Kapiolani Royale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapiolani Royale
Building Overview
Kapiolani Royale in McCully-Moiliili — 20-story concrete building (1976) with mountain views and an on-site pool.
About Kapiolani Royale
Based on MLS data, Kapiolani Royale is a 20-floor condominium building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1976 and is of concrete construction, with listed mountain views for some units.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool. Units are reported to use window air conditioning. No additional amenity details are provided in the MLS data supplied.
Based on MLS data, parking is available and includes covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are listed as not allowed. The management company is listed as Unknown in the provided records. Buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or building management before making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy details, including an exact percentage or descriptive phrases indicating a predominantly owner-occupied building, but found none. The remarks do not provide any basis to estimate the owner-occupancy rate.
I looked for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but the remarks only confirm that the building has updated/modernized elevators. Because no number is provided, the elevator count remains unknown from these remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings that cable TV is included in the maintenance fee. At least 2 remarks explicitly mention cable/basic cable, and the current MLS data still shows CABTV in most listings. This looks consistent rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
The MLS data strongly supports this feature with 13 of 15 listings including OTCOEX. Public remarks are less explicit about common-area electricity specifically, but they do reference shared-building coverage in the maintenance fee and the pattern is consistent across the building. This is likely a stable building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
Electricity appears to be universally included. The current MLS data shows ELECTR on all 15 listings, and remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like "HOA covers electricity" and "maintenance fees cover electricity." This is very strong, consistent evidence.
No analysis available
Hot water is repeatedly described as included in the HOA/maintenance fee. One remark explicitly says the HOA covers "electricity, water, sewer, hot water and cable TV," matching the MLS pattern of 14/15 listings showing HOTWAT. There is one WTRHTR indicator in the data, but the overall evidence still strongly supports hot water inclusion for this building.
Internet inclusion is not universal in the MLS data, but there is clear remark-level evidence that it is included in at least some listings. One agent remark explicitly states that maintenance fees cover "internet," which supports keeping this feature on for the building. This may reflect either a building-wide inclusion that is inconsistently entered or a feature described only by some agents.
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included. The current MLS data shows SEWER on all 15 listings, and remarks explicitly list sewer among the covered utilities. This is a very strong building-level feature with no meaningful sign of change.
Water is consistently included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows WATER on all 15 listings, and several remarks explicitly confirm that water is covered. This is a stable, high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are strongly supported. The amenity appears in most current MLS listings, and the remarks directly confirm a "car wash area," making this very likely a real building feature. The consistency across listings suggests this is not just unchecked copy-paste data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings mention a "meeting room" and one also says "community room," which is consistent with a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error. Historical confidence was already high, and the current remarks reinforce it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some support for a shared recreation area, but it is not widespread in the remarks. The strongest evidence is the explicit mention of a "rec room" / "community room" in a small number of listings, plus RECARE appearing in 2 of 15 current MLS records. This looks plausible but not as strongly confirmed as the other amenities.
Evidence is strong: at least several listings explicitly mention a recreation/community/meeting room (quotes include 'rec room', 'community room', 'meeting room'), and 7 of 13 current MLS listings have RECROO checked. Mentions appear across different agent remarks rather than a single isolated listing, so include recreation_room = true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is very well supported for Kapiolani Royale. Multiple listings explicitly mention "extra storage," "storage locker," and even "storage lockers conveniently located on each floor," with additional references to bike/surfboard storage. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be genuine building-level storage access rather than a one-off unit feature.
This feature is directly confirmed by the public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly advertise bike/surfboard storage, which is clear evidence that surfboard storage is available.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a legitimate building-wide amenity based on the MLS checkbox pattern. While the public remarks do not explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, the feature is present in most current listings, which is strong supporting evidence. There is no contrary evidence suggesting it should be removed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building very clearly has a swimming pool. The feature is mentioned in numerous remarks across the listings, with about a dozen explicit references such as 'cozy pool,' 'refreshing pool,' 'pool and rec room,' and 'building features including secured entry, pool.' This appears consistent across different agents and aligns with the current MLS amenity data, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for wording that would identify the pool as salt water. The building does have a pool, but the remarks do not specify that it is salt-based.
Strong, consistent evidence supports in-unit laundry at the building level. At least 5 current remarks explicitly mention it, using multiple phrasings such as "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer dryer located in the unit," "in-home washer and dryer," and "Washer/Dryer in the unit." The wording appears across multiple listings rather than a single copy-paste-only mention, reinforcing that this is a real building feature.
No analysis available
I looked for any public remark indicating paid community laundry, including coin-op or card-operated machines. The remarks instead describe in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence that community laundry is paid.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," and similar wording. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no public remark evidence that community laundry exists on every floor.
All 13 listings include parking in the MLS checkboxes and the remarks repeatedly reference parking: phrases include 'covered parking', 'gated garage', 'secured parking', and 'parking stalls'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and unit remarks, indicating the building offers parking (common/gated/covered) for buyers.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'one assigned covered parking stall,' '1 assigned parking stall,' and even '2 tandem parking stalls,' which is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS data. The evidence appears repeated across several agents rather than a single copied description.
