Hokulani Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hokulani Apartments
Building Overview
Hokulani Apartments in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building built in 1962. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Hokulani Apartments
Hokulani Apartments is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1962. The building is constructed of concrete. Size details such as number of units, floors, or unit square footage are not provided in the available MLS data.
Key policies listed in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is recorded as unknown in the MLS; no specific amenities, common-area features, or utilities information are provided in the available records.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers—such as parking availability, association fees, maintenance assessments, and specific amenity listings—are not included in the MLS information provided. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify parking, fee schedules, management contacts, and any other property-specific details with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I checked the remarks for any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative ownership mix statement and found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no explicit evidence, I left it unknown rather than guessing.
I searched the remarks for any elevator count or direct elevator references and found none. Although the building is described as a walk-up, I did not use that to infer a numeric value because no explicit elevator count was provided.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4/4 current listings include OTCOEX, which strongly supports that common area electricity is included in the maintenance fee. No public remarks address this directly, but the MLS data is fully consistent across listings and looks reliable rather than copy-pasted noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
3/4 current listings include HOTWAT, which is solid evidence that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. No listings show WTRHTR, and the public remarks do not mention individual water heaters or anything that would undermine the MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4/4 current listings include WATER, strongly indicating water is covered by the maintenance fee. The public remarks are silent on the fee details, but the MLS data is unanimous and therefore highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to have a shared swimming pool. Three of four remarks explicitly mention the pool, including phrases like "community pool," "pool entrance," and "Relax in the pool." The remarks are consistent across multiple listings and align with the current MLS amenity data, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly offers shared laundry facilities. Three of four listings explicitly mention it, with phrases like 'convenient on-site laundry facilities' and 'community laundry on site,' and the MLS amenities show COMLAU in 3/4 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and does not look like isolated copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly supported across the current listings. Two remarks explicitly state parking details — 'one assigned parking' and '1 open parking space' — and the MLS parking fields show parking in all 4/4 listings with no NONE entries. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for language like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The remarks mention assigned/open parking, which confirms parking exists, but they do not establish that the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for any parking charge, rental fee, or additional monthly parking cost. The listings mention assigned/open parking only, with no fee disclosed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist system, but none were found. The remarks only indicate that the unit comes with parking, without describing any waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window air conditioning appears to be a real building-level feature for Hokulani Apartments. One listing explicitly mentions "new window A/C’s," and current MLS data shows ACWIUN in 3 of 4 listings, suggesting this is not a one-off copy/paste error. The evidence is moderate to strong and consistent with some units having window units.
All 4 current listings indicate concrete construction in MLS, which is strong building-level evidence even though the remarks do not explicitly repeat it. The building is consistently presented as the same Hokulani Apartments, and there is no sign of a correction or contradiction in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of four current listings include the ABOGRO construction tag, and the public remarks describe the property as a 'walk-up building,' supporting above-ground construction at a moderate level. The evidence is not as strong as for concrete, but it is consistent across the building-level description and MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU language. The public remarks do not mention any of these, so STR allowance is not verified from the listings.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or branded pool participation. There were no such references, and nothing in the remarks supports a short-term rental hotel pool.
I searched for wording that would indicate a mandatory hotel rental pool or required participation. The remarks do not mention any rental pool program at all, so there is no evidence for a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as a lease expiration year, ground lease end date, or renewal/extension terms. The remarks only describe the building, unit condition, and parking/pool amenities, so no lease expiry year can be extracted.
I searched the public remarks for any indication that VA loans are accepted, but there were no references to VA approval or VA financing. With no explicit mention, this is treated as not verified from the listing remarks.
I searched for HOA insurance or walls-in coverage language and found no references in the remarks. Since there is no current value and no explicit mention, this is marked false with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for any fire/life safety certification or inspection-passed language and found nothing in the public remarks. With no current value and no supporting evidence, this is marked false with moderate confidence based on absence of mention.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings provide evidence of sunset views, and the MLS view descriptions are mostly NONE. The public remarks focus on unit upgrades, pool, laundry, and location, with no mention of western exposure or sunset-facing units. This looks like a consistent absence across the building rather than a copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.