Jason Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Jason Apartments
Building Overview
Jason Apartments in Manoa, built in 1974; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Jason Apartments
Jason Apartments is located in the Manoa neighborhood and was built in 1974. According to available records, specific information on building size and construction type is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features and on-site amenities are not detailed in the available MLS records. Prospective buyers should note that the MLS-derived information does not list amenities, unit mix, or common-area features for this property.
Based on MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed; the management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
County assessor and state registration both report 10 floors, matching the stored value and the highest unit-number-implied floor. MLS floor fields reach only 9 and have no penthouse listings, so they do not establish a higher or different top floor.
The county assessor reports 48 residential units and the state registration independently reports 48 units for this single-building record. The stored value is supported by both sources.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 450. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
I searched for an explicit count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." The remarks only confirm elevator access, so the building's elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 11 current listings include OTCOEX in the association-fee fields, supporting common-area operating-cost inclusion. Remarks do not specifically quote "common area electricity" or "common electric"; the only related wording is "common area maintenance," so the evidence is primarily MLS-based rather than independently confirmed by multiple remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and repeated remarks from multiple listings. At least two remarks explicitly confirm that the maintenance fee includes hot water, consistent with the 6 of 10 HOTWAT entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is shown in all 11 current listings, making the evidence strong across the dataset. A direct remark confirms that the maintenance fee includes "water, sewer & common area maintenance," providing independent support beyond potentially copied MLS checkboxes.
Water inclusion appears in all 11 current listings. One listing explicitly says the maintenance fee includes "water, sewer & common area maintenance," so the feature is supported both by unanimous MLS data and by a detailed public remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention covered parking and secured garages only. They do not identify dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities.
No analysis available
Eight of 9 current MLS listings include TRACHU, but 0 of 11 public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute or related feature. The checkbox evidence supports inclusion, though it is not independently confirmed by remarks and may reflect agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks do not describe a pool or its water type. The building context indicates there is no pool, but the remarks themselves provide no pool information.
At least 9 of 11 current listings mention in-unit laundry or explicitly include washer/dryer equipment. Key phrases include 'washer and dryer in the unit,' 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'washer/dryer in unit,' and 'washer/dryer ... all in your unit.' The evidence is repeated across multiple listing descriptions and confirms the previously high-confidence building feature, rather than relying only on copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
The remarks refer to in-unit washers and dryers rather than shared laundry facilities. There is no evidence that community laundry requires payment.
The remarks consistently describe washers, dryers, or washer/dryer hookups inside the units. They do not mention community laundry facilities available on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is directly confirmed in at least 2 current remarks, with additional listings describing a designated parking stall or one-parking unit. The current MLS data supports the feature in 7 of 11 listings, and the repeated explicit wording across listings makes this strong evidence rather than a single copied description.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed across the dataset: at least 10 current remarks explicitly use phrases such as "one assigned covered parking stall," "covered parking stall," "covered, gated parking," or "covered parking." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and is reinforced by covered or garage parking codes in 11 of 11 MLS records.
The listings consistently describe assigned, covered, gated, or secured parking. They do not explicitly confirm deeded or owned parking, so deeded status cannot be established from the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fees, monthly charges, parking rental, and additional parking cost language. None was found in the public remarks.
No analysis available
Secured entry is explicitly mentioned in at least 8 current remarks, including "secured garage," "secured fob/key entry," "secured, gated building," "covered, gated parking," and "gated garage." The repeated references across multiple listings and the SECENT indicator in 6 of 11 records strongly confirm this building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned and covered parking but contain no reference to a parking waitlist. No evidence of a waitlist system was found.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe fob or key-entry security, along with secured or gated garage access. This is direct evidence of a card/fob access security system.
No analysis available
The remarks describe secured, gated, and fob-access areas but do not mention security personnel or patrol services. Secured access alone does not establish patrol service.
No analysis available
There is one explicit remark stating 'Central AC' for Jason Apts, while the other listings are silent on central air or mention window AC units instead. The MLS data is sparse but does show ACCEN/CENAC appearing in a small subset of listings, which supports that some units/building configuration include central air rather than this being a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported by both MLS data and explicit remarks from multiple listings. At least two remarks directly reference window A/C units, including 'Window A/C units to keep it cool' and 'working window cranks that seal window AC units'; the latter also confirms the windows are designed to accommodate and seal such units.
Concrete is identified in 9 of 11 current listings, making it the clear dominant construction classification. Although the public remarks do not explicitly say "concrete construction," the repeated MLS designation across many listings and previously high confidence strongly support including this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 4 of 11 current listings identify BRICK, and no public remarks use phrases such as "brick exterior" or "brick construction." The evidence is therefore weak and inconsistent, so brick construction is omitted despite the prior medium-confidence indication.
No analysis available
The remarks do not state that short-term rentals are permitted or prohibited. Because there is no explicit STR authorization and the available descriptions focus on residential ownership and investment use, the value is assessed as false with low-to-moderate confidence.
I searched for hotel rental pool and hotel-managed rental program references. None appeared in the remarks, and the prerequisite of confirmed STR permission is not met.
The remarks contain no indication that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Since neither STR permission nor hotel pool participation is confirmed, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold terminology, lease expiration dates, ground lease terms, and lease renewal information. No specific lease expiry year was found, so the value remains unknown.
The remarks directly confirm that the building is VA approved. This is strong, explicit evidence of VA financing eligibility.
I searched for references to fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, fully covered insurance, and walls-in coverage. None appeared in the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. No such statements were found; this does not establish that the building failed an evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported across the building: 11 of 11 current listings identify CITY in the view descriptions, and multiple separate remarks explicitly mention “city views” from the lanai or preferred side of the building. The consistent evidence across numerous listings and agents confirms that the building offers units with city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention city, mountain, and lanai views only. They do not establish that fireworks can be seen from the building.
No analysis available
1 of 10 current listings explicitly mentions an "on-site resident manager," while 4 of 10 listings include RESMAN in the MLS amenities. The evidence is not widespread in remarks, but the explicit statement directly confirms a building-level resident manager rather than relying solely on a potentially copied checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.