Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 12
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 12
Building Overview
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage like "80% owner occupied" or phrases like "majority owner occupied" and found none. There is no explicit evidence in the public remarks to estimate the owner-occupancy percentage.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to elevators, including phrases like "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," and found nothing. There is no explicit evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny the number of elevators, so the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to include common area electricity in the maintenance fee based on current MLS data: 3/3 listings show OTCOEX. No public remarks mention a change, but the MLS consistency across all listings makes this a strong building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the public remarks that hot water is included, and the current MLS pattern is the opposite: HOTWAT is absent in all listings while WTRHTR appears in all of them. That combination is a strong indicator that units have their own water heaters, so maintenance fees likely do not include hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is well supported: 3/3 current listings carry the SEWER MLS flag, and a public remark explicitly states the fee covers 'water, sewer, trash.' This is consistent across the listing data and directly confirmed by the remarks.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both the MLS and the remarks. All 3 current listings include the WATER flag, and one listing plainly says the maintenance fee covers 'water, sewer, trash,' which confirms the feature at the building level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the remarks reference a clubhouse or community center, despite the MLS checkbox being present. The text appears to be generic listing copy about the unit and Ocean Pointe maintenance fees, so there is no public-remark support for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The provided listing remarks do not describe any meeting or conference room amenity. With no corroborating public wording across the listings, the MLS meeting-room flag is not supported by the remarks.
Strong evidence across multiple remarks that the building offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. One listing says there is a "retractable shade on the lanai," and another describes the home as having a lanai area. MLS amenities currently show PATDEC/COVPAT in 2/3 listings, so this appears consistent rather than accidental.
There is no explicit evidence of a jogging or walking path in the supplied remarks. The references to parks and beaches are location benefits, not confirmation of an on-site path amenity, so the MLS path flag lacks public-remark support.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence that private yard space is available. Multiple listings mention a "private fenced yard" and a "lovely yard equipped with sprinklers," and current MLS amenities show PRIYAR in 2/3 listings. This looks like a genuine building feature, not just agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there is no explicit mention of a recreation area or comparable shared amenity. The remarks focus on the individual townhome, its yard, garage, and upgrades, which reads like standard copy rather than evidence of a building rec facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by the MLS history across multiple listings, with 3/3 units showing storage in unit features and 2/3 also showing it in amenities. The current remarks don’t explicitly mention storage, but the repeated MLS entries suggest this is a real building/unit feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is clearly confirmed across multiple listings. At least 2 remarks explicitly mention "washer/dryer" or "new washer & dryer," and the current MLS inclusions also show WASHER/DRYER on multiple listings. This looks like consistent, repeated listing data rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly supported across the current remarks, with multiple listings explicitly stating a "2-car garage" or "two-car garage." This aligns with the current MLS parking feature data and appears consistent rather than copy-paste error, so the building should be marked as having covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking is clearly supported by both the current MLS checkbox data and the public remarks. One listing explicitly says "plus lots of guest parking," and the feature is checked in 3/3 current listings, indicating consistent building-level availability.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit mentions of a security guard or 24/7/on-site security. One listing mentions only a 'security system,' which is not the same as guard service, and the historical MLS checkbox evidence was already low confidence. Overall, the evidence suggests this feature is not reliably present in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly confirmed across the listing remarks and historical MLS data. One remark explicitly says "Brand-new central AC system," and another references the cost of running "central AC 24/7," while the current MLS data shows ACCEN/CENAC checked in all recent listings. Evidence is consistent and appears to be reliable rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of three current MLS entries show double-wall in construction materials, but none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar wording. Because prior confidence was only medium and the remarks are silent, this remains unconfirmed and could reflect repeated MLS copying.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks support steel frame construction in any of the listings reviewed. With only 1 of 3 current MLS records showing STEFRA and no corroborating agent remarks, this appears unverified and may be a checkbox copy/paste issue.
Three out of three current MLS records list a slab foundation, but none of the public remarks reference a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. This looks like a possibly repeated MLS checkbox entry without supporting narrative evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current MLS records indicate above-ground construction, but the public remarks do not describe the building that way. With no direct confirmation from agents or owners, this feature should remain unverified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state that the buyer needs an H-06 policy to cover the interior, which indicates the HOA/building is not providing full walls-in insurance coverage. That is strong evidence the building is not fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks do not mention any fire/life safety evaluation result, so there is no evidence that the building has passed FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is mixed but still leans toward garden-view units being available in the building: 2 of 3 current listings include GARDEN in the view field. The public remarks mention a private fenced yard and sprinkler repairs, but no agent explicitly describes a garden/courtyard/landscaped view, so this looks more like incomplete remark coverage than a confirmed absence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views: 0 of 2 current listings include SUNSET in view_descriptions and prior data showed 0 of 1. Current public remarks contain no supporting phrases like 'sunset view' or 'western exposure', and there is no evidence across multiple agent remarks to suggest the building offers sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.