Kauhale - Rainbow Series
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kauhale - Rainbow Series
Building Overview
Kauhale - Rainbow Series in Waipahu — wood-frame building (1981) with assigned parking and sunset views.
About Kauhale - Rainbow Series
Kauhale - Rainbow Series is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1981 and is wood frame construction. Size or unit count information is not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS data include sunset views, window air conditioning, and an allowance for pets. Short-term rentals are not permitted according to the records provided. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information.
Parking is noted as available and assigned. No homeowner association fees, utility arrangements, or additional amenities are specified in the MLS excerpt. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, including unit size, fees, management, and rules, with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings consistently show floor 2 as the highest floor, and both the county parcel record and state registration report 2 floors.
The county's reconciled residential-unit count is 127 and matches the currently stored value. The state registration reports 128 units, but the county's reconciled figure is the preferred parcel count; the county dwell sum also differs by one.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1490. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." None were found, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. The public remarks reviewed here do not explicitly say 'common area electricity' or similar, so the evidence comes primarily from MLS data rather than agent comments.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, there are no HOTWAT MLS entries, while 12/20 list WTRHTR in inclusions, which is a strong signal that hot water is not part of the maintenance fee. The public remarks also never say hot water is included and instead mention a 'Gas water heater,' reinforcing that this is unit-level equipment rather than a building-paid utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears to be a building-wide, consistent MLS pattern: 19 of 20 current listings show SEWER included. The public remarks do not mention sewer directly, but nothing suggests a change, so the historical and current MLS evidence strongly supports this feature.
Water inclusion is supported by the MLS checkbox pattern, with 19 of 20 listings showing WATER included in association fees. No remarks mention a change or exception, so this remains a high-confidence building-level utility benefit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area. The only evidence is the current MLS amenity checkbox appearing on 8 of 20 listings, which is weak and inconsistent with the remarks, so the feature should not be treated as verified for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck is supported by many listings, with repeated references to 'covered lanai,' 'private patio/deck area,' 'covered balcony,' 'large balcony,' and 'large fenced courtyard.' The feature appears across multiple agents and listing styles, so this does not look like copy-paste noise. Combined with 7/20 MLS amenity flags, there is strong evidence that the building offers outdoor patio/deck-style spaces.
Strong evidence the building/community offers jogging/walking paths. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "walking/jogging path," "jogging paths," and "walking/cycling and jogging paths," and the current MLS amenity flag appears in 14 of 20 listings. This is consistent across multiple remarks, so the feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence that this building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple listings explicitly mention it, with repeated wording such as "full size washer and dryer in the unit," "in-unit laundry," and "washer and dryer located in the unit." The consistency across many remarks suggests this is a real building feature, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available building-wide. Across the remarks, nearly every listing references some form of parking, including assigned stalls, open stalls, and nearby street parking, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is well supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. This is mentioned in many listings across different agents, making it a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
The remarks confirm that units generally include an assigned or open parking stall. They do not characterize the stall as deeded or owned with the unit, so deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly identify a $40 monthly rental charge for an additional parking stall. This appears to apply to an extra stall rather than the included assigned stall.
Guest parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks from different agents mention ample or plenty of guest parking, so this does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Additional parking may require an application and availability, but no formal waitlist system is described. Searches for waitlist, waiting list, or joining a parking queue found no explicit mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence: 15/20 MLS listings historically included ACWIUN and multiple current remarks explicitly reference window ACs (quotes include 'new window A/C’s' and 'ceiling fans and window A/C's in every room'). Mentions appear across different listings/agents and are corroborated by the prior checklist data, indicating many units have window air conditioning.
Only 1/20 MLS listings mark CONCRETE, while 11/20 mark WOOD FRAME and no remarks suggest concrete construction, making the single concrete entry likely a checkbox error.
Double-wall construction is the strongest-supported feature here, with 20 of 20 current listings showing DOUWAL and historical high-confidence support. The public remarks do not address construction details, but the MLS checkbox data is fully consistent across listings.
No analysis available
Just 1/20 MLS listings indicate MASSTU while 11/20 indicate WOOD FRAME, and no remarks mention masonry or stucco construction.
No analysis available
Concrete slab construction is not supported by the available evidence: only 5 of 20 listings mark SLAB and the remarks never describe a slab foundation. Because this is a building-level construction feature and the majority of listings do not carry it, the safest correction is false.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is supported by high-confidence historical data and remains present in 12 of 20 current listings via WOOFRA. The public remarks do not explicitly mention construction type, which is common for agent copy/paste remarks, but there is no evidence against the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe ordinary residential townhome use and do not provide evidence that short-term rentals are allowed. Because no explicit prohibition is stated, this is based on absence of supporting STR language.
There is no evidence of a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Additionally, STR permission is not established, so the prerequisite for hotel-pool participation is unmet.
The listings contain no evidence that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool. Since STR permission and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks provide no specific lease-expiration year. The fee-simple description suggests leasehold tenure does not apply, but no separate land-tenure confirmation is provided.
Public remarks directly confirm VA financing eligibility for the building. The explicit VA-approved statement and VA assumable-loan reference provide strong, current evidence.
The remarks were searched for HOA insurance language including fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. No qualifying insurance statement or explicit denial was found; under the stated rules, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, was FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or life safety compliant. No such evidence or explicit denial was found; under the stated rules, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 20 current MLS listings list MOUNTA in the view_descriptions, and at least two public remarks explicitly state 'serene mountain views' and 'beautiful mountain views.' Mentions appear in listings from different remark blocks, so some units likely have mauka/mountain views, but the overall frequency is low and may reflect unit-specific views rather than a building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by multiple independent listings, not just MLS metadata. At least 2 remarks explicitly reference sunset, including "perfect for unwinding at sunset" and "enjoy the sunset," and the prior dataset already had sunset in the view field on 2/20 listings. The evidence is consistent with a real building/unit-level view attribute rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 6 of 20 listings currently show RESMAN, and the public remarks across the listings are silent on any resident or on-site manager. Because there is no historical confidence and no firsthand-style confirmation in remarks, the evidence is too weak to validate this feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.