Kamaaina
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kamaaina
Building Overview
Kamaaina in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1967). Pet-free building; short-term rentals not allowed, per MLS data.
About Kamaaina
Based on MLS data, Kamaaina is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. Records indicate the building was built in 1967. Size (number of units, unit square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Specific common-area amenities (pool, gym, laundry, etc.) are not detailed in the provided records.
Parking arrangements, maintenance fees, special assessments, and other operational details are not specified in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building features, policies, fees, and management information with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
One remark directly describes the building as having a high owner-occupancy, which is strong evidence that many units are owner-occupied. No exact percentage is provided, so I cannot convert this into a precise numeric value without guessing.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator-count language such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but found nothing. Since this is rarely included in MLS remarks and no current value was provided, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate building-level MLS support for common area electricity being included: 8 of 11 current listings have OTCOEX checked. None of the public remarks explicitly say "common area electricity" or equivalent, so this looks more like consistent MLS coding than textual confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported by both remarks and MLS data. One listing clearly says the maintenance fee covers "gas, water, and sewer," and 6 of 11 current MLS entries also include GAS, suggesting a building-level amenity rather than a one-off agent error.
Hot water does not appear to be a building-paid utility here. Multiple remarks reference an in-unit water heater or instant hot water heater, which is a strong indicator that hot water is generated inside the unit rather than included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very well supported. The remarks explicitly mention sewer coverage, and 9 of 11 current MLS listings include SEWER, which makes this one of the most reliable building-level fee inclusions.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed. The clearest remark says maintenance fees cover "gas, water, and sewer," and 9 of 11 current MLS records include WATER, indicating consistent building-level support across listings.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported by the public remarks: 8+ listings explicitly mention a "BBQ area," "barbecue area," or "barbeque area." The language is consistent across multiple agents and repeated often enough to indicate a real shared building amenity, not a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is well-supported for this building and appears in many current listings from multiple agents. Across the provided remarks, at least 8 listings explicitly mention storage-related features such as 'additional storage,' 'assigned storage locker,' 'extra storage unit,' and 'private secured storage unit.' This looks like a genuine building feature rather than a copy-paste error, reinforced by the strong historical MLS pattern.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or combined bike-and-surfboard storage references. The remarks mention assigned storage units, lockers, and closets, but nothing specifically about surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears in the current MLS amenity field for 10 of 11 listings, which is fairly strong building-level evidence. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, so this is supported by MLS checkbox data rather than remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly confirmed. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "pool for the residents," "pool and barbecue area," "heated saltwater pool," and "lap pool," across many remarks from different agents. This looks consistent rather than copy-paste error, and the current MLS data also shows the pool amenity checked in all current listings.
No analysis available
The remarks directly identify the pool as saltwater multiple times, including "heated Saltwater pool" and "saltwater pool." This is clear evidence that the building's pool is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported: multiple current listings explicitly say 'in unit washer and dryer,' 'washer/dryer in unit,' and 'the unit includes all major appliances, including an in-unit washer and dryer.' The MLS inclusion data is also consistent at 11/11 listings showing washer/dryer, so this appears to be a reliable building feature rather than a one-off remark.
No analysis available
I searched for coin-op, card-operated, quarters, coin laundry, or other paid community laundry references. The remarks repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer and do not describe any paid shared laundry facility.
I looked for language like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer and storage, with no evidence of community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported by both the historical MLS pattern and the current public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say "assigned covered parking stall," "one assigned covered parking stall," or simply "1 parking stall," which is consistent across many remarks rather than a one-off agent note.
Covered parking is confirmed by numerous current listings and aligns with the historically strong MLS data. At least several remarks explicitly use phrases like "one covered parking stall" and "assigned covered parking stall," indicating this is a building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as deeded stall, parking included in deed, or owned parking, and found none. The remarks indicate assigned or covered parking, which is not enough to confirm deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking fee, monthly parking charge, or parking rental language and found nothing. The remarks only mention assigned/covered parking and guest parking.
Guest parking is confirmed by MLS data (6 of 10 listings) and multiple remark blocks that say 'ample guest parking', 'guest parking on the upper level', or 'Guests will enjoy ample guest & street parking'. Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks and appears to reflect an available building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting list references and found none. The listings consistently suggest parking is assigned rather than waitlisted.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state that the building has card entry, which indicates keycard/fob access security. This is consistent across the listings that describe the building as secure.
No analysis available
I looked for security patrol, roving security, patrolled building, or similar service language. The remarks mention a secure building and card entry, but there is no evidence of an actual security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is supported by the current MLS checkbox data in 9 of 11 listings and by remarks mentioning "spalling repairs" and parking deck renovation, which are typical of concrete buildings. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents/listings rather than a one-off copy-paste note, so this feature should be retained with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 10 MLS listings list above-ground construction (ABOGRO) and no public remarks mention 'above ground' materials or a recent change. Given the lack of supporting remarks across listings, this appears to be an inconsistent checkbox entry rather than a documented building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any indication that short-term rentals are allowed, including references to NUC, TVU, vacation rentals, or minimum-stay rules, but found none. Since there is no evidence of STR permission, this is marked false.
I searched for hotel pool, hotel rental program, or hotel-managed references such as Hilton or Ritz pool participation and found none. Because there is no indication STR is allowed, hotel pool participation cannot be true.
I looked for any indication that owners must participate in a rental pool, including mandatory enrollment language, and found nothing. The remarks do not describe any rental program at all, so mandatory participation is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold, or renewal dates, but nothing was stated in the remarks. Without a specific expiration year, the value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to VA-approved status or VA loan eligibility and found none. The listings focus on unit features, views, parking, and amenities, but do not mention financing programs.
I searched for explicit full-coverage language like "fully insured," "walls-in coverage," or "full insurance," but found only a reference to hurricane insurance. That suggests the building has some insurance in place, but not enough to confirm it is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
I looked for wording indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection, or similar compliance statement, but none was mentioned. The remarks mention security, resident manager, and building repairs, but nothing about FLSE or fire/life safety certification.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
MLS view_descriptions include OCEAN in 4 of 10 current listings and several public remarks explicitly state 'ocean views' or 'Pacific/Ocean' (e.g., 'incredible ocean and city views', 'peek a boo ocean views'). Evidence indicates some units in the building offer ocean views, though it is not universal across all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported across the listings. Remarks repeatedly mention phrases like "city views," "cityscape views," "stunning Ocean and City Views," and "panoramic city and ocean views," matching the MLS CITY view flag in 10 of 11 listings. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Coastline views are not explicitly described in the public remarks, but the current MLS data now marks COASTL in 4 of 11 listings. The remarks instead consistently say "ocean views" or "ocean and city views," so the evidence is indirect rather than a clear verbal confirmation of coastline/shoreline/coastal views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly mention 'view of the sunrise/ sunset' and references to enjoying 'morning coffee' on the lanai, indicating some units have sunrise/morning exposure. MLS view_descriptions do not list SUNRIS, but the explicit remarks suggest at least some units offer sunrise views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements that fireworks can be seen from units or lanais. The remarks mention ocean, city, sunset, and panoramic views, but nothing about viewing Friday night fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to have a resident manager on-site. Out of 11 current listings, 8 include RESMAN in the amenities, and remarks explicitly say 'full time resident manager' and 'Resd Mgr.' This is consistent across multiple listings and looks like a real building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.