Kapiolani Banyan
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapiolani Banyan
Building Overview
Kapiolani Banyan in McCully-Moiliili, built 1982; no pets and no short-term rentals (based on MLS data).
About Kapiolani Banyan
Kapiolani Banyan is a condominium building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood, built in 1982. According to available records, specific information on unit count, building size, and construction type is not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building enforces a no-pets policy and does not allow short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in available records. No additional amenities are specified in the provided MLS information.
Parking, maintenance fees, financing restrictions, and other building policies are not detailed in the MLS excerpts supplied. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and financials with the seller, management, or their agent prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy information such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found no such language. Because this is a numeric field and there is no explicit evidence in the remarks, the value remains unknown.
The remarks directly state there is 1 elevator in the building, so this is a high-confidence numeric match. I looked for phrases like "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a count, and found a clear count in the listing text.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. One listing explicitly says "maintenance fee includes, hot water," and the current MLS data shows HOTWAT in 6 of 7 listings with no WTRHTR exclusions. This looks like consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent typo.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears to be a stable building feature. The current MLS data is unanimous at 7/7, and a remark directly confirms it with "maintenance fee includes... sewer." This is strong cross-listing evidence with no sign of inconsistency.
Water is consistently listed as included in the maintenance fee. All 7 current MLS listings include WATER, and a public remark explicitly confirms "maintenance fee includes... water." The evidence is uniform across listings, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention a car wash, auto wash, vehicle wash area, or similar amenity. The feature appears only in MLS amenities on 4/7 listings, but the remarks are silent across all examples, which is consistent with copy-paste checkbox noise rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. Only 2/7 MLS records check the amenity, but the absence of any supporting remarks across multiple agents suggests the checkbox is likely inaccurate or unverified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported: 4 separate public remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, and the current MLS data shows washer/dryer included in 6 of 7 listings. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings indicates parking is assigned/reserved for units. At least 3 listings explicitly mention 'assigned,' 'dedicated parking stalls,' or equivalent wording, which is more reliable than MLS checkbox data alone.
Covered parking is consistently confirmed in the remarks across several listings. The language is direct and repeated by multiple agents, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than a copied checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as secured, with remarks citing 'secured building access' and 'secured entry throughout.' This is strong multi-listing evidence that parking and building access use secured entry controls such as key access or monitored entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is mentioned in 3 current listing remarks, including phrases like "Split AC" and "a split AC system to keep you cool year-round." Combined with 5/7 MLS inclusions checking ACSPL, the evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings. This looks like a real feature offered by some units in the building.
No current remarks mention window AC, window units, or wall AC, while the same set of listings repeatedly and explicitly mentions split AC instead. Although 2/7 MLS records currently show ACWIUN, the absence of corroborating remarks makes that signal weak and possibly copied from prior data. Buyer-interest-wise, there is not enough reliable evidence here to treat window AC as an available building feature.
Concrete construction appears likely for this building based on the MLS checkbox data: 5 of 7 listings mark CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete,' so this is supported more by repeated MLS data than by agent descriptions.
There is no support in the remarks for double-wall construction, and the current MLS data is limited to 3 of 7 listings. With no explicit 'double wall' language from any listing, this feature is not well validated and likely reflects inconsistent checkbox entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for HOA insurance wording such as fully insured, fully covered, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, but the remarks do not mention it. Since there is no current value and no direct evidence, this is unconfirmed from the listings.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing. With no explicit mention and no prior value, this remains unverified and is treated as not evidenced in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City-view units appear to exist in the building based on MLS view data: 4 of 7 recent listings list CITY while 3 list NONE. The public remarks do not directly mention a cityscape or downtown view, so this is supported more by the MLS view field than by narrative remarks. Overall evidence suggests some units offer city views, but not all do.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of the 7 listings explicitly mentions a resident manager: "On-site resident manager." The other remarks do not discuss this amenity, but the direct on-site wording is strong evidence that the building has resident management. No evidence suggests this is a temporary or incorrect MLS checkbox entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.