Kawaihae Crescent West
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kawaihae Crescent West
Building Overview
Kawaihae Crescent West in Hawaii Kai — built 1973; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kawaihae Crescent West
Kawaihae Crescent West is a condominium building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1973. MLS data provided for this property does not specify unit sizes or the construction type.
Key policies recorded in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The MLS does not list specific building amenities, common-area features, or homeowner association services for this property.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance or association fees, and the management company are not specified in the MLS (management company listed as unknown). Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all building facts, policies, fees, and amenities with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
There is no explicit evidence in the remarks that cable TV is included in the maintenance fee. The listings focus on renovations, parking, storage, and HVAC, with one mention of internet service only—not cable—so this appears more like unchecked/copy-paste MLS data than a verified building feature.
One listing says, 'maintenance of common areas is covered in the maintenance fee,' but none explicitly mention common-area electricity or building power. That wording supports common maintenance, not OTCOEX specifically, so the evidence for common electricity being included is weak despite the current checkbox activity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly contradicted by the remarks: multiple listings mention a 'tankless water heater' or 'new water heater,' which indicates unit-level water heating rather than HOA-provided hot water. With 0/9 HOTWAT and 8/9 WTRHTR in the current MLS data, the evidence is highly consistent that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit remark evidence that water is included in the HOA fee. With only 2/9 current listings showing WATER and no confirming copy across the remarks, this appears to be weak or inconsistent MLS checkbox data rather than a verified building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported by the remarks: multiple listings explicitly reference a "large storage area," "built-in storage," a "storage locker," and "additional storage." This appears in both building-level and unit-level descriptions, across several agents, so it is not just a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported: current MLS data shows 9/9 listings with WASHER/DRYER in inclusions. Public remarks also explicitly mention "washer/dryer" and "dryer," confirming the feature rather than suggesting a copy-paste error. This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 listings include parking in MLS features and numerous remarks explicitly state two stalls (e.g., 'Two assigned parking stalls,' '2 parking stalls,' '2 parking'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches the MLS checkbox data, indicating strong, building-level parking availability.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly describe "two assigned parking stalls" and even identify stall numbers (#41 and #38), while another says "one covered parking stall ... one open stall." This appears to be consistent across multiple agents and confirms the MLS assigned-parking data rather than a copy-paste error.
7 of 8 MLS entries indicate covered parking and several remarks explicitly mention 'one covered parking stall' or 'one covered and one uncovered,' confirming the presence of covered parking (covered stall/garage) at the building. Evidence is strong and consistent across listings.
I found repeated references to two assigned/included stalls, but no explicit language that the parking is deeded or owned with the unit. Because deeded parking requires direct evidence and none was provided, this is set to false.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking, additional parking cost, or parking rental. The remarks only say the unit includes assigned stalls and street parking, so no parking fee can be confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist references, including waiting list or join waitlist language, and found none. There is no evidence in these remarks that the building uses a parking waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers split AC in at least some units. 3+ listings explicitly mention "Split A/C" or "split AC," and one remark says it was "newly installed," suggesting this is a real unit feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox issue. The MLS inclusion rate (4/9) is consistent with a partial building-level feature available in some units.
MLS checkbox ACWIUN appears in 4 of 8 current listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'wall AC'. Remarks mostly reference 'split A/C' or 'newly installed split AC', so the checkbox evidence suggests some units may have window units but agent copy/paste or inconsistent reporting is likely; include the feature with moderate confidence (4/8 listings checked, no direct remarks confirming).
No public remarks (0 of 8) mention concrete construction or phrases like 'concrete building' or 'reinforced concrete.' The MLS field is set for only 1 of 8 listings, which appears inconsistent with the unanimous silence in agent remarks and suggests a checkbox error rather than a true building attribute.
Double wall construction is supported by 8 of 9 current listings, making it a strong MLS-level pattern even though the remarks themselves do not mention it directly. The consistency across most listings suggests this is likely a building feature rather than a one-off agent input, though the lack of remark confirmation keeps confidence below the highest tier.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is only weakly supported: 2 of 9 current listings have WOOFRA, while public remarks across the provided listings do not mention "wood frame" or similar language. Because the remarks are silent and the checkbox appears inconsistently, this looks more like uneven MLS input than a clearly verified building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental terms such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, and 30-day minimum rules. The remarks contain no such information, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, Hilton pool, or managed-by-hotel language and found none. With no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for mandatory program language like required to participate, cannot opt out, or must be in rental program and found nothing. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, land lease to, renewed through, and similar phrases. Nothing in the provided listings indicates a lease expiry year, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks directly advertise VA financing availability through an assumable VA loan. This is strong, explicit evidence that VA-related financing is available for the building/unit marketing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing explicitly confirms views with the phrase "Koko Head views," and the current set of remarks repeats that same detail. While most listings focus on renovations and layout, the repeated view mention indicates the building does offer view units, and the evidence does not look like a one-off MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.