Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka
Building Overview
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka in Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley, built 2007; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka
Island Courtyards at Mililani Mauka is a residential building located in the Mililani Mauka–Launani Valley neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 2007. Size, unit mix, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies indicated in the MLS record include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information. No specific building amenities, common area features, or HOA service descriptions are included in the provided data.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or HOA fees, utilities, and any guest or leasing restrictions are not specified in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data analysis — buyers and agents should verify all property specifics, fees, and policies with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy information such as a percentage ('80% owner occupied') or a qualitative description ('highly owner occupied'). The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy data. Because no number or clear estimate is stated, the value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit reference to elevators, including phrases like 'elevator,' 'multiple elevators,' or a numeric count such as '4 elevators.' Nothing in the listings mentions elevators at all. Since this is a townhouse-style complex and no evidence appears in the remarks, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 6 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electric) in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks mention utility responsibility or contradict this. This appears to be an implied building-level inclusion (some agent checkbox usage), so included with moderate confidence (3/6 listings).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings mention hot water being included, and all 7 listings instead show WTRHTR in the unit inclusions. That pattern is consistent across multiple entries and points to individual water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current listings include sewer in the association fees. The evidence is uniform across the dataset, with no remark-level contradictions, so this appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
All 7 current listings include water in the association fees. The inclusion is consistent across every listing reviewed, and nothing in the public remarks suggests otherwise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Private yard space is consistently described in the building's listings, with multiple remarks mentioning 'private courtyard,' 'private yard,' 'gated private yard,' and 'your own fully fenced yard.' The evidence appears strong and repeated across several agents, supporting that this building offers private outdoor yard/courtyard space for at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units offer storage: 2 of 6 MLS listings have STORAG in unit_features and public remarks in at least 2 listings explicitly state 'outdoor storage' and that a private courtyard is 'currently used for storage.' No listings check a building-level storage amenity, so the storage appears to be unit-level/outdoor rather than shared lockers; multiple agents mention it but it's not universal across all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six current MLS entries list pool amenities, and one public remark explicitly states the Mililani Town Association provides "recreation centers, pools, dog parks, and community parks." The consistency of MLS checkboxes across multiple listings plus the explicit remark suggests the building/community offers pools, though agent copy/paste is possible so evidence is not yet overwhelming across remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported by the current MLS data, with 7/7 listings including washer/dryer in the inclusions. Public remarks also reference a "large laundry closet" in more than one listing, which aligns with washer/dryer hookups or installed units. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and does not look like a one-off agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building, with all current MLS entries showing parking features and multiple remarks describing parking stalls or spaces. Evidence is consistent across several listings and appears to be building-level rather than isolated to one unit.
Assigned parking is supported by both MLS flags and direct listing remarks. At least two listings explicitly state assigned stalls, making this a strong building-level feature.
Covered parking is strongly supported by the current MLS data and repeated remarks. Several listings explicitly mention covered stalls or spaces, so this is a reliable building feature.
The listings consistently describe assigned, covered, open, and tandem parking, but never explicitly state that the stalls are deeded to the unit. Because the remarks do not use deeded/owned-parking language, this is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to parking fees, parking rentals, or additional monthly charges and found none. The remarks describe parking arrangements, but not any separate fee.
Guest parking is mentioned in multiple listings and is also reflected in current MLS flags for some units. The repeated references suggest it is a building-level amenity rather than a one-off detail.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is directly confirmed by remarks in more than one listing, including explicit references to '2 tandem parking stalls.' Even though only one MLS entry currently flags TANDEM, the remarks provide strong support that tandem parking exists in the building.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join-the-waitlist language and found nothing. The remarks indicate available parking stalls, not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported for this building. At least 3 listings explicitly mention it, with phrases like 'two window unit ACs,' 'window AC in the bedroom,' and '2 cool AC units,' alongside MLS inclusions showing ACWIUN in all current listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
0 of 7 public remarks mention double wall, double-wall construction, or 'two walls.' Even though 5 of 7 current MLS records list DOUWAL, the lack of any explicit mention across multiple listings points to a probable MLS copy/paste issue rather than verified building construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 7 public remarks mention steel frame, steel frame construction, or anything comparable. Despite 5 of 7 current MLS records listing STEFRA, the absence of any corroborating agent remarks suggests the checkbox is likely not reliable for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks reference 'above ground' construction or similar wording (0 mentions). Although 4 of 6 MLS records currently include ABOGRO, the absence of any explicit mention in multiple agents' remarks and no historical confirmation means there is insufficient evidence to include this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, TVU, NUC, or minimum-stay rules and found no relevant language. Based on the public remarks, STR allowance is not established.
I looked for hotel-pool language such as hotel rental pool, hotel program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar management terms and found nothing. Since STR is not evidenced in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is not supported.
I searched for mandatory-pool wording like required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program and found no evidence. With no STR or hotel-pool language present, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry years, ground lease end dates, or renewal terms, but found nothing. There is no evidence in these remarks to identify a lease expiration year.
Public remarks explicitly mention VA-assumable financing for eligible veterans, which is strong evidence the building supports VA financing. This is a direct financing reference rather than an inference.
I searched the remarks for indications that the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage, including phrases like 'fully insured' and 'comprehensive building insurance.' None were found. There is no public-remarks evidence to confirm this feature.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'fire safety certified,' or 'passed fire inspection.' The remarks do not mention any of those terms. With no public-remarks evidence, I cannot mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the 7 listings reviewed, there are no explicit sunset-view references; 3 listings even show NONE in the view field. The public remarks are consistent in describing courtyard, mauka-breeze, and location details, but never mention sunset, western exposure, or related phrasing, suggesting the MLS data does not support this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.