Hoomaka Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hoomaka Village
Building Overview
Hoomaka Village in Waipahu, built 1991; condo community with no pets and no short-term rentals allowed (based on MLS data).
About Hoomaka Village
Hoomaka Village is a condominium community located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1991. Details on overall building size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, the building's policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Specific on-site amenities are not detailed in the MLS information supplied.
Additional details such as assigned parking, maintenance fees, and other HOA rules are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, fees, and management information with the listing agent or condominium association prior to making any purchasing decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy data like percentages or descriptors such as 'highly owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' and found none. The remarks include owner-occupant-friendly language in one listing, but that is not evidence of the building's actual owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references, including singular/plural elevator mentions and count-based language, and found none. The listings describe townhomes/ground-floor units in Hoomaka Village, but they do not provide evidence confirming any elevators in the building.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building-level MLS data strongly supports common area electricity being included: 16 of 20 current listings mark OTCOEX. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, but the repeated MLS inclusion across multiple listings suggests this is a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion appears absent for this building. Across the current listings, 0 of 20 mark HOTWAT while 14 of 20 include WTRHTR, which is a strong signal that units rely on individual water heaters rather than a building-paid hot water system. The remarks are consistent with this and do not contain any explicit hot-water-included language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported by overwhelmingly consistent MLS data, with 19 of 20 current listings marking SEWER. Public remarks are silent on the point, which is typical for a building-level fee item, and nothing in the remarks suggests a recent change.
Water inclusion is effectively confirmed by the MLS: all 20 current listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. The remarks don’t mention it directly, but the consistency across every listing makes this the strongest of the fee-inclusion features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are supported by the current MLS amenities and corroborated by public remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly mention 'car wash' / 'car wash areas' in the complex, which aligns with the historical high-confidence MLS data. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. At least 8+ listings mention it directly, including "private lanai," "covered patio," "private patio," and "patio/lanai," with consistent language across multiple agents rather than a one-off mention. The repeated references suggest this is a real building feature, not just MLS copy-paste noise.
Only 2 of 20 listings list a path/jogging amenity in MLS checkboxes, and none of the aggregated public remarks explicitly state 'jogging path', 'walking path', or 'running trail'. Remarks do mention nearby parks, playgrounds, and walking distance to outlets, but there is no direct description of a community jogging/walking path across multiple agents, suggesting the checkbox entries are likely errors rather than a building feature.
No analysis available
There is clear current evidence that some units have private yard space. About 5+ listings reference it directly, including "private yard," "enclosed private yard," "spacious yard," and yard access tied to ground-floor units, which is strong enough to verify the feature. The wording appears in multiple remarks and is not limited to a single agent or listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage amenities. The remarks mention parking, car wash areas, and resident manager, but nothing about dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit saltwater or salt pool wording such as "salt water pool" or "saltwater pool." The remarks mention community pools in the area, but there is no indication that any pool is saltwater.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'full-size washer/dryer,' and 'washer/dryer stack,' showing this is not a one-off or copy-paste anomaly. The evidence is consistent across many agents and aligns with the existing MLS data.
No analysis available
I looked for coin-operated, card-operated, fee-based, or other paid community laundry references. The remarks only reference in-unit washer/dryer and do not mention any pay laundry amenities.
I searched the remarks for language like "laundry on every floor," "community laundry on each floor," and similar floor-by-floor laundry descriptions. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no public remark evidence for laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is clearly present for the building. Across the provided remarks, numerous listings mention parking in many forms such as "2 assigned parking stalls," "1 assigned parking stall," "parking conveniently located," and "2 parking stalls." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to reflect a building-wide feature, not a one-off copy/paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly confirmed. Many remarks explicitly state "assigned parking stalls," "1 assigned parking stall," "assigned parking that is right in front of your door," and "parking stall located at the foot of the stairs." This is consistent across many listings and appears to be a standard amenity for the building.
