Kapalama Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kapalama Gardens
Building Overview
Kapalama Gardens in Downtown-Chinatown, built 1975; concrete construction with a resident manager and covered parking.
About Kapalama Gardens
Kapalama Gardens is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1975. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction. Specific details such as number of units or building size are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key features noted in MLS-derived information include a resident manager on site. No other building amenities are listed in the available records.
Additional details from the MLS data: covered parking is available, pets are not allowed, and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, fees, rules, and current management directly with the listing agent or property management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy statements (e.g., percent owner-occupied or descriptors like 'majority owner occupied') and found no references. There is no prior/current numeric value to preserve, so this field remains unknown rather than guessed.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' but found no references. Because there is no prior/current numeric value and no explicit statement in the remarks, I cannot infer a number and leave this as unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2/2) list 'OTCOEX' in association_fee_includes indicating common area electricity is included, but none of the public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrasing. Evidence relies solely on MLS checkbox data and appears unconfirmed by agent remarks, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than explicitly described).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2/2) list 'SEWER' in association_fee_includes indicating sewer fees are included, but public remarks contain no explicit phrase like 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA fees.' The assertion is based on MLS checkbox data only, so confidence is moderate.
Both current MLS listings (2/2) list 'WATER' in association_fee_includes indicating water is included, but public remarks lack explicit mentions such as 'water included' or 'water in HOA.' Because the evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox entries and not agent remarks or owner verification, confidence is moderate (implied).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings have the COMLAU amenity checked (2/2), and at least one listing's public remarks explicitly say the building has 'community laundry facilities.' The evidence is consistent across MLS checkboxes and agent remarks, so inclusion is supported and likely not a data entry error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings include parking features and the public remarks explicitly state 'one assigned parking stall' and 'guest parkings available', indicating the building provides parking. Evidence is consistent across MLS checkbox data and agent remarks, so parking is included.
MLS data shows assigned parking on at least one listing and the remarks explicitly state 'one assigned parking stall' / '1 assigned parking stall is include', confirming the building offers assigned parking. Multiple sources align, giving high confidence.
No analysis available
The listing explicitly mentions an assigned parking stall ("1 assigned parking stall is include"), which confirms parking is provided, but there is no language indicating the stall is deeded/owned with the unit. Because 'deeded' is not stated, parking_deeded is set to false with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', or similar. No parking charges are described; since parking is described as an assigned stall (included), parking_fee is left null.
At least one MLS listing lists GUEST parking and the public remarks explicitly say 'guest parkings available', indicating the building provides guest parking. The agent remarks and MLS checkbox agree, supporting inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for terms like 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found none. Set to false with low confidence due to lack of any reference.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2 of 2) list the building as concrete construction ('CONCRE'). Public remarks for the sampled unit do not explicitly mention concrete or reinforced concrete, so the evidence is from consistent MLS checkbox entries rather than remark descriptions; this is moderate-strength but not explicit confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the two current MLS listings (1 of 2) indicates the building has a concrete slab foundation ('SLAB'). The public remarks for the provided unit do not reference 'concrete slab' or foundation type, so the evidence is limited to a single MLS entry and is considered moderate/ tentative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases such as 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', or minimum night rules. No evidence that STRs are permitted, so set to false with low-to-medium confidence based solely on absence of mention.
Looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or mentions of hotel management. None found; because STRs are not indicated as allowed, this must be false.
Searched for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program'. No such language appears; therefore mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', or 'leasehold expiring in' and any 4-digit year. No specific lease expiry year or renewal information was found.
Searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted'. No evidence found, so set to false with low-to-medium confidence due to absence of any explicit statement.
I searched the public remarks for explicit insurance statements like 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage' and found none. Since there is no existing value and no mention, I report false with medium confidence (lack of mention suggests HOA walls-in coverage was not claimed).
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'passed fire inspection') and found no such statements. With no current data and no mention in the remarks, the conservative default is false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it was not advertised).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 2) mention city/downtown/urban views and the MLS view checkbox is not set for CITY. Public remarks describe location and amenities but contain no phrases such as 'city view', 'cityscape', or 'downtown view', so there is strong evidence the building does not offer a documented city view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2/2) include the RESMAN amenity box, and the public remarks explicitly state "The building features a resident manager." Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and includes a clear remark rather than only a checkbox, supporting a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.