Covered parking is clearly offered in the building. Listings repeatedly mention 'covered parking stall,' '1 covered secured parking,' and 'gated garage,' matching the prior MLS pattern of covered/garage parking. This is strong, consistent evidence across many remarks.
I searched the remarks for explicit deeded-parking language such as deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or owned parking stall and found none. The listings consistently mention assigned, secured, or covered parking, which supports parking availability but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
At least one remark explicitly gives a monthly parking charge for an additional stall. That is sufficient evidence that parking can carry a fee when extra parking is rented.
Guest parking is confirmed in multiple remarks, including explicit phrases like 'guest parking' and 'guest parking stalls.' This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data and suggests the feature is a normal building amenity. The wording appears in more than one listing, not just a checkbox.
Secured parking/entry is very well supported. Remarks repeatedly describe the building as 'secured,' with phrases such as 'secured entry,' 'completely secured building,' 'secured parking,' and 'secured gated garage.' This is consistent across multiple listings and strongly confirms the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, and join the waitlist for parking, but there was no evidence of any waitlist system. The public remarks describe assigned stalls, guest parking, and a possible second stall for rent instead.
No analysis available
I looked for references to card or fob entry systems. The remarks say the building is secured, has secured entry, and a gated garage, but they do not specifically mention card/fob access.
No analysis available
I searched for any explicit indication of security patrol services. The remarks only mention secured entry, resident manager, and gated parking, with no public mention of patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by both current MLS inclusions and public remarks. The MLS shows ACWIUN in the majority of listings (11/15), and one remark explicitly mentions 'window AC,' while the rest of the remarks do not contradict it. This looks like a building-level feature that agents are consistently carrying forward rather than a one-off typo.
12 of 15 current MLS listings identify the building as concrete (CONCRE), which is strong building-level evidence. None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction materials, so this appears to come from the MLS property data rather than agent narrative. Given the consistent majority in current listings, concrete construction should be retained.
Although 3 of 14 MLS listings include DOUWAL, 0 of 14 public remarks mention 'double wall' or equivalent. With prior Low confidence and no supporting remarks across multiple listings, this likely reflects inconsistent checkbox usage rather than an actual building feature; omitted with low confidence.
Only 1 of 13 current MLS listings marks hollow tile (HOLTIL) and there are no mentions of 'hollow tile' or similar in the public remarks. Given the lack of corroborating text and the single MLS checkbox, the evidence for hollow tile construction is weak and likely a checkbox error.
No public remarks (0 of 14) mention 'masonry' or 'stucco' despite 2/14 MLS listings marking MASSTU. With no prior confidence and no corroborating agent remarks, this appears to be an unchecked claim likely due to copy/paste; therefore the feature is omitted with low confidence.
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of 14) reference a concrete slab foundation, despite 2 of 14 MLS listings marking SLAB. With no prior confidence and no corroborating agent remarks, this appears to be an unverified checkbox entry and is omitted with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 13 current MLS listings marks above-ground construction (ABOGRO) and there are no supporting phrases in the public remarks. With no corroborating remarks or user verification, this appears to be an isolated checkbox entry rather than confirmed building information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or similar permissions and found nothing. Because there is no evidence in the remarks that short-term rentals are permitted, this is treated as not allowed based on the available public information.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style program, managed-by-hotel, or part of hotel operations and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature must also be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required to participate, must rent, or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no hotel pool program mentioned and no evidence of STR permission, there is no basis to mark this as mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings identify the building as fee simple rather than leasehold, so there is no lease expiration year to extract. I searched for lease expiry, ground lease, and renewal language and found none.
Multiple remarks directly state that Kapiolani Royale is VA-approved, which supports VA financing being allowed. I found no contradictory language suggesting VA loans are not accepted.
The public remarks repeatedly and explicitly confirm full insurance coverage for the building. Phrases like "100% hurricane insurance coverage" and "100% insured building" are strong evidence of full HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE, fire safety certification, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing. With no explicit mention in the public remarks, there is no evidence that the building has passed FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence confirms mountain views for Kapiolani Royale. Multiple listings explicitly reference 'mountains,' 'mauka,' and 'mountain & city views,' with several agents describing the same view from the lanai or unit. This is consistent across many remarks and aligns with the historically high MLS signal.
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported by both historical MLS data and current public remarks. Numerous listings explicitly mention 'city,' 'city skyline,' 'city lights,' or 'Honolulu city views,' often paired with mountain views. The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building-level feature available in some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct references to seeing Friday night fireworks from units, lanais, or the building. The remarks discuss city, mountain, and skyline views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks explicitly state there is an on-site or resident manager (phrases include 'on-site building manager' and 'resident manager'), and the RESMAN amenity checkbox is present on 7 of 14 current listings. Evidence appears across different agent remarks (at least four separate remarks mention a manager), supporting a high-confidence inclusion of a resident manager for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.