No analysis available
I found repeated references to assigned stalls, including units with 1 or 2 assigned stalls and parking located near the unit. None of the remarks say the parking is deeded, owned, or included in the deed, so deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charges, parking rental, or additional parking costs and found none. The listings mention assigned stalls and guest parking, but no separate parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be an established amenity. Several listings independently mention "ample guest parking" and "ample guest parking is available throughout the complex," which supports a building-level feature rather than a mistaken checkbox. The wording is repeated enough across listings to trust it with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a parking queue and found nothing. The public remarks instead describe assigned parking and guest parking availability.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob access, card reader, electronic access, or keycard entry references. The only security-related wording is keyless entry and ring cameras for the unit, which are not the same as a building-wide card access system.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-related terms such as security patrol, roving security, patrolled building, or patrol service. The public remarks do not mention any security patrol service for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is confirmed by multiple remarks across the listings: phrases include "3 split ACs," "two quiet split A/C systems," "two quite split A/Cs," "a split A/C system," and "split AC to keep cool." Current MLS data also shows ACSPL in 5 of 20 listings, supporting that some units in the building offer split AC rather than this being a one-off error.
Window A/C is clearly supported by the remarks: multiple listings explicitly say 'window AC units,' 'new window AC units,' or 'brand-new window AC unit.' The MLS also shows 12 of 20 listings including ACWIUN, reinforcing that this feature is common in the building. Evidence is strong across several agents and does not look like a one-off mention.
Concrete construction appears in a minority of current MLS entries (6 of 20). None of the public remarks explicitly describe the building as concrete, so this is supported mainly by the MLS pattern rather than listing text. Because the feature is building-level and buyers may search for it, it should be retained with moderate confidence.
Double wall construction is supported by the current MLS data, with 13 of 20 listings showing DOUWAL. Public remarks do not describe the wall construction directly, which suggests this is an MLS-level building attribute rather than something agents are writing about.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation is not supported by the public remarks, and the current MLS signal is relatively weak at 7 of 20 listings. With no explicit mention of a slab foundation and only medium historical confidence, this appears to be a likely MLS inconsistency.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is indicated in 13 of 20 current MLS listings, which is a strong majority pattern. The public remarks do not explicitly mention wood frame construction, suggesting the evidence comes from MLS data rather than agent descriptions. Still, this is strong enough to include for building-level search relevance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "STR permitted," "TVU," "NUC," and "vacation rental" and found no evidence. In the absence of any public support, I cannot confirm that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as "hotel pool," "managed by hotel," or brand-specific rental programs and found none. Since there is no evidence of STR permission, this must also remain false.
I searched for language like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. The remarks provide no indication that a hotel rental pool exists, much less that it is mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language like "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold," or any 4-digit expiration year and found nothing. Because no lease tenure details appear in the remarks, the expiry year remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related phrases such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no public evidence, I cannot confirm VA eligibility from these listings.
One listing explicitly says the property has "full hurricane insurance," which is strong public-remarks evidence that the HOA/building is fully insured. No conflicting remarks were found, so this remains a high-confidence true.
No analysis available
I looked for any language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, or fire inspection compliance, and found nothing in the public remarks. Because there is no direct mention, this remains unconfirmed from the listing text alone.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/courtyard/landscaped views are mentioned in several remarks across different listings, not just one agent. The strongest phrases are "beautifully landscaped and spacious courtyard," "beautifully landscaped common areas," and "views of open grassy area are expansive." Because the MLS view data is split between GARDEN and NONE, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are supported by 2+ listings with explicit language about watching the sunrise/morning sun from the lanai. While only 1/20 current MLS view descriptions show SUNRIS and many show NONE, the repeated remark references suggest this is a real but unit-dependent feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No listings (0/20) mention sunset or western/evening views; multiple remarks explicitly reference sunrise (e.g., "watch the sunrise") or neutral views like "open grassy area." MLS view checkbox shows SUNSET unchecked across current listings and 5/20 list NONE, indicating agents are not representing sunset views. Evidence is consistent across agents and remarks, so building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit claims that units can watch fireworks or have fireworks views from the lanai or building. The remarks mention views of sunrise, playground, and open grassy areas, but nothing about fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
There is direct evidence for an on-site resident manager: one public remark explicitly mentions "a resident manager," and current MLS data shows RESMAN in 9 of 20 listings. This is enough to support the feature, though it is not universal across all remarks, suggesting some listings may be copying MLS amenities while others simply omit it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.