Kahala View Estate
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kahala View Estate
Building Overview
Kahala View Estate in Waialae-Kahala — built 1979; pets not allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Kahala View Estate
Based on MLS data, Kahala View Estate is located in the Waialae-Kahala neighborhood and was built in 1979. Size (units/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records, so buyers should verify those details with the listing agent or building management.
According to available records, the building's documented policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. The MLS data does not list specific on-site amenities, common area features, or services. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information provided.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, special assessments, and other building rules are not included in the MLS excerpt available. This summary is based solely on the MLS data provided; prospective buyers should confirm all building characteristics, policies, and fees with official documents and the listing agent prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included for this building based on current MLS data: 6 of 8 listings have CABTV in association_fee_includes. The public remarks do not explicitly mention cable, so this is driven by the repeated MLS inclusion rather than agent commentary, which could still reflect copy/paste behavior.
Common-area electricity is strongly supported by MLS data, with 7 of 8 listings including OTCOEX. There are no public remarks addressing this directly, but the near-universal checkbox pattern suggests this is a real building-level fee inclusion rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is very likely not included in the maintenance fee. The MLS pattern is the key evidence here: zero listings show HOTWAT, and most show WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is provided by individual unit water heaters instead of the HOA.
Internet inclusion has moderate support from the MLS, with 4 of 8 listings showing INTSER. There are no public remarks referencing internet service, so this looks like a building-level inclusion that may be inconsistently entered across listings.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is effectively confirmed: all 8 of 8 listings include SEWER in the association fee breakdown. This is the strongest possible MLS pattern and is very unlikely to be a copy/paste mistake across every listing.
Water inclusion is effectively confirmed by the MLS data, with all 8 of 8 listings showing WATER in association_fee_includes. The absence of direct mention in remarks does not weaken this, since the checkbox pattern is perfectly consistent across listings.
BBQ is directly mentioned in the public remarks, including "resort-style amenities including... BBQ area." This appears consistent across the building-level description rather than a one-off unit note, and the current MLS data shows BBQ in 6/8 listings, reinforcing that it is a shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The clubhouse feature is directly named in at least one listing: "community pool, clubhouse, tennis courts, and BBQ area." While fewer listings show this than tennis or BBQ, the explicit mention is enough to verify it as a shared amenity for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for patio/deck amenities: 8 of 8 public remarks mention outdoor spaces such as lanais, decks, or patios. Several listings explicitly call out 'four spacious lanais,' 'four private outdoor deck spaces,' and 'upper and lower decks,' which suggests this is a consistent amenity rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. The MLS data also supports it with PATDEC/COVPAT appearing in 3/8 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remark explicitly describes a recreation area or recreation center. Although the MLS has RECARE in 6/8 listings, the lack of supporting narrative suggests this checkbox is likely copy-paste or loosely applied, so it should not be treated as verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by the MLS pattern and by multiple listings noting storage-related features. Two remarks explicitly mention storage — including "extensive storage space in carport" and a "covered parking and storage area" — which suggests the building offers some form of extra storage, even if the wording is not always specific about lockers or dedicated storage units.
No analysis available
Tennis courts are mentioned across multiple listings, including phrases like "tennis courts" and "community pool, clubhouse, tennis courts, and BBQ area." With 8/8 MLS listings showing TENCOU and no contradictory remarks, this is very strong building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for Kahala View Estates. 4+ listings in the public remarks explicitly mention a 'swimming pool,' 'community pool,' or 'sparkling pool,' and the current MLS data shows pool-related amenities in all 8/8 listings. This is consistent across multiple agents and reads like a shared building amenity rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry appears to be a building feature based on MLS inclusions: 8 out of 8 listings list washer/dryer. None of the public remarks mention laundry directly, but there is also no evidence suggesting the MLS data is being copied incorrectly or that the feature has been removed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available in this building. Across the remarks, 3+ listings explicitly reference parking with phrases like "2 parking spaces right out front" and "covered parking," and the MLS data is consistent with 7/8 listings having a parking feature checked. The evidence appears strong and consistent rather than a one-off copy-paste artifact.
Assigned parking is plausible but not as explicitly documented as the other parking features. The MLS shows 4/8 listings with assigned parking checked, and the remarks imply dedicated spots with "2 parking spaces right out front," but there is little direct wording confirming assignment. Confidence is moderate because the evidence is partly inferred.
Covered parking is strongly supported. The MLS data is highly consistent at 7/8 listings, and the remarks directly mention "covered parking" and "carport." This looks like a real building feature rather than copied checkbox data.
The listings describe parking associated with the homes, including two spaces and covered parking, but do not explicitly say the stalls are deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed. Under the public-remarks-only rule, deeded status cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for monthly parking fees, parking rental charges, and additional parking costs. No parking fee or dollar amount is stated.
Guest parking is clearly available in the building. The remarks explicitly mention "guest parking," and the MLS data aligns with 7/8 listings checked for guest parking. This is strong multi-listing evidence and not just a single-agent anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings mention guest, covered, and nearby parking but do not mention a parking waitlist or waiting list. There is no public-remarks evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong and consistent for split AC in this building. One recent remark explicitly mentions 'Split AC units throughout,' and the current MLS inclusions show ACSPL in 8/8 listings, which supports that this is not just a copy-paste checkbox issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears in 6 of 8 current MLS listings, making it the stronger of the two construction indicators. The public remarks do not discuss construction, so the evidence comes from repeated MLS material fields across listings rather than narrative descriptions. This looks consistent across the current set, though still not explicitly confirmed by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears in 5 of 8 current MLS listings. None of the public remarks mention construction type, so this is supported mainly by the MLS materials fields rather than copy in the descriptions. Confidence is moderate because the feature is present in a majority of listings but not explicitly verified in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for short-term rentals, vacation rentals, NUC, TVU, legal rental use, and minimum-stay restrictions. None are mentioned, so STR permission is not supported by the public remarks.
No hotel rental pool, hotel-managed rental program, branded hotel pool, or similar language appears in the listings. Because short-term rental permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is false.
The remarks contain no statement that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or cannot opt out. Since STR permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for leasehold status, ground leases, lease expiry, and renewal or extension dates. No specific lease-expiry year or related land-tenure information is provided.
The remarks were checked for VA approval, VA financing, and VA loans accepted. None of these terms or equivalent statements appear, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are confirmed in several remarks across the listings, including explicit phrases like "captivating ocean" and "spectacular ... ocean" views. This appears to be a real building-level offering rather than a one-off copy-paste, though not every listing mentions it.
Mountain views are strongly supported across the dataset and appear in multiple remarks, including "mountain views" and "mountainside." The MLS pattern is especially strong at 8/8, so this is clearly a building-level feature.
Diamond Head views are consistently confirmed in the remarks across the listings, with several explicit references to "Diamond Head views" and "spectacular Diamond Head" views. Combined with 8/8 MLS listings showing DIAHEA, this is highly reliable.
No analysis available
Coastline view is not evidenced in the remarks and does not appear to be a reliable building feature here. The MLS pattern is sparse at only 2/8, and the public descriptions consistently focus on other view types instead.
Garden view is not clearly supported by the public remarks. While a few listings mention lush landscaping and greenery, none explicitly state a garden, courtyard, or landscaped view, so the 3/8 MLS signal looks weak and may be copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.