Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 3
Building Overview
Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 3 (neighborhood not specified in MLS): built 1999; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 3
Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 3 is a townhouse community listed in MLS records. According to available records, the development was built in 1999. Specific location/neighborhood, unit sizes, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key rules and policies noted in the MLS entry include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list on-site amenities, common facilities, or HOA services, so no additional amenity information is available from the provided records.
Management company, parking details, HOA fees, and other operational or fee-related information are listed as unknown or are not provided in the MLS. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3/3 current listings indicate common area electricity is included via OTCOEX. There are no public remarks mentioning it, but the MLS inclusion is consistent across every listing, which suggests this is a stable building-level fee item rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing includes HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and one listing explicitly shows WTRHTR, which generally points away from building-supplied hot water being part of the maintenance fee. With no remarks mentioning hot water and the presence of a water-heater inclusion instead, this is a strong correction to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3/3 current listings include sewer in the association fee breakdown. The evidence is consistent across listings and there are no remarks suggesting otherwise, so this appears to be a reliable building-level inclusion.
Water is included in the association fees on all 3/3 current listings. This is fully consistent across the MLS data, with no public remarks conflicting, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck-style outdoor space appears supported across all 3 listings via current MLS amenities and repeated remarks about lanai/outdoor living. One listing explicitly references a "private outdoor area" and another says the backyard extends from the lanai, suggesting the feature is real rather than copy-paste only.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Private yard is confirmed in all 3 listings by both MLS amenities and repeated remark language. The clearest phrases are "private fenced yard" and "large backyard," which strongly support a true building/unit-level private yard offering.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit laundry-in-unit mention in any of the provided remarks. The only supporting signal is MLS inclusions in 1 of 3 listings, which looks like weak/possibly copy-pasted data rather than confirmed building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is clearly supported by the remarks: one listing explicitly says "detached 2-car garage." Current MLS parking features also indicate covered/garage parking across all 3 of 3 listings. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I searched for wording that would indicate deeded or owned parking, such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The only parking-related detail is a detached 2-car garage, which does not establish deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit parking cost language, including monthly parking fees, rental charges, or dollar amounts tied to parking. No such information appears in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or instructions to join a parking queue. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC is clearly supported by the current remarks, which explicitly say "central AC." The MLS data is also consistent across all 3/3 listings (ACCEN/CENAC in unit_features and ACCEN in inclusions), so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-based evidence for concrete construction in any of the provided listings. The MLS data shows only 1 of 3 listings with CONCRE, which is weak and inconsistent with the need for corroboration from remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3 of 3 listings currently mark steel frame construction, making this the strongest of the three features in the MLS data. However, no listing remarks explicitly describe a steel frame building, so the evidence is suggestive rather than fully confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no textual support in the remarks for above-ground construction. The MLS data shows only 1 of 3 listings with ABOGRO, which is too weak to treat as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit STR permission or restriction language such as "short-term rental allowed," "legal vacation rental," "NUC," or minimum-stay rules. Nothing in the remarks indicates that short-term rentals are allowed, so this is treated as not supported by the public remarks.
I looked for hotel-rental-pool references such as "hotel pool," "managed by hotel," or branded rental program language, and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature is also false.
I searched for phrases like "mandatory hotel pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out," and found none. Since the remarks do not indicate STR is allowed, mandatory pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold phrases like "lease expires 2050," "ground lease ends," or any lease renewal year, but nothing was stated. The remarks do not provide a specific land tenure or lease expiry date.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The remarks discuss the home, short sale status, and community amenities, but do not reference VA eligibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks explicitly support sunset views for this building, and the MLS view data is uniformly NONE across all 3 listings. The lone mention of 'sunset stroll' appears to describe the community setting rather than a true sunset view feature, so this looks like copy-paste marketing rather than evidence of the amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.