Kauhale - Rainbow Series
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kauhale - Rainbow Series
Building Overview
Kauhale - Rainbow Series in Waipahu — wood-frame building (1981) with assigned parking and sunset views.
About Kauhale - Rainbow Series
Kauhale - Rainbow Series is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1981 and is wood frame construction. Size or unit count information is not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS data include sunset views, window air conditioning, and an allowance for pets. Short-term rentals are not permitted according to the records provided. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information.
Parking is noted as available and assigned. No homeowner association fees, utility arrangements, or additional amenities are specified in the MLS excerpt. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, including unit size, fees, management, and rules, with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or phrases like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' and found none. The remarks do not provide enough information to estimate the owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or similar building-amenity language and found none. The listings read like low-rise townhome/condo units with parking and courtyard details, but they do not confirm any elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. The public remarks reviewed here do not explicitly say 'common area electricity' or similar, so the evidence comes primarily from MLS data rather than agent comments.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No MLS entries list HOTWAT and 10 of 20 listings list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions, and remarks do not mention 'hot water included.' This strongly indicates hot water is supplied by unit water heaters and not covered by HOA; set to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. Historical remarks and prior notes also support sewer being included, making this a strong, consistent building-level feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
19 of 20 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. Prior high-confidence notes and the repeated MLS checkbox pattern strongly support water being included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 8 of 20 current MLS listings have the CRWSH amenity checked, none of the combined public remarks mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or any vehicle wash area. With the feature recently appearing in the MLS and no supporting remarks across multiple agents, the evidence points to probable checkbox error rather than an actual building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck is supported by many listings, with repeated references to 'covered lanai,' 'private patio/deck area,' 'covered balcony,' 'large balcony,' and 'large fenced courtyard.' The feature appears across multiple agents and listing styles, so this does not look like copy-paste noise. Combined with 7/20 MLS amenity flags, there is strong evidence that the building offers outdoor patio/deck-style spaces.
Strong evidence the building/community offers jogging/walking paths. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "walking/jogging path," "jogging paths," and "walking/cycling and jogging paths," and the current MLS amenity flag appears in 14 of 20 listings. This is consistent across multiple remarks, so the feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: the MLS historically indicated 19/20 listings include washer/dryer, and the current remarks repeatedly state phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer", "indoor washer and dryer", and "full size washer & dryer" across multiple agent listings. This strong, consistent messaging from many listings (not just a single agent) supports keeping laundry_in_unit = true for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available building-wide. Across the remarks, nearly every listing mentions some form of parking such as 'your own parking space,' 'one open parking stall,' 'assigned parking stall,' or 'dedicated parking spot,' which strongly confirms the MLS data. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be stable rather than a copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is supported by both the MLS checkboxes and the remarks. Several listings explicitly mention 'one assigned parking stall,' 'assigned parking stall nearby,' and similar phrasing, while a few others mention open or additional parking instead. Overall, the evidence is strong and repeated across multiple agents.
No analysis available
I looked for deeded/owned parking wording and did not find it. The remarks consistently describe the parking as assigned, open, or available nearby, which suggests use rights but not ownership tied to the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for any dollar amount or wording like 'parking fee,' 'parking rental,' or 'monthly charge' and found none. One listing mentions the ability to apply for an additional parking stall from management, but no cost is provided.
Guest parking is well supported across the listing remarks and MLS data. Multiple descriptions say 'ample guest parking,' 'plenty of guest parking,' 'guest parking across building,' or 'guest parking in complex,' which makes this a consistent building-level amenity. The repetition across listings suggests this is a real and persistent feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' and similar queue language, but found nothing. The only related reference is that new owners can apply to rent an additional parking stall, which is not the same as a formal waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence: 15/20 MLS listings historically included ACWIUN and multiple current remarks explicitly reference window ACs (quotes include 'new window A/C’s' and 'ceiling fans and window A/C's in every room'). Mentions appear across different listings/agents and are corroborated by the prior checklist data, indicating many units have window air conditioning.
Only 1/20 MLS listings mark CONCRETE, while 11/20 mark WOOD FRAME and no remarks suggest concrete construction, making the single concrete entry likely a checkbox error.
Double-wall construction is consistently shown across all 20 current listings, making this the strongest-supported feature. There are no conflicting remarks, and the MLS pattern looks uniform rather than sporadic copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Just 1/20 MLS listings indicate MASSTU while 11/20 indicate WOOD FRAME, and no remarks mention masonry or stucco construction.
No analysis available
Concrete slab construction is not supported by the available evidence: only 5 of 20 listings mark SLAB and the remarks never describe a slab foundation. Because this is a building-level construction feature and the majority of listings do not carry it, the safest correction is false.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is supported by historical high-confidence data and by 11 of 20 current listings marking WOOFRA. The remarks do not mention construction, so this appears to be MLS field consistency rather than a remark-based confirmation, but the existing evidence still supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms indicating short-term rental allowance, such as 'STR permitted,' 'vacation rental allowed,' 'NUC,' and 'TVU,' and found none. Because there is no evidence of STR permission in the public remarks, this is treated as not allowed based on the available listing text.
I looked for hotel pool terms such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel-managed operations, or rental program references and found nothing. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel pool participation is also not supported.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, required rental programs, or inability to opt out, and found none. With no indication that short-term rentals are allowed in the first place, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold,' and any 4-digit expiry year, but found nothing. The listings read like a standard owner-occupied townhome/condo description and do not provide evidence of a land lease or an expiration date.
This is strong direct evidence that VA financing is available for at least one unit in the building. The remark specifically references a VA assumable loan, which is the clearest possible indicator for VA loan compatibility in public listings.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language such as fully insured, walls-in coverage, or full building insurance and found no evidence. The listings discuss unit upgrades, parking, and location, but not HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for any public-remarks language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection compliance, and found nothing. There is no explicit certification or safety-evaluation status mentioned in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 20 current MLS listings list MOUNTA in the view_descriptions, and at least two public remarks explicitly state 'serene mountain views' and 'beautiful mountain views.' Mentions appear in listings from different remark blocks, so some units likely have mauka/mountain views, but the overall frequency is low and may reflect unit-specific views rather than a building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by multiple listings, with at least 2 explicit remarks referencing sunset use from the lanai/balcony. Phrases like 'perfect for unwinding at sunset' and 'a place to relax while you enjoy the sunset' confirm this as a real building-level offering for some units. Current remarks are consistent with the historical High confidence and do not suggest a correction is needed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 6 of 20 listings currently show RESMAN, and the public remarks across the listings are silent on any resident or on-site manager. Because there is no historical confidence and no firsthand-style confirmation in remarks, the evidence is too weak to validate this feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.