Iolani
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Iolani
Building Overview
Iolani in McCully-Moiliili, built 1970, concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Iolani
Iolani is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1970 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix details are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. No specific amenity list is available in the provided records, and information about on-site facilities should be verified with listing materials or the managing entity.
MLS data lists the management company as unknown. Buyers should confirm details such as parking, maintenance fees, specific amenities, and building rules with the seller, the managing agent, or official condominium documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for a numeric owner-occupancy percentage such as "80% owner occupied," but found only qualitative language. The remarks do suggest a high level of owner occupancy, yet there is no exact percentage to report.
I looked for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators," but the remarks only confirm that the building has elevator access. Because this is a numeric field and no number is provided, I cannot determine the count from the remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings show 'OTCOEX' (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks for the building mention that common electric is included. Evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears to be copy/paste rather than confirmed in remarks, so inclusion is tentative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the remarks reviewed, none mention hot water being included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data is also consistent with hot-water exclusion: 0/6 list HOTWAT, and 3/6 list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not building-included. This appears to be a likely agent-data inconsistency/copy-paste issue rather than a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings list 'SEWER' as included in association fees, but sewer inclusion is not mentioned in any public remarks. Because verification exists only as repeated MLS checkbox entries (possible agent copy/paste) and no corroborating remarks or user verification exist, the assertion is tentative.
All 5 MLS listings indicate 'WATER' is included in association fees, but none of the public remarks for the building mention water inclusion. The claim relies solely on repeated MLS checkbox data (likely copy/paste) without agent/owner verification in remarks, so it is included with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (remarks in this batch cite storage in at least 3–4 separate remarks) explicitly reference an assigned or large storage locker—phrases include 'convenient storage locker near the stall', 'assigned storage locker', and 'large storage locker/closet'. MLS checkbox data is consistent across listings (5/5 unit_features, 4/5 amenities), so evidence is strong across agents rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is very strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, with several different agents using phrases like 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'washer/dryer in the guest bath,' and 'Washer and dryer in the unit.' The current MLS inclusions are unanimous (6/6), matching the public remarks and suggesting the data is consistent rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that The Iolani offers parking. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings explicitly mention parking in different forms, including covered, open, dedicated, and assigned stalls. This is consistent across several agents and not just a single copy-paste phrase.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported at the building level. Multiple listings explicitly describe the stall as 'assigned' or 'dedicated,' and the MLS checkbox data is consistent across all current listings. The evidence appears stable and corroborated by both data fields and remarks.
Mixed but sufficient evidence that the building has covered parking: at least one listing explicitly states 'one covered parking stall' and MLS parking_features shows covered codes for several listings. However other remarks reference an 'open parking stall', so coverage is not universal; evidence is moderate across agents.
I found repeated references to assigned/dedicated parking, which confirms parking is included with the unit. However, there is no explicit wording that the stall is deeded or owned with the unit, so deeded parking is not established from the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a monthly parking charge, rental fee, or additional parking cost and found none. The listings state that the unit includes parking, but they do not mention a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or similar references and found nothing. The remarks indicate the unit includes assigned or dedicated parking, but there is no evidence of a building parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the five current listings explicitly mentions 'split A/C in the living room,' and MLS checkbox data shows ACSPL in 1/5 listings. Other listings reference 'upgraded window AC units' and ceiling fans, so HVAC types vary by unit, but there is clear explicit evidence that at least some units have split (ductless) AC.
No analysis available
Five of six current MLS listings identify the building as concrete (CONCRE). None of the public remarks explicitly say “concrete” or “reinforced concrete,” so this is supported mainly by the MLS material field rather than agent descriptions.
Three of six listings flag double-wall construction in MLS, but none of the public remarks mention double walls or two-wall construction. The pattern looks like checkbox data without narrative confirmation.
One of six MLS entries indicates hollow tile, but no listing remarks reference hollow tile construction. This appears isolated and likely copy-pasted or miscoded.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one of five MLS listings lists a concrete slab (SLAB) and there is no mention of 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation' in the public remarks. This provides very limited evidence, so slab is listed as present but with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of six listings mark above-ground construction, but the public remarks never describe the building that way. With no corroboration from agents or site-style descriptions, this feature should be omitted.
Just one of six listings shows BRICK, and there are no public remarks describing brick exterior or brick-and-mortar construction. The absence across multiple remarks suggests this is not a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, vacation rental language, or minimum-stay rules, and found none. There is also no mention of hotel-style use or any explicit allowance for short-term rentals, so this cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool or managed hotel program such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, or similar and found nothing. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false as well.
I searched for language like 'must participate,' 'required to rent,' or 'cannot opt out' and found none. With no evidence of STR allowance or a hotel pool program, there is no basis for mandatory pool participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," or a renewal year, but found nothing. The remarks only describe the building as a boutique condo and do not provide any lease expiry information.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA-related wording such as "VA approved," "VA financing accepted," or similar language and found none. The listings discuss unit features, parking, storage, and location, but do not mention VA loan eligibility.
I looked for insurance language indicating the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage, but the remarks do not mention it. Since there is no explicit insurance statement in the listings, this cannot be verified from the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety evaluation terms such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, and found none. With no explicit mention and no contrary evidence, this is treated as not confirmed in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks provided here reference mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. Current MLS metadata notes 1/5 listings with MOUNTA, but the public remarks focus on lanai views overlooking Kapiolani Boulevard and describe 'city living.' Given the lack of any mountain-related phrasing in these remarks, there is weak evidence for mountain views at the building.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state an open lanai with 'views overlooking Kapiolani Boulevard—perfect for enjoying city living,' and repeatedly emphasize a central/town location near Waikiki and downtown amenities. At least this listing clearly advertises a city view, supporting inclusion of view_city for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 of 6 mention sunset views and one explicitly says NONE in the view field. The remarks describe city, Kapiolani Boulevard, and lanai features, but never reference sunset, western exposure, or evening sun. With no supporting evidence in the remarks and the current MLS view data not showing SUNSET, this is best corrected to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.