Kahana Kai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kahana Kai
Building Overview
Kahana Kai in Aliamanu-Salt Lake (built 1971) — concrete construction with pool and BBQ area, window AC; no pets or short-term rentals.
About Kahana Kai
Kahana Kai is a condominium building located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood, built in 1971. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction and units are served by window air conditioning.
Key on-site amenities include a pool and a BBQ area. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, per the MLS-derived data.
Parking is listed as available. Management company information is not provided in the available MLS data. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, including fees, exact unit size and condition, and current management or association rules, before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
County assessor records and the state registration both report 10 floors, and the highest MLS floor field is also 10. The unit-number-derived maximum of 9 is less reliable because it agrees with the floor field in only 3 of 6 listings.
The county assessor reports 39 reconciled residential units, and the single-building state registration also reports 39 units. These independent records support the currently stored value.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 265. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for elevator counts and terms such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." No elevator information was found, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of six listings include OTCOEX in the association-fee inclusions, supporting that common-area expenses, likely including common electricity, are covered. No public remarks explicitly confirm or contradict common-area electricity, so the evidence is based primarily on the current MLS majority.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six listings identify sewer as included in the association fees, providing strong multi-listing MLS support. The remarks contain no explicit sewer language, but the consistent checkbox data across listings supports inclusion.
Five of six listings state that water is included in the association fees, which is strong evidence across the building's listings. Public remarks do not explicitly discuss water billing, so this conclusion relies on the consistent current MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports that Kahana Kai has a community pool. Three of six remarks explicitly mention a “community pool,” “overlooking the pool,” or a “view of the pool,” and the pool amenity is checked in all 6 current listings, indicating consistent building-level evidence rather than a single copied remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 of 6 listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry or a washer and dryer located in the unit. The repeated, specific confirmations across multiple listings, combined with 6/6 MLS inclusions, provide strong evidence that the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: 6/6 listings have parking-related MLS features. Remarks explicitly cite '2 parking stalls' and assigned stalls, indicating parking is available to residents rather than being an isolated or ambiguous listing detail.
Assigned parking is confirmed by multiple listings, including the phrases 'one assigned parking stall' in two separate remarks. The matching ASSIGN MLS code in 2/6 listings supports that at least some units have assigned parking.
Covered parking is indicated in current MLS data for 2/6 listings, but the public remarks do not mention garages, carports, or covered stalls. This supports including the feature as a moderate-confidence building offering, though the evidence may reflect checkbox usage rather than consistently documented remarks.
Parking is repeatedly described as assigned, but there is no explicit statement that the stalls are deeded or included in the unit deed. Based on the required public-remarks-only evidence standard, deeded parking is not established.
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned or included parking availability but do not identify any parking-related fee. No public-remarks evidence supports a monthly parking charge.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned parking stalls but contain no information about a parking waitlist. A waitlist is therefore not indicated by the available remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six listings identify concrete construction materials, making concrete the dominant MLS-reported construction type. However, no public remarks quote or independently confirm concrete construction, so the evidence is strong but primarily checkbox-based and may reflect copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one of six listings reports above-ground construction, while the other five do not. None of the six remarks mention an above-ground building or above-ground materials, so this appears to be an isolated MLS entry rather than a reliably validated building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not affirmatively allow short-term rentals or mention any applicable STR authorization. No evidence was found for STR permission, so this is treated as false under the absence rule.
The remarks contain no hotel-pool or hotel-rental-program information. Because short-term rental permission is not established, the hotel rental pool prerequisite is also not met.
There is no evidence that units must participate in a hotel rental pool or rental program. Since STR is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not provide a lease expiration year or any leasehold renewal information. No specific 4-digit lease-expiry year can be extracted.
The remarks explicitly indicate VA financing availability and VA approval. This is strong direct evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
The listing explicitly reports that the building is 100% insured for replacement value. This supports fully insured status with high confidence, although the remark does not specifically use the phrase "walls-in coverage."
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. No such statements were found, so there is no evidence that the evaluation passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are explicitly confirmed in multiple remarks, including 'sweeping mountain views' and 'Diamond Head views.' Combined with MOUNTA appearing in 3 of 6 current MLS records, this is strong evidence that the building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
Three of six current MLS listings contain CITY in the view description, which supports including city views as a building-level offering. The public remarks do not independently confirm the feature, so the evidence may partly reflect MLS checkbox usage or copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.