Jason Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Jason Apartments
Building Overview
Jason Apartments in Manoa, built in 1974; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Jason Apartments
Jason Apartments is located in the Manoa neighborhood and was built in 1974. According to available records, specific information on building size and construction type is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features and on-site amenities are not detailed in the available MLS records. Prospective buyers should note that the MLS-derived information does not list amenities, unit mix, or common-area features for this property.
Based on MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed; the management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators like a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found no such language. The remarks do mention the building is suitable for both first-time buyers and investors, but that does not provide an ownership-occupancy percentage.
I searched the public remarks for elevator-related wording such as "elevator," "multiple elevators," or a specific count like "4 elevators," but found nothing. The listings discuss parking, security, and unit features, but do not describe the building's elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly say 'common area electricity' or 'building power included.' Only 'common area maintenance' and hot water are mentioned. MLS checkbox for common electric appears in 3 of 8 listings (possible agent copy/paste), so evidence for common-area electricity is weak and inconsistent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. 6 of 9 current MLS listings check HOTWAT, and several remarks explicitly state it, which is stronger than a simple copy-paste checkbox pattern. No listings show WTRHTR, so there is no sign the feature was replaced by unit water heaters.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported. All 9 of 9 current MLS listings include SEWER, matching prior high-confidence history and explicit remarks. This appears consistent across agents rather than a single copied entry.
Water inclusion is extremely well supported. All 9 of 9 current MLS listings include WATER, and remarks explicitly confirm it alongside sewer and hot water. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "surfboard storage," "board storage," or "surf storage." The remarks contain no mention of dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
8 of 9 current MLS listings include TRACHU (trash chute) in amenities, while none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute. This looks more like repeated MLS amenity data than a one-off copy-paste error, so the feature is included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for pool-related wording, especially "salt water pool" or similar terms. There is no pool described in the remarks, and the building context also indicates no pool.
Strong, repeated evidence that this building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple listings explicitly mention "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer/dryer in unit," and "washer and dryer in your home," matching the prior high-confidence MLS pattern (8/9 listings with WASHER/DRYER in inclusions). The consistency across remarks suggests this is a real building feature, not a copy-paste mistake.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to paid community laundry such as coin-op, card-operated, or quarter machines. The remarks only describe in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of paid shared laundry.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not indicate community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Several listings imply assigned parking, but the wording is not always explicit. Across the remarks, 5+ listings mention a specific stall or 'one covered parking stall,' suggesting the parking is reserved for the unit rather than open/common parking.
Covered parking is consistently supported across the dataset. Multiple listings explicitly mention covered parking or a garage, and the MLS checkboxes show covered parking in all 9/9 listings, making this a high-confidence building feature.
I looked for deeded/owned parking wording, but the listings only describe covered, secured, gated parking. Since there is no explicit deeded parking mention, this remains false based on available remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly charge, rental, or paid stall, but found nothing. The remarks only mention that parking is covered and secured.
No analysis available
Secured parking/building access is mentioned in several listings, including phrases like 'secured, gated building,' 'fob entry,' and 'gated garage.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is stronger than a one-off copy-paste checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist or joining a waitlist for stalls, but none appeared. With no evidence in the remarks, this is marked false.
No analysis available
The remarks directly mention "fob entry," which is strong evidence of a card/fob access system. Multiple listings also describe the building as secured and gated, reinforcing that this feature is present.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to security patrol or roving security service. The remarks only mention gated/secured access and do not describe any patrol service.
No analysis available
There is one explicit remark stating 'Central AC' for Jason Apts, while the other listings are silent on central air or mention window AC units instead. The MLS data is sparse but does show ACCEN/CENAC appearing in a small subset of listings, which supports that some units/building configuration include central air rather than this being a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
6 of 8 current listings include the ACWIUN inclusion. Public remarks explicitly state 'working window cranks that seal window AC units,' confirming window units in at least some units; one listing's 'Central AC' note appears to be a likely copy/paste discrepancy. Evidence from multiple agent listings plus the explicit remark indicates the building offers window AC units.
Concrete construction appears to be the dominant MLS classification for this building: 7 of 9 current listings mark construction as CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly say “concrete,” so this is driven by consistent MLS data rather than listing text, but the repeated material entry across multiple listings is strong evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Brick is not supported by the public remarks and appears in only 2 of 9 current MLS records. Because the remarks consistently describe the building without any brick references, the BRICK checkbox likely reflects inconsistent or copy-pasted MLS data rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental language, and found none. There is also no conflicting indication that STR is allowed, so this is marked false.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or managed hotel program, but found none. Since STR is not evidenced in the remarks, this must remain false.
I searched for mandatory pool wording like required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in the rental program, but found nothing. With no STR allowance indicated, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease, renewal, or an end year, but found none. The remarks do not provide any land tenure or lease expiration information.
The remarks directly confirm VA financing eligibility. No conflicting statements were found, so this is a high-confidence true.
I searched for insurance language such as "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or similar HOA coverage statements and found nothing. The remarks focus on location, parking, and unit upgrades, not building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for references to fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire inspection, or life-safety compliance, and none were present. The remarks mention the building is VA approved and secured, but do not state any fire/life safety evaluation pass status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported across the building’s listing history and current remarks. Multiple listings mention 'city views' directly, while a few others describe the quieter mauka/mountain side, suggesting some units have different outlooks but the building definitely offers city-view units. The repeated wording across several remarks looks consistent rather than a one-off agent copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from the lanai," or similar language. The remarks mention city, mountain, and mauka-side views, but nothing about viewing fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.