Hinahina at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hinahina at Hoopili
Building Overview
Hinahina at Hoopili in Ewa (built 2020). Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company listed as unknown.
About Hinahina at Hoopili
Based on MLS data, Hinahina at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood. The building is recorded as built in 2020. Size and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, key property policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. The MLS data does not list specific amenities, common area features, or on-site services for the building.
Management company information is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, association rules, and other assessments are not provided in the available records. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to include common area electricity in maintenance fees based on MLS history: 13 of 19 listings show OTCOEX. Public remarks do not directly spell out "common electric," but the feature has enough repeated MLS support to keep it included with medium-high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported as a maintenance-fee inclusion in the current data. Across 18 listings, none mention HOTWAT, while most list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not centrally included. Public remarks are consistent with this absence and do not describe any change to building-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but real evidence for sewer inclusion: 2 of 19 listings show SEWER, and one remark says, "Maintenance fee includes sub-metered water/sewage usage." Because the statement appears in a detailed listing description rather than a generic checkbox-only entry, it supports inclusion, though confidence is only moderate.
Water inclusion is supported by 3 of 19 MLS listings and one explicit remark mentioning "water/sewage usage" in the maintenance fee context. The evidence is not overwhelming, but it is consistent enough to indicate that some units’ fees include water-related charges.
BBQ/grilling amenities are supported by both the historical MLS pattern and current remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly say 'BBQ areas' or 'BBQ area,' alongside community pool/resort-style amenity descriptions, which is consistent with a building/community shared feature rather than a one-off unit amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly name a clubhouse or community center (e.g., "SoHo community center", "SoHo community center and pool"), appearing in about 4–6 of the 17 remarks. Historical MLS confidence was high and agent remarks consistently reference the community center, supporting a true value.
No analysis available
Dog park access is strongly confirmed. Multiple current remarks explicitly reference 'dog park' or 'dog parks' (including listings that also mention parks and playgrounds), matching the very high historical MLS prevalence and suggesting this is a consistent community amenity.
No analysis available
Public remarks do not describe an on-site gym/fitness center; the only fitness reference is an external 24 Hour Fitness nearby. MLS checkbox appears in only 1/16 listings, and multiple agent remarks consistently omit any building exercise room, so evidence for a building fitness center is weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers patio/deck-type outdoor spaces. Across the remarks, many listings reference outdoor areas such as a "private covered lanai," "lanai," "front lanai," "yard/patio area," and a "private, fenced backyard." The consistency across multiple listings supports keeping patio/deck as present in the building.
A jogging/walking-path-type amenity is reasonably supported, though the wording is usually 'walking and biking paths' or 'pedestrian and bicycle pathways' rather than a literal jogging trail. Roughly 4-5 current listings reference this kind of pathway access, so the evidence is moderate but consistent across multiple remarks.
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence that some units offer private yard space: at least 6 listings mention 'private, fenced backyard', 'private yard', or an 'enclosed backyard'. Multiple agents independently describe ground-floor units with direct yard access, and MLS currently shows PRIYAR on several listings, so buyers searching for private yard units would find relevant offerings in this building.
No analysis available
Numerous listings reference recreational amenities—"parks, playgrounds, community garden," "resort-style amenities," and "recreational parks/playgrounds"—with roughly 8–10 of the 17 remarks mentioning shared recreation spaces. This consistent, multi-agent language supports marking recreation_area = true.
Public remarks do not mention a recreation/rec room or game room; although a few MLS listings have the RECROO checkbox (4/16), the remarks lack supporting language, so building-level recreation room is not substantiated by the provided listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage and related terms like board storage or surf storage, but found none. Storage references in the remarks focus on closets, cabinets, and parking, not surf-specific storage.
No public remarks reference tennis courts or tennis facilities (mentions are of pickleball and soccer courts instead). Given absence in remarks and likely agent checkbox noise, the building should not be listed as having tennis courts.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported for this building/community. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings explicitly mention a "community pool" or "swimming pool," and the current MLS amenity data shows the pool checkbox in 19/19 listings. The evidence is consistent across many agents and aligns with the existing high-confidence historical record.
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater pool, salt pool, saline pool, and similar wording, but found none. The public remarks confirm a community pool, but do not describe it as salt water.
In-unit laundry appears to be an established building feature, with current MLS inclusions showing washer/dryer in 16 of 19 listings. One public remark explicitly says "in-unit laundry," and the broader set of remarks is consistent with copy-paste MLS marketing rather than contradiction. Given the strong MLS history and confirming remark, this should be treated as available in the building.
No analysis available
I searched for paid laundry wording such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees and found nothing. The only laundry mention is in-unit laundry, which is not a paid community laundry setup.
I looked for language like laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or laundry rooms on every floor and found none. The only laundry reference is to "in-unit laundry," which points away from a shared laundry facility.
Parking is strongly confirmed for this building. All current MLS listings include a parking feature, and several public remarks explicitly describe assigned stalls, open stalls, and garage parking. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the building: multiple current remarks explicitly mention assigned or designated stalls, including "1-assigned stall," "two assigned parking stalls," and "2 assigned standard sized parking stalls." This matches the historical MLS pattern where 15/18 listings had ASSIGN, so the feature appears consistent and not just a one-off agent copy-paste error.
Covered parking is available for at least some units: 4 of 16 MLS entries flag covered/garage, and remarks repeatedly mention '3-car garage' and 'garage' in multiple listings. Evidence shows covered/garage parking exists for certain units (not universal across the building).
I looked for explicit ownership language such as deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or parking included with title. The listings repeatedly describe assigned or designated stalls and garages, but do not say the parking is deeded. Based on the remarks, deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like parking fee, monthly parking charge, rental parking, and additional parking cost. The remarks only state that parking is assigned, designated, abundant, or included in the garage setup. No parking cost is provided, so this cannot be determined.
Guest parking appears to be available, but the evidence is mixed. Nine of nineteen current MLS listings are flagged with GUEST, while the public remarks do not explicitly mention visitor or guest parking. This suggests the feature likely exists but is not consistently described by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'waitlist,' 'waiting list,' and similar parking allocation language. The public remarks describe available assigned stalls and garages, but never mention a waitlist process. With no evidence of a waitlist, this is not supported by the listings.
No analysis available
I looked for building access terms like keycard entry, fob access, card readers, or electronic access and found nothing. The remarks mention a security system in some units, but not a building-level card/fob access system.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-related wording such as security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled building and found no evidence. The remarks only discuss general community amenities and, in some listings, in-home security features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence strongly confirms split AC across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it, with phrases like "split AC in every room," "split AC system throughout the house," and "split A/C units in every room." This appears consistent across many listings and agents, not just copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears in 16 of 19 MLS listings, making it the strongest construction signal in the data. Public remarks are silent on the phrase, so this appears to be a consistent MLS-level building attribute rather than something explicitly described by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 16 MLS listings list 'steel frame' and none of the public remarks mention steel-frame construction. The evidence is scant and likely due to inconsistent checkbox use by agents, so steel-frame is not supported by the remarks.
Concrete slab appears in only 3 of 18 listings and is not described in the public remarks. This suggests either sparse reporting or a less consistently recorded feature, so confidence remains low.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears in 7 of 19 MLS listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly say "wood frame" or describe construction details. The evidence is mostly checkbox-based and may reflect agent-entered MLS data rather than confirmed public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related phrases such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or a 30-day minimum. The remarks contain no rental-policy language at all, only standard residential marketing copy. Since there is no evidence that STRs are allowed, this is treated as not supported.
I looked for hotel pool, hotel rental program, managed-by-hotel language, and branded rental pools. There are no such references in the remarks, and without STR evidence this must be false.
I searched for mandatory pool, required to rent, cannot opt out, and similar phrases. The remarks contain no indication of any hotel rental pool requirement, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold-related language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'land lease,' and renewal dates like 'extended through' or 'renewed to.' The public remarks only discuss the home's features, amenities, and parking, with no lease tenure information. Because no expiry year is stated, this remains unknown.
Multiple listings directly state VA financing is available, including assumable VA loan language. This is strong public-remarks evidence that the building/unit context supports VA financing.
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit mentions of fire sprinklers or sprinkler systems. Given the weak historical signal and the lack of any supporting remark language from multiple listings/agents, this feature appears unconfirmed and likely should not be treated as building-level confirmed data.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks in these listings mention mountain/mauka/Koolau views; instead listings describe "views of green farmlands," "views toward Waikiki’s skyline," and generic lanai vistas. MLS snapshot shows 2 of 16 listings labeled MOUNTA, but the agent remarks across many listings do not corroborate mountain views, suggesting limited or absent mountain visibility for most units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although a community garden is cited as an amenity, none of the listing remarks claim units have explicit garden/courtyard/landscaped views. Only 1 of 16 MLS view_descriptions included GARDEN, and the broader remark set emphasizes backyards, lanai vistas, farmland, and skyline views rather than garden-facing exposures.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports sunset views in some units of this building, but not all. Across the provided remarks, 1 listing explicitly mentions views 'toward Waikiki’s skyline, perfect for fireworks,' while most other listings do not mention sunset views at all. The MLS data is consistent with this being a partial building feature rather than a universal one.
No analysis available
This is directly supported by the public remarks. The listing clearly says the unit has a balcony view that is perfect for fireworks, which satisfies the requirement that fireworks are visible from the unit/building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.