence building-level feature rather than appearing to be an isolated or unsupported checkbox.
Coastline views are supported by the current MLS data, which shows COASTL in all 3 listings. The remarks do not explicitly say 'coastline,' but they do describe ocean, harbor, and skyline views, which is consistent with a coastal outlook. Confidence is high based on MLS consistency, though the wording in remarks is indirect.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are strongly confirmed: 5 of 6 current MLS listings include SUNSET, and multiple remarks specifically describe sunset views from the signature Sky Lanais. The repeated explicit references across listings support the previously high-confidence feature.
No analysis available
Several listings describe views from residences and sky lanais, but none specifically state that fireworks can be viewed from the building. Proximity to entertainment and beaches does not establish a fireworks view.
No analysis available
None of the five provided remarks explicitly mentions a resident manager or on-site manager. However, all 6 of 6 current listings include RESMAN, matching the previously high-confidence building-level verification and indicating consistent MLS data rather than an isolated copy-paste entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.