Kauhale - Rainbow Series
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kauhale - Rainbow Series
Building Overview
Kauhale - Rainbow Series in Waipahu — wood-frame building (1981) with assigned parking and sunset views.
About Kauhale - Rainbow Series
Kauhale - Rainbow Series is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1981 and is wood frame construction. Size or unit count information is not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS data include sunset views, window air conditioning, and an allowance for pets. Short-term rentals are not permitted according to the records provided. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information.
Parking is noted as available and assigned. No homeowner association fees, utility arrangements, or additional amenities are specified in the MLS excerpt. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, including unit size, fees, management, and rules, with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or qualitative phrases describing the building as owner occupied, and found none. Since there is no current percentage value provided and no remark evidence, the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references and found none. Because there is no current elevator value provided and the remarks do not describe the building as having elevators, the count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. The public remarks reviewed here do not explicitly say 'common area electricity' or similar, so the evidence comes primarily from MLS data rather than agent comments.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, there are no HOTWAT MLS entries, while 12/20 list WTRHTR in inclusions, which is a strong signal that hot water is not part of the maintenance fee. The public remarks also never say hot water is included and instead mention a 'Gas water heater,' reinforcing that this is unit-level equipment rather than a building-paid utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears to be a building-wide, consistent MLS pattern: 19 of 20 current listings show SEWER included. The public remarks do not mention sewer directly, but nothing suggests a change, so the historical and current MLS evidence strongly supports this feature.
Water inclusion is supported by the MLS checkbox pattern, with 19 of 20 listings showing WATER included in association fees. No remarks mention a change or exception, so this remains a high-confidence building-level utility benefit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area. The only evidence is the current MLS amenity checkbox appearing on 8 of 20 listings, which is weak and inconsistent with the remarks, so the feature should not be treated as verified for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck is supported by many listings, with repeated references to 'covered lanai,' 'private patio/deck area,' 'covered balcony,' 'large balcony,' and 'large fenced courtyard.' The feature appears across multiple agents and listing styles, so this does not look like copy-paste noise. Combined with 7/20 MLS amenity flags, there is strong evidence that the building offers outdoor patio/deck-style spaces.
Strong evidence the building/community offers jogging/walking paths. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "walking/jogging path," "jogging paths," and "walking/cycling and jogging paths," and the current MLS amenity flag appears in 14 of 20 listings. This is consistent across multiple remarks, so the feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence that this building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple listings explicitly mention it, with repeated wording such as "full size washer and dryer in the unit," "in-unit laundry," and "washer and dryer located in the unit." The consistency across many remarks suggests this is a real building feature, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available building-wide. Across the remarks, nearly every listing references some form of parking, including assigned stalls, open stalls, and nearby street parking, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is well supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. This is mentioned in many listings across different agents, making it a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
I looked for wording like deeded, owned, or parking included in deed and did not find it. The listings instead describe assigned/open parking, which indicates parking is not deeded based on the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for any dollar amount or language such as parking fee, parking rental, or monthly parking charge and found nothing. The remarks only mention assigned parking and guest/street parking.
Guest parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks from different agents mention ample or plenty of guest parking, so this does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or queue system and found none. The only related note is that an extra stall may be applied for, which is not the same as a formal waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence: 15/20 MLS listings historically included ACWIUN and multiple current remarks explicitly reference window ACs (quotes include 'new window A/C’s' and 'ceiling fans and window A/C's in every room'). Mentions appear across different listings/agents and are corroborated by the prior checklist data, indicating many units have window air conditioning.
Only 1/20 MLS listings mark CONCRETE, while 11/20 mark WOOD FRAME and no remarks suggest concrete construction, making the single concrete entry likely a checkbox error.
Double-wall construction is the strongest-supported feature here, with 20 of 20 current listings showing DOUWAL and historical high-confidence support. The public remarks do not address construction details, but the MLS checkbox data is fully consistent across listings.
No analysis available
Just 1/20 MLS listings indicate MASSTU while 11/20 indicate WOOD FRAME, and no remarks mention masonry or stucco construction.
No analysis available
Concrete slab construction is not supported by the available evidence: only 5 of 20 listings mark SLAB and the remarks never describe a slab foundation. Because this is a building-level construction feature and the majority of listings do not carry it, the safest correction is false.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is supported by high-confidence historical data and remains present in 12 of 20 current listings via WOOFRA. The public remarks do not explicitly mention construction type, which is common for agent copy/paste remarks, but there is no evidence against the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, or TVU and found none. There is also no indication of hotel-style rental use or any statement that short-term rentals are allowed, so this is treated as not allowed from the public remarks.
I looked for hotel pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel operations, or managed rental program language and found nothing. Since the remarks do not support STR allowance, hotel pool participation must also be false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, required rental programs, or inability to opt out and found none. Because there is no evidence of a hotel rental pool or STR program, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease, leasehold, or a 4-digit expiration year and found none. The only relevant tenure clue is "fee simple," which suggests the property is not leasehold, so no expiry year can be extracted.
This is direct evidence that VA financing is available for at least one unit in the building. The listing specifically references a VA assumable loan, which strongly supports VA loan compatibility.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language such as fully insured, walls-in coverage, or full building insurance and found no evidence. The listings do not provide any indication that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for public-remarks language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, or fire inspection compliance and found nothing. With no such mention in the listings, there is no evidence to mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 20 current MLS listings list MOUNTA in the view_descriptions, and at least two public remarks explicitly state 'serene mountain views' and 'beautiful mountain views.' Mentions appear in listings from different remark blocks, so some units likely have mauka/mountain views, but the overall frequency is low and may reflect unit-specific views rather than a building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by multiple independent listings, not just MLS metadata. At least 2 remarks explicitly reference sunset, including "perfect for unwinding at sunset" and "enjoy the sunset," and the prior dataset already had sunset in the view field on 2/20 listings. The evidence is consistent with a real building/unit-level view attribute rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 6 of 20 listings currently show RESMAN, and the public remarks across the listings are silent on any resident or on-site manager. Because there is no historical confidence and no firsthand-style confirmation in remarks, the evidence is too weak to validate this feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.