Hokualii Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hokualii Hale
Building Overview
Hokualii Hale in Mililani-Waipio — concrete building built in 1974; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Hokualii Hale
Hokualii Hale is a residential building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction. The MLS data provided does not include building size, unit count, or floor plan information.
Key policies listed in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS does not list on-site amenities or descriptions of common areas; a management company is listed as unknown in the available data.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, association fees, maintenance responsibilities, and other policies are not included in the MLS information provided. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or applicable condominium association prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks directly mention that the community has over 90% owner occupancy, which is strong evidence for this feature. I used 90 as the reported percentage value, with the note that the text says 'over 90%'.
I searched the remarks for any explicit elevator count or references to multiple elevators, but found none. Because this is a numeric feature and there is no evidence in the public remarks, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included based on current MLS data: 2 of 2 listings show OTCOEX. The public remarks do not address utility inclusions, so this is being driven by the MLS association fee data and appears consistent across the available listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current MLS data. None of the listings include HOTWAT in association fee inclusions, and both show WTRHTR, which typically means the unit has its own water heater rather than shared hot water provided by the association.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS records: 2 of 2 listings include SEWER. The remarks do not mention utilities, so there is no reason to discount the consistent MLS checkbox data.
Water appears to be included based on current MLS data, with 2 of 2 listings showing WATER in association_fee_includes. There are no public remarks suggesting otherwise, so this looks like a consistent building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Neither listing remarks mention any jogging or walking path amenities. With no supporting language such as 'jogging path' or 'walking path,' the MLS checkbox appears unsupported for this feature.
No analysis available
2 listing remarks support private yard access. One says the home has a "fully fenced yard" that opens to a quiet courtyard, and another mentions a "lush courtyard garden" with added privacy and serenity. The language is specific and consistent, indicating this is an actual feature available to buyers.
No analysis available
The remarks mention the community has access to Mililani Town Association recreation centers and specifically reference Mililani Recreation Center 2. Amenities listed include a heated pool, basketball court, and ping pong tables, which strongly supports a shared recreation area. This appears to be a real community amenity rather than copied generic MLS text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both the current public remarks and the MLS data. One listing explicitly describes 'an impressive amount of interior and exterior storage,' and the historical/current MLS fields show storage in 2 of 2 listings for both amenities and unit features. This looks consistent rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across both available listings. The remarks explicitly mention "pools" and a "community heated pool," which aligns with the current MLS amenities being checked in both listings. This looks like a real shared building/community amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is supported by both current MLS inclusions and the public remarks. One remark explicitly states the home features "washer and dryer," and the current MLS data shows 2/2 listings include washer/dryer. This appears consistent rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is supported by the current MLS data: 2 of 2 listings indicate parking features rather than NONE. The remarks do not explicitly discuss parking, but nothing suggests it was removed or incorrectly entered.
No analysis available
Covered parking is supported by the current MLS data in both listings. No public remarks mention parking directly, but the MLS parking-feature codes consistently indicate a covered/garage-type space.
I searched for deeded parking, owned stalls, or parking included with the unit and found nothing. With no evidence in the remarks, deeded parking cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for monthly parking charges, parking rental fees, or any additional parking cost references. The remarks do not mention parking pricing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language about a parking waitlist or joining a parking waiting list and found no mention. There is no evidence from these remarks that parking is waitlisted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The only available building-level evidence is MLS material data: 1 of 2 listings lists SLAB construction. No public remarks mention the foundation directly, so this is supported only by the current MLS checkbox/material field rather than descriptive agent notes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental allowances or restrictions such as STR permitted, NUC, TVU, or 30-day minimum rules. The remarks contain no short-term rental information, so this cannot be confirmed and is treated as not evidenced.
I searched for hotel pool references like hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or branded rental programs and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I looked for wording such as mandatory pool participation, required rental program, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. There is also no evidence that any hotel pool arrangement exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease, or lease extension years, but none were present in the remarks. No specific expiration year can be extracted from the text.
This is a strong public-remarks indicator of VA financing being available or at least directly relevant to the transaction. I searched for explicit VA approval/VA financing language and found a direct mention of an existing VA loan.
I searched the remarks for any HOA insurance or walls-in coverage language, but there were no relevant statements. Since the remarks do not address insurance coverage, this remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as 'passed fire life safety evaluation,' 'FLSE passed,' or 'fire safety certified,' but nothing in the remarks indicates this. With no explicit mention, there is no evidence to mark the building as having passed the evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear to be a real building-level feature based on current MLS data: 2 of 2 listings include a mountain/mauka-type view description. The public remarks do not explicitly mention mountains, so this is driven mainly by the consistent MLS evidence rather than listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden views are strongly supported by both sources. The MLS data shows garden views in 2 of 2 listings, and the remarks explicitly mention a 'lush courtyard garden' and a 'quiet courtyard,' making this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.