Hinahina at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hinahina at Hoopili
Building Overview
Hinahina at Hoopili in Ewa (built 2020). Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company listed as unknown.
About Hinahina at Hoopili
Based on MLS data, Hinahina at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood. The building is recorded as built in 2020. Size and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, key property policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. The MLS data does not list specific amenities, common area features, or on-site services for the building.
Management company information is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, association rules, and other assessments are not provided in the available records. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
11/16 current MLS listings include OTCOEX ("common electric"/building power) in association_fee_includes, suggesting the building-level maintenance fee typically covers common area electricity. No public remarks explicitly state "common area electricity" or similar, so the evidence rests on multiple agents' MLS checkbox entries (possible copy/paste risk) but is consistent across a majority of listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/17) mention 'hot water included' and 15/17 listings include WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, indicating units have their own water heaters. Public remarks reference only sub-metered water/sewage ('Maintenance fee includes sub-metered water/sewage usage') and contain no statements like 'hot water included' or 'hot water in HOA', so evidence across multiple listings consistently indicates hot water is not included in the association fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention BBQ/BBQ areas (phrases like "BBQ areas" and "community pool, BBQ areas") across the Ho'opili Hinahina remarks—roughly 6–8 of the 17 listing remarks reference BBQ facilities. Historical MLS data also showed high prevalence (11/17), and the language appears across different agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste source, supporting inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly name a clubhouse or community center (e.g., "SoHo community center", "SoHo community center and pool"), appearing in about 4–6 of the 17 remarks. Historical MLS confidence was high and agent remarks consistently reference the community center, supporting a true value.
No analysis available
Dog park(s) are explicitly mentioned across many listings (phrases like "dog park" and "dog parks" appear repeatedly), with roughly 7–10 of 17 remarks calling out dog parks or dog-friendly areas. High historical MLS prevalence (14/17) and repeated agent remarks across listings indicate strong evidence for inclusion.
No analysis available
Public remarks do not describe an on-site gym/fitness center; the only fitness reference is an external 24 Hour Fitness nearby. MLS checkbox appears in only 1/16 listings, and multiple agent remarks consistently omit any building exercise room, so evidence for a building fitness center is weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence for building patio/deck amenities: at least 9 listings' remarks reference outdoor living spaces such as 'private covered lanai', 'lanai', 'front lanai', or 'patio'. Historical MLS summary showed High confidence and 8/17 current listings checked PATDEC/COVPAT, and multiple agents' remarks consistently mention lanais/patios across different units (not just one outlier).
Multiple listings mention "pedestrian and bicycle pathways", walkability to parks, and pedestrian pathways (about 3–5 of 17 remarks), which implies the presence of walking/jogging paths. The language is less explicit than other amenities (mentions tend to say "pathways" rather than "jogging path"), so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence that some units offer private yard space: at least 6 listings mention 'private, fenced backyard', 'private yard', or an 'enclosed backyard'. Multiple agents independently describe ground-floor units with direct yard access, and MLS currently shows PRIYAR on several listings, so buyers searching for private yard units would find relevant offerings in this building.
No analysis available
Numerous listings reference recreational amenities—"parks, playgrounds, community garden," "resort-style amenities," and "recreational parks/playgrounds"—with roughly 8–10 of the 17 remarks mentioning shared recreation spaces. This consistent, multi-agent language supports marking recreation_area = true.
Public remarks do not mention a recreation/rec room or game room; although a few MLS listings have the RECROO checkbox (4/16), the remarks lack supporting language, so building-level recreation room is not substantiated by the provided listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not reference any surfboard or specialty board storage facilities. Storage mentions are generic (e.g., parking, garages) but do not include surfboard-specific storage.
No public remarks reference tennis courts or tennis facilities (mentions are of pickleball and soccer courts instead). Given absence in remarks and likely agent checkbox noise, the building should not be listed as having tennis courts.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 17 current MLS listings have the POOL amenity checked, and many public remarks explicitly mention on-site pool access (quotes include "community pool", "swimming pool", and "SoHo community center and pool"). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and matches the historical high-confidence data, indicating the building/community offers a pool.
No analysis available
Although a community pool is repeatedly referenced, there is no indication in the public remarks that the pool is saltwater. No salt-related terminology was found.
Historical MLS inclusions indicated washer/dryer for 15 of 17 listings. In the current batch of public remarks at least one listing explicitly states "in-unit laundry," and several listings reference appliances broadly. The high prior prevalence across listings plus the explicit remark indicate some units in the building have in-unit washer/dryer, so the feature is included.
No analysis available
There is no reference to paid or coin-operated community laundry in the public remarks. Remarks that mention laundry refer to in-unit laundry only and do not describe community laundry or payment requirements.
