
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka
Building Overview
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka in Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley, built 2007; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.

About Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka is a residential building located in the Mililani Mauka–Launani Valley neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 2007. Size, unit mix, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies indicated in the MLS record include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information. No specific building amenities, common area features, or HOA service descriptions are included in the provided data.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or HOA fees, utilities, and any guest or leasing restrictions are not specified in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data analysis — buyers and agents should verify all property specifics, fees, and policies with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for numeric or qualitative statements about owner-occupancy in the remarks and found none. Because owner_occupancy is a numeric field and no current value or explicit statements exist in the remarks, the percentage is unknown.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator counts or references (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. Because there is no explicit numeric value in the remarks and no current numeric value provided, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 6 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electric) in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks mention utility responsibility or contradict this. This appears to be an implied building-level inclusion (some agent checkbox usage), so included with moderate confidence (3/6 listings).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and all 6 listings show WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, which is a strong indicator hot water is not supplied/included by the HOA. Public remarks contain no statements about building-supplied hot water, so hot water inclusion is set to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes. There are no public-remark statements contradicting this, and the uniformity across listings indicates strong building-level inclusion of sewer in the HOA/maintenance fees.
All 6 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not mention utility responsibilities or contradict this. The consistent checkbox usage across all listings provides strong evidence that water is included in the HOA/maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks clearly describe private yard/courtyard space in this building: at least five listings mention it (quotes include '200 sqft of private, enclosed yard', '200 sq. ft. private courtyard', and 'gated private yard'). Current MLS amenities show PRIYAR checked on 4 of 6 listings, and the consistent, detailed remarks across different listings indicate the building offers private yard/courtyard areas for units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units offer storage: 2 of 6 MLS listings have STORAG in unit_features and public remarks in at least 2 listings explicitly state 'outdoor storage' and that a private courtyard is 'currently used for storage.' No listings check a building-level storage amenity, so the storage appears to be unit-level/outdoor rather than shared lockers; multiple agents mention it but it's not universal across all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six current MLS entries list pool amenities, and one public remark explicitly states the Mililani Town Association provides "recreation centers, pools, dog parks, and community parks." The consistency of MLS checkboxes across multiple listings plus the explicit remark suggests the building/community offers pools, though agent copy/paste is possible so evidence is not yet overwhelming across remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six current MLS listings include WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions, and multiple public remarks reference a “large laundry closet,” suggesting units have space for laundry. While agents may be copying checklist items, the unanimous MLS inclusion plus repeated remarks pointing to a laundry closet provide moderate confidence that some units offer in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least two listings explicitly state assigned parking ('covered, assigned parking stall'; 'two assigned parking stalls'), and another mentions 'tandem parking' which typically implies reserved stalls. Evidence comes from multiple agent remarks across different listings, indicating some units have assigned/reserved parking.
Multiple listings explicitly refer to covered parking (examples: 'one covered parking space', 'one covered parking stall'), and MLS parking_features also indicate covered/garage for all units. The evidence is consistent and strong across several agent remarks.
Multiple listings reference assigned/covered/open/tandem parking stalls and that parking 'comes with' the unit, but none use the term 'deeded' or indicate ownership of the stall in the deed. Based on the public remarks, there is no explicit evidence that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking charge', and similar language but found no references. There is no evidence in the public remarks to indicate a separate parking fee.
Guest parking is mentioned in multiple remarks ('convenient guest parking'; 'Guest parking is nearby') and is reflected in MLS parking flags for some listings. While not every listing mentions it, consistent agent remarks indicate guest parking is available in the complex.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking' and found none. The remarks do not reference any waitlist system for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions, and at least 3 of the public remarks explicitly reference window air conditioners: 'two window unit ACs', 'window AC in the bedroom', and 'Window shutters and 2 cool AC units'. One other remark generically lists 'AC'. The consistency across multiple listings and explicit phrasing indicates some units in the building have window AC units.
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention 'double wall', 'double-wall construction', or similar (0 mentions). While 4 of 6 MLS entries currently list DOUWAL, there is no corroborating language in agent remarks or prior verified data, so inclusion is not supported by the available evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention steel frame or 'steel frame construction' across the provided listings (0 mentions). Although 4 of 6 current MLS records list STEFRA, there is no prior confidence or agent remarks confirming a steel frame; this appears to be a probable copy/paste of MLS checkboxes rather than an explicitly stated feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks reference 'above ground' construction or similar wording (0 mentions). Although 4 of 6 MLS records currently include ABOGRO, the absence of any explicit mention in multiple agents' remarks and no historical confirmation means there is insufficient evidence to include this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit indicators like 'short-term rental allowed', 'STR', 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', 'TVU', or 'NUC' and found none. With no public-remarks evidence permitting STRs, STR is set to false (medium confidence).
I looked for phrases such as 'hotel rental pool', 'managed by [hotel]', or 'hotel rental program' and found none. Because there is no evidence STRs are allowed, there is also no evidence of participation in any hotel rental pool.
I searched for explicit statements that participation in a hotel/rental pool is required or mandatory and found none. Since STRs are not indicated as allowed and no rental pool is mentioned, mandatory pool participation is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', and explicit years for lease expiry but found none. No evidence to determine a leasehold expiry year.
Public remarks explicitly mention a VA assumable mortgage loan and VA-eligible financing. This indicates the building accepts VA financing (from the listing text) with high confidence.
I searched the remarks for any statement that the HOA provides full (walls-in) or comprehensive building insurance and found none. With no explicit mention and no user verification, the field is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit language indicating the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar certification and found no such statements. In the absence of any mention and with no current verification provided, the field is set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.