Ihona
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ihona
Building Overview
Ihona in Waipahu (built 1984) offers window air conditioning and assigned parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed per MLS data.
About Ihona
Based on MLS data, Ihona is a condominium building located in the Waipahu neighborhood, built in 1984. Size and specific construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, units at Ihona use window air conditioning. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in MLS data.
Parking is available and assigned. Other fees, amenities, or HOA details are not provided in the MLS information reviewed. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management for current and complete information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy statements such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or any percentage-based occupancy disclosure, but found none. Because this is a numeric field and no value is stated in the remarks, it remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording and found none. The repeated walk-up descriptions strongly suggest there are no elevators, but because there is no explicit statement of count, this is still a low-confidence inference.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 11 current listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. No public remarks explicitly mention common area electricity, which suggests this is an MLS checkbox pattern rather than copy in the remarks, but the recurring current data is enough to support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one of 11 current listings has HOTWAT checked, while eight list WTRHTR in the inclusions. With no remarks mentioning hot water included and multiple listings pointing to in-unit water heaters, hot water should be treated as not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 11 current listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. This is strong building-level evidence and appears consistent across listings, with no conflicting remarks.
All 11 current listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. The evidence is consistent across the current MLS set and is not contradicted by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I did not find any public-remarks evidence for a car wash amenity across the listings reviewed. The only signal is partial MLS checkbox usage (4/11 listings), which is not strong enough on its own and could reflect copy/paste errors. Until remarks or more listings explicitly confirm a car wash station, this feature should be treated as unverified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit listings explicitly mention outdoor spaces: phrases include "enclosed open lanai," "enclosed private courtyard," "enclosed 100 sq. ft yard," "fenced-in lanai," and "fenced patio (with remote controlled awning)." At least 5 of the listing remark sections reference a lanai/patio, and 4 of 8 MLS checkbox amenities currently list PATDEC/COVPAT, so there is strong, consistent evidence that the building offers patios/decks to some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of seven listings explicitly mention private, enclosed ground-floor outdoor areas such as an 'enclosed private courtyard', an 'enclosed 100 sq. ft yard', a 'fenced-in lanai', and a 'fenced patio (with remote controlled awning)'. These descriptions, from different listings, indicate that some units have private yard-type spaces despite inconsistent MLS checkbox usage. This supports including private_yard as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Majority of current MLS entries indicate storage: 6 of 8 listings list STORAG in unit_features and 1 of 8 lists STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in building amenities. None of the public remarks explicitly mention storage lockers or additional storage, so the evidence relies on MLS checkboxes across multiple listings (likely some copy/paste), but the prevalence across listings suggests the building offers storage/lockers for at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing remarks. Multiple remarks explicitly say "in-unit laundry," "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer and dryer," and "inside washer/dryer," indicating this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. The current MLS data also aligns closely, with washer/dryer included in 10 of 11 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present for this building. Across the provided listings, multiple remarks mention parking details such as '1 assigned parking,' 'parking stall that fronts the unit,' 'ample guest parking,' and 'additional rental parking stall available.' This is consistent with the MLS parking feature data, which shows parking on every current listing and no NONE values.
Well-supported: every current MLS listing shows assigned parking and at least six public remarks explicitly advertise "1 assigned parking" or "assigned parking stall," indicating assigned/reserved stalls are provided to units.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit terms like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only describe assigned parking and an additional rental stall option, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking rent, monthly parking cost, or any dollar amount tied to parking. The remarks mention the possibility of an extra rental stall, but no fee is provided.
Moderate-to-strong evidence for guest parking: about half the MLS listings include guest in parking features and at least four public remarks mention guest or visitor parking (phrases such as "ample guest parking" and "guest stalls close by"), indicating the building offers guest parking availability.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for stalls. The listings do not mention any waitlist system, so there is no evidence that one exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears in the MLS data across 8 of 11 listings, suggesting this building includes units with window air conditioning or allows them. None of the public remarks explicitly mention window AC, so the evidence is moderate and likely based on agent-entered MLS inclusions rather than listing descriptions. This is still useful for buyers searching for units with AC options in the building.
2 of 8 current listings list 'CONCRE' (concrete) in the construction_materials field. Public remarks across all listings do not mention concrete or reinforced concrete; evidence appears to come solely from MLS checkbox entries and may reflect agents' copy/paste. Confidence is moderate because MLS shows some listings with concrete but there are no remarks or user verifications to corroborate.
The MLS construction_materials field frequently includes DOUWAL (7 of 10 current listings), and historical data showed Medium confidence for double-wall construction. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing, so the feature is included for buyers with moderate confidence that the building offers double-wall construction.
No analysis available
There is no mention of masonry or stucco in any of the public remarks (0 of 10 listings). Only 1 of 10 current MLS records lists MASSTU, and there is no historical confidence for this feature, suggesting the single checkbox is likely an agent error or copy/paste rather than a building-level characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears in the current MLS data for 6 of 11 listings, which is enough to treat it as a building feature with moderate confidence. None of the public remarks explicitly reference "wood frame" or similar construction details, so the evidence looks more like consistent MLS coding than copy-pasted narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or 30-day minimum rules. The listings are silent on this topic, so STR allowance cannot be confirmed from remarks and is treated as not evidenced.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program such as Hilton, Ritz, or Trump pool language. Nothing in the remarks suggests the building participates in a hotel pool program.
I searched for wording like mandatory rental pool, required participation, or cannot opt out. The remarks contain none of those phrases, so there is no evidence of a mandatory pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as a lease expiry year, ground lease end date, or extension/renewal terms. Nothing in the provided listings indicates whether the building is leasehold or provides any expiration year.
This is a direct mention of VA approval in the listings, which indicates VA financing is accepted. I did not rely on inference here; the wording is explicit and repeated enough to be strong evidence.
I searched the remarks for terms such as "fully insured," "full insurance," and "walls-in coverage" and found no references. Since the listings do not mention HOA insurance coverage, there is no basis to mark this as true.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," and similar language, but found nothing in the public remarks. With no explicit evidence, I cannot confirm a pass and therefore keep this as unverified/absent from the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current remarks mention sunset views, western exposure, or evening sun across the 11 listings provided. The MLS view data is also consistent with absence: 0/11 listings include SUNSET and 9/11 explicitly list NONE, suggesting no meaningful evidence that this building offers sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.