
Kaloaluiki Streamside
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaloaluiki Streamside
Building Overview
Kaloaluiki Streamside in Manoa, built in 1982. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.

About Kaloaluiki Streamside
Kaloaluiki Streamside is a residential building located in the Manoa neighborhood, constructed in 1982. According to available records, specific details on building size (number of units or square footage) and construction type are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building has explicit policies that do not allow pets and do not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity information (pool, laundry, fitness, etc.) is provided in the MLS summary.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, association rules, and unit-level features are not specified in the provided MLS data. Buyers and agents should verify parking, fee schedules, building condition, and management information with the seller, HOA, or property manager before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2/2) include OTCOEX in association fee includes, indicating common area electricity is covered. Public remarks for the listings do not discuss utilities, and there are no user verifications to contradict the MLS checkboxes, so the evidence from multiple listings is strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Neither MLS listing includes HOTWAT in association fee includes (0/2) and both listings list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions, which strongly indicates hot water is not a building-provided, fee-included service. Public remarks do not mention building-supplied hot water; therefore hot water included is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both MLS listings (2/2) include SEWER in the association fee includes, indicating sewer is covered by the maintenance fee. Public remarks contain no utility details to contradict this, so the MLS checkbox evidence across multiple listings is considered strong.
Both current MLS listings (2/2) include WATER in association fee includes, indicating water is covered by the maintenance fee. The public remarks do not address utilities, so the consistent MLS checkbox data across listings provides strong evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current listings for the building mention a pool; public remarks state "private driveway, pool" and "private pool." With the MLS checkbox set on 2/2 listings and both agents' remarks explicitly describing the amenity, there is strong evidence the building has a pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2/2) include 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions, indicating some units in the building have in-unit laundry. However, none of the public remarks mention washer/dryer or 'in-unit laundry', suggesting the MLS checks may be agent-entered without elaboration. Given the lack of corroborating remarks but consistent MLS inclusions, include the feature with moderate confidence (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2/2) include parking features (garage/open/covered). Public remarks explicitly state "two-car garage" and "private driveway," confirming the building offers parking. Evidence is strong across MLS data and the agents' remarks.
MLS data lists ASSIGN in 2/2 listings and remarks reference a "private driveway" and "two-car garage," indicating assigned/reserved parking for the unit. Multiple sources align, giving moderately high confidence.
Covered parking is clearly present: 2/2 MLS listings list covered/garage parking and the remarks state a "two-car garage," providing high-confidence confirmation of covered parking.
I searched for explicit terms like 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed'. Although the remarks mention a 'two-car garage' and 'private driveway', there is no explicit statement that the parking is deeded, so I set parking_deeded to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'additional parking cost' and found none. The remarks describe a two-car garage/private driveway but do not indicate any parking fees, so parking_fee is set to false with medium confidence.
MLS parking_features include GUEST in both listings (2/2), but none of the public remarks mention guest or visitor parking. Inclusion relies on MLS checkbox data and lacks corroborating remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for indications of a waitlist system (e.g., 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list') and found no references. With no evidence, parking_waitlist is false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 listings reviewed — 0 include 'double wall' or similar phrasing. Current MLS shows DOUWAL on both listings, but public remarks only describe finishes and site amenities; lack of any mention across multiple agent remarks indicates the checked box is likely erroneous.
No analysis available
2 listings reviewed — 0 mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Although 1/2 MLS entries currently list MASSTU, both public remarks focus on interior finishes and site setting with no masonry/stucco descriptions; the absence across remarks suggests the MLS checkbox is likely incorrect.
No analysis available
2 listings reviewed — 0 include 'concrete slab' or equivalent. While 1/2 MLS records list SLAB, both public remarks focus on interior and site features with no foundation details; the lack of any mention across remarks indicates the slab checkbox is likely incorrect.
No analysis available
2 listings reviewed — neither mentions 'wood frame' or related terms. Current MLS checkbox indicates WOOFRA on 2/2 listings, but public remarks contain no construction-material language; evidence is weak in listings and likely an agent data entry artifact.
2 listings reviewed — 0 mention 'above ground' construction. Both public remarks describe location, finishes, and amenities without referencing above-ground structural details; absence across listings suggests the MLS checkbox entries are likely incorrect.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental allowance or related program language and found none. Therefore str_allowed is set to false with medium confidence. If there is off-listing or owner-provided verification, that could change this assessment.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and related phrases and found none. Because str_allowed is false based on the remarks, str_hotel_pool is false as well (must be false if STR not allowed).
I looked for language such as 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'cannot opt out' and found none. Since the remarks provide no evidence of STR participation or a mandatory program, str_mandatory_pool is false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit lease expiry years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'ground lease ends') and any language indicating a leasehold. The remarks describe a 4-unit CPR community but give no leasehold/expiry details, so the lease expiry year is unknown (null).
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' but found no references. With no explicit mention, I set financing_va to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 2 current listings mentions mountain views; public remarks explicitly say "breathtaking mountain views." MLS view_descriptions include MOUNTA for one listing and no listings list NONE, so there is strong, explicit evidence that the building offers mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 2 current listings references garden-type views; public remarks repeatedly describe being "surrounded by lush greenery," a "private tropical oasis," and overlooking Manoa Stream, indicating landscaped/garden views. Though garden is not in every remark, the explicit descriptive language plus MLS GARDEN entry provide solid evidence the building offers garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.