Kalakaua Sands
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kalakaua Sands
Building Overview
Kalakaua Sands in McCully-Moiliili — concrete building (built 1968) with mountain views, window AC, and assigned covered parking.
About Kalakaua Sands
Kalakaua Sands is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1968. According to available records, the building is concrete construction and is served by one elevator.
Based on MLS data, units in Kalakaua Sands offer mountain views and rely on window air conditioning. Building policies indicated in the MLS show that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listed management company is unknown in the available records.
MLS data also notes that parking is available, covered, and assigned. Buyers should verify all details, including management, fees, and restrictions, with the listing agent or condominium association as this summary is based solely on MLS-provided information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative terms indicating the proportion of owner-occupied units, but found nothing. Since there is no explicit evidence in the listings, the value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts such as “1 elevator,” “2 elevators,” or “multiple elevators,” but found none. The only evidence is that the elevator was updated or newly installed in 2024, so the current value of 1 is retained with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The strongest signal is the current MLS data: 14 of 19 listings include OTCOEX, which is consistent with common-area electricity or similar building expenses being covered. The remarks do not explicitly mention common electric, but nothing suggests the opposite, so this appears to be a building-level fee item that is often carried by the association.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is little support that hot water is included in the HOA/maintenance fee: only 2 of 19 current listings show HOTWAT, while 12 of 19 show WTRHTR, a strong sign of in-unit water heaters. The remarks across the listings do not mention hot water service or inclusion, so this feature is best corrected to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is a very strong building-level inclusion. All 19 of 19 current listings show SEWER included, and the public remarks do not contain any contradictory evidence. This looks consistent across multiple agents and is not just a copy-paste anomaly.
Water inclusion appears to be standard for this building. All 19 of 19 current listings include WATER, and none of the remarks suggest otherwise. The evidence is strong across listings and aligns with the historical high-confidence signal.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently referenced across many listings, with well over a dozen remarks mentioning a storage locker, separate storage unit, or additional storage. The phrasing varies by agent, but the feature appears repeatedly and independently, which supports that the building offers storage units/lockers.
I searched for 'surfboard storage,' 'board storage,' 'surf storage,' and similar terms and found no explicit mention. Several remarks note a separate storage locker, but that is not the same as surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears in MLS amenities for 11 of 19 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. The evidence is moderate and comes from MLS checkbox data rather than agent descriptions, which suggests it may be a standard building amenity that agents do not call out in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'salt water pool,' 'saltwater pool,' 'salt pool,' and related terms and found nothing. Since the current building context already indicates there is no pool, this feature is false.
Strong, repeated evidence supports in-unit laundry for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in unit or stacked washer/dryer, and this matches the prior MLS pattern where 18 of 19 listings included washer/dryer in inclusions. The consistency across many remarks suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as 'coin laundry,' 'quarters,' 'laundry fee,' and 'card operated' and found nothing. The remarks consistently reference washer/dryer in the unit, which suggests no evidence of a paid common laundry facility.
I looked for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer or storage, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly present at the building. Across the remarks, at least 12 listings mention parking in some form, including phrases like “assigned parking stall,” “2 covered parking stalls,” “open parking stall,” and “parking lot.” The evidence is consistent across multiple agents, though some wording is repetitive/copy-paste.
Assigned parking is well supported by the remarks and MLS data. At least 8-10 listings explicitly say “assigned parking” or describe a dedicated stall/space, including covered assigned parking. This appears to be a building-level amenity rather than a one-off unit detail.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only describe assigned/covered/open parking and rental parking availability, so deeded status is not supported.
No analysis available
I searched for a parking fee, monthly parking charge, or any dollar amount tied to parking. The only relevant note is that rental parking is available, but no fee is stated.
No analysis available
Secured entry for parking/building access is strongly supported. Multiple listings reference gates, FOB entry, remote access, and secured building/parking lot entry, with at least 6-7 remarks explicitly indicating security features. The consistency across listings suggests a real building feature, not a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join one. None were found, so there is no evidence that a waitlist system exists.
No analysis available
Multiple listings clearly describe card/fob-based controlled access, including FOB entry and secured building entry. This is strong evidence that the building has a card/fob security system.
No analysis available
I looked for 'security patrol,' 'roving security,' 'patrol service,' and similar wording and found none. The remarks describe secured/gated access, but not an actual patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS record: 17 of 19 listings currently mark CONCRE in construction_materials. The public remarks do not explicitly describe the structure, but they also do not suggest any different primary construction type, so this appears consistent across listings and not like a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, TVU, or NUC. No such language appears, so there is no evidence that STRs are allowed.
I looked for any hotel pool or hotel-managed rental program references and found none. Since STR allowance is not evidenced, hotel-pool participation is also not supported.
I searched for language like mandatory pool, required to participate, cannot opt out, or must be in rental program. No such remarks were found, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like lease expires, land lease, ground lease, and renewal dates, but found none. There is no public-remarks evidence to identify a lease expiry year.
Public remarks repeatedly advertise VA loan assumption/VA assumable financing. This is strong, explicit evidence that VA financing is available for this building or at least for listed units.
The remarks directly say the building is “fully covered for Hurricane Insurance,” which aligns with fully insured / walls-in coverage. This is strong explicit evidence, so the feature is marked true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language and related phrases such as FLSE, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the listings indicates the building passed such an evaluation, so this remains false based on lack of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 18 current MLS view_descriptions list CITY. Several agent remarks explicitly mention city views — key quotes include 'panoramic mountain and city views' and 'Enjoy the vibrant city views.' The evidence is present across multiple listings/agents (possible copy-paste), indicating the building does offer units with city views, but not universally across all units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: None of the 9 current MLS listings select SUNSET in view_descriptions, and the one listing that describes views specifies 'panoramic mountain and city views' with no mention of sunsets, suggesting sunset view is not a notable or typical feature here.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to being able to view fireworks from the building or unit, such as 'watch fireworks from lanai' or 'fireworks view,' and found none. Nearby Waikiki/beach mentions do not establish a fireworks view.
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Only 1 of 9 MLS listings has RESMAN checked in amenities, while 8 do not, and none of the detailed remarks for multiple units mention a resident manager even when describing building security and amenities, suggesting the single RESMAN entry is likely an agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.