Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka
Building Overview
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka in Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley, built 2007; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka is a residential building located in the Mililani Mauka–Launani Valley neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 2007. Size, unit mix, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies indicated in the MLS record include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information. No specific building amenities, common area features, or HOA service descriptions are included in the provided data.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or HOA fees, utilities, and any guest or leasing restrictions are not specified in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data analysis — buyers and agents should verify all property specifics, fees, and policies with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage or descriptions such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. No such information was provided, so the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
The remarks were searched for explicit elevator information, including references to an elevator, multiple elevators, or a numeric count. No such evidence was found, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 6 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electric) in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks mention utility responsibility or contradict this. This appears to be an implied building-level inclusion (some agent checkbox usage), so included with moderate confidence (3/6 listings).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 8 current listings indicate that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. All 8 list WTRHTR, and no remarks contradict this pattern, so hot water should be excluded.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current listings include sewer in the association fees. Although no public remark explicitly quotes sewer inclusion, the consistent checkbox data across all listings provides strong building-level evidence.
All 8 current listings include water in the association fees. No public remarks explicitly discuss water fees, but the consistent inclusion across every listing strongly supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 7 of 8 current listings explicitly mention private yard or courtyard space, using phrases such as 'private courtyard,' 'fully fenced yard,' 'gated private yard,' and 'two small courtyard areas.' The repeated, detailed descriptions across multiple listings and alignment with the previously high-confidence history provide strong evidence that the building offers private yard space.
No analysis available
1 of 8 listings explicitly mentions access to "recreation centers" through the Mililani Town Association, with additional references to pools and community parks. Although the amenity is described as association-wide rather than specifically as an Island Courtyards building facility, it is available to residents and is corroborated by the current MLS RECARE entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported for some units rather than clearly as a shared building amenity. At least 3 of 8 current listings mark storage in unit features, and multiple remarks independently describe "outdoor storage," "many options for storage," or a courtyard used for storage, so the feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is supported by 5 of 6 current MLS records listing pool-related amenities and one remark stating that residents have access to Mililani Town Association "recreation centers, pools, dog parks, and community parks." The checkbox evidence is strong across multiple listings, with the explicit remark providing confirmation rather than relying solely on potentially copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current listings include washer/dryer in the MLS inclusions, providing strong, consistent support across multiple listings. Two public remarks specifically reference a "large laundry closet," further corroborating that laundry facilities are located within the units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building, with all current MLS entries showing parking features and multiple remarks describing parking stalls or spaces. Evidence is consistent across several listings and appears to be building-level rather than isolated to one unit.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both current MLS data and multiple listing remarks. At least two listings explicitly state 'assigned parking stall' or 'two assigned parking stalls,' while 6 of 8 listings carry the assigned-parking flag.
Covered parking is overwhelmingly supported across the building. At least four listings explicitly mention covered parking, including a 'covered, assigned parking stall,' a 'covered parking space,' and a covered stall paired with an open stall; all 8 current MLS records also contain covered or garage-related flags.
Multiple listings confirm that units have assigned or tandem parking stalls. However, none explicitly say the stalls are deeded, included in the deed, or owned, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly charge, parking rental, and additional parking cost language. The listings discuss parking availability and configuration but provide no fee information.
Guest parking is supported by both current MLS data and multiple remarks. Two listings explicitly mention 'guest parking' or 'Guest parking is nearby,' and 5 of 8 listings carry the guest-parking flag, indicating this is available at the complex even if not every unit's listing highlights it.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is directly confirmed in multiple listings rather than inferred from checkbox data alone. Two remarks explicitly state 'parking - tandem' and '2 tandem parking stalls,' and the current MLS data also flags tandem parking in 2 of 8 listings.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe available assigned, covered, open, and guest parking. No evidence of a building parking waitlist was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 6 of 8 current listings mention air conditioning, with multiple explicit references to window units: "two window unit ACs," "window AC in the bedroom," and "2 cool AC units." The 8/8 ACWIUN inclusion rate and consistent remarks across multiple listings strongly support window AC as a building feature rather than an isolated or copied entry.
No analysis available
Six of eight current listings identify DOUWAL, although zero public remarks mention a double wall, double-wall construction, or two walls. The strong historical confidence and current majority support retaining this building feature despite the lack of narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 7 public remarks mention steel frame, steel frame construction, or anything comparable. Despite 5 of 7 current MLS records listing STEFRA, the absence of any corroborating agent remarks suggests the checkbox is likely not reliable for this building.
Two of eight listings contain the SLAB construction code. None of the public remarks explicitly reference a concrete slab foundation, so evidence is limited and could reflect inconsistent MLS checkbox usage.
No analysis available
Two of eight listings contain the WOOFRA construction code. None of the eight public remarks explicitly mention wood-frame construction, so the feature is supported only by limited MLS checkbox data and may reflect inconsistent agent entry.
No public remarks reference 'above ground' construction or similar wording (0 mentions). Although 4 of 6 MLS records currently include ABOGRO, the absence of any explicit mention in multiple agents' remarks and no historical confirmation means there is insufficient evidence to include this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term-rental indicators and restrictions, including STR, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, 30-day minimum, and owner-occupant-only language. None were found, so STR allowance is not supported by the remarks.
The listings contain no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Because STR is not supported, this feature must also be false.
I searched for wording indicating required participation in a hotel rental pool or rental program and found none. Since STR is not supported by the remarks, mandatory pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, lease expiry, and renewal language. No specific lease expiration year was found, so the value is unknown.
The public remarks directly mention a VA-assumable mortgage for eligible veterans, providing strong evidence that VA financing is supported. This is explicit financing evidence from the listings.
The remarks were searched for full insurance, fully insured, comprehensive building insurance, or walls-in coverage. No relevant insurance language was found, so full HOA insurance coverage is not supported by these remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for statements such as FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. None were found; there is no remark-based evidence that the building has passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of eight listings identify GARDEN in the view description. Remarks do not consistently say 'garden view,' but multiple independent listings mention private courtyards or yards, including areas suitable for gardening, so the feature is supported moderately rather than strongly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the 7 listings reviewed, there are no explicit sunset-view references; 3 listings even show NONE in the view field. The public remarks are consistent in describing courtyard, mauka-breeze, and location details, but never mention sunset, western exposure, or related phrasing, suggesting the MLS data does not support this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.