Public remarks do not indicate community laundry facilities on each floor. Some listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, which suggests laundry is not necessarily centralized on every floor. No phrasing matching floor-by-floor laundry was found.
Strong evidence that the building has parking: 17 of 17 current MLS listings include parking in parking_features and multiple public remarks explicitly mention parking types and counts (quotes: "3-car garage, 3-tandem spots", "two assigned parking stalls"). Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks and MLS checkboxes, indicating a building-wide parking provision.
Assigned parking is well-supported: 14 of 17 MLS listings include ASSIGN and several public remarks explicitly mention assigned stalls (examples: "two assigned parking stalls", "1-assigned stall"). The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, indicating designated/assigned parking is offered.
Covered parking is available for at least some units: 4 of 16 MLS entries flag covered/garage, and remarks repeatedly mention '3-car garage' and 'garage' in multiple listings. Evidence shows covered/garage parking exists for certain units (not universal across the building).
Remarks repeatedly note assigned, designated, or dedicated parking stalls and garages, but none state parking is deeded/owned with the unit. Because deeded ownership was not explicitly mentioned, deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'additional parking cost' but found no references. The remarks describe assigned stalls and abundant parking but do not specify any monthly parking fee.
Mixed evidence for guest parking: 8 of 17 MLS listings have GUEST flagged in parking_features, but 0 of the public remarks explicitly state "guest" or "visitor" parking. This indicates possible guest parking on some parcels according to MLS data, but lack of corroborating remarks lowers confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', and similar phrases. Listings describe assigned and abundant parking but provide no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The public remarks reference in-unit security features (e.g., security system, video doorbell) but do not describe building-level key card or fob access. No explicit card/fob access language was found.
No analysis available
There is no indication in the public remarks that the building employs a security patrol or roving security service. The remarks focus on community amenities and nearby services instead.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 17 current MLS listings include ACSPL in inclusions and multiple agent remarks explicitly mention split systems (phrases like 'Split AC', 'split A/C units in every room', 'Split AC's throughout', and 'two split AC systems'). Evidence is consistent across many different listings/agents and aligns with the MLS checkbox, so confidence is high that the building offers split AC in units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 17 current MLS listings include 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction materials, indicating consistent agent checkbox reporting. None of the public remarks for these units explicitly mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing, so the evidence is primarily from MLS fields rather than agent remark confirmation; confidence is moderate (0.75) due to possible copy/paste reporting.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 16 MLS listings list 'steel frame' and none of the public remarks mention steel-frame construction. The evidence is scant and likely due to inconsistent checkbox use by agents, so steel-frame is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 5 of 16 MLS listings have 'WOOFRA' checked and no public remarks mention wood framing. Because agent remarks are silent and the checkbox is present in a minority of entries, there's weak evidence the building should be advertised as wood-frame; likely copy/paste. Confidence is low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', and minimum-day requirements; none were found. Absence of any STR language suggests short-term rentals are not indicated in the public remarks.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and hotel-managed rental language with no matches. Since short-term rentals are not indicated as allowed in the remarks, participation in a hotel pool is not supported.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', and similar phrases and found none. There is no evidence in the public remarks of any mandatory rental-pool program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', and 'lease expiry year' but found no references. Without any explicit leasehold language or a year, the lease expiry is unknown.
Public remarks across multiple listings explicitly mention VA loan assumptions and assumable VA financing at specified rates. This provides strong evidence that VA financing/assumability is available for units in this building/community.
No analysis available
Evidence is weak for building fire sprinklers: none of the provided public remarks (many unit listings) mention sprinklers or a sprinkler system, and only 6 of 17 current MLS listings include the FIRSPR checkbox. Given the prior Low confidence and absence of any explicit remark like 'sprinklers installed' or 'new sprinkler system,' the most likely explanation is inconsistent checkbox usage by agents rather than an actual building feature.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks in these listings mention mountain/mauka/Koolau views; instead listings describe "views of green farmlands," "views toward Waikiki’s skyline," and generic lanai vistas. MLS snapshot shows 2 of 16 listings labeled MOUNTA, but the agent remarks across many listings do not corroborate mountain views, suggesting limited or absent mountain visibility for most units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although a community garden is cited as an amenity, none of the listing remarks claim units have explicit garden/courtyard/landscaped views. Only 1 of 16 MLS view_descriptions included GARDEN, and the broader remark set emphasizes backyards, lanai vistas, farmland, and skyline views rather than garden-facing exposures.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing explicitly states a private balcony has views toward Waikiki's skyline and is 'perfect for fireworks,' indicating units in the building have a view of Friday night fireworks. This is an explicit statement in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.