Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 5
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 5
Building Overview
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not provide an owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive terms such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. No owner-occupancy value can be determined from these listings.
The remarks describe townhome layouts, private yards, detached garages, and community locations, but do not mention elevators or provide a number. No explicit elevator count can be determined.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of five current listings list OTCOEX, consistent with common-area/building electricity being included in the maintenance fee. None of the five public remarks explicitly mention common electricity, so the evidence is strong at the MLS level but may reflect copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero of five listings indicate HOTWAT, while four of five list WTRHTR; one remark specifically mentions a new water heater. This is consistent across the MLS data and remarks and strongly supports hot water being excluded from the association fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of five current listings list SEWER as included in the association fee. None of the public remarks mention sewer, making the evidence moderately strong but potentially subject to repeated agent checkbox usage.
Four of five current listings list WATER as included in the association fee. The five public remarks are silent on fee-included water, so this is strong repeated MLS evidence but lacks explicit narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS metadata is low/conflicted (only 1 of 3 listings flags CLUHOU). The supplied public remarks do not mention a clubhouse, community center, or recreation center. With low historical confidence and no confirming remarks from listing agents, the evidence supports omitting a clubhouse for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS indicates WAJOPA on 2/3 listings, yet the public remarks for the unit do not reference a jogging path, walking path, or running trail. Given the lack of explicit mention across remarks and no historical confirmation, the evidence for a building-level jogging/walking path is weak and may be a checklist error.
No analysis available
At least four of five listings describe private yard space, including private fenced yards, a private yard, an enclosed courtyard, and a private spacious yard. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and strongly confirms that the building offers units with private yard or enclosed outdoor space.
No analysis available
None of the provided remarks describe a building recreation area or amenity deck. The only evidence is mixed MLS checkbox data (RECARE on 2 of 4 listings), which looks like inconsistent agent input rather than verified building information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of 3 listings) mention a building swimming pool and current MLS checkbox data shows 0/3 listings with a pool. Historical confidence was Low and there is no corroborating agent language (no phrases like 'pool' or 'resort pool' or 'recently installed pool'), so evidence strongly indicates the building does not offer a shared pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is explicitly mentioned in 1 of 5 current listings, which states the property has an "in-unit washer and dryer." Additionally, 4 of 5 current MLS records include washer/dryer, and this aligns with the prior high-confidence evidence, making the feature strongly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly confirmed across multiple listings: 4 of 5 remarks mention a detached or two-car garage. The repeated garage descriptions from multiple listings align with the current MLS data showing covered-parking designations in all 5 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking is present in the current MLS checkbox data for 3 of 5 listings, but 0 of 5 public remarks confirm it. Because the prior confidence was only medium and the evidence appears checkbox-based rather than independently described, this feature should be treated as tentative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some MLS entries for this building have the SECGUA amenity checked (1 of 3 current listings), but none of the public remarks for this unit mention a security guard or '24-hour/24/7' security. Because the only evidence is a minority of MLS checkboxes (and no explicit remarks), the existence of on-site security is possible but not well supported across agents, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central air is explicitly mentioned in 2 of 5 listings, using clear phrases such as “central air” and “central air conditioning system.” This aligns with consistent MLS data across 4/5 listings and the previously high-confidence building-level determination, indicating the evidence is strong rather than isolated copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The double-wall checkbox appears in all 4 current listings, but none of the remarks describe double-wall construction or anything equivalent. With no corroborating agent language, this remains tentative and may reflect repeated MLS data entry rather than confirmed building construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings have the steel-frame checkbox selected, but there are zero supporting mentions in the remarks. Because the agent comments are focused on interior updates and amenities, this evidence looks like possible MLS copy/paste rather than firsthand confirmation.
Three of four current listings mark the slab checkbox, but the public remarks are silent on foundation type. The evidence is weak and appears to come from MLS fields rather than explicit agent confirmation, so confidence is limited.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for statements that the HOA or building is fully insured, comprehensively insured, fully covered, or has walls-in coverage. The remarks contain no insurance or HOA coverage information.
No analysis available
I searched for references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. None of these statements appear in the public remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of five current listings is tagged with "SUNSET" in the MLS view field, indicating the building may offer sunset-view units. The other four listings show "NONE," and none of the five public remarks mention sunset views or related phrases, so support is limited and may be unit-specific rather than consistent across the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.