Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 5
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 5
Building Overview
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive phrasing that would indicate how owner-occupied the building is, but nothing was stated in the remarks. Since this field is rarely included in remarks and no explicit percentage appears, the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for any reference to elevators or a count such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators," but found nothing. Since this is a townhome-style building/community description and no elevator information appears in the public remarks, the number of elevators cannot be confirmed from the text.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 4 MLS listings check OTCOEX, suggesting common area/building electricity is included in the association fee. The remarks across the listings do not explicitly mention common electric, so this appears to be an MLS-driven building-level inclusion rather than something agents called out in prose.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current MLS listings indicate hot water included, and most list WTRHTR instead, which is a strong sign the units have their own water heaters. The remarks reinforce that pattern with phrasing like 'new water heater,' so hot water inclusion should be corrected to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 4 MLS listings check SEWER, indicating sewer is likely included in the association fee. The remarks do not explicitly confirm it, so this conclusion relies on the repeated MLS data rather than agent narrative.
3 of 4 MLS listings include WATER in the association fee, which is strong building-level evidence for water inclusion. The remarks are silent on the topic, so this appears to be a consistent MLS-reported amenity rather than a copied remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS metadata is low/conflicted (only 1 of 3 listings flags CLUHOU). The supplied public remarks do not mention a clubhouse, community center, or recreation center. With low historical confidence and no confirming remarks from listing agents, the evidence supports omitting a clubhouse for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS indicates WAJOPA on 2/3 listings, yet the public remarks for the unit do not reference a jogging path, walking path, or running trail. Given the lack of explicit mention across remarks and no historical confirmation, the evidence for a building-level jogging/walking path is weak and may be a checklist error.
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported by the current MLS and remarks. Three of four listings mention it directly, including 'private yard,' 'enclosed courtyard,' and 'private, spacious yard,' indicating this is a real building/unit feature available to buyers. The checkbox data and remarks align closely, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
None of the provided remarks describe a building recreation area or amenity deck. The only evidence is mixed MLS checkbox data (RECARE on 2 of 4 listings), which looks like inconsistent agent input rather than verified building information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of 3 listings) mention a building swimming pool and current MLS checkbox data shows 0/3 listings with a pool. Historical confidence was Low and there is no corroborating agent language (no phrases like 'pool' or 'resort pool' or 'recently installed pool'), so evidence strongly indicates the building does not offer a shared pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports in-unit laundry in this building. 1 of the provided public remarks explicitly states 'in-unit washer and dryer,' and the current MLS data shows WASHER/DRYER in inclusions for 3/4 listings. This looks consistent across listings and is strong enough to treat as a building feature available in some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is clearly present in these listings. Across 4 remarks, at least 3 explicitly mention a garage, including phrases like "detached 2-car garage" and "two-car garage," which is strong evidence of covered parking in the building/community.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking appears in the current MLS checkbox data for 2 of 4 listings, but none of the public remarks confirm it directly. The evidence is weaker than for covered parking and may reflect agent-entered MLS data rather than repeated remark-level confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some MLS entries for this building have the SECGUA amenity checked (1 of 3 current listings), but none of the public remarks for this unit mention a security guard or '24-hour/24/7' security. Because the only evidence is a minority of MLS checkboxes (and no explicit remarks), the existence of on-site security is possible but not well supported across agents, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for central AC. 2 of 4 public remarks explicitly state central air or central air conditioning, and the MLS history shows 3 of 4 listings with ACCEN/CENAC in unit features and 3 of 4 with ACCEN in inclusions. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The double-wall checkbox appears in all 4 current listings, but none of the remarks describe double-wall construction or anything equivalent. With no corroborating agent language, this remains tentative and may reflect repeated MLS data entry rather than confirmed building construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings have the steel-frame checkbox selected, but there are zero supporting mentions in the remarks. Because the agent comments are focused on interior updates and amenities, this evidence looks like possible MLS copy/paste rather than firsthand confirmation.
Three of four current listings mark the slab checkbox, but the public remarks are silent on foundation type. The evidence is weak and appears to come from MLS fields rather than explicit agent confirmation, so confidence is limited.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any indication that the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage, but found no such language. Because there is no existing value and no public remark evidence, this is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements that the building passed fire/life safety evaluation or similar safety-compliance language, but none were present. With no current value provided and no supporting remark evidence, this is marked false by default with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of four current listings is tagged with "SUNSET" in the MLS view field, which suggests some units in the building do offer sunset-facing views. None of the public remarks explicitly say "sunset view," "western exposure," or "evening sun," so the evidence is moderate rather than strong and may reflect selective unit exposure rather than a building-wide guarantee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.