Hillside Terrace 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hillside Terrace 3
Building Overview
Hillside Terrace 3 in Aiea — concrete building from 1974 with no pets and no short-term rentals allowed.
About Hillside Terrace 3
Based on MLS data, Hillside Terrace 3 is a residential building located in the Aiea neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count were not provided in the MLS data.
Key policies noted in the MLS information include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS-derived data does not list a management company.
Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, amenities, and management contact information were not provided in the available MLS records. Buyers should verify all building features, rules, and fees with the listing broker or management before making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy information, including percentages and qualitative descriptions like 'majority owner occupied,' but found none. The remarks do not provide enough information to estimate an owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to elevators, including explicit counts such as '4 elevators' or vague wording like 'multiple elevators,' but found nothing. These listings describe townhome-style units with garages and parking, which typically do not include elevator references in the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows OTCOEX on 8 of 10 listings, with no contradictory public remarks, so this looks like a stable building-level fee inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water should be treated as not included in the maintenance fee. None of the current MLS records show HOTWAT, while most show WTRHTR, which is a strong opposite signal that the building does not supply hot water through HOA dues.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows SEWER on 8 of 10 listings, with no public-remark evidence to the contrary, making this a strong building-level inclusion.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS pattern shows WATER on 8 of 10 listings, and there are no remarks indicating otherwise, so this is likely a reliable building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there are 0 mentions of a gym, fitness center, exercise room, or workout room. The remarks consistently focus on unit updates, parking, laundry, and views, which suggests the MLS amenity flag is likely copy-pasted or incorrect for this building.
No analysis available
0 of the provided remarks reference any meeting or conference room amenity. The only shared facilities described are recreation-oriented, not community meeting space. There is no basis here to include a meeting room feature.
Multiple listings describe patio/deck-style outdoor space, including phrases like 'private lanai,' 'useable deck,' and 'private entry courtyard.' With 2/10 MLS amenities checked but repeated remarks across several agents, the evidence strongly supports that some units in the building offer patio/deck space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is described in multiple remarks as having yard space, with direct language such as 'a small private yard' and 'beautiful back yard.' While the MLS checkbox is rare at 1/10, the explicit remarks from multiple listings indicate that private yard space is present in at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are 0 remark mentions of a recreation room-type amenity across the listings. The limited MLS checkbox presence looks unsupported by the text, so this feature does not appear verified for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are 0 mentions of sauna-related amenities in the remarks. The listings instead focus on renovations, parking, laundry, and views, so the sauna checkbox appears unsubstantiated for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 1 public remark explicitly confirms tennis courts via access to the Newtown Rec Center, and the current MLS data shows 7/10 listings with TENCOU. This is consistent with the building association amenity being legitimately available rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is supported by the prior MLS history (9 of 10 listings with pool-related amenities) and reinforced by one current remark that says residents have "full access to the Newtown Rec Center, which includes a pool." Only one listing explicitly mentions the pool, but the strong historical pattern makes this a high-confidence building/community amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers in-unit laundry. 4+ listings explicitly mention it with phrases like 'in-unit laundry' and 'dedicated indoor laundry area,' and the MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 8/9 listings. The repeated mentions across different remarks suggest this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available across the building. Across the remarks, multiple listings mention an "enclosed garage," "1-car garage," "2 car garage," and "additional open parking stall," which strongly confirms building-level parking access rather than a one-off listing artifact.
Assigned/reserved parking appears to be a real building feature. Several listings describe an "assigned parking space" or "assigned open 2nd parking near the unit," suggesting this is not just copy-paste checkbox noise and is consistently represented in the remarks.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed. Multiple listings explicitly describe garage parking, including "enclosed 1-car garage," "attached 1-car garage," and "covered garage with remote control or digital keypad access," making the evidence strong across multiple agents.
I found clear evidence of parking availability, including a garage and assigned/open stall, but nothing that indicates the parking is deeded. Because deeded ownership was not explicitly stated, this should not be assumed.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, or parking rental language and found none. The remarks describe parking as included/available, but they do not state any separate parking cost.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found no references. The listings suggest parking is readily available, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by both the MLS checkbox data and at least one explicit remark. Only 1 of the 10 public remarks clearly mentions 'window AC units,' which suggests the feature is present but not consistently described across agents, likely due to copy/paste omission rather than absence.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be a consistent building-level characteristic for Hillside Terrace 3. It is indicated in 9 of 10 current MLS listings via DOUWAL, but the public remarks do not explicitly describe it, suggesting this comes from MLS data rather than agent narration. The signal is strong enough to include as true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears to be the dominant MLS classification for this building, with 8 of 9 listings showing WOOFRA. The public remarks do not explicitly say "wood frame," but there is no contrary evidence, and the consistency across most listings suggests this is likely a real building feature rather than a one-off checkbox error.
Above-ground construction is not supported by the listing set: only 1 of 9 MLS records includes ABOGRO, and the public remarks never mention above-ground materials or construction. The evidence looks like a lone checkbox rather than a consistent building characteristic, so it is best treated as false for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, TVU, NUC, or vacation-rental wording, but found nothing. With no public remark supporting STR use, the building is treated as not evidenced to allow it.
I looked for hotel pool, hotel rental program, branded rental management, or similar terms and found none. Because there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, a hotel pool arrangement is not supported.
I searched for wording indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, but found nothing. Since there is also no evidence STR is allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease, leasehold, lease expiry, renewal, or any 4-digit expiration year, but found nothing. Since the remarks do not mention land tenure terms, the lease expiry year cannot be extracted.
I searched the public remarks for any VA-loan approval language, but nothing referenced VA financing or acceptance. With no explicit mention, there is no evidence the building is VA approved.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance terms such as 'fully insured,' 'walls-in coverage,' or similar wording and found no references. Nothing in the listing text confirms that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification, but none appears in the public remarks. There is no remark evidence to confirm a passed FLSE or related fire-safety status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean-view evidence appears in several listings, including 'unbeatable views of Pearl Harbor and Honolulu' and 'nice views of the valley, city and ocean from the living room.' Current MLS data also shows 5/9 listings with OCEAN, so this is consistent across multiple agents rather than a single outlier.
I did not find explicit mountain-view language such as 'mountain view,' 'Koolau view,' or 'mauka view' in the remarks. The listings mostly describe valley, garden, or breezy surroundings, which is not enough to confirm mountain views from the remarks alone despite the MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
City-view evidence is explicit in the remarks, with phrases like 'city and ocean' and 'Pearl Harbor and Honolulu.' Because multiple listings mention it and the MLS data shows 4/9 CITY, this appears to be a real building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for sunset views is limited but present: 1 of 10 current listings explicitly uses SUNSET in the view field. Several remarks mention strong directional views like Pearl Harbor, Honolulu, valley, city, and ocean, but they do not explicitly say sunset or western exposure, so this appears to be a modest rather than strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.