Kamaaina
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kamaaina
Building Overview
Kamaaina in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1967). Pet-free building; short-term rentals not allowed, per MLS data.
About Kamaaina
Based on MLS data, Kamaaina is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. Records indicate the building was built in 1967. Size (number of units, unit square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Specific common-area amenities (pool, gym, laundry, etc.) are not detailed in the provided records.
Parking arrangements, maintenance fees, special assessments, and other operational details are not specified in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building features, policies, fees, and management information with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
One remark directly says the building has 'a high owner-occupancy,' which is strong evidence that many units are owner-occupied. No exact percentage is given, so the result is kept as the qualitative description rather than a numeric estimate.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator-count language such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but found nothing. Because there is no direct evidence in the public remarks, the number of elevators cannot be confirmed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate building-level MLS support for common area electricity being included: 8 of 11 current listings have OTCOEX checked. None of the public remarks explicitly say "common area electricity" or equivalent, so this looks more like consistent MLS coding than textual confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported by both remarks and MLS data. One listing clearly says the maintenance fee covers "gas, water, and sewer," and 6 of 11 current MLS entries also include GAS, suggesting a building-level amenity rather than a one-off agent error.
Hot water does not appear to be a building-paid utility here. Multiple remarks reference an in-unit water heater or instant hot water heater, which is a strong indicator that hot water is generated inside the unit rather than included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very well supported. The remarks explicitly mention sewer coverage, and 9 of 11 current MLS listings include SEWER, which makes this one of the most reliable building-level fee inclusions.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed. The clearest remark says maintenance fees cover "gas, water, and sewer," and 9 of 11 current MLS records include WATER, indicating consistent building-level support across listings.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported by the public remarks: 8+ listings explicitly mention a "BBQ area," "barbecue area," or "barbeque area." The language is consistent across multiple agents and repeated often enough to indicate a real shared building amenity, not a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is well-supported for this building and appears in many current listings from multiple agents. Across the provided remarks, at least 8 listings explicitly mention storage-related features such as 'additional storage,' 'assigned storage locker,' 'extra storage unit,' and 'private secured storage unit.' This looks like a genuine building feature rather than a copy-paste error, reinforced by the strong historical MLS pattern.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike-and-surfboard storage references. The remarks only mention general storage units/lockers, not dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears in the current MLS amenity field for 10 of 11 listings, which is fairly strong building-level evidence. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, so this is supported by MLS checkbox data rather than remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly confirmed. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "pool for the residents," "pool and barbecue area," "heated saltwater pool," and "lap pool," across many remarks from different agents. This looks consistent rather than copy-paste error, and the current MLS data also shows the pool amenity checked in all current listings.
No analysis available
The remarks directly identify the pool as saltwater multiple times. This is strong, repeated evidence that the building pool is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported: multiple current listings explicitly say 'in unit washer and dryer,' 'washer/dryer in unit,' and 'the unit includes all major appliances, including an in-unit washer and dryer.' The MLS inclusion data is also consistent at 11/11 listings showing washer/dryer, so this appears to be a reliable building feature rather than a one-off remark.
No analysis available
I looked for coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fee, card-operated machines, and quarters/coin-op references. The listings repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer instead, with no evidence of a paid shared laundry facility.
I searched for language such as 'laundry on every floor,' 'laundry room on each floor,' and other floor-by-floor laundry references. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported by both the historical MLS pattern and the current public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say "assigned covered parking stall," "one assigned covered parking stall," or simply "1 parking stall," which is consistent across many remarks rather than a one-off agent note.
Covered parking is confirmed by numerous current listings and aligns with the historically strong MLS data. At least several remarks explicitly use phrases like "one covered parking stall" and "assigned covered parking stall," indicating this is a building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I searched for deeded, owned, or included-in-deed parking language and found none. The remarks consistently describe assigned/covered parking and guest parking, which suggests parking is assigned rather than deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking charge and found nothing. The remarks mention covered/assigned parking and guest parking, but no separate parking cost.
Guest parking is confirmed by MLS data (6 of 10 listings) and multiple remark blocks that say 'ample guest parking', 'guest parking on the upper level', or 'Guests will enjoy ample guest & street parking'. Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks and appears to reflect an available building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting list references and found none. The listings instead mention assigned or covered parking stalls, which do not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob, card reader, and electronic entry language. The listing explicitly confirms card entry, which supports a card/fob access security system.
No analysis available
I looked for references to security patrol or roving security services. The remarks mention a secure building and card entry, but nothing about patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is supported by the current MLS checkbox data in 9 of 11 listings and by remarks mentioning "spalling repairs" and parking deck renovation, which are typical of concrete buildings. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents/listings rather than a one-off copy-paste note, so this feature should be retained with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 10 MLS listings list above-ground construction (ABOGRO) and no public remarks mention 'above ground' materials or a recent change. Given the lack of supporting remarks across listings, this appears to be an inconsistent checkbox entry rather than a documented building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or explicit STR permission, and found none. There is also no language suggesting short-term rentals are allowed in this building, so this remains unsupported and is treated as not allowed from the public remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed, Hilton/Ritz pool, or similar program references and found none. Because the remarks do not indicate STR is allowed, hotel-pool participation is not supported.
I searched for mandatory rental-pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a hotel program and found nothing. The remarks do not describe any rental pool arrangement, mandatory or optional.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expiry year, or renewal/extension dates and found none. The remarks do not state whether the building is fee simple or leasehold, so no expiry year can be extracted.
I searched the public remarks for VA approval, VA financing, or VA loans accepted and found nothing. The listings describe unit features, amenities, parking, and location, but do not reference VA eligibility.
I searched for explicit full-coverage wording such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance.' The only insurance-related statement is that the 'Building has hurricane insurance,' which does not confirm full HOA insurance.
No analysis available
I looked for statements about passing a fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection, FLSE compliance, or similar certification language. None of the remarks mention this, so there is no basis to mark it true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
MLS view_descriptions include OCEAN in 4 of 10 current listings and several public remarks explicitly state 'ocean views' or 'Pacific/Ocean' (e.g., 'incredible ocean and city views', 'peek a boo ocean views'). Evidence indicates some units in the building offer ocean views, though it is not universal across all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported across the listings. Remarks repeatedly mention phrases like "city views," "cityscape views," "stunning Ocean and City Views," and "panoramic city and ocean views," matching the MLS CITY view flag in 10 of 11 listings. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Coastline views are not explicitly described in the public remarks, but the current MLS data now marks COASTL in 4 of 11 listings. The remarks instead consistently say "ocean views" or "ocean and city views," so the evidence is indirect rather than a clear verbal confirmation of coastline/shoreline/coastal views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly mention 'view of the sunrise/ sunset' and references to enjoying 'morning coffee' on the lanai, indicating some units have sunrise/morning exposure. MLS view_descriptions do not list SUNRIS, but the explicit remarks suggest at least some units offer sunrise views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for remarks saying fireworks can be seen from the building, unit, or lanai. The listings mention ocean, city, sunset, and panoramic views, but nothing about viewing fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to have a resident manager on-site. Out of 11 current listings, 8 include RESMAN in the amenities, and remarks explicitly say 'full time resident manager' and 'Resd Mgr.' This is consistent across multiple listings and looks like a real building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.