Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 12
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ke Aina Kai Townhomes 12
Building Overview
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for owner-occupancy percentages and phrases such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' No relevant information was found, so the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
The remarks were searched for elevator counts and terms such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators.' None of these references appeared, so the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity is supported by the current MLS pattern: 4/4 listings show OTCOEX. No public remark explicitly mentions it, but the consistency across listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included. The MLS pattern is the opposite of HOTWAT: 0/4 listings have HOTWAT while all 4/4 show WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that the fee does not cover building-supplied hot water. The remarks support this by explicitly listing other fee items but never mentioning hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is clearly confirmed. All 4/4 current listings carry the SEWER flag, and multiple remarks explicitly state the fee covers sewer. This is consistent across listings and does not look like copy-paste error.
Water inclusion is clearly confirmed. All 4/4 current listings include the WATER flag, and the remarks directly state that the maintenance fee covers water. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings have the clubhouse amenity checked, but the remarks do not mention a clubhouse, club house, community center, or recreation center. The available text reads like generic update/marketing copy for individual townhomes, so there is no explicit listing-language confirmation even though the checkbox is consistent across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The provided listing remarks do not describe any meeting or conference room amenity. With no corroborating public wording across the listings, the MLS meeting-room flag is not supported by the remarks.
Strong evidence across multiple listings that this building offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. Current remarks mention a "covered lanai" and "retractable shade on the lanai," which aligns with the historical PATDEC/COVPAT checkbox data shown in 3/4 listings. This appears consistent across different remarks rather than a one-off agent copy-paste.
All 4 current listings have the walking/jogging path amenity checked, yet none of the remarks reference a jogging path, walking path, running trail, or fitness path. The remarks only mention nearby parks and beaches as location benefits, so the evidence is checkbox-based rather than text-based confirmation.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention private yard space, including a "private fenced yard" and a "lovely yard equipped with sprinklers," making this a strong building-level feature for buyers. The historical MLS data already showed PRIYAR in 3/4 listings, and the current remarks reinforce that this is not just checkbox noise.
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there is no explicit mention of a recreation area or comparable shared amenity. The remarks focus on the individual townhome, its yard, garage, and upgrades, which reads like standard copy rather than evidence of a building rec facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage appears to be a real building feature rather than a one-off checkbox: all 4 listings include storage in unit_features, and 2 of 4 also list it in amenities. Current remarks reinforce the idea with phrases like "garage storage shelving" and "adds everyday convenience," though the remarks sound more like unit-level storage than a shared locker. Overall evidence is strong across multiple listings and not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is clearly confirmed across the listings. At least 2 remarks explicitly mention "washer/dryer" or "new washer & dryer," and the MLS data shows 4/4 listings including washer/dryer. This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention a "2-car garage" or "two-car garage," which matches the current MLS parking data and suggests this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Multiple listings describe a 2-car garage and, in some cases, driveway or guest parking. However, there is no explicit statement that the parking is deeded or legally owned with the unit.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, and additional parking costs. No parking fee is disclosed.
Guest parking is clearly supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. At least one listing directly states "plus lots of guest parking," and the feature appears consistently present across the building's listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention garages, driveway parking, street parking, and guest stalls but do not mention a parking waitlist or waiting list. No waitlist system is evidenced.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit mentions of a security guard or 24/7/on-site security. One listing mentions only a 'security system,' which is not the same as guard service, and the historical MLS checkbox evidence was already low confidence. Overall, the evidence suggests this feature is not reliably present in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly confirmed for this building. Multiple listings mention it directly, including explicit phrases like "brand-new central AC system" and "central AC 24/7," which supports that this is not just copied MLS checkbox data. Historical MLS data also shows consistent ACCEN/CENAC inclusion across all current listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks describe the building as double-wall constructed, and none reference 'two walls' or other indicators. The MLS checkbox appears to be copy/paste data without support in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings reviewed, 0 listings mention steel frame construction in the remarks. The public remarks focus on updates, AC, garages, and yard features, which suggests the MLS STEFRA flag is likely not corroborated by agent descriptions.
Three out of three current MLS records list a slab foundation, but none of the public remarks reference a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. This looks like a possibly repeated MLS checkbox entry without supporting narrative evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no remark-level references to above-ground construction in any of the listings reviewed. Because the remarks are consistent in discussing upgrades and amenities but not construction type, the MLS ABOGRO flag is not publicly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings do not mention short-term rentals, vacation rentals, STR permission, NUC, TVU, or any rental restrictions. Because there is no explicit evidence of STR authorization, this is treated as false with medium confidence.
No remarks mention a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel management, or participation in hotel operations. Since STR permission is not established, the prerequisite for hotel-pool participation is also not met.
The remarks contain no statements that owners must participate in a hotel pool or rental program. Because STR permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not identify the property as leasehold or provide a lease expiration year. No specific four-digit lease expiry year could be extracted.
The remarks were searched for VA approval, VA financing, and VA loan acceptance. None of these terms or equivalent statements appear, so VA approval is not evidenced.
The listings indicate that the association provides exterior insurance but buyers must obtain an H-06 policy for interior coverage. This strongly indicates the HOA does not provide full walls-in coverage, so the building is not fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. No such statements were found; under the absence rule, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is mixed but still leans toward garden-view units being available in the building: 2 of 3 current listings include GARDEN in the view field. The public remarks mention a private fenced yard and sprinkler repairs, but no agent explicitly describes a garden/courtyard/landscaped view, so this looks more like incomplete remark coverage than a confirmed absence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views: 0 of 2 current listings include SUNSET in view_descriptions and prior data showed 0 of 1. Current public remarks contain no supporting phrases like 'sunset view' or 'western exposure', and there is no evidence across multiple agent remarks to suggest the building offers sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.