Iolani
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Iolani
Building Overview
Iolani in McCully-Moiliili, built 1970, concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Iolani
Iolani is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1970 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix details are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. No specific amenity list is available in the provided records, and information about on-site facilities should be verified with listing materials or the managing entity.
MLS data lists the management company as unknown. Buyers should confirm details such as parking, maintenance fees, specific amenities, and building rules with the seller, the managing agent, or official condominium documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage such as '80% owner occupied' or similar numeric language. The remarks only describe the building qualitatively as largely owner-occupied, which is not enough to assign a percentage.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count and found only general references to elevator access. Because the building is described as having elevator access but no number is stated, the exact count cannot be confirmed from remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings show 'OTCOEX' (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks for the building mention that common electric is included. Evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears to be copy/paste rather than confirmed in remarks, so inclusion is tentative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the remarks reviewed, none mention hot water being included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data is also consistent with hot-water exclusion: 0/6 list HOTWAT, and 3/6 list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not building-included. This appears to be a likely agent-data inconsistency/copy-paste issue rather than a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings list 'SEWER' as included in association fees, but sewer inclusion is not mentioned in any public remarks. Because verification exists only as repeated MLS checkbox entries (possible agent copy/paste) and no corroborating remarks or user verification exist, the assertion is tentative.
All 5 MLS listings indicate 'WATER' is included in association fees, but none of the public remarks for the building mention water inclusion. The claim relies solely on repeated MLS checkbox data (likely copy/paste) without agent/owner verification in remarks, so it is included with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (remarks in this batch cite storage in at least 3–4 separate remarks) explicitly reference an assigned or large storage locker—phrases include 'convenient storage locker near the stall', 'assigned storage locker', and 'large storage locker/closet'. MLS checkbox data is consistent across listings (5/5 unit_features, 4/5 amenities), so evidence is strong across agents rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is very strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, with several different agents using phrases like 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'washer/dryer in the guest bath,' and 'Washer and dryer in the unit.' The current MLS inclusions are unanimous (6/6), matching the public remarks and suggesting the data is consistent rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that The Iolani offers parking. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings explicitly mention parking in different forms, including covered, open, dedicated, and assigned stalls. This is consistent across several agents and not just a single copy-paste phrase.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported at the building level. Multiple listings explicitly describe the stall as 'assigned' or 'dedicated,' and the MLS checkbox data is consistent across all current listings. The evidence appears stable and corroborated by both data fields and remarks.
Mixed but sufficient evidence that the building has covered parking: at least one listing explicitly states 'one covered parking stall' and MLS parking_features shows covered codes for several listings. However other remarks reference an 'open parking stall', so coverage is not universal; evidence is moderate across agents.
I found multiple references to an assigned, dedicated, or included stall, but not the specific term 'deeded.' Because deeded parking must be explicitly supported by the public remarks, this remains unconfirmed and is best treated as not established from the text.
No analysis available
I searched for any indication of a separate parking cost and found none. The listings describe one covered/assigned stall, but do not mention any additional monthly parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for 'parking waitlist,' 'join waitlist for parking,' or similar phrasing and found nothing. The remarks instead suggest the unit has an assigned stall, so no waitlist is evidenced.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the five current listings explicitly mentions 'split A/C in the living room,' and MLS checkbox data shows ACSPL in 1/5 listings. Other listings reference 'upgraded window AC units' and ceiling fans, so HVAC types vary by unit, but there is clear explicit evidence that at least some units have split (ductless) AC.
No analysis available
Five of six current MLS listings identify the building as concrete (CONCRE). None of the public remarks explicitly say “concrete” or “reinforced concrete,” so this is supported mainly by the MLS material field rather than agent descriptions.
Three of six listings flag double-wall construction in MLS, but none of the public remarks mention double walls or two-wall construction. The pattern looks like checkbox data without narrative confirmation.
One of six MLS entries indicates hollow tile, but no listing remarks reference hollow tile construction. This appears isolated and likely copy-pasted or miscoded.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one of five MLS listings lists a concrete slab (SLAB) and there is no mention of 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation' in the public remarks. This provides very limited evidence, so slab is listed as present but with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of six listings mark above-ground construction, but the public remarks never describe the building that way. With no corroboration from agents or site-style descriptions, this feature should be omitted.
Just one of six listings shows BRICK, and there are no public remarks describing brick exterior or brick-and-mortar construction. The absence across multiple remarks suggests this is not a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit permission language such as short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, TVU, or NUC, and found none. Without any affirmative public remark, the building should not be marked as STR allowed.
I looked for any hotel pool or hotel rental program references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, or mandatory managed rental arrangements and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature remains false.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel or rental pool, such as 'must participate' or 'cannot opt out,' and found nothing. With no evidence of STR or a rental pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold', 'ground lease ends', and similar wording, but found nothing. The remarks do mention the building name and year built, but nothing about land tenure or an expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit VA loan approval language and found none. Since this feature must be determined from public remarks only, there is no evidence to mark the building as VA approved.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related phrases indicating full HOA or walls-in coverage and found nothing explicit. Since the remarks do not mention comprehensive building insurance, this feature is not supported by the available text.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE and fire inspection pass statements, and found none. With no current value provided and no supportive remarks, this is treated as not evidenced in the listing text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks provided here reference mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. Current MLS metadata notes 1/5 listings with MOUNTA, but the public remarks focus on lanai views overlooking Kapiolani Boulevard and describe 'city living.' Given the lack of any mountain-related phrasing in these remarks, there is weak evidence for mountain views at the building.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state an open lanai with 'views overlooking Kapiolani Boulevard—perfect for enjoying city living,' and repeatedly emphasize a central/town location near Waikiki and downtown amenities. At least this listing clearly advertises a city view, supporting inclusion of view_city for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 of 6 mention sunset views and one explicitly says NONE in the view field. The remarks describe city, Kapiolani Boulevard, and lanai features, but never reference sunset, western exposure, or evening sun. With no supporting evidence in the remarks and the current MLS view data not showing SUNSET, this is best corrected to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.