Honuakaha
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Honuakaha
Building Overview
Honuakaha in Downtown-Chinatown, built 1995; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per MLS data.
About Honuakaha
Based on MLS data, Honuakaha is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. The property was built in 1995. Specific information on building size (number of units or floors) and construction type is not provided in the available records.
According to available records, on-site policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. No amenities, common area features, or other building services are listed in the MLS data provided.
Additional details such as parking, monthly maintenance fees, association management, and the management company are not specified in the MLS data (management company listed as Unknown). Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for an owner-occupancy percentage or language indicating a mostly owner-occupied building. The remarks mention owner-occupants as a buyer type and describe one owner’s personal use of a unit, but that is not a building-level occupancy rate. No reliable percentage is stated, so this remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count, but found only references to being near the elevator. That confirms elevator access in the building, but not how many elevators there are. Without a stated count, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence that maintenance fees include common area electricity: 9 of 14 current listings include OTCOEX. No public remarks explicitly call it out, so the support comes mainly from the repeated MLS inclusions rather than agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is not supported by the current MLS pattern: only 2 of 14 listings have HOTWAT, while 11 of 14 list a water heater in the unit. The public remarks repeatedly reference a "new water heater," "newer water heater," and "tankless water heater," which is strong evidence against hot water being included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very strongly supported across the building, with 14 of 14 current listings showing SEWER in association_fee_includes. There are no contrary remarks, so this appears to be a consistent MLS fact rather than a copy-paste error.
Water inclusion is strongly supported across all current listings, with 14 of 14 showing WATER in association_fee_includes. The consistency across listings suggests this is a stable building-level fee inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports patio/deck-type amenities. Across the provided listings, at least 3 explicitly mention a "lanai," and one also calls out a "7th-floor recreation deck," which aligns with the existing PATDEC/COVPAT history. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a real shared feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence strongly supports a shared recreation room in the building. One current remark explicitly says the building offers a "2nd-floor recreation room," and another mentions a "7th-floor recreation deck," confirming shared amenity space rather than a unit-specific feature. This appears consistent across listings and not just a one-off agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by several listings, not just the MLS checkboxes. At least 4 remarks explicitly reference shared storage amenities, including "bicycle and surfboard storage available" and "secured building provides surfboard and bicycle storage." The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is a genuine building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
This feature is directly confirmed in the public remarks multiple times. The building is explicitly described as having surfboard storage, often paired with bicycle storage.
No analysis available
At least one current listing explicitly says the building has a "trash chute" as a common amenity. Combined with the current MLS pattern showing TRACHU in most listings, this is strong evidence the building has a shared trash chute system. The consistency suggests this is a real building feature, not merely copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked the remarks for any pool references, especially saltwater or saline pool wording. There are no public remarks describing a pool at all, so this feature is not supported.
Laundry in unit is strongly confirmed for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it with varied wording such as "in-unit washer and dryer," "side by side washer and dryer," "stack washer/dryer," and "full-size washer/dryer." The evidence is consistent across many remarks and appears to be repeated by multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for references to coin laundry, quarters, card-op, or laundry fees in the public remarks. The listings only mention in-unit laundry, so there is no evidence that community laundry exists or requires payment.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on every floor,' 'each floor has laundry,' or similar community-laundry descriptions. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer and do not describe communal laundry locations.
No analysis available
Strong multi-listing evidence supports assigned parking. Across the current remarks, several listings explicitly mention a 'dedicated parking stall,' 'assigned parking stall,' or 'dedicated parking space,' indicating this is a building feature rather than a one-off unit detail. The wording is consistent across multiple agents, so this appears well-supported rather than copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple current remarks explicitly describe covered parking, secure garage access, or covered/secure stalls, and the historical MLS data is unanimous. This is robust building-level evidence that the building offers covered parking.
The listings consistently indicate assigned or dedicated parking, which suggests parking is included, but that is not the same as deeded parking. I did not find explicit language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed."
No analysis available
I searched for any parking charge language, including monthly parking fees or rental costs, and found nothing. The remarks only mention that parking is assigned, dedicated, or secure.
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that parking/building access is secured. Multiple listings mention 'secured building entry,' 'secure parking,' 'secure garage,' or 'gated parking,' suggesting access control rather than simple open parking. This is supported by several independent remarks, though not as universally as assigned or covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or joining a list for parking, but found none. The remarks instead describe parking as dedicated, assigned, covered, or secure.
No analysis available
I searched for key card access, fob access, card readers, or electronic entry language. The listings only say the building is secured or has secured entry, which is not enough to confirm a card-based security system.
Security guard/service is strongly supported by the current MLS data, with 14/14 listings marked SECGUA. The remarks don’t usually spell out "security guard," but several listings reference a "secured building," "secure building entry," and "security"-oriented access, which is consistent across multiple agents and appears more like repeated MLS/marketing language than a one-off claim.
I looked for any reference to security patrols or roving security service. The remarks mention secured entry, gated parking, and an on-site manager, but nothing about patrols.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window air conditioning is strongly supported for this building. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it across multiple remarks, including phrases such as "Friedrich window a/c," "newer window A/C," and "window AC," which indicates this is not just a single-agent copy/paste issue. The current MLS remarks continue to consistently describe window-style AC or AC units, so the feature should remain included.
Concrete construction is strongly supported at the building level: 13 of 14 current listings use CONCRE. None of the public remarks suggest a different structural type, so this appears to be consistent MLS data rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Double wall construction appears in 10 of 14 current listings, which gives it solid but not definitive support. The remarks do not discuss wall construction, so this is being inferred mainly from repeated MLS building data.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco has moderate building-level support, with 10 of 14 listings coded MASSTU. Public remarks do not explicitly describe the exterior, but the repeated MLS coding across multiple listings suggests this is not a one-off entry.
No analysis available
Slab construction has the weakest signal of the four features, with 6 of 14 listings marked SLAB. Because the remarks never mention the foundation, this looks like a modest MLS-based building attribute rather than a confirmed site-visit observation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough evidence to support above-ground construction. Only 2 of 12 current listings show ABOGRO, and none of the public remarks mention above-ground materials or construction. This looks like an isolated MLS entry pattern rather than a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental terms such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, or vacation rental references and found nothing. One remark mentions rental income potential, but that is not explicit evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation, and found none. Since STR permission is not evidenced in the remarks, hotel pool participation is also unsupported.
I searched for language indicating required participation in a hotel or rental pool, such as mandatory enrollment or cannot opt out, and found none. There is also no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so this cannot be true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording, ground lease references, and any 4-digit lease expiration year, but none appeared in the remarks. There is no public evidence here to extract a lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA financing language such as "VA approved" or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings mention parking, security, and unit features, but nothing about VA eligibility.
I searched for evidence that the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage. The only insurance-related phrase is a general hurricane insurance note, which does not confirm full building insurance. So this feature is not verified from the remarks.
Fire sprinklers are explicitly confirmed in multiple current listings, and the historical MLS pattern was already high confidence. At least 3 remarks mention them directly, with phrases like "fully equipped with fire sprinklers" and "fire sprinklers throughout," which makes this a strong building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I looked for phrases like "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," or "passed fire inspection." The remarks mention fire sprinklers and general security, but nothing that directly confirms a passed fire/life safety evaluation. In the absence of explicit wording, this is left as not verified.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well supported across the remarks: at least 4 listings explicitly mention them with phrases like 'mountain-facing side,' 'panoramic mountain and city view,' and 'breathtaking view.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single copied remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is explicit sunset-view language in 1 listing: 'sunset reflecting onto Punchbowl.' The remaining listings mostly mention mountain, city, or generic views, and the MLS view field shows 0/14 SUNSET tags, so this appears to be an occasional unit-level feature rather than a building-wide pattern.
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit cemetery-view mentions. The listings consistently talk about mountain, city, Punchbowl, and urban views instead, so the cemetery-view signal is not supported by the remarks and looks weak relative to the rest of the data.
I searched for explicit statements that residents can see Friday night fireworks from the building or from a unit lanai. The remarks mention mountain, city, and panoramic views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
Resident manager/on-site management is strongly supported. Historical MLS data already had high confidence, and current remarks explicitly mention "on-site Association Manager" and "on-site manager" in the building. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.