Iolani
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Iolani
Building Overview
Iolani in McCully-Moiliili, built 1970, concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Iolani
Iolani is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1970 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix details are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. No specific amenity list is available in the provided records, and information about on-site facilities should be verified with listing materials or the managing entity.
MLS data lists the management company as unknown. Buyers should confirm details such as parking, maintenance fees, specific amenities, and building rules with the seller, the managing agent, or official condominium documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit numeric owner-occupancy percentages. The remarks describe the building as 'largely owner-occupied' but give no percentage and there is no prior numeric value to preserve, so the exact owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit counts ('4 elevators', 'four elevators', etc.). The remarks mention 'elevators' but provide no numeric count, and there is no prior/current numeric value to preserve, so the exact number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings show 'OTCOEX' (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks for the building mention that common electric is included. Evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears to be copy/paste rather than confirmed in remarks, so inclusion is tentative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings list 'SEWER' as included in association fees, but sewer inclusion is not mentioned in any public remarks. Because verification exists only as repeated MLS checkbox entries (possible agent copy/paste) and no corroborating remarks or user verification exist, the assertion is tentative.
All 5 MLS listings indicate 'WATER' is included in association fees, but none of the public remarks for the building mention water inclusion. The claim relies solely on repeated MLS checkbox data (likely copy/paste) without agent/owner verification in remarks, so it is included with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (remarks in this batch cite storage in at least 3–4 separate remarks) explicitly reference an assigned or large storage locker—phrases include 'convenient storage locker near the stall', 'assigned storage locker', and 'large storage locker/closet'. MLS checkbox data is consistent across listings (5/5 unit_features, 4/5 amenities), so evidence is strong across agents rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings include WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions, and at least 3–4 of the public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry (quotes: "washer and dryer in the unit", "Washer and dryer is included", "wahser/dryer in the guess bath"). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and supports that the building offers units with in-unit washer/dryer.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: remarks across multiple listings use phrases like 'one assigned parking', 'one dedicated parking stall', and 'assigned storage locker'. The MLS parking_features also shows ASSIGN for all 5 listings, and multiple agents independently mention assigned/dedicated stalls, so confidence is high.
Mixed but sufficient evidence that the building has covered parking: at least one listing explicitly states 'one covered parking stall' and MLS parking_features shows covered codes for several listings. However other remarks reference an 'open parking stall', so coverage is not universal; evidence is moderate across agents.
The listings consistently mention an assigned/dedicated parking stall included with the unit, but they do not explicitly say the parking is 'deeded' or part of the deed. Based only on public remarks, deeded ownership of the stall is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', or similar phrases and found none. There is no evidence in the remarks of a separate parking fee to report a value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for phrases like 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found no references. The remarks describe an assigned stall and street parking nearby but do not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the five current listings explicitly mentions 'split A/C in the living room,' and MLS checkbox data shows ACSPL in 1/5 listings. Other listings reference 'upgraded window AC units' and ceiling fans, so HVAC types vary by unit, but there is clear explicit evidence that at least some units have split (ductless) AC.
No analysis available
Four of five current MLS listings list the building as concrete (CONCRE), but none of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete or reinforced concrete. Evidence is moderately strong across MLS checkbox data but lacks corroborating agent remarks, so included with moderate confidence and flagged as implied rather than explicitly documented.
Two of five MLS listings indicate double-wall construction, but none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing. The checkbox occurrences suggest some units/building records claim double-wall construction, but the lack of textual confirmation and low prevalence result in low-to-moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one of five MLS listings lists a concrete slab (SLAB) and there is no mention of 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation' in the public remarks. This provides very limited evidence, so slab is listed as present but with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit indications that short-term rentals are permitted (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC') and found none. In the absence of affirmative language in the public remarks, STR allowance cannot be assumed.
I looked for phrases like 'hotel rental pool', 'part of hotel operations', or hotel brand rental programs and found none. Because the remarks do not indicate STR is allowed, there is no evidence of any hotel rental pool participation.
I searched for terms like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'cannot opt out' and found nothing. Without evidence of STR or a hotel pool program, mandatory participation is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold', or specific expiry years (e.g., 2050) and found no references. Because the remarks do not indicate this is a leasehold or provide any year, the lease expiry year is unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Without explicit mention in the public remarks, VA financing approval cannot be confirmed.
I searched remarks for explicit insurance coverage statements (e.g., 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage'). None were found, so there is no evidence the HOA provides full building (walls-in) insurance; absence of mention yields a medium-confidence false.
No analysis available
I searched remarks for explicit FLSE language (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed'). There are no mentions, so there is no evidence the building has passed an FLSE; absence of mention yields a medium-confidence false per the rules.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks provided here reference mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. Current MLS metadata notes 1/5 listings with MOUNTA, but the public remarks focus on lanai views overlooking Kapiolani Boulevard and describe 'city living.' Given the lack of any mountain-related phrasing in these remarks, there is weak evidence for mountain views at the building.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state an open lanai with 'views overlooking Kapiolani Boulevard—perfect for enjoying city living,' and repeatedly emphasize a central/town location near Waikiki and downtown amenities. At least this listing clearly advertises a city view, supporting inclusion of view_city for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.