
Ihona
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ihona
Building Overview
Ihona in Waipahu (built 1984) offers window air conditioning and assigned parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed per MLS data.

About Ihona
Based on MLS data, Ihona is a condominium building located in the Waipahu neighborhood, built in 1984. Size and specific construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, units at Ihona use window air conditioning. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in MLS data.
Parking is available and assigned. Other fees, amenities, or HOA details are not provided in the MLS information reviewed. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management for current and complete information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy disclosures such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or any percentage-based statement, and found none. Without a direct remark, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator references, including count-based phrases like '4 elevators' or generic wording like 'multiple elevators,' and found none. The listings instead describe the unit as a 'walk-up' and ground-floor, which suggests no elevator detail is being advertised, but there is still no direct evidence to set a number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
About half of the current listings (6/12) include OTCOEX, indicating the building likely has at least some HOA coverage for common-area electricity. No public remarks explicitly call out common electric or building power, so this appears to be a MLS-driven feature rather than one repeatedly described by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one of 11 current listings has HOTWAT checked, while eight list WTRHTR in the inclusions. With no remarks mentioning hot water included and multiple listings pointing to in-unit water heaters, hot water should be treated as not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current listings (12/12) include sewer in association_fee_includes, making this a very strong building-level feature. There are no conflicting remarks, and the uniform MLS reporting suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly.
All current listings (12/12) include water in association_fee_includes, so this appears to be a consistent building-level HOA benefit. No public remarks dispute it, and the broad agreement across listings makes the evidence very strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I did not find any public-remarks evidence for a car wash amenity across the listings reviewed. The only signal is partial MLS checkbox usage (4/11 listings), which is not strong enough on its own and could reflect copy/paste errors. Until remarks or more listings explicitly confirm a car wash station, this feature should be treated as unverified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers patio/deck-type outdoor spaces. At least 5 current listings mention them directly, including phrases like 'enclosed open lanai,' 'spacious lanai,' and 'fenced patio.' This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong, repeated evidence that some units have private yard-like outdoor areas. Current remarks include 'enclosed private courtyard' and 'enclosed 100 sq. ft yard,' while historical data already flagged PRIYAR in 2/12 listings. This suggests the feature is real and available in at least some ground-floor units, not merely an MLS checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS history and current public remarks. At least 1 listing explicitly mentions a "storage closet outside," and the majority of current MLS entries include STORAG in unit features, suggesting this is not just a copy-paste checkbox error. Buyers looking for storage should consider this building as offering storage-related space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings and appears consistent rather than copy-paste error. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "in-unit laundry," "in-unit washer and dryer," and "inside washer/dryer," with at least 4-5 separate listings confirming the feature. The current remarks align with the historical MLS inclusions, so this feature should remain true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present for this building. Across the provided remarks, at least 8 listings reference parking directly with phrases like "1 assigned parking," "parking stall that fronts the unit," and "parking is just steps away." The MLS data is consistent and does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. Multiple listings mention "1 assigned parking," "1 assigned parking stall," and similar wording, matching the MLS checkbox data across all current listings. This is high-confidence and consistent across multiple agents.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The remarks only refer to assigned parking and a separately available rental stall, which does not support deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for a parking rent, monthly charge, or specific dollar amount tied to parking. The remarks mention an additional rental parking stall being available, but they do not provide a fee, so the amount is unknown.
Guest parking appears to be available at the building. At least 3-4 remarks mention guest parking directly, including phrases like "ample guest parking," "ample street parking for your guest," and "a number of guest stalls close by." The evidence is solid even though guest parking is not checked on every listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a list for stalls. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system, so there is no evidence this building uses one.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears in the MLS data across 8 of 11 listings, suggesting this building includes units with window air conditioning or allows them. None of the public remarks explicitly mention window AC, so the evidence is moderate and likely based on agent-entered MLS inclusions rather than listing descriptions. This is still useful for buyers searching for units with AC options in the building.
2 of 8 current listings list 'CONCRE' (concrete) in the construction_materials field. Public remarks across all listings do not mention concrete or reinforced concrete; evidence appears to come solely from MLS checkbox entries and may reflect agents' copy/paste. Confidence is moderate because MLS shows some listings with concrete but there are no remarks or user verifications to corroborate.
The MLS construction_materials field frequently includes DOUWAL (7 of 10 current listings), and historical data showed Medium confidence for double-wall construction. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing, so the feature is included for buyers with moderate confidence that the building offers double-wall construction.
No analysis available
There is no mention of masonry or stucco in any of the public remarks (0 of 10 listings). Only 1 of 10 current MLS records lists MASSTU, and there is no historical confidence for this feature, suggesting the single checkbox is likely an agent error or copy/paste rather than a building-level characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears to be a building-level feature based on the current MLS data: 7 of 12 listings show WOOFRA in construction_materials. The public remarks across the sampled listings do not explicitly mention construction type, so this is supported mainly by the MLS fields rather than agent comments. Evidence is moderate and consistent enough to include, but it does not rise to high confidence because there is no direct remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental language, or 30-day minimum rules. The listings are silent on STR permissions, so this is not supported by the remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, or any managed rental-program language. Nothing in the remarks suggests the building participates in a hotel pool.
I searched for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or similar rental-program restrictions. The remarks contain none of those phrases, so there is no evidence of a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as a lease expiry year, ground lease end date, renewal, or extension terms. Nothing in the listings mentions land tenure or a lease expiration year, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks directly state VA approval, which indicates VA financing is accepted. This is a strong, explicit match for the financing_va feature.
I searched the remarks for insurance wording that would indicate walls-in or full building coverage, including 'fully insured' and 'comprehensive building insurance,' and found no references. The low HOA fee is mentioned, but that does not confirm insurance status.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' or similar certification language, and found nothing. Because this feature is only determined from public remarks and there is no explicit mention, it cannot be confirmed from the provided listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings in the provided remarks mention sunset views, western exposure, or evening sun. The MLS view data is also consistent with this, with most listings marked NONE and none marked SUNSET, so this appears to be a stable building-level absence rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.