
Kaanapali Shores
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kaanapali Shores
Building Overview
Kaanapali Shores in Kaanapali — concrete condo (1980) with pool and fitness center and central air conditioning.

About Kaanapali Shores
Based on MLS data, Kaanapali Shores is a condominium property located in Kaanapali. The building was constructed in 1980 and is of concrete construction. Size details (number of units, floors, or total square footage) are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, a fitness center, and a security guard. The building is served by central air conditioning. No short-term rental activity is allowed per the provided data.
Additional details from the MLS indicate covered parking is available. Pets are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building features, rules, fees, and current policies with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
All 4 current MLS listings list central AC in association_fee_includes and the remarks explicitly say "central A/C"/"central A/C included" (quoted: "Maintenance fee includes ... central A/C"). Multiple listings corroborate this, indicating strong evidence the building's fees include central air.
All 4 current MLS listings include CABTV in association_fee_includes and the agents' remarks explicitly state "basic cable TV" is included in the maintenance fee (quoted: "Maintenance fee includes ... basic cable TV"). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 MLS listings include electricity in the association fee and the remarks state "Maintenance fee includes electric" (quoted: "Maintenance fee includes electric, central A/C, Wi-Fi service, basic cable TV, local phone service, water and sewer"). This is consistent across multiple agent remarks.
No analysis available
2 of 4 MLS listings include HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, but the public remarks do not mention hot water explicitly. Because evidence is mixed (only half the listings) and agents did not describe hot water in remarks, confidence is moderate that some units/building fees may include hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 MLS listings list sewer in the association fee and the remarks explicitly state "sewer" is included (quoted: "Maintenance fee includes ... water and sewer"). Multiple agent remarks corroborate this consistently.
All 4 MLS listings include water in association_fee_includes and the public remarks explicitly state "water" is included (quoted: "Maintenance fee includes ... water and sewer"). This is consistent across listings and agents' remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 2 of 4 MLS checkboxes list a clubhouse, none of the public remarks for the four listings use terms like 'clubhouse', 'club house', 'community center', or 'recreation center'. Given the lack of any explicit remark across multiple listings, the evidence implies the building likely does not have a clubhouse (or the amenity is not notable/shared), so club_house is omitted pending further verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four listings mention a fitness center/fitness room (phrases include 'fitness center' and 'fitness center'), and the MLS amenities show EXEROO for all units. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of an exercise room/fitness center for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or combined bike/surf storage but found no references. Absent any mention, this is set to false with medium confidence.
The remarks explicitly state 'tennis & pickle ball courts' in multiple listing blocks, and MLS amenities indicate TENCOU for all units. This consistent, multi-listing mention supports a high-confidence determination that the building offers tennis court facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current listings explicitly describe on-site pools, with phrases like "two pools," "two swimming pools," and "2-swimming pools" appearing in the public remarks. Consistent mentions across multiple unit listings and the MLS pool checkbox indicate strong, building-level pool availability rather than a single-unit or erroneous entry.
No analysis available
The public remarks mention two swimming pools and spa pools but do not specify the pool being salt water. With no direct evidence, this is set to false with medium confidence.
All 4 current MLS listings include 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions, but none of the public remarks mention 'washer', 'dryer', or 'in-unit laundry.' This is consistent across multiple listings (likely from the same building-level data), indicating the building likely offers in-unit laundry—but because remarks provide no explicit confirmation, evidence is moderate and may reflect checklist copy/paste.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating paid laundry (coin-op, quarters, card-operated machines, laundry fee) but found none in the public remarks. With no evidence and no existing data, this is set to false with medium confidence.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'floor-by-floor laundry', or 'laundry room on every floor' and found no references. Because there is no mention in the remarks and no prior/current value, this feature is set to false with medium confidence.
2 of 4 current listings include parking_features (e.g., OPEN/CO/GARAGE types) while 1 listing explicitly shows 'NONE'. None of the public remarks mention parking, and there is no historical confidence data, so evidence is mixed and may reflect agent copy/paste. Because some listings report parking, the building is reported as offering parking, but confidence is moderate pending verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for indications that parking is deeded (e.g., 'deeded parking', 'owned stall') and found none. With no evidence in the public remarks, I assume parking is not deeded with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit parking fees ('monthly parking fee', 'parking rental', 'additional parking cost') but found no references. Because there's no information about a parking fee, the value is unknown (null) with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the listings for terms indicating a parking waiting list and found none. In the absence of any mention, I mark parking_waitlist as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to card/fob access or electronic entry systems but found none; the remarks mention a '24-hour front desk' but not card access. Therefore security_card is set to false with medium confidence.
None of the provided public remarks mention security personnel or 24/7 security; they reference a "24-hour front desk" but not a security guard. MLS checkbox SECGUA appears on 2 of 4 current listings, but with no corroborating remarks or historical verification this likely reflects inconsistent agent checkboxing rather than a confirmed building feature.
Although the building has a 24-hour front desk and the broader context notes security guard, the public remarks do not mention a security patrol or roving service. With no explicit mention, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has central air: 3 of 4 listings show ACCEN/CENAC in unit features and all 4 listings include ACCEN in inclusions. Public remarks in multiple listings explicitly state "Maintenance fee includes ... central A/C" and "central A/C," consistent across agents (likely copy/paste but confirming the feature). Confidence is high due to repeated MLS checkbox data plus explicit remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings list construction_materials=CONCRE, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete.' The evidence rests entirely on the MLS checkboxes across multiple listings (could be copy/paste), so include the feature with moderate confidence (4 of 4 listings checked; 0 of 4 remarks mention it).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly state the unit is enrolled in the resort/hotel rental program and note hotel zoning and professional management (Aqua-Aston), which clearly indicates short-term rental activity is allowed. I mark STR allowed as true with high confidence.
The property is described as hotel-zoned and enrolled in a resort rental program managed by a professional operator, which is consistent with participation in a hotel rental pool. Therefore str_hotel_pool is true with high confidence.
Listings explicitly describe flexible use and indicate owners can keep units in the resort rental program or use them personally, which implies participation in the rental/hotel pool is not mandatory. I mark mandatory participation as false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The property is explicitly described as a leasehold unit and the remarks specify 'lease expire 12/31/45', which indicates a lease expiry year of 2045. I used the most recent/explicit date provided.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. Given the absence of any VA loan language in the listings, I mark this as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
All four public remarks reference ocean/beachfront access or ocean views (phrases include 'oceanfront condo', 'lead to the shoreline for sunsets', 'stunning views of the Ocean and Island of Molokai', and 'beach front property'). While only 2/4 MLS view_descriptions list OCEAN, the consistent language across multiple listings and agents indicates the building offers ocean-view units; therefore view_ocean is marked true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for statements that the building/units have views of fireworks (phrases like 'fireworks view from', 'watch fireworks from') and found no such claims. Therefore